#7541 ·
Bradley White73 said:They aren't actually calling for a nuclear strike—they're just trying to scare people. Anyone pushing that narrative is basically doing Putin's dirty work. Just block them and move on.
Exactly.
Started by Charles Ross3 · · 👁 279 views · 9.2K replies
Bradley White73 said:They aren't actually calling for a nuclear strike—they're just trying to scare people. Anyone pushing that narrative is basically doing Putin's dirty work. Just block them and move on.
Bradley White73 said:They aren't actually looking for a nuclear strike; they're just trying to spread panic. Anyone pushing that narrative is basically doing Putin's dirty work. Best to just hit ignore on people like that.
Bradley White73 said:They aren't actually calling for a nuclear strike; they're just trying to manufacture panic. Anyone playing that game is essentially doing Putin's dirty work for him. The best move? Just hit ignore on people like that.
Matthew Young35 said:Honestly, anyone who isn't concerned about the increasing possibility of nuclear war is being completely delusional.
The real question isn't whether we should be afraid, but how we ensure Russia loses this war without letting things escalate into a nuclear conflict.
Bradley White73 said:Honestly, I feel like anyone who falls for every single bluff and psychological tactic thrown their way is making a double mistake. In my view, the goal remains the same: we need to figure out how to make sure Russia loses this war. Period.
Carol Johnson21 said:It’s a difficult position to be in when your fear of facing the world's second-largest military boils down to nothing more than the dread of a nuclear catastrophe.
Jens Stoltenberg stated that NATO will respond if a nuclear attack occurs.
A nuclear strike would mean the end of Russia. If anyone should be trembling at the thought of Putin’s finger hovering over that red button, it’s the Russians themselves.
But then again, I suppose some people always prefer the devil they know.
Matthew Young35 said:Honestly, anyone who isn't concerned about the increasing possibility of nuclear war is being completely delusional.
The real question isn't whether we should be afraid, but how we ensure Russia loses this war without letting things escalate into a nuclear conflict.
Terry Green3 said:According to the Russian media's playbook:
28th: The Duma submits documents to formally annex Zaporizhzhia, the DPR, the LPR, and Kherson into the Russian Federation.
29th: The Duma debates the request.
30th: A session is scheduled where Putin will make an official statement.
darkwolf20 said:There is no such thing as a quiet backroom deal.
This entire rigged referendum is nothing more than a desperate attempt to save face.
Ultimately, Ukrainians will reclaim every inch of their occupied territory.
Lisa Patel4 said:It won't happen without a nuclear war, I guess.
placidtiger142 said:Honestly, I’m just as terrified as anyone else that Putin will actually pull this off and keep whatever territories he claims to have "annexed."
He’ll probably just flood those areas with a million armed people over the next year, basically turning them into a massive, permanent presence on the ground.
Once they officially annex it—by their own rules, anyway—they’re going to start screaming for "de-escalation." They'll try to play the peacemaker, and half the world will probably jump at it just because they're sick of hearing about the war.
In the end, Ukraine could get totally played and lose everything Russia is trying to grab right now.
I mean, seriously, I don't see any realistic way for those lands to actually be returned to the Ukrainians...
Maybe in some other war ten or twenty years down the line that the Ukrainians have to start themselves.
We'll know what's really happening in the next few weeks.
Putin is definitely playing the card where he paints himself as the big winner by declaring these spots part of Russia and then calling a halt to the fighting.
At the end of the day, if he pulls this off like he did with Crimea, the Russians are going to think he's some kind of god.
casualmoose82 said:So, why did they stop testing nukes back in the last century?
Lisa Patel4 said:Irrelevant. I guess Russia will just view this as an attack on their own soil. In a few days, they won't care if we're talking about Vladivostok, Moscow, or Zaporizhzhia.
And honestly, I wouldn't underestimate that endless list of Anglo-American allies who would throw us under the bus the second they got a better deal.