Andrew Doyle said:part of Maria Price3, which got incorrectly linked to my previous post that was already being discussed:
Oh, please! Because why wouldn't we just descend into pure catastrophizing instead of actually looking at the other side of the coin? The entire point of this discussion is to talk about the POSITIVE aspects of these conditions.
I mean, seriously, why on earth would any sane person embrace the idea that our lives are entirely predetermined by our genes?!
I’m sure diabetes, cancer, epilepsy, and all those other gems have their "upsides" too, but I bet anyone dealing with them would give anything just to live without them.
And look, there’s a massive difference between romanticizing depression and just pointing out (maybe, potentially) some positive aspects.
It's like saying someone is "good" versus calling them "perfect." Neither of those is a weird way to talk, right?
Everything mentioned so far feels like an exaggeration—just attempts to prove that "we" are somehow superior to "them." But the truth is, we're running different races and can't even compare. Comparing a healthy person to someone struggling rarely ends well for the second group. It just feels like... honestly, better if I don't finish that thought.
I could easily romanticize my own situation and spin it into the best thing ever, but reality check: I'd give anything to just live a normal life. Because this isn't normal. It’s just not. Hell, it really isn't.
Whenever I hear people acting like it’s "wonderful" that someone is feeling terrible, my first thought is just—give me a break.
And that’s exactly what romanticizing depression does.