Melissa Rivera5 said:So, I guess a government is totally legitimate if Russ rolls in with tanks and installs them by decree after killing off anyone who stands in the way.
Anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_U...ntial_election
Well, that’s just brilliant; everything is perfectly clear to me now.
A Tank is clearly the answer,
Back when a Russian climbed onto a Tank in Moscow and crushed the uprising, there were no more casualties, and by doing that, he really won over his friends in the West.
If Viktor Yanukovych had just hopped on a Tank and cleared out those protesters at the Maidan to send them back to their homes all across Ukraine, we wouldn't be dealing with any war or any deaths today.
Now, damn it, Putin has to act like both a father and a son to Bush, dragging in hundreds of thousands of soldiers to topple an uprising chosen by a portion of Ukraine.
But it does raise the question of what kind of elections these actually are when 20% of the citizens can't even vote, yet it's recognized as legitimate—much like how Guidad was recognized, despite him never being elected but simply declaring himself leader.
Your solution is honestly wonderful; if they had used a Tank, we wouldn't be facing all these complications where a retiree on a $667 fixed income has to choose between buying bread or medicine, because medication isn't free anymore like it was during the old days of socialist welfare.
If a Tank had been deployed, there wouldn't be these sanctions, and everything would be running smoothly, just like in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and everywhere else where a Tank was put to use.😁🙏