CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Round 6 Elections: Let's hear your thoughts...

Round 6 Elections: Let's hear your thoughts...

Started by steelridge58 · · 👁 6 views · 161 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants steelridge58James Lee77hiddeneagle98Amanda Jackson5Joseph Murphy10David Robinson26Terry Martinez10lonegardenerSandra Murphy33Amy BennettKyle Nelson2Amanda Flores88gentlerider7Eric Newman75placidorca6ruggedraven36
steelridge58 steelridge58 RegularOP
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#1 ·
This is our space to talk about round six

Sigmund, I have to say it again—huge congrats on having your response picked as the winner in the last round.
The latest question he’s thrown our way
is just so strange and intriguing and honestly quite brilliant, and I have to admit that it immediately
really struck a chord deep within me...
James Lee77 James Lee77 Active Member
172 messages
joined Jan 2012
#2 ·
Apemant said:Jesus. I’d honestly just be like, hey man, why are you being so low-key about everything? 🤣

Just go for it right now, no point in waiting...

edit: oh wait, someone already replied

hiddeneagle98 said:Jesus: I'm just maintaining continuity
hiddeneagle98 hiddeneagle98 Regular
300 messages
joined Nov 2023
#3 ·
Apemant said:Jesus. I’d honestly just pull him aside and be like, "Look, man, why are you being so incredibly low-key about all this?" 🤣

Jesus: I'm just maintaining continuity
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#4 ·
It feels like most of you are just taking it for granted, assuming that if an afterlife actually exists, Jesus would somehow be wandering around there too. That wasn't my intention at all, nor did I expect anyone to take the path of least resistance—it’s like everyone wants to find Jesus, but they haven't even figured out what they’d bother asking him.
James Lee77 James Lee77 Active Member
172 messages
joined Jan 2012
#5 ·
When things are going right, nobody asks questions. You don't show up at the finish line and start asking for directions.
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#6 ·
James Lee77 said:When things are going right, nobody asks questions. You don't show up at the finish line and start asking for directions.

And honestly, that wasn't even the core of the question. But even if we assume an afterlife exists, does that automatically mean you’re going to run into Jesus there? I can imagine dozens of different scenarios for what happens after we die, and frankly, none of them necessarily involve biblical mythology. Don't you think someone would actually want an explanation? Like, is this whole thing a digital render or some kind of magic trick? Just a little clarity would be nice. Are we living in a Matrix situation, what's the deal here, how does it affect me, and all that...
James Lee77 James Lee77 Active Member
172 messages
joined Jan 2012
#7 ·
Of course. Everyone’s out here just writing their own script, I don't get why you're having such an issue with some of them.
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#8 ·
James Lee77 said:Of course. Everyone’s out here just writing their own script, I don't get why you're having such an issue with some of them.

It’s not even that I have a problem with them; I’m just feeling a bit let down, honestly. The whole point was to ask what you’d change about your life if you suddenly realized everything you thought you knew about the afterlife was totally wrong. Maybe I overcomplicated things by being too broad with the question.
James Lee77 James Lee77 Active Member
172 messages
joined Jan 2012
#9 ·
Maybe you should've just asked, "Who would you want to meet if it wasn't Jesus Christ"... 🤔
Joseph Murphy10 Joseph Murphy10 Active Member
102 messages
joined Dec 2020
#10 ·
I zeroed in on that specific part of your question and gave you my take. What I’m looking to change—and honestly, what I need to fix and get past—has absolutely nothing to do with the afterlife itself.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S9 using Reddit
steelridge58 steelridge58 RegularOP
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#11 ·
addx-ova reply is really more of a response to a different comment made on the thread, so I’m going to move it down into the comments section since I just don't see how it works as a direct answer to the actual question being asked here.
David Robinson26 David Robinson26 Member
28 messages
joined Jan 2019
#12 ·
Amanda Jackson5 said:And honestly, that wasn't even the core of the question. But even if we assume an afterlife exists, does that automatically mean you’re going to run into Jesus there? I can imagine dozens of different scenarios for what happens after we die, and frankly, none of them necessarily involve biblical mythology. Don't you think someone would actually want an explanation? Like, is this whole thing a digital render or some kind of magic trick? Just a little clarity would be nice. Are we living in a Matrix situation, what's the deal here, how does it affect me, and all that...

But honestly, who would even know the explanation if we set aside biblical mythology?
If you "arrive" there under the exact same conditions as here, does that mean everyone else is just as clueless as you are?
That’s why I believe my line of questioning is perfectly valid. If the afterlife is just a continuation of this existence, then I need to establish a hierarchy of priorities so I can try to fix the mistakes I made first. However, if it isn't like that, then there really is no need to rush.
Terry Martinez10 Terry Martinez10 Active Member
82 messages
joined Nov 2021
#13 ·
Amanda Jackson5 said:It’s not even that I have a problem with them; I’m just feeling a bit let down, honestly. The whole point was to ask what you’d change about your life if you suddenly realized everything you thought you knew about the afterlife was totally wrong. Maybe I overcomplicated things by being too broad with the question.

Personally, I wouldn't change a single thing either way.
But that isn't quite what I was asking, is it?
Life remains life, regardless of whether there's something waiting for us on the other side or not.
lonegardener lonegardener Regular
347 messages
joined Apr 2010
#14 ·
Amanda Jackson5 said:It feels like most of you are just taking it for granted, assuming that if an afterlife actually exists, Jesus would somehow be wandering around there too. That wasn't my intention at all, nor did I expect anyone to take the path of least resistance—it’s like everyone wants to find Jesus, but they haven't even figured out what they’d bother asking him.

That is such a strange objection to make. No one actually assumed a figure like Jesus *had* to be there, but honestly, the concept of "Jesus" isn't any weirder or more far-fetched than the idea of an afterlife itself. So, bringing him up fits the spirit of the question perfectly. And it's not true that we wouldn't know what to ask him; if he really were there, the first thing I'd want to know is why he stays so low-profile—basically, why does it feel like he was made up?😬

As for asking "ordinary" people—like ancestors, old acquaintances, or historical figures—I have to admit I can't think of much that I'd find particularly fascinating to ask. 😬 One thing I do know: I'd look Oswald in the eye and ask, "Hey man, did you actually pull the trigger on Washington, D.C.?" 🤣
Sandra Murphy33 Sandra Murphy33 Active Member
239 messages
joined May 2022
#15 ·
steelridge58 said:This is our space to talk about round six

Sigmund, I have to say it again—huge congrats on having your response picked as the winner in the last round.
The latest question he’s thrown our way
is just so strange and intriguing and honestly quite brilliant, and I have to admit that it immediately
really struck a chord deep within me...

It inspired me to write anything from my most private fantasies to convictions that might actually hold some weight in reality...
But then it hit me: this is likely a trick question. Sigmund probably just wants to gauge our level of "metaphysical consciousness" on a scale of 1 to 100, so he can use the data to predict certain political possibilities and report them to some dubious scientific circles in Washington, D.C. 🙂 😬 ....

Quote : Weekend Warrior said:If I wanted to be "a bit different" from the rest, I'd go with Metatron. 😁

According to certain traditions, he sits at the top of the hierarchy, which might mean he possesses a greater capacity for understanding the typical limitations of an ordinary human. He would better grasp the earthly circumstances—those daily cognitive and conative constraints, along with the accompanying existential dilemmas and trilemmas. In that sense, he could truly understand where I am, who I am, and where I am headed.

You might find it interesting to look into Swedenborg. 🙂

Amanda Jackson5 said:It’s not even that I have a problem with them; I’m just feeling a bit let down, honestly. The whole point was to ask what you’d change about your life if you suddenly realized everything you thought you knew about the afterlife was totally wrong. Maybe I overcomplicated things by being too broad with the question.

Studies on near-death experiences (NDEs) have established that when participants reach the end of that famous tunnel and see the light, they encounter figures from their own religious or spiritual backgrounds. For instance, Christians often see Christ, Muslims see Muhammad, and Buddhists are met by Buddha, and so on.
The conclusion is that at the threshold of death—in that transitional space between life and whatever comes next—an individual's existing beliefs and "knowledge" regarding mortality are activated.
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#16 ·
lonegardener said:That is such a strange objection to make. No one actually assumed a figure like Jesus *had* to be there, but honestly, the concept of "Jesus" isn't any weirder or more far-fetched than the idea of an afterlife itself. So, bringing him up fits the spirit of the question perfectly. And it's not true that we wouldn't know what to ask him; if he really were there, the first thing I'd want to know is why he stays so low-profile—basically, why does it feel like he was made up?😬

As for asking "ordinary" people—like ancestors, old acquaintances, or historical figures—I have to admit I can't think of much that I'd find particularly fascinating to ask. 😬 One thing I do know: I'd look Oswald in the eye and ask, "Hey man, did you actually pull the trigger on Washington, D.C.?" 🤣

The degree of craziness isn't really the point here. People can dream up things far wilder than Jesus without even touching religious territory. The core issue is that this feels like a standard, knee-jerk reaction rather than a response born from actual critical thinking—which is the only thing that would actually qualify it as a response in a philosophical sense.

Sandra Murphy33 said:It inspired me to write anything from my most private fantasies to convictions that might actually hold some weight in reality...
But then it hit me: this is likely a trick question. Sigmund probably just wants to gauge our level of "metaphysical consciousness" on a scale of 1 to 100, so he can use the data to predict certain political possibilities and report them to some dubious scientific circles in Washington, D.C. 🙂 😬 ....

You might find it interesting to look into Swedenborg. 🙂

Studies on near-death experiences (NDEs) have established that when participants reach the end of that famous tunnel and see the light, they encounter figures from their own religious or spiritual backgrounds. For instance, Christians often see Christ, Muslims see Muhammad, and Buddhists are met by Buddha, and so on.
The conclusion is that at the threshold of death—in that transitional space between life and whatever comes next—an individual's existing beliefs and "knowledge" regarding mortality are activated.

😁 Now we're getting somewhere...
Joseph Murphy10 Joseph Murphy10 Active Member
102 messages
joined Dec 2020
#17 ·
@Nea
Treaty or no treaty—this guy’s just fishing for likes at this point 👍🙂
lonegardener lonegardener Regular
347 messages
joined Apr 2010
#18 ·
@Nea, why on earth would you actually "change your pessimism" if you were absolutely certain about eternal oblivion? What’s the logic behind "trying to find something interesting in everything"?

It feels like the exact opposite to me: if I knew for sure that eternal oblivion was a fact (and honestly, I'm about 99.5% convinced right now, lol), I’d become even more pessimistic. I certainly wouldn't feel like looking for the silver lining in anything.

That said, we should probably point out a bit of ambiguity in the Freudian question. When he asks "what would you change about your life," it isn't clear if he means changing things *now*—from the moment you "realize" eternal oblivion exists until you die—or if he means looking back retrospectively, like "if you could be reborn with that knowledge from the start." It seems like you're interpreting it in that second sense, which is why you mention "youth," but even that feels backwards to me: you can't turn back the clock. No matter how I spent my youth, my "now" remains the same. Of course, that assumes we ignore the actual consequences a certain lifestyle might have on your current situation—though I think you've overlooked that too. You seem to be focusing strictly on experiences or "missed opportunities," rather than practical things like, well, "if I had saved more money, I'd actually have some cash now," lol.
Sandra Murphy33 Sandra Murphy33 Active Member
239 messages
joined May 2022
#19 ·
lonegardener said:@Nea, why on earth would you actually "change your pessimism" if you were absolutely certain about eternal oblivion? What’s the logic behind "trying to find something interesting in everything"?

It feels like the exact opposite to me: if I knew for sure that eternal oblivion was a fact (and honestly, I'm about 99.5% convinced right now, lol), I’d become even more pessimistic. I certainly wouldn't feel like looking for the silver lining in anything.

That said, we should probably point out a bit of ambiguity in the Freudian question. When he asks "what would you change about your life," it isn't clear if he means changing things *now*—from the moment you "realize" eternal oblivion exists until you die—or if he means looking back retrospectively, like "if you could be reborn with that knowledge from the start." It seems like you're interpreting it in that second sense, which is why you mention "youth," but even that feels backwards to me: you can't turn back the clock. No matter how I spent my youth, my "now" remains the same. Of course, that assumes we ignore the actual consequences a certain lifestyle might have on your current situation—though I think you've overlooked that too. You seem to be focusing strictly on experiences or "missed opportunities," rather than practical things like, well, "if I had saved more money, I'd actually have some cash now," lol.

The logic is that I would be more exposed—more vulnerable, less shielded (granted, being shielded is an evolutionary illusion that serves our nervous system and is necessary for its development 😎) so that bliss—which is the only thing in this world that justifies itself—could exist. Instead of just surrendering to negative and unwanted experiences, I would be attempting to see or invent even the tiniest glimmer of light to follow amidst the general despair...
(Because once you surrender to despair, you lose the will to follow anything or go anywhere... so pessimism is ultimately a loss of the will to live and an acquisition of the will to cease existing; will is always present, it just depends on what it’s directed toward)

It seems to me quite the opposite: if I knew for sure about eternal oblivion (though even now, I am about 99.5% convinced, lol), I would become even more pessimistic and have even less desire to find anything interesting in anything at all.

That somewhat explains your tendency toward sensationalist oddities.
😛

One has to mention a certain imprecision in the Freudian question: when he asks "what would you change in your life," it isn't clear if he means "change NOW," as in from the moment you "learn" about eternal oblivion until death, or if he means "in retrospect"—like, "if you could be born again, but with that knowledge from the start" lol.
It seems you interpreted it in the latter sense, which is why you speak of "youth," but to me, even that feels backwards: you can't turn back time.

In reality, it seems irrelevant whether we are changing something in the past or the future; it can be understood either way since it's all just a hypothesis anyway. Eternal oblivion isn't a categorical fact here, just a proposition.
And propositions and hypotheses exist to give wings to the imagination. 🙂

No matter how I "spent my youth," NOW would remain the same (assuming, of course, we ignore the actual "consequences" that a certain lifestyle in the past has on the present—but I think you ignored that too, aiming exclusively at experiences or "missed opportunities" rather than things like—well, if I had saved money, I'd actually have some cash now, lol).

I was actually aiming for that sentiment of, "...if only I had been this wise back then!" 🤣
- which is inherently absurd, considering that this very "wisdom" and these insights were forged specifically because I lacked them at the time. It’s just the standard process of learning through trial and error, isn't it?

By the way, experiences are everything we actually want and truly possess. They aren't like money, which people squirrel away just to spend again later, or leave behind for an heir to blow through shortly after. Money and material goods are strictly linear (diachronically 😁) and, as far as I can tell, don't exist outside of our 3D reality (synchronously). You can't extract wealth from the constraints of space and time, except perhaps as a conceptual idea within the mind. Experiences and lived moments, however—those are the only things capable of being shared and carried beyond the bounds of space and time (if anything can be,
).
Sandra Murphy33 Sandra Murphy33 Active Member
239 messages
joined May 2022
#20 ·
Joseph Murphy10 said:@Nea
Treaty or no treaty—this guy’s just fishing for likes at this point 👍🙂

I'm glad you enjoyed it. 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads