The ultimate thread

Justin Baker6 said:Do you even have any actual work? Start a thread so we can all see it.
Don't be intimidated by me; I'm not even here.

Unfortunately, I have no works to my name, Your Excellency. I am merely a humble, insignificant man—but that doesn't stop me from marveling at your Great Work, the sheer depth of your intellect, and the elegance of your interpretation. Thank you for graciously sharing your wisdom with the world; the universe is a better place because of it.

Paul Rogers94 said:Unfortunately, I have no works to my name, Your Excellency. I am merely a humble, insignificant man—but that doesn't stop me from marveling at your Great Work, the sheer depth of your intellect, and the elegance of your interpretation. Thank you for graciously sharing your wisdom with the world; the universe is a better place because of it.

You saw it however you were capable of seeing it. That's that. I actually started this thread specifically so we could tear apart the flaws in this "I am and am not at the same time" concept.
Forget about who I am or what my deal is. Let's focus on the actual concept. Is that cool? Or do I need to ask permission from someone else to run my own damn thread?

Jessica Miller51 said:Why don't you start over at Fermilab? They've got plenty of anti-matter there, and they've even managed to photograph it. 🙄

That's just movie magic from a Tom Hanks flick. He’s probably holding it in a bucket. 😁

Thomas Nelson25 said:That's just movie magic from a Tom Hanks flick. He’s probably holding it in a bucket. 😁

She claims she's "in touch with reality" or whatever. Honestly, she's just bouncing from one crazy idea to the next.
They're killing my threads everywhere.

Justin Baker6 said:She claims she's "in touch with reality" or whatever. Honestly, she's just bouncing from one crazy idea to the next.
They're killing my threads everywhere.

Who even are these guys?

Feels like they're tracking you—you're clearly on their radar, even if they won't admit it. ☕

Thomas Nelson25 said:That's just movie magic from a Tom Hanks flick. He’s probably holding it in a bucket. 😁

Haha, it's not just Hollywood. Back in November 2010, researchers at NASA actually managed to trap and study antimatter atoms for the first time. That crew pulled off trapping 38 hydrogen atoms within a complex magnetic field system for just over a tenth of a second. They cooled antiprotons down to half a degree above absolute zero in a storage ring, then forced them to react with positrons to create anti-hydrogen atoms. It all happened inside this specialized magnetic field setup that worked like a mirror: once the anti-particles hit the "wall," they bounced right back to the center. Through 335 cycles, they held onto those 38 hydrogen atoms for at least 172 milliseconds. Here’s the shot of an anti-hydrogen proton annihilating after hitting a regular matter proton: https://www.welt.de/img/channels-ext...thacht-jpg.jpg

On top of that, some scientists in Austria recently teamed up with researchers from China and successfully moved a photon into another dimension using quantum entanglement. I can dig into that too if you want.🙂

Stop with the nitpicking... I mean, sure, I know, but you're seriously watching which fraction of a second they existed for? What a joke of a camera... glad it didn't just disintegrate entirely.

Thomas Nelson25 said:Who even are these guys?

Feels like they're tracking you—you're clearly on their radar, even if they won't admit it. ☕

bots

Thomas Nelson25 said:Stop with the nitpicking... I mean, sure, I know, but you're seriously watching which fraction of a second they existed for? What a joke of a camera... glad it didn't just disintegrate entirely.

From what I've read in the reports, it wasn't some instant win; they had to run several trials before they finally caught it. Did you know there are cameras capable of capturing events at an attosecond scale? I won't get bogged down in the technical weeds here. As for the "bimovanje" stuff, I'll shoot you a DM so we don't hijack the thread. I only brought up the antimatter thing in passing, because people throw terms around all the time without having a clue what they actually mean.

Matter and antimatter are just two sides of the exact same coin.
They balance each other out. When I talked about dematerialization, I wasn't talking about stuff vanishing into thin air—I meant a simple spin swap from one side to the other.
It’s just like looking in a mirror where left becomes right and right becomes left.
Through that mirror, these worlds collide, and anyone smart enough to grasp the core of it can pull off something massive. That's exactly why a mirror is a staple tool for any magician.

Jessica Miller51 said:Haha, it's not just Hollywood. Back in November 2010, researchers at NASA actually managed to trap and study antimatter atoms for the first time. That crew pulled off trapping 38 hydrogen atoms within a complex magnetic field system for just over a tenth of a second. They cooled antiprotons down to half a degree above absolute zero in a storage ring, then forced them to react with positrons to create anti-hydrogen atoms. It all happened inside this specialized magnetic field setup that worked like a mirror: once the anti-particles hit the "wall," they bounced right back to the center. Through 335 cycles, they held onto those 38 hydrogen atoms for at least 172 milliseconds. Here’s the shot of an anti-hydrogen proton annihilating after hitting a regular matter proton: https://www.welt.de/img/channels-ext...thacht-jpg.jpg

On top of that, some scientists in Austria recently teamed up with researchers from China and successfully moved a photon into another dimension using quantum entanglement. I can dig into that too if you want.🙂

I honestly wonder how much someone has to lack basic intelligence to swallow this nonsense. CERN basically burns through massive amounts of money for absolutely nothing—total garbage. They just need to churn out some reports that don't mean a damn thing either. Organizations like CERN or HAARP wouldn't even exist if it weren't for people like you, who let them shove abstract jargon down your throat. Seriously, we both know what this is supposed to mean, but none of those words actually signify anything real. It makes zero sense. I don't get how anyone can buy into this just because it's uttered by some "scientific authority" or because it's "CERN." Screw CERN. Just watch any documentary, and when they ask those young, stoned "scientists" what's actually going on, it’s obvious they haven't a clue and couldn't explain it if their lives depended on it. Maybe you can try explaining to me what CERN actually is and what its purpose serves—without hiding behind abstract, meaningless "science" phrases like "particle accelerator." Seriously, give it to me straight: what does CERN actually do? I haven't been able to wrap my head around it for twenty-five years. Though, from the start, it was clearly all bunk; I'm just trying to figure out how lazy a person has to be to fall for it. "God particle," "Higgs boson"... they're just hollow buzzwords used to mask the emptiness. No sane person could fall for these stupidities and "sensational discoveries" used to justify their existence—what kind of actual contribution do these "discoveries" even make?
By the way, how is it possible to photograph a hypothetical particle when it's just hypothetical? Such a particle doesn't even exist. It's just the scientific community and the Nobel committee—followed by the general public—falling for sensationalism, just like they have so many times before. That’s part of the reason why it’s so hard to find any serious critique of CERN; massive piles of cash have been thrown away for nothing, and who would ever dare admit they were being played for fools... hahaha

The Higgs Fak : How Particle Physicists Fooled The Nobel Committee



Did The Nobel Prize in Physics in 2013 make Einstein Turn in his Grave? The Higgs Fak : How Particle Physicists Fooled The Nobel Committee is a merciless critique of The Large hadron Collider AT CERN and of the theoretical model on which The World ’ is built. Unzicker, German physicist and award-winning science writer , argues that The reaction of The Swedish Academy to last year’s announcement looks less like scientific triumph and more like they were simply hoodwinked by CERN's desperate need to justify pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into the void. The book starts OFF by claiming that The Greatest physicists such as Einstein , Dirac of Schrödinger would have considered The “ discovery ” of The Higgs particle ridiculous. According to the author, the logic is simple: "1) the so-called standard model has become absurdly convoluted, 2) we still haven't cracked any of the massive physics mysteries that have stumped us for a hundred years, 3) history tells us this current model is a total dead end, 4) because their experimental setups are getting so insanely complex, particle physicists are essentially tricking themselves with their own data, 5) scientific convictions in the community are established by blind faith in expert opinions, group-think and parroting, and 6) the math behind the data analysis is so dense that no single person can actually oversee it." After walking through the history of the field, Unzicker wraps things up by calling particle physics—as it has been conducted since 1930—"a futile enterprise in its entirety."

Paul Rogers94 said:I honestly wonder how much someone has to lack basic intelligence to swallow this nonsense. CERN basically burns through massive amounts of money for absolutely nothing—total garbage. They just need to churn out some reports that don't mean a damn thing either. Organizations like CERN or HAARP wouldn't even exist if it weren't for people like you, who let them shove abstract jargon down your throat. Seriously, we both know what this is supposed to mean, but none of those words actually signify anything real. It makes zero sense. I don't get how anyone can buy into this just because it's uttered by some "scientific authority" or because it's "CERN." Screw CERN. Just watch any documentary, and when they ask those young, stoned "scientists" what's actually going on, it’s obvious they haven't a clue and couldn't explain it if their lives depended on it. Maybe you can try explaining to me what CERN actually is and what its purpose serves—without hiding behind abstract, meaningless "science" phrases like "particle accelerator." Seriously, give it to me straight: what does CERN actually do? I haven't been able to wrap my head around it for twenty-five years. Though, from the start, it was clearly all bunk; I'm just trying to figure out how lazy a person has to be to fall for it. "God particle," "Higgs boson"... they're just hollow buzzwords used to mask the emptiness. No sane person could fall for these stupidities and "sensational discoveries" used to justify their existence—what kind of actual contribution do these "discoveries" even make?
By the way, how is it possible to photograph a hypothetical particle when it's just hypothetical? Such a particle doesn't even exist. It's just the scientific community and the Nobel committee—followed by the general public—falling for sensationalism, just like they have so many times before. That’s part of the reason why it’s so hard to find any serious critique of CERN; massive piles of cash have been thrown away for nothing, and who would ever dare admit they were being played for fools... hahaha

The Higgs Fak : How Particle Physicists Fooled The Nobel Committee



Did The Nobel Prize in Physics in 2013 make Einstein Turn in his Grave? The Higgs Fak : How Particle Physicists Fooled The Nobel Committee is a merciless critique of The Large hadron Collider AT CERN and of the theoretical model on which The World ’ is built. Unzicker, German physicist and award-winning science writer , argues that The reaction of The Swedish Academy to last year’s announcement looks less like scientific triumph and more like they were simply hoodwinked by CERN's desperate need to justify pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into the void. The book starts OFF by claiming that The Greatest physicists such as Einstein , Dirac of Schrödinger would have considered The “ discovery ” of The Higgs particle ridiculous. According to the author, the logic is simple: "1) the so-called standard model has become absurdly convoluted, 2) we still haven't cracked any of the massive physics mysteries that have stumped us for a hundred years, 3) history tells us this current model is a total dead end, 4) because their experimental setups are getting so insanely complex, particle physicists are essentially tricking themselves with their own data, 5) scientific convictions in the community are established by blind faith in expert opinions, group-think and parroting, and 6) the math behind the data analysis is so dense that no single person can actually oversee it." After walking through the history of the field, Unzicker wraps things up by calling particle physics—as it has been conducted since 1930—"a futile enterprise in its entirety."

You’ve got a solid instinct when it comes to CERN. I’ve heard through the grapevine that they're about to birth some new dogma there—basically just a high-tech rebranding of the old Roman Catholic Church doctrines. It's a massive, overcomplicated mess with zero actual substance. Just a new Trinity that those CERN priests think they're the only ones qualified to interpret.
Could be total misinformation, but we'll see...

About Svetlana 😁

Don't waste your time looking for an idiot. If they want to talk, they'll reach out.

Justin Baker6 said:You’ve got a solid instinct when it comes to CERN. I’ve heard through the grapevine that they're about to birth some new dogma there—basically just a high-tech rebranding of the old Roman Catholic Church doctrines. It's a massive, overcomplicated mess with zero actual substance. Just a new Trinity that those CERN priests think they're the only ones qualified to interpret.
Could be total misinformation, but we'll see...

For now, all we have is a photo of the God particle; next up will probably be a selfie of God himself.

Paul Rogers94 said:For now, all we have is a photo of the God particle; next up will probably be a selfie of God himself.

I'm telling you, they're cooking up a religion specifically for atheists, and once they're done, the whole world will be under the thumb of the Roman Catholic Church.

Justin Baker6 said:Don't waste your time looking for an idiot. If they want to talk, they'll reach out.

I was actually hoping for some expert insight from neonmarlin39, but you've gone and completely botched it...
If we need to, we might just have to put a muzzle on you. 🙂

Paul Rogers94 said:I was actually hoping for some expert insight from neonmarlin39, but you've gone and completely botched it...
If we need to, we might just have to put a muzzle on you. 🙂

Just move this over to the natural science PDF thread and we can keep talking there.

Paul Rogers94 said:I was actually hoping for some expert insight from neonmarlin39, but you've gone and completely botched it...
If we need to, we might just have to put a muzzle on you. 🙂

My apprentice is right on my heels.

Don't worry, I won't be hanging around here much longer. I've got word that a permanent ban is coming.

neonmarlin39 said:Just move this over to the natural science PDF thread and we can keep talking there.

Does the specific thread even matter? There's nobody here anyway—not like we need to hold a formal debate—but I’m open to hearing what people think. You don't need some dedicated arena just to exchange ideas... it isn't a confrontation, it's an exchange. I share my perspective, you share yours, keeping things rational and without all the unnecessary hostility. It's not a fight. I don't have to agree, but I'll always respect someone else's viewpoint. Don't worry about Justin Baker6—he was probably just wired and exhausted last night, running on zero sleep. He seems a lot more chill today.