swiftjackal11 said:It isn't the same thing when one dictatorial nation has nukes versus a European country. It's like how you wouldn't want to live under a dictatorship; you want to live somewhere you actually feel safe.
Russians brag about how well their version of "McDonald's" is doing. Honestly, they could have built something of their own without resorting to war and killing. All they seem to know how to manufacture is weapons instead of cars, phones, TVs, or game consoles.🤷
Of course it isn't the same. I mean, if we're being honest, a democratic nation has dropped two nuclear bombs and killed roughly 120,000 to 150,000 people.
A dictatorial state hasn't dropped a single one yet.
Let's move past the demagoguery and talk about actual sanctions.
They don't need to compete with the trivial consumer goods that China churns out for the entire world. They just need to focus on milestones like launching the first satellite, the first man, the first dog, or the first woman into space. They can build a space station where they host friends from all over the globe—with the last visitor paying in rubles.
They produce heavy-duty trucks capable of hauling 50 to 100 tons, which is about the weight of their missile systems, and they build off-road vehicles that can tackle terrain no Western vehicle could ever dream of navigating.
They are self-sufficient in all their vital industries, and they claim they don't need luxury items like Vuitton handbags or designer collars.
Never before have they seen such a massive trade surplus—around $100 billion—and they remain among the least indebted nations globally. If the "democrats" hadn't seized $300 billion of their foreign exchange reserves through sanctions, they wouldn't even know what a deficit feels like.
You really have to hand it to them; Western sanctions have been a total "bullseye," hitting them right in both knees.
These are the facts, even if demagoguery tries its best to hide them.☕