CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Debates over sex and gender

Debates over sex and gender

Started by Jose Edwards16 · · 👁 11 views · 159 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jose Edwards16ruggedraven36lonetrucker4lonegardenerSam Martinez9Amanda Jackson5David Robinson26Nicholas Grant20Drew Parker2Sandra Murphy33Harold Doyle3Amy Howard18steelridge58Laura Jones56Kenneth Cruz67Justin Richardson7
Jose Edwards16 Jose Edwards16 MemberOP
45 messages
joined Dec 2011
#61 ·
lonegardener said:I finally stumbled upon an incredibly solid, deep-dive documentary that tackles a similar question: What is a man?

🤣

man vs Woman:

http://billtmiller.com/images/man-woman.jpg

🙄
Jose Edwards16 Jose Edwards16 MemberOP
45 messages
joined Dec 2011
#62 ·
I was reading this article online where they used the phrase 'people who menstruate.'
Link

It's pretty obvious, I mean—obviously—that 'people who menstruate' refers to women. If you're wondering why an article about women wouldn't just say 'women'
but instead uses some long-winded description like 'people who have menstruation'—well, it's just to avoid offending trans women, since they don't have periods.

So then JK Rowling (the author of Harry Potter) tweeted this:
‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

People who menstruate? I'm fairly certain there was once a specific term for them. Help me out here! Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?

And wouldn't you know it—Rowling gets accused of being transphobic.
Link

Personally, I think she was mostly just poking fun at that style of writing—you know, when someone avoids using a perfectly clear, direct term like 'women' in favor of some clunky, descriptive phrase.

Besides, JKR actually explained her position. She pointed out that she respects trans people and their identities—and that she'd even march in a Pride parade for their rights.
“At the same time, my life is defined by the fact that I am a woman, and highlighting that isn't hate speech,” she wrote.
She also noted: If sex isn't real, then same-sex attraction doesn't exist either.
Link

To me, everything seems clearly explained and nothing in her statements feels controversial, so, in a way, she actually expressed support for trans people.
But instead, there's been this massive, widespread harassment campaign against her—there was even a #RIP JKRowling hashtag popping up on X. Emma Watson (and several other actors from the series)
took the side of the trans community because, apparently, Rowling is "against" them.

It's funny how inclusive, tolerant, and sensitive the trans community is.
Saying 'if there is no sex, there is no same-sex attraction' is somehow transphobic.
Saying 'my life is defined by being a woman' can only be said by a transphobic woman, I guess.
Asking 'what were those people called again?'—apparently, you aren't even allowed to question things like that anymore! ☕

From her blog:
...to be told I was literally killing trans people with my hate, to be called cunt and bitch and, of course, for my books to be burned, although one particularly abusive man told me he’d composted them.

Link


...being told that my views are literally killing trans people through hate... Being called a cunt and a bitch, and of course, having people call for my books to be burned—though one especially aggressive guy told me he'd rather just compost them.
Sandra Murphy33 Sandra Murphy33 Active Member
239 messages
joined May 2022
#63 ·
What a joke.
It sounds like we're talking about people living in a literal hellscape... or perhaps just some half-baked nationalists who seek to divide and conquer—as if the very spirit of analytical thought has finally fallen ill and begun to metastasize 🤔

This is a vivid illustration of the gap between mindless herd mentality—clinging to whatever political fad or supposed "value" is currently trending—and true individual critical thinking. It’s the refusal to forget what one already knows, rather than hitting a mental reset button just because some idiot decided to go on a crusade to reshape the world to fit their own personal whims.

History will likely label this phenomenon as the "evolution of human consciousness"🙂
Harold Doyle3 Harold Doyle3 Active Member
216 messages
joined Aug 2006
#64 ·
Jose Edwards16 said:Matt Walsh is the creator of the documentary What is a Woman?
The film hits screens on June 1st.

If you’re wondering—and it is a bit of a weird question, I guess—what "woman" actually means and why some guy would make a whole movie about it, the answer is pretty straightforward.
Basically, while participating in debates with transgender individuals regarding how they define "woman," Matt Walsh kept getting told that the term can't actually be defined—or rather, that they don't know what a woman is. So, Walsh eventually asked: if people identifying as trans women can't define the term "woman," how do they even know they are trans women? I mean, the phrase "trans woman" is just two words joined together to create a new concept.
To get from "woman" to "trans woman," you really have to understand what both "woman" and "trans" signify first.

Here is the trailer for the Walsh film. A lot of folks in the LGBTQ community have already labeled the doc "transphobic" just based on the trailer alone, even though
the footage shows Walsh interviewing people with all sorts of viewpoints (including members of the LGBTQ community) and getting various responses—like one person saying the term "woman" could mean anything, or that there are women with penises and men with vaginas. There was also one guy who, when asked "How do you know you're a man?", just answered bluntly: "I know because I have a penis."

YouTube Trailer What Is A Woman

IMDB
It's the question you're not allowed to ask. The documentary they don't want you to see.

One woman told him that "only a woman can answer the question of what a woman is." Walsh then asked her: "So, are you perhaps a cat?" She said, "No."
Then Walsh asked: "Well, can you define what a cat is, then?"

Meanwhile, over on Twitter, members of the LGBTQ community are tagging the trailer as "transphobic" and trying to get it taken down—though it hasn't worked so far.

I find it interesting that Walsh gets branded a "transphobe" just for questioning the very premise of the film's title.
Also, if members of the LGBTQ community don't know (or maybe just won't) give an answer to the question of what a woman is, are we all supposed to just accept that view and say starting in 2022:
"The term woman is undefinable; we don't know what it signifies."

Just to be fair and listen to the other side, there have been plenty of critiques and attacks on the Walsh film, so here is one:

Transphobic Ad Asks "What is A Woman?"
YouTube

Right in the first minute, this YouTuber (Jamie) expresses shock at Walsh joining a march and asking the protesters: "What is a woman?"
By the second minute, when the trailer shows someone answering "Because I have a penis" to the question "How do you know you're a man?", Jamie doesn't even comment.
I guess he just didn't like that straightforward answer.

Jamie then goes on to say: "Trans women aren't men who became women; they are women who became trans."
Just a quick thought: how did these trans women become "trans"? We end up right back at the same spot where you need to define "trans" and "woman."

Jamie continues by calling Walsh's questions "bullshit" and repeats that the documentary is transphobic. ☕

Matt Walsh responded to him in his own video:
trans YouTuber Responds to What is a Woman
YouTube MW

Addressing Jamie's question about why "that dude" is asking women at a protest "what a woman is,"...
Walsh asks Jamie how he (Jamie) knows he (Walsh) is—well, a guy. He's like, "I didn't actually say I was a man anywhere in the documentary."
And honestly, that’s the first major contradiction from the LGBTQ crowd—I mean, first they claim "woman" is an undefinable concept, but then they spot Matt Walsh on screen and start lecturing him for being a man leading a march of women. So, the LGBTQ community immediately identifies Walsh as a man—and they clearly recognize he's among the women on the march.
Wait, how does that work—if we aren't allowed to define certain terms?

It seems pretty obvious to me that the term "woman" is easy enough to define, just like "man" or "trans woman." I mean, when we see someone, we don't usually struggle to tell if they're a man or a woman. It feels like the LGBTQ population just blurs the definitions to push a specific agenda.

And Walsh hit them with a point at the end too: "Jamie, in your ten minutes of commentary on my trailer, you didn't even answer the question I asked: What is a woman, how do we actually define that term?"
That's the second big contradiction right there.

Finally, Walsh explains his actual goal with the film: What is a Woman.
Explanation

He says, somewhat ironically, that the documentary will actually be incredibly useful and eye-opening for the LGBTQ+ community, since they insist they can't define what a "woman" is.
Another contradiction!

There's more to it, I guess, but this is just a starting point for the discussion.☕

A woman is whatever a man wants her to be—physically and spiritually.
A man is whatever a woman wants him to be—physically and spiritually.

The problem is, they both have no clue what they actually want from one another.
lonetrucker4 lonetrucker4 Active Member
193 messages
joined Apr 2024
#65 ·
Yeah, I touched on Sokolov's basement back in the day when I was still grinding away in journalism.

There’s this crowd, totally blinded by the "hard sciences," who insist that if an activity isn't an hard science, then it isn't even science at all. If there aren't rigid, mathematical criteria, they claim it doesn't exist.

The end result? Everyone thinks they can just spout whatever nonsense pops into their heads. So why even bother debating? Look at today's endless arguments over gender; people don't even cite science anymore—they lean on tradition or religion. It’s always, "Men are men, women are women, period! That's God's will, so don't you dare question the binary."

I'm done wasting my breath on this. You aren't going to budge, but I hope some readers from the older threads finally get why this whole thing is such a mess.
lonegardener lonegardener Regular
347 messages
joined Apr 2010
#66 ·
Sure, anyone can "babble whatever they want"—that’s what we call freedom of speech.

You have the right to counter any "babbling" with actual, coherent arguments. That's how you convince someone of the "scientific truths" being shoved down their throats by people whose "research papers" wouldn't even pass a replication test half the time. And even if they did, it wouldn't matter because their methods are total garbage. They take advanced statistical models and apply them to "data" pulled from surveys as flimsy as the ones used at Gloria. LOL. How does the saying go? You can't make a cake out of crap, no matter how good the chef is.

Honestly, I value basic common sense more than the nonsense some circles try to sell as science today—nonsense they cling to with more conviction than religious dogmas did 400 years ago.

(I'm not usually one to champion folk wisdom, but it helps illustrate my point about gender ideology and other modern nonsense.)

BTW, that wasn't a link to the Sokal affair, but to a stunt performed years later. Sokal published one such paper, though there were many more intended; they actually managed to get four published before those guys finally realized they were being pranked, lol.
Amy Howard18 Amy Howard18 Member
35 messages
joined Aug 2021
#67 ·
Harold Doyle3 said:A woman is whatever a man wants her to be—physically and spiritually.
A man is whatever a woman wants him to be—physically and spiritually.

The problem is, they both have no clue what they actually want from one another.

I’d like to add my two cents to this. I feel like a man should be masculine in every other aspect of his life, but when it comes to love? That's where he should embrace being the "woman."
steelridge58 steelridge58 Regular
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#68 ·
lonetrucker4 said:Yeah, I touched on Sokolov's basement back in the day when I was still grinding away in journalism.

There’s this crowd, totally blinded by the "hard sciences," who insist that if an activity isn't an hard science, then it isn't even science at all. If there aren't rigid, mathematical criteria, they claim it doesn't exist.

The end result? Everyone thinks they can just spout whatever nonsense pops into their heads. So why even bother debating? Look at today's endless arguments over gender; people don't even cite science anymore—they lean on tradition or religion. It’s always, "Men are men, women are women, period! That's God's will, so don't you dare question the binary."

I'm done wasting my breath on this. You aren't going to budge, but I hope some readers from the older threads finally get why this whole thing is such a mess.

Sure thing. That’s a huge part of the process, especially when we don't have that immediate, direct feedback from someone reading our work who can actually help us wrap our heads around what we're trying to say.
ruggedraven36 ruggedraven36 Regular
331 messages
joined Dec 2015
#69 ·
Amy Howard18 said:I’d like to add my two cents to this. I feel like a man should be masculine in every other aspect of his life, but when it comes to love? That's where he should embrace being the "woman."

So, how does one actually "act" like a man (or a woman)? Is it in picking cherries, collecting stamps, grabbing a coffee, watching sparrows through a window, walking down stairs, or even knowing how to capitalize a sentence? Is it in reading the debate about whether to put cheese in the fridge, or listening to Robert Flack? How do you suddenly become "masculine" or "feminine" in all those endless little actions—and a million others besides?
Harold Doyle3 Harold Doyle3 Active Member
216 messages
joined Aug 2006
#70 ·
ruggedraven36 said:So, how does one actually "act" like a man (or a woman)? Is it in picking cherries, collecting stamps, grabbing a coffee, watching sparrows through a window, walking down stairs, or even knowing how to capitalize a sentence? Is it in reading the debate about whether to put cheese in the fridge, or listening to Robert Flack? How do you suddenly become "masculine" or "feminine" in all those endless little actions—and a million others besides?

Like this.
ruggedraven36 ruggedraven36 Regular
331 messages
joined Dec 2015
#71 ·
Harold Doyle3 said:Like this.

Glad you didn't just send me smoke signals. Dropping links isn't a conversation.
Harold Doyle3 Harold Doyle3 Active Member
216 messages
joined Aug 2006
#72 ·
Maybe you should try taking a hit of something to calm down; you wouldn't need to bark so much just to hold a conversation.

At the start, you have one word.
Laura Jones56 Laura Jones56 Active Member
55 messages
joined Sep 2019
#73 ·
lonegardener said:Here’s a little more food for thought:

This older guy, a local shop owner, hung a sign outside his door that read: "if you were born with a dick, you're not a chick." 🤣

Well, some guy in a skirt—who happens to be a local city councilman—spotted it and demanded the owner take it down. So, you have this tall, burly guy who is very obviously a man. Look, nobody is stopping him from wearing a skirt, but apparently, that isn't enough for him: he wants *society* to loudly "validate" that he is a woman. It’s a very interesting concept.

Then there’s an older example: Ben Shapiro addressed Zoe Tur as "sir" (instead of, presumably, "ma'am" 🤦)

—to which the guy put his hand on Ben Shapiro's neck and said, "you can cut it out, or you'll go home in an ambulance."

Ben Shapiro gave a pretty weak response to that. He really should have said: DUDE! That was soooo ladylike, I'm sure everyone is now convinced that you are, in fact, a woman. 🤣
Jose Edwards16 Jose Edwards16 MemberOP
45 messages
joined Dec 2011
#74 ·
ruggedraven36 said:Glad you didn't just send me smoke signals. Dropping links isn't a conversation.

Well, I suppose I could try to get a discussion going here. Not that anyone asked, but I figured I might as well throw it out there—maybe.

So, let's say—just as an example—we take a look at something actually constructive and decent for once.
So, in response to that whole "What is a Woman" debate—you know, the one everyone seems to be shouting about lately—this one woman actually decided to write a poem instead of just arguing on Twitter. I guess she figured there was a more... artistic way to handle it? Maybe. Anyway, here’s what she put together:

I guess I should probably start by saying that YouTube is... well, it’s a bit of a mess lately, isn't it? Not that I'm complaining—I mean, I spend way too much time on there anyway—but the whole vibe feels different. It’s like everything is being pushed toward this specific, polished, almost corporate aesthetic, which, honestly, is kind of exhausting. You go looking for something niche or just a random guy talking about his woodworking hobby, and suddenly you're being fed ten videos from some massive media conglomerate that feels like it was produced in a studio in Burbank. Maybe it’s just me, or maybe the algorithm is just getting better at being annoying—I don't really know. It feels more aggressive, if that makes sense. Like it knows exactly what you want before you do, but instead of giving you the actual thing, it gives you a high-production version of it that feels hollow. I guess we’ve all just accepted it, though. We click, we watch, we move on. It’s just how things work now, I suppose.

Being a woman—well, I guess you could say it’s a kind of pain that starts right along with that very first period. It’s just one of those things, I suppose.
And then there’s just that massive wave of confusion that follows—if you can even call it that. It's more like a fog that settles in, I guess.
Ideas aren't really the thing—anyone can have ideas, I guess. It’s more about what you actually do with them, which is where most people usually trip up.
It’s that kind of ache—the one that just settles in after you lose a child. It isn't really a feeling, more like a constant, heavy presence. I guess you could call it a hollow sort of pain, though even that feels a bit too simple for what it actually is.
And then there’s that whole thing about her body betraying her—like it’s some kind of personal failure just because it can't carry one. I guess it's just one more way things feel out of control, isn't it?
It’s not just about the makeup and the clothes, I guess.
Clowns are out there painting their faces—I guess you could say they’re just putting on a mask, though why anyone would want to look like that is beyond me. It's all just part of the act, I suppose.
Using the props from his show—well, if you can even call them that—he’s basically just... I guess you could say he's leaning into it? It feels a bit much, maybe, but then again, who am I to judge the whole production? He's definitely trying to make a point with those items, though whether that point actually lands or just gets lost in the theatricality is another story entirely. Just my two cents, I suppose.
(World news related /?/).

I'm not entirely sure if I nailed the translation on that last one—you know, like, if I actually captured the actual vibe or meaning of it. Maybe I didn't. It's hard to say, I guess.

She isn't exactly the picture of grace and fragility—not by a long shot.
Fine china—it’s beautiful, sure, but man, it breaks way too easily. I guess that’s just the nature of things—you get something high-end and delicate, and you’re basically just waiting for the inevitable crack. It’s kind of like life, isn't it? You spend all this time picking out the perfect stuff, only to realize it's fragile. Anyway, just something I was thinking about while cleaning up some dishes earlier.
But she—she just won't quit—it’s actually kind of relentless, I guess.

What is a Woman?
She’s basically the word for God on her child's lips—if you know what I mean.
She’s those sleepless nights—you know, that restless feeling when you just can't shut your brain off—and I guess there's just no escaping it.
Just sitting here, wondering if this world is actually safe enough for her kid—I mean, you look around sometimes and it’s hard not to worry, I guess.

She just isn't the type of person you'd want casting that role—I mean, maybe if you were looking for someone totally different, but honestly? Probably not.
Where a man actually gets to play the lead role.
It’s kind of like an old Shakespearean drama—if you think about it.

She’s just being provocative—it's all just a way to get under your skin, I guess. Just constant agitation, really.
When you're just walking down the street...
She isn't exactly looking for the spotlight—I guess you could say she's not really chasing the attention, if that makes sense. Maybe she just prefers staying under the radar.
She just wants to exist, I guess.

What is a Woman?
She’s basically just a walking testament to everything her ancestors survived—it’s kind of wild when you think about it.
Pushed aside.
She’s basically their only shot at survival—if they can even pull it off, I guess.
It’s their fight for equality, I guess—though you have to wonder who actually defines what that looks like in practice.
It’s one thing to see it—it’s another thing entirely to actually hear it. Or maybe I'm just overthinking things again... I guess what I mean is, visibility isn't everything. You need that auditory component too, if that makes any sense.

She’s basically the only thing her kids have to look forward to.
Waiting for it to happen.
What is a Woman?
She’s a total marvel—honestly, kind of a miracle.
What exactly a man *can't* be. It’s funny how people try to draw these lines in the sand—you know, those arbitrary boundaries we all just collectively decided to follow—but I guess there are certain things that simply don't fit the mold. It’s less about what you can't do and more about the inherent contradictions of being a guy in this country today. Maybe it's about expectations, or maybe it's just the way things are wired, but there are definitely some roles that feel... off. I mean, I'm not saying there aren't exceptions to everything—there always are—but if we're talking about the core idea of masculinity, there are limits. It's a weird conversation to have, honestly.
It’s like his yin and his yang—and then there’s that little bit of something else tucked right in the middle.

It’s not like some label you'd see on a bathroom stall, I guess.
She’s just... I don't know, she's so much more than that—it’s hard to put a finger on it, really. Maybe it's just the way she carries herself, or some quality I can't quite grasp—anyway, she’s just more.
Just based on what you can see from her chest—well, I guess it’s hard to say much more than that without getting into all the other details, right?
Or maybe they're just tucked away in her desk drawers.


Of course, just take a look at the original—this was just a quick-and-dirty translation from English.

I don't know—this actually brought a few tears to my eyes, which is kind of wild because I can't even remember the last time I felt this emotional... and that's while listening to poetry, of all things.
Quincy:
She isn't just some idea—I mean, anyone can come up with an idea, I guess.
It’s that kind of ache—the one that settles in after you lose a child. I guess there isn't really a way to describe it without sounding like a cliché, but it's just... there.
So, this...
Quincy:
She’s those sleepless nights—you know the ones—where everything just feels a bit off and you can't quite shut your brain down.
Just sitting here wondering if this world is actually safe enough for her kid—it’s one of those things that stays in the back of your mind, I guess. Maybe it isn't, maybe it is, but you can't help but worry about whether everything is truly stable out there.
It looks like you might have cut off your message there. I was just sitting here thinking about how things usually go—you start typing something, maybe a thought hits you, and then... nothing. Just a stray semicolon staring back at you from the screen. Anyway, if you were trying to get a point across or ask something, feel free to drop it whenever. I'm around.
She just isn't looking for the spotlight—honestly, she’d probably rather blend into the background if she could. It’s not like she’s trying to be difficult or anything, she just... I guess she prefers the quiet life, away from all the noise. Maybe it's just her way of being, though I suppose some people find that kind of avoidance a bit odd—but hey, to each their own, right?
She really just wants to exist, I guess—to just be.

She isn't looking for attention—or at least, that’s how it seems from where I'm sitting—but I guess it's hard to tell sometimes, isn't it? Maybe she just prefers the quiet, though I don't know. It feels like everyone is constantly performing these little roles, trying to be seen, when maybe some people actually just want to exist without the spotlight being shoved in their face. It's a weird dynamic, I suppose.
She just wants to exist, I guess.


🙂👍
Laura Jones56 Laura Jones56 Active Member
55 messages
joined Sep 2019
#75 ·
I suppose I struggle to grasp the logic behind the idea that a woman inhabiting a male body could be considered identical to a woman inhabiting a female body.🤷
How far would society actually go in practice when it comes to accepting a trans woman as a woman?
To me, it all seems quite clear if I just sit back and let my mind wander for a moment without overthinking it too much.
It really isn't the same thing, and I certainly wouldn't pretend that it is.
Sam Martinez9 Sam Martinez9 Regular
361 messages
joined Jan 2021
#76 ·
Laura Jones56 said:I suppose I struggle to grasp the logic behind the idea that a woman inhabiting a male body could be considered identical to a woman inhabiting a female body.🤷
How far would society actually go in practice when it comes to accepting a trans woman as a woman?
To me, it all seems quite clear if I just sit back and let my mind wander for a moment without overthinking it too much.
It really isn't the same thing, and I certainly wouldn't pretend that it is.

That really depends on whether you define yourself by your mind or by your body.
ruggedraven36 ruggedraven36 Regular
331 messages
joined Dec 2015
#77 ·
Jose Edwards16 said:Well, I suppose I could try to get a discussion going here. Not that anyone asked, but I figured I might as well throw it out there—maybe.

So, let's say—just as an example—we take a look at something actually constructive and decent for once.
So, in response to that whole "What is a Woman" debate—you know, the one everyone seems to be shouting about lately—this one woman actually decided to write a poem instead of just arguing on Twitter. I guess she figured there was a more... artistic way to handle it? Maybe. Anyway, here’s what she put together:

I guess I should probably start by saying that YouTube is... well, it’s a bit of a mess lately, isn't it? Not that I'm complaining—I mean, I spend way too much time on there anyway—but the whole vibe feels different. It’s like everything is being pushed toward this specific, polished, almost corporate aesthetic, which, honestly, is kind of exhausting. You go looking for something niche or just a random guy talking about his woodworking hobby, and suddenly you're being fed ten videos from some massive media conglomerate that feels like it was produced in a studio in Burbank. Maybe it’s just me, or maybe the algorithm is just getting better at being annoying—I don't really know. It feels more aggressive, if that makes sense. Like it knows exactly what you want before you do, but instead of giving you the actual thing, it gives you a high-production version of it that feels hollow. I guess we’ve all just accepted it, though. We click, we watch, we move on. It’s just how things work now, I suppose.

Being a woman—well, I guess you could say it’s a kind of pain that starts right along with that very first period. It’s just one of those things, I suppose.
And then there’s just that massive wave of confusion that follows—if you can even call it that. It's more like a fog that settles in, I guess.
Ideas aren't really the thing—anyone can have ideas, I guess. It’s more about what you actually do with them, which is where most people usually trip up.
It’s that kind of ache—the one that just settles in after you lose a child. It isn't really a feeling, more like a constant, heavy presence. I guess you could call it a hollow sort of pain, though even that feels a bit too simple for what it actually is.
And then there’s that whole thing about her body betraying her—like it’s some kind of personal failure just because it can't carry one. I guess it's just one more way things feel out of control, isn't it?
It’s not just about the makeup and the clothes, I guess.
Clowns are out there painting their faces—I guess you could say they’re just putting on a mask, though why anyone would want to look like that is beyond me. It's all just part of the act, I suppose.
Using the props from his show—well, if you can even call them that—he’s basically just... I guess you could say he's leaning into it? It feels a bit much, maybe, but then again, who am I to judge the whole production? He's definitely trying to make a point with those items, though whether that point actually lands or just gets lost in the theatricality is another story entirely. Just my two cents, I suppose.
(World news related /?/).

I'm not entirely sure if I nailed the translation on that last one—you know, like, if I actually captured the actual vibe or meaning of it. Maybe I didn't. It's hard to say, I guess.

She isn't exactly the picture of grace and fragility—not by a long shot.
Fine china—it’s beautiful, sure, but man, it breaks way too easily. I guess that’s just the nature of things—you get something high-end and delicate, and you’re basically just waiting for the inevitable crack. It’s kind of like life, isn't it? You spend all this time picking out the perfect stuff, only to realize it's fragile. Anyway, just something I was thinking about while cleaning up some dishes earlier.
But she—she just won't quit—it’s actually kind of relentless, I guess.

What is a Woman?
She’s basically the word for God on her child's lips—if you know what I mean.
She’s those sleepless nights—you know, that restless feeling when you just can't shut your brain off—and I guess there's just no escaping it.
Just sitting here, wondering if this world is actually safe enough for her kid—I mean, you look around sometimes and it’s hard not to worry, I guess.

She just isn't the type of person you'd want casting that role—I mean, maybe if you were looking for someone totally different, but honestly? Probably not.
Where a man actually gets to play the lead role.
It’s kind of like an old Shakespearean drama—if you think about it.

She’s just being provocative—it's all just a way to get under your skin, I guess. Just constant agitation, really.
When you're just walking down the street...
She isn't exactly looking for the spotlight—I guess you could say she's not really chasing the attention, if that makes sense. Maybe she just prefers staying under the radar.
She just wants to exist, I guess.

What is a Woman?
She’s basically just a walking testament to everything her ancestors survived—it’s kind of wild when you think about it.
Pushed aside.
She’s basically their only shot at survival—if they can even pull it off, I guess.
It’s their fight for equality, I guess—though you have to wonder who actually defines what that looks like in practice.
It’s one thing to see it—it’s another thing entirely to actually hear it. Or maybe I'm just overthinking things again... I guess what I mean is, visibility isn't everything. You need that auditory component too, if that makes any sense.

She’s basically the only thing her kids have to look forward to.
Waiting for it to happen.
What is a Woman?
She’s a total marvel—honestly, kind of a miracle.
What exactly a man *can't* be. It’s funny how people try to draw these lines in the sand—you know, those arbitrary boundaries we all just collectively decided to follow—but I guess there are certain things that simply don't fit the mold. It’s less about what you can't do and more about the inherent contradictions of being a guy in this country today. Maybe it's about expectations, or maybe it's just the way things are wired, but there are definitely some roles that feel... off. I mean, I'm not saying there aren't exceptions to everything—there always are—but if we're talking about the core idea of masculinity, there are limits. It's a weird conversation to have, honestly.
It’s like his yin and his yang—and then there’s that little bit of something else tucked right in the middle.

It’s not like some label you'd see on a bathroom stall, I guess.
She’s just... I don't know, she's so much more than that—it’s hard to put a finger on it, really. Maybe it's just the way she carries herself, or some quality I can't quite grasp—anyway, she’s just more.
Just based on what you can see from her chest—well, I guess it’s hard to say much more than that without getting into all the other details, right?
Or maybe they're just tucked away in her desk drawers.


Of course, just take a look at the original—this was just a quick-and-dirty translation from English.

I don't know—this actually brought a few tears to my eyes, which is kind of wild because I can't even remember the last time I felt this emotional... and that's while listening to poetry, of all things.
Quincy:
She isn't just some idea—I mean, anyone can come up with an idea, I guess.
It’s that kind of ache—the one that settles in after you lose a child. I guess there isn't really a way to describe it without sounding like a cliché, but it's just... there.
So, this...
Quincy:
She’s those sleepless nights—you know the ones—where everything just feels a bit off and you can't quite shut your brain down.
Just sitting here wondering if this world is actually safe enough for her kid—it’s one of those things that stays in the back of your mind, I guess. Maybe it isn't, maybe it is, but you can't help but worry about whether everything is truly stable out there.
It looks like you might have cut off your message there. I was just sitting here thinking about how things usually go—you start typing something, maybe a thought hits you, and then... nothing. Just a stray semicolon staring back at you from the screen. Anyway, if you were trying to get a point across or ask something, feel free to drop it whenever. I'm around.
She just isn't looking for the spotlight—honestly, she’d probably rather blend into the background if she could. It’s not like she’s trying to be difficult or anything, she just... I guess she prefers the quiet life, away from all the noise. Maybe it's just her way of being, though I suppose some people find that kind of avoidance a bit odd—but hey, to each their own, right?
She really just wants to exist, I guess—to just be.

She isn't looking for attention—or at least, that’s how it seems from where I'm sitting—but I guess it's hard to tell sometimes, isn't it? Maybe she just prefers the quiet, though I don't know. It feels like everyone is constantly performing these little roles, trying to be seen, when maybe some people actually just want to exist without the spotlight being shoved in their face. It's a weird dynamic, I suppose.
She just wants to exist, I guess.


🙂👍

There's some real beauty in those lines. Let's just leave it at that—I've got no interest in turning this into some dry, endless debate.
Laura Jones56 Laura Jones56 Active Member
55 messages
joined Sep 2019
#78 ·
Sam Martinez9 said:That really depends on whether you define yourself by your mind or by your body.

I'm struggling to see the logic behind that, honestly.
And I can't quite grasp the reasoning used to split identity into such distinct categories as "mind" versus "body" in the first place.
Sam Martinez9 Sam Martinez9 Regular
361 messages
joined Jan 2021
#79 ·
Laura Jones56 said:I'm struggling to see the logic behind that, honestly.
And I can't quite grasp the reasoning used to split identity into such distinct categories as "mind" versus "body" in the first place.

There are certain people who are just completely fascinated by their physical forms. Take professional athletes, for instance, or young, attractive women... they tend to be hyper-focused on their bodies, enjoying the process of grooming, dressing up, or applying makeup. Their physicality is essentially their primary focus; they dwell on it and invest heavily in it. I remember having a conversation once with a young woman where we drifted into a debate about God and the afterlife, and she insisted that her body absolutely had to survive death, because without that specific vessel, she wouldn't truly be herself.

On the other hand, you have people who couldn't care less about their physical selves. To them, the body is merely a sort of biological machine housing their consciousness. They are much more preoccupied with thoughts of the world around them and could easily imagine themselves inhabiting any body at all—they might even find the idea of uploading their mind into a computer quite appealing. They handle basic hygiene, dress in a way that fits social norms, see a doctor when they get sick, and that’s really the extent of it.

I'm feeling a bit drained right now, so my thoughts are somewhat scattered; I hope you can follow my train of thought.

Ultimately, people aren't monolithic, and that extends to how they perceive their own physical existence.
Amy Howard18 Amy Howard18 Member
35 messages
joined Aug 2021
#80 ·
ruggedraven36 said:So, how does one actually "act" like a man (or a woman)? Is it in picking cherries, collecting stamps, grabbing a coffee, watching sparrows through a window, walking down stairs, or even knowing how to capitalize a sentence? Is it in reading the debate about whether to put cheese in the fridge, or listening to Robert Flack? How do you suddenly become "masculine" or "feminine" in all those endless little actions—and a million others besides?

You really do get caught up in the trivial stuff sometimes... I was talking about masculine courage because you need guts to face real life... and for love, you need sincerity and sensitivity. But honestly, it’s hard to generalize things by gender because you have great women and great men, just as you have bad ones. There isn't some inherent moral difference based on sex.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads