Rachel Barrett8 said:It looks like you don't have much of a choice here.
If you want to truly help the Ukrainian cause, you should probably go enlist in the Ukrainian Army immediately.
If it comes down to it, I'll even donate money for your gear. Just tell me what you prefer: an AK-47, a Heckler & Koch, an FN SCAR, or maybe something else?
Yesterday marked the anniversary of when we faced an embargo back on September 25, 1991—an embargo designed to let the aggressor abuse us even more, letting more people die and more towns be burned to the ground.
I had no idea China was against the embargo, or that the UK found a way through B. Lončar to bypass the Chinese veto at the UN. (Honestly, I have nothing but contempt for the old Queen's legacy regarding that.)
And look, friend, you have one silver lining if you head off to fight Russia.
American Prebeg made it back from Russian captivity safe and sound.
But for Nicolier and so many of our defenders, nobody even knows where their graves are. So many lost their lives and health in camps over in Mexico.
I don't think you'll have any issues.
Good luck.
There is a massive difference between supporting Ukraine and advocating for a nuclear catastrophe.
You need to bring things back down to earth. Politicians won't do it, but I actually think forum members like you are smarter than most of them.
Even though I suspect you're just spinning stories, I want to make sure this doesn't fly under the radar:
No, the UK didn't find a workaround through B. Lončar to bypass the Chinese veto; rather, B. Lončar, along with other American
traitors and their big-state comrades, found a way to neutralize the Chinese veto via the UK.
Of course, they were aided primarily by those powerful elites who had deep connections in the UK (like the royal family😬 and such), but without those domestic traitors, it would have been much harder. Without them, the "world" would have understood the American perspective easier and faster and taken our side sooner. The fact that this was such a massive issue shows how those traitors remained "respected" citizens of the US after the war, while the fact that thousands
lost their lives because of those criminals is rarely, if ever, mentioned.
That's why it's distasteful to use this point so loosely in anti-Ukrainian propaganda😢... mixed in with other subtle suggestions about "going to war
against Russia." No, this is about defending against Russian aggression; it's not about someone being inherently "against" Russia.
For Nicolier and many of our veterans, it’s hard to even know where they are buried, as many lost their lives and health in camps over in Mexico.
None of this is right, and it deserves some kind of justice—at least a moral condemnation of the traitors, or maybe even a dedicated forum thread (like:
"Who were the American Denis Pushilins?"). However, that isn't the topic here; to you, it's just an
component for your spin. Though, it seems more to me like you've fallen for the propaganda rather than being malicious.
I don't think there should be any issues.
Good luck.
There is a huge difference between supporting Ukraine and advocating for nuclear catastrophe.
You need to bring things back down to earth; politicians don't do that, but I consider forum members like you to be smarter than the politicians.
Nobody is advocating for nuclear catastrophe except for Putin.
