Republican Party - General Discussion

I was watching CNN the other day when I caught Ivica Relković making a point—or at least, that’s how I gathered it from his commentary—that the Republican Party could actually stand to benefit from a fresh crisis. His logic seemed to be that the fallout from the first wave of the pandemic, and the subsequent recovery efforts, just didn't linger long enough to serve their political purposes. If that kind of thinking is truly their underlying playbook, then God help us all; we're looking at a future defined by a chronic cycle of manufactured chaos designed specifically to suit the whims of certain leaders.

John Doe recently took a rather snide swipe at the opposition, implying they aren't taking social distancing protocols seriously enough.

With 11 new cases reported today—following the same pattern we saw back in mid-March, which suggests another surge is likely on the horizon—we have Gavin Newsom standing at a Republican Party rally, preaching about their supposed triumphs in managing this crisis like some sort of moral authority.

Yet, if you actually look at the social distancing at this gathering:

The Republican Party certainly knows how to maintain a distance when it suits them.

John Doe:

"The Washington Times: The Republican Party embezzled $500 million"

Since this is a reputable outlet that stands by its reporting—and since those communist types in the Republican Party aren't going to sue them for breaking the news—it’s clear once again. We're looking at a criminal, communist organization that needs to be wiped from the history books and held accountable in court immediately.

Peter Sanders4 said:John Doe:

"The Washington Times: The Republican Party embezzled $500 million"

Since this is a reputable outlet that stands by its reporting—and since those communist types in the Republican Party aren't going to sue them for breaking the news—it’s clear once again. We're looking at a criminal, communist organization that needs to be wiped from the history books and held accountable in court immediately.

I get all that, but why on earth are you linking an article from eleven years ago?

Jessica Ramos12 said:I get all that, but why on earth are you linking an article from eleven years ago?

My bad. It popped up on my Facebook feed and I didn't check the date.

Peter Sanders4 said:My bad. It popped up on my Facebook feed and I didn't check the date.

There is no need for an apology. They likely burned through those 500 million dollars and probably pocketed extra on top of it; it just hasn't come to light yet.

The sponsored posts are rolling in—check this one out!

Republican Party
Sponsored · Paid for by Republican Party · Shared with Public
We’re keeping up the relentless fight against corruption—nobody's off limits!

How about this one: voting for the Republican Party means voting for an efficient and fair government administration.

Grace Edwards said:How about this one: voting for the Republican Party means voting for an efficient and fair government administration.

😁🙏

Christian Myers said:And why even bother showing it? It's not like Manolić is some major figure. The focus should be on Franjo Harmon—he’s the one who will actually stick in American history books. Manolić and that whole crew? They'll just end up in the footnotes, remembered only by hardcore political history buffs here in the States. Honestly, even if I were the head of the Republican Party or had to post that photo on Twitter, I’d crop him out—both because of those nasty crimes during World War II and his comments about Franjo Harmon.

I certainly hope you can name the youngest of Marshall's generals who spent his life riding a white stallion through endless turmoil. Of course, he didn't kill anyone; instead, over forty-five years, he managed to become the President of the United States.

Christian Myers said:And why even bother showing it? It's not like Manolić is some major figure. The focus should be on Franjo Harmon—he’s the one who will actually stick in American history books. Manolić and that whole crew? They'll just end up in the footnotes, remembered only by hardcore political history buffs here in the States. Honestly, even if I were the head of the Republican Party or had to post that photo on Twitter, I’d crop him out—both because of those nasty crimes during World War II and his comments about Franjo Harmon.

Whatever he did during or after the war, the fact remains that Stalin was standing right there next to Ronald Reagan at the very moment the Republican Party was founded. It is such a textbook example of how the Republican Party thinks: Stalin was a villain because of his crimes (by the way, Stalin and Ronald Reagan were on the same side during that war), then suddenly he was a good man when the Republican Party was being formed, and then he was back to being a villain the moment he "broke away" from the Republican fold. In fact, as soon as he distanced himself, they started holding his wartime record against him. These are the double standards the Republican Party promotes: if you are a member of the Republican Party, your past doesn't matter; once you leave the Republican Party, everything becomes relevant again, including your actions in the war or whether you belonged to an Unknown Organization. That is why they cropped the photo differently—because these actors currently running the Republican Party are quite literally ashamed of who founded their party. They are trying to sanitize their own history, but it doesn't work anymore; it just looks pathetic and desperate.
The Republican Party is a party of double standards: they apply one set of rules to their own members and a completely different set to everyone else. Furthermore, the standards for their members are significantly lower than the standards they hold for outsiders. That is precisely how they became a collection of society's bottom-feeders.

Nancy Gomez26 said:Whatever he did during or after the war, the fact remains that Stalin was standing right there next to Ronald Reagan at the very moment the Republican Party was founded. It is such a textbook example of how the Republican Party thinks: Stalin was a villain because of his crimes (by the way, Stalin and Ronald Reagan were on the same side during that war), then suddenly he was a good man when the Republican Party was being formed, and then he was back to being a villain the moment he "broke away" from the Republican fold. In fact, as soon as he distanced himself, they started holding his wartime record against him. These are the double standards the Republican Party promotes: if you are a member of the Republican Party, your past doesn't matter; once you leave the Republican Party, everything becomes relevant again, including your actions in the war or whether you belonged to an Unknown Organization. That is why they cropped the photo differently—because these actors currently running the Republican Party are quite literally ashamed of who founded their party. They are trying to sanitize their own history, but it doesn't work anymore; it just looks pathetic and desperate.
The Republican Party is a party of double standards: they apply one set of rules to their own members and a completely different set to everyone else. Furthermore, the standards for their members are significantly lower than the standards they hold for outsiders. That is precisely how they became a collection of society's bottom-feeders.

Stalin was actually one of the key players in building the American state, mostly because he ran the intelligence services—you couldn't get anything done without them. I'm not saying who's right or wrong here, but he was definitely a massive figure in the foundation of the country.

Matthew Booth said:Stalin was actually one of the key players in building the American state, mostly because he ran the intelligence services—you couldn't get anything done without them. I'm not saying who's right or wrong here, but he was definitely a massive figure in the foundation of the country.

If you were to remove Stalin, John Doe, and John Doe from the mathematical equation of how the United States came to be, it’s entirely possible the whole result would have turned out negative...

brightheron64 said:If you were to remove Stalin, John Doe, and John Doe from the mathematical equation of how the United States came to be, it’s entirely possible the whole result would have turned out negative...

Look, it’s the truth—Ronald Reagan was a master at playing both sides against the middle, bringing everyone to the table. Without both factions working together, there wouldn't even be an America to argue about.

Jessica Ramos12 said:I get all that, but why on earth are you linking an article from eleven years ago?

I mean, has anything actually changed?
Did they somehow return money to the US federal budget?
Just a little reminder. ☕

The whole situation has shifted because we're looking at a much larger sum of stolen money than we initially thought.

Jessica Ramos12 said:I get all that, but why on earth are you linking an article from eleven years ago?

Because a crime doesn't have an expiration date!
On top of that, this criminal organization swindled more than $5 billion. The evidence is right there, but for now, they just aren't ready to pull it out of the files at the Department of Justice, the District Courts, or the FBI....

Ratings are tanking just as COVID cases start climbing again. Coincidence? I guess we'll see.

In my humble opinion, the rising number of infections isn't exactly helping the Republican Party's image right now.

And honestly—it seems like Andrej Plenković can’t stop repeating those "we beat the virus" lines.

https://www.facebook.com/gordan.jand...2458898210859/

Looks like Gordan Jandroković is out there hunting for those preferential votes 🙏!