#3841 ·
The overview I laid out is just the standard protocol when first you start transcribing hormone prescriptions, based on the question asked here. If a patient has been on a specific med before, it’s super easy for the next doctor to just renew the script without doing a deep dive...
Just because someone isn't doing their job quite by the book doesn't mean the standard procedure should be described differently. Mentioning certain medical history is just about getting the full picture of what actually matters for hormonal birth control. Like, having the flu last fall or breaking a leg when you were a kid? Doesn't matter. But cardiovascular issues, diabetes, or a family history of blood clotting? That's the real deal...
The second your doctor sees you, certain risks jump right out at them. They don't necessarily need to grill you just to eyeball a normal BMI. If someone walks in looking young and fit, healthy complexion, says they're fine and their family is too... honestly, they might not even bother with the scale or a blood pressure cuff. Are we aiming for the bare minimum here, or following the actual standard practice?
...
Just because someone isn't doing their job quite by the book doesn't mean the standard procedure should be described differently. Mentioning certain medical history is just about getting the full picture of what actually matters for hormonal birth control. Like, having the flu last fall or breaking a leg when you were a kid? Doesn't matter. But cardiovascular issues, diabetes, or a family history of blood clotting? That's the real deal...
The second your doctor sees you, certain risks jump right out at them. They don't necessarily need to grill you just to eyeball a normal BMI. If someone walks in looking young and fit, healthy complexion, says they're fine and their family is too... honestly, they might not even bother with the scale or a blood pressure cuff. Are we aiming for the bare minimum here, or following the actual standard practice?
...