Brian Jackson39
Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2008
Look, I'm just a regular forum user here.
The question might seem a bit silly... though, honestly, maybe it isn't.
In the worlds of business and politics, being an attractive woman can actually be more of a hindrance than a help.
Work is work. Sex appeal and physical attractiveness belong to a different part of life, even if people constantly conflate the two—usually in a pretty derogatory way.
When there's actual business to be done, looks tend to distract from the substance of who you are. And frankly, what America needs right now isn't some beauty queen drawing eyes toward her appearance rather than her intellect.
From a purely superficial standpoint, Condoleezza Rice handles this perfectly. She’s always impeccably dressed in classic, understated tones—blacks, whites, greys—which is exactly the vibe you want for a stateswoman.
And for another thing, when it comes to aesthetics, look at Angela Merkel... Rice actually has the edge there. So, does looking good really dictate whether a woman succeeds in politics?