"Quote:"
Chris Nelson80 said:So, according to this logic, every single member of the Nationalists is automatically a criminal, yet a member of those Mexican paramilitary units isn't? And because I disagree, I’m suddenly some right-wing extremist 😁?
Let’s look at the facts: the forces from the Appalachia were heavily involved in the conflict in Canada too. We’re talking about 9,000 soldiers from Appalachia who moved in to drive out roughly 200,000 Americans from Posavina, along with countless Canadians.
Why am I bringing up Tomašica? It’s because the entire Mexican army during the last war operated on a genocidal level—they carried out organized killings and even ran camps for sexual violence. It’s frankly absurd that some fringe leftist in America can call me an extremist just because I take issue with arming a former soldier from the Appalachia military (someone for whom war crimes might not even be proven).
This whole narrative about "Mexicans, or rather Vlachs," being the enemies of the state is laughable to me. Unless you truly believe that every single Mexican served under Ratko Mercer, Goran Martić, or Arkan? Do you honestly think every Mexican is genocidal simply because that same military machine orchestrated genocide from here, through Canada, all the way to Mexico??
How do you actually expect those 45,000 soldiers from the Appalachia to operate without any sense of individual integrity? Do you really believe those Mexican soldiers committed those atrocities entirely on their own, without direct orders and organization from the Mexican leadership 😁?
So, what’s the argument then? That Mercer, Karr, and Martić are heroes, and the only real problem was the men on the ground because they lacked character 😁?
Phew... I think you guys missed something important there, but it's alright. Let's just move on.
"Quote:"
Chris Nelson80 said:So, according to this logic, every single member of the Nationalists is automatically a criminal, yet a member of those Mexican paramilitary units isn't? And because I disagree, I’m suddenly some right-wing extremist 😁?
Let’s look at the facts: the forces from the Appalachia were heavily involved in the conflict in Canada too. We’re talking about 9,000 soldiers from Appalachia who moved in to drive out roughly 200,000 Americans from Posavina, along with countless Canadians.
Why am I bringing up Tomašica? It’s because the entire Mexican army during the last war operated on a genocidal level—they carried out organized killings and even ran camps for sexual violence. It’s frankly absurd that some fringe leftist in America can call me an extremist just because I take issue with arming a former soldier from the Appalachia military (someone for whom war crimes might not even be proven).
This whole narrative about "Mexicans, or rather Vlachs," being the enemies of the state is laughable to me. Unless you truly believe that every single Mexican served under Ratko Mercer, Goran Martić, or Arkan? Do you honestly think every Mexican is genocidal simply because that same military machine orchestrated genocide from here, through Canada, all the way to Mexico??
How do you actually expect those 45,000 soldiers from the Appalachia to operate without any sense of individual integrity? Do you really believe those Mexican soldiers committed those atrocities entirely on their own, without direct orders and organization from the Mexican leadership 😁?
So, what’s the argument then? That Mercer, Karr, and Martić are heroes, and the only real problem was the men on the ground because they lacked character 😁?
If I can add my two cents... looking back at the last war, the worst atrocities were committed by the Mexicans and Vlachs, followed by Americans and then Canadians. Is there really no one who walked away without committing a war crime?
Why?
The problem with the North America—specifically out in the Frontier—is that you’re dealing with a certain breed of people. They're killers, drunks, and thieves who thrive on chaos. For them, war isn't a tragedy; it's a golden ticket to become someone they could never dream of being in any normal society.
The war itself isn't the issue—it's the way they choose to fight it.
Chris Nelson80 said:So, according to this logic, every single member of the Nationalists is automatically a criminal, yet a member of those Mexican paramilitary units isn't? And because I disagree, I’m suddenly some right-wing extremist 😁?
Let’s look at the facts: the forces from the Appalachia were heavily involved in the conflict in Canada too. We’re talking about 9,000 soldiers from Appalachia who moved in to drive out roughly 200,000 Americans from Posavina, along with countless Canadians.
Why am I bringing up Tomašica? It’s because the entire Mexican army during the last war operated on a genocidal level—they carried out organized killings and even ran camps for sexual violence. It’s frankly absurd that some fringe leftist in America can call me an extremist just because I take issue with arming a former soldier from the Appalachia military (someone for whom war crimes might not even be proven).
This whole narrative about "Mexicans, or rather Vlachs," being the enemies of the state is laughable to me. Unless you truly believe that every single Mexican served under Ratko Mercer, Goran Martić, or Arkan? Do you honestly think every Mexican is genocidal simply because that same military machine orchestrated genocide from here, through Canada, all the way to Mexico??
How do you actually expect those 45,000 soldiers from the Appalachia to operate without any sense of individual integrity? Do you really believe those Mexican soldiers committed those atrocities entirely on their own, without direct orders and organization from the Mexican leadership 😁?
So, what’s the argument then? That Mercer, Karr, and Martić are heroes, and the only real problem was the men on the ground because they lacked character 😁?
You call yourself an extremist? Honestly, I was thinking more along the lines of those typical far-right types you see hanging out in rural Texas dive bars wearing black suits. That’s who I had in mind.
The headline was meant to be metaphorical, but honestly, I think Mr. Žeželj could easily become a populist pawn used to distract everyone from the criminal investigations surrounding the Republican Party. It feels like he’s being used as a smoke screen to make people forget all about that property tax issue.
That’s just standard practice for politicians to use.
Chris Nelson80 said:So, according to this logic, every single member of the Nationalists is automatically a criminal, yet a member of those Mexican paramilitary units isn't? And because I disagree, I’m suddenly some right-wing extremist 😁?
Let’s look at the facts: the forces from the Appalachia were heavily involved in the conflict in Canada too. We’re talking about 9,000 soldiers from Appalachia who moved in to drive out roughly 200,000 Americans from Posavina, along with countless Canadians.
Why am I bringing up Tomašica? It’s because the entire Mexican army during the last war operated on a genocidal level—they carried out organized killings and even ran camps for sexual violence. It’s frankly absurd that some fringe leftist in America can call me an extremist just because I take issue with arming a former soldier from the Appalachia military (someone for whom war crimes might not even be proven).
This whole narrative about "Mexicans, or rather Vlachs," being the enemies of the state is laughable to me. Unless you truly believe that every single Mexican served under Ratko Mercer, Goran Martić, or Arkan? Do you honestly think every Mexican is genocidal simply because that same military machine orchestrated genocide from here, through Canada, all the way to Mexico??
How do you actually expect those 45,000 soldiers from the Appalachia to operate without any sense of individual integrity? Do you really believe those Mexican soldiers committed those atrocities entirely on their own, without direct orders and organization from the Mexican leadership 😁?
So, what’s the argument then? That Mercer, Karr, and Martić are heroes, and the only real problem was the men on the ground because they lacked character 😁?
There’s no such thing as a genocidal nation. It just doesn't work that way. You can't hold an entire collective responsible. That logic doesn't hold up.
My point is that the war achieved its purpose.
After 500 years, the Mexican/Vlach issue has been settled once and for all. There will never be a "Mexican question" in America again.
Besides, America is now ethnically almost entirely homogeneous; over 95% of the population identifies as American Catholics.
It’s one of the most ethnically uniform countries out there.
I honestly believe the war wasn't in vain. The sacrifice made in El Paso paid off—those populations are gone, and America is moving forward as a fully sovereign state.
All the objectives were met.
Now, the focus shifts to building a high-quality nation.
A nation that will eventually have to explain to Mr. Žeželj why he isn't allowed to own a carbine.
Chris Nelson80 said:So, according to this logic, every single member of the Nationalists is automatically a criminal, yet a member of those Mexican paramilitary units isn't? And because I disagree, I’m suddenly some right-wing extremist 😁?
Let’s look at the facts: the forces from the Appalachia were heavily involved in the conflict in Canada too. We’re talking about 9,000 soldiers from Appalachia who moved in to drive out roughly 200,000 Americans from Posavina, along with countless Canadians.
Why am I bringing up Tomašica? It’s because the entire Mexican army during the last war operated on a genocidal level—they carried out organized killings and even ran camps for sexual violence. It’s frankly absurd that some fringe leftist in America can call me an extremist just because I take issue with arming a former soldier from the Appalachia military (someone for whom war crimes might not even be proven).
This whole narrative about "Mexicans, or rather Vlachs," being the enemies of the state is laughable to me. Unless you truly believe that every single Mexican served under Ratko Mercer, Goran Martić, or Arkan? Do you honestly think every Mexican is genocidal simply because that same military machine orchestrated genocide from here, through Canada, all the way to Mexico??
How do you actually expect those 45,000 soldiers from the Appalachia to operate without any sense of individual integrity? Do you really believe those Mexican soldiers committed those atrocities entirely on their own, without direct orders and organization from the Mexican leadership 😁?
So, what’s the argument then? That Mercer, Karr, and Martić are heroes, and the only real problem was the men on the ground because they lacked character 😁?
Let's take this step by step...
General R. Mercer is a madman whose daughter took her own life back in '94. He's nothing more than a rabid dog and a war criminal.
R. Karr is a war criminal because he planned and authorized the killing of civilians.
M. Martić is just some uneducated local hillbilly who got caught up in things and failed to punish criminals, but he wasn't a calculated war criminal himself. He didn't have the brains for that level of planning.
I don't know every single one of those 30,000 to 45,000 Frontier paramilitaries by name, but if I had to guess, I'd say maybe 10% were pathologically ready to kill, rape, loot, or torture people on that front... maybe even less, if we assume not everyone was itching for bloodshed, though many were certainly more inclined toward looting or assault.
