CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Parenting & Kids › Students & Teens › Religion classes in school - Megathread

Religion classes in school - Megathread

Started by Susan James · · 👁 33 views · 3K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Susan JamesKaren Richardson3Jeffrey Cook55Nancy Kelly31rowdypanther12hiddenpuma3Michelle Nelson4silentraven6Robert Rodriguez9wanderingbadger44Jason Ortiz5brighteagle86feralmoose32Mark Johnson12AAnthony White8rapidbison15Ronald Lopez10Lawrence Torres56James Alvarez2Benjamin Nelson8frozenrider15Larry Walker24Chloe Roberts2 …
Karen Richardson3 Karen Richardson3 Active Member
177 messages
joined Jul 2012
#261 ·
Alexander Ortiz3 said:The real issue is that the Department of Education hasn't addressed the gaps regarding free periods, supervision, or what students are actually doing during those hours.
Religious education isn't the culprit here, nor is it the responsibility of anyone attending those classes to fix systemic issues that should be handled by the Department of Education.
Trying to solve the "free period" dilemma by making things harder for those enrolled in religious studies is the wrong way to go about it.

Even if what you’re saying is technically true—that the Catholic Church in America was granted an elective slot within the standard school day and isn't responsible for babysitting the kids who don't sign up—the real sting is how immoral that perspective feels.

That's basically why people get so worked up about this stuff in the first place.
I mean, sure, nothing catastrophic is going to happen to a kid sitting around for 45 minutes, but it boils down to this massive hypocrisy from an institution that insists on acting like the ultimate moral compass for society.

I think we can all agree that calling the Church in America a moral authority is about as believable as calling those "non-profit NGOs" anything other than political interest groups.

Honestly, it's all just a joke—both the left and the right are just different flavors of the same taxpayer-funded circus. The only thing that gives me any peace of mind is looking at the stats on how many people are fleeing this country; in another decade or so, you guys will probably end up consuming yourselves, since it seems like nobody left with a functioning brain can get through the day without being on heavy antidepressants.
Nancy Kelly31 Nancy Kelly31 Member
36 messages
joined Oct 2015
#262 ·
Jason Ortiz5 said:Look, the school nurse isn't an administrator. Period. She shouldn't be patrolling the halls telling kids what to do, let alone trying to play hall monitor and "enforce order."

🤔 But whose employee are they supposed to be, for heaven's sake?! I had simply assumed we were talking about a layperson serving as a religion instructor. If some random volunteer just wandered in off the street and started patrolling the halls and playing judge and jury in the school, then yes, I absolutely agree—that is a serious issue that needs to be addressed, and such a person should be removed from the building immediately.

Don't you realize that every single religious educator is under a microscope, being pulled in two different directions by two separate superiors, both of whom have their own legitimate demands?
The first superior is the principal, who expects pedagogical expertise, monitors lesson plans, observes classroom instruction, and scrutinizes every little detail regarding professional teaching standards. Then, the second superior is the Bishop, who ensures the instructor is teaching and living in strict accordance with Catholic doctrine. Two bosses. And that’s not even mentioning all the parents who would love nothing more than to swoop in and try to boss them around too... whether it's for the students enrolled in their specific class or those who aren't. 👏 Honestly... ☕
Jason Ortiz5 Jason Ortiz5 Regular
325 messages
joined Mar 2025
#263 ·
Nancy Kelly31 said:🤔 But whose employee are they supposed to be, for heaven's sake?! I had simply assumed we were talking about a layperson serving as a religion instructor. If some random volunteer just wandered in off the street and started patrolling the halls and playing judge and jury in the school, then yes, I absolutely agree—that is a serious issue that needs to be addressed, and such a person should be removed from the building immediately.

Don't you realize that every single religious educator is under a microscope, being pulled in two different directions by two separate superiors, both of whom have their own legitimate demands?
The first superior is the principal, who expects pedagogical expertise, monitors lesson plans, observes classroom instruction, and scrutinizes every little detail regarding professional teaching standards. Then, the second superior is the Bishop, who ensures the instructor is teaching and living in strict accordance with Catholic doctrine. Two bosses. And that’s not even mentioning all the parents who would love nothing more than to swoop in and try to boss them around too... whether it's for the students enrolled in their specific class or those who aren't. 👏 Honestly... ☕

Honestly, I don't even care who she works for. She isn't a teacher, a professor, a psychologist, a principal, or even a janitor. She isn't even a full member of the school staff. She isn't there for the kids; she's there specifically to divide them, separate them, and teach intolerance and hypocrisy... By the way, she isn't even officially on duty; she's just playing "authority figure" in the hallways. It’s already too much how they push certain kids—like the ones in choir, drama, or dance—to participate in everything. They don't even ask if the kids actually *want* to join in on stuff with religious themes... Honestly, it's just classic aggressive behavior from the church and its people in our society... 😢
Jason Ortiz5 Jason Ortiz5 Regular
325 messages
joined Mar 2025
#264 ·
Nah, I’m really not looking to let her boss me around. And I definitely don't want her thinking she can pull that same power trip on my kid.
Nancy Kelly31 Nancy Kelly31 Member
36 messages
joined Oct 2015
#265 ·
Jason Ortiz5 said:Honestly, I don't even care who she works for. She isn't a teacher, a professor, a psychologist, a principal, or even a janitor. She isn't even a full member of the school staff. She isn't there for the kids; she's there specifically to divide them, separate them, and teach intolerance and hypocrisy... By the way, she isn't even officially on duty; she's just playing "authority figure" in the hallways. It’s already too much how they push certain kids—like the ones in choir, drama, or dance—to participate in everything. They don't even ask if the kids actually *want* to join in on stuff with religious themes... Honestly, it's just classic aggressive behavior from the church and its people in our society... 😢

I am somewhat perplexed by this reasoning. How can someone with advanced pedagogical credentials employed at a school not be considered a teacher or a professor? 🤔 She could certainly become a principal if she were elected to that role... Just as an IT teacher or a foreign language instructor isn't necessarily there for every single child in the building, neither is she...
Furthermore, I fail to see how she isn't on duty. Hallway supervision is a standard part of the responsibilities for all educational staff members. Perhaps the specific period supervisor or the shift lead isn't on duty at that moment... I cannot say for certain...
I simply do not understand. I truly do not... I find myself at a loss...
Robert Rodriguez9 Robert Rodriguez9 Active Member
173 messages
joined Sep 2018
#266 ·
I don't quite follow. I know some teachers also act as homeroom instructors (in high school, at least—not sure how it works in middle school). The only way this makes sense is if there’s a specific distinction between a chaplain and a regular teacher that prevents the former from being a homeroom lead. 😕
In any case, what this "honorary" staffer (is she even an official 🤔?) said was completely uncalled for from a pedagogical standpoint. As an educator with degrees in psychology and pedagogy, she really should know better.
Alexander Ortiz3 Alexander Ortiz3 Active Member
164 messages
joined Jan 2012
#267 ·
Jason Ortiz5 said:Honestly, I don't even care who she works for. She isn't a teacher, a professor, a psychologist, a principal, or even a janitor. She isn't even a full member of the school staff. She isn't there for the kids; she's there specifically to divide them, separate them, and teach intolerance and hypocrisy... By the way, she isn't even officially on duty; she's just playing "authority figure" in the hallways. It’s already too much how they push certain kids—like the ones in choir, drama, or dance—to participate in everything. They don't even ask if the kids actually *want* to join in on stuff with religious themes... Honestly, it's just classic aggressive behavior from the church and its people in our society... 😢

You're spreading falsehoods, to put it mildly.
Religious instructors are full members, with all the rights and responsibilities, of the teaching faculty in elementary and high schools, or the educator staff in preschool institutions.
http://www.congress.gov/legislation/...
Religious instructors are full members of the teaching faculty just like any other teacher or professor in an American school. There is no difference! There is nothing stopping a religious instructor from becoming a principal or a homeroom teacher. In fact, there are plenty of principals who started out as religious instructors.
As for the rest of that post, which is just filled with hate, I won't even dignify it with a response. I can only feel sorry for a child growing up in such an atmosphere.
Matthew Young35 Matthew Young35 Veteran
1.1K messages
joined Jan 2018
#268 ·
Look... there are some of us who simply don't want our children being raised by nuns. I know I'm one of them.
They should be removed from the school system.
It’s ridiculous—it's as if we were living under an Islamic Caliphate, yet we're strictly Catholic.

I have no desire to see nuns educating our kids in our schools.
Is that too much to ask?
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#269 ·
I personally would never tell a child not to listen to someone just because of their faith, but I can't help wondering how those deeply offended Catholics would react if they saw a Muslim guard watching over their kids in school hallways and handing out discipline. 😁
Nancy Kelly31 Nancy Kelly31 Member
36 messages
joined Oct 2015
#270 ·
So, what’s your take on this, you lot? If we are looking at an individual who possesses the requisite pedagogical credentials and holds their position within the school because their religious community—just as ours is entitled to do—has the right to provide spiritual guidance to its members, all while serving as a faculty member on hallway duty, then who truly has any grounds to object?! In my view, the modern educational landscape has become far too feminized these days, which I find rather concerning... but perhaps that is a discussion for another time...
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#271 ·
Yeah, obviously.
And I guess you wouldn't mind one bit if kids had to listen to a sermon during their school plays 😁
Sure, sure 😁
Nancy Kelly31 Nancy Kelly31 Member
36 messages
joined Oct 2015
#272 ·
What kind of question does one truly pose when they find themselves doubting an answer, not because of its lack of merit, but because it conflicts so sharply with their own preconceived notions? 🤷
silentraven6 silentraven6 Regular
276 messages
joined Nov 2018
#273 ·
Nancy Kelly31 said:What kind of question does one truly pose when they find themselves doubting an answer, not because of its lack of merit, but because it conflicts so sharply with their own preconceived notions? 🤷

Let’s look at it this way, then. How many teachers have actually brought an imam, a rabbi, or an Orthodox priest—literally anyone from a different faith tradition—into their classroom just to help students grasp the concept of ecumenism?
James Alvarez2 James Alvarez2 Active Member
96 messages
joined Mar 2015
#274 ·
Karen Richardson3 said:One more thing: I honestly find it pretty bizarre that American Catholics who actually live out their faith every single day—passing those values down to their kids through daily prayer and regular church attendance—would even feel the need for a 45-minute religion class at school twice a week.

And it’s weird (at least from my perspective as an atheist) that someone has to rack up a certain number of "participation points" for attending Mass just to qualify for First Communion or Confirmation. It almost makes it feel like going to Mass is some kind of chore or a penalty you have to serve, rather than a genuine celebration of faith.

In the context of a Catholic faith that's supposed to teach self-denial and humility, this whole topic feels totally out of place:

Why do we constantly feel this pressure to be politically correct?
Out of everyone who signs their kids up for religious education, maybe 20%* actually sit down with their children at home to pray before meals or read the Bible.
The rest of them seem to send their kids just so they can prove they aren't Mexicans or old-school communists.
From what I recall of the Bible, there isn't a single word in there about the historical struggles between Americans and Mexicans, no matter how much some American priests might try to spin it that way. 😁

* And honestly, I don't even think that percentage is that high, but you get my point.

Look, I'm with everyone else on this, but you're dead wrong here. Faith is just like anything else in life—it's something you're taught. You can sit a kid down at home and teach them their ABCs, math, or how to read a map... same goes for teaching them how to pray or use a rosary. But just like the English language is way more than just letters, and math is much more than just numbers, religion is about a hell of a lot more than just saying grace before dinner...
Yeah, should be.
But not at school, definitely not in the middle of class, and certainly not while people are actually paying attention...
First things first—been getting this stuff at home since forever...

After all that nonsense about collecting points, it’s not even about some kind of penalty. It's just how she lives out her faith through the core of it... attending Mass with her local parish.
Nobody ever admits that kids just don't always feel like showing up. I used to love my martial arts classes, but there were days I just couldn't deal because I was wiped out or my friends were all hanging out at the mall... Same thing with church. Sometimes I’d rather just sit there watching cartoons in the morning. It wasn't like I thought Mass was some kind of punishment. If you actually grew up with your faith, following tradition isn't a chore. If it feels like a punishment, then fine—don't bother with Sunday school, Mass, or First Communion. Just skip it. It's totally fine to miss service if you're not feeling it or if the timing just sucks. Look, instead of counting down to one single ceremony, there are basically fifty-seven different chances throughout the year to show up and get those points...
Not even a thing. My training sessions are always at the same damn time, too. Besides, there are plenty of masses throughout the week and on Sundays. If your church doesn't work for you, just find another one...

Look, you gotta be careful when you're talking about those little "plus" marks or moving up levels. It’s not just some participation trophy. If I sign up for an intensive language course to hit the next level, I actually have to pass an exam. Same thing with Taekwondo—you don't just get a new belt; you earn it. You want to move up a grade in school? You need solid grades. You want to play in a varsity basketball game? You better show up and grind at practice first. Even with stuff like a baptism, your parents and godparents are basically testifying for you... but once it comes to things like First Communion or Confirmation, that responsibility falls squarely on your shoulders. That’s why you need real prep work. And at the end of the day, it all goes back to the parents being the foundation of everything...

Lawrence Torres56 said:Thanks for sharing your thoughts!😉
So, what, I should just go ahead and become illiterate too? Is that the plan?🎉

Who on earth is bringing up politics and democracy here? Seriously... let’s just cut the crap and drop the insinuations and the political demagoguery, alright? Look, you don't have to agree with my take—that's your right—but why the hell the sudden accusations?😲😁
Look, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we aren't actually going to be a true secular nation until we finally draw a hard line between the state and the church. Honestly, as long as we keep talking about separation while simultaneously leaning on phrases like "God willing" or keeping religious education in our public schools, all this talk about being a secular country is nothing more than empty noise. It's just pure theater, you know? Can we really claim to be separate when our very language and school systems are still wrapped up in religious tradition? To me, it's all just talk until we actually walk the walk.😉 And honestly, I just don't see any point in us clinging to something that isn't even true, you know? Why would we bother pretending when the facts are staring us right in the face?

Honestly, I don't even have an issue with most people, whether they belong to the majority or the minority groups out there.
I’m honestly just asking from a purely human perspective here—is this actually okay? Like, does it make any sense for twenty-two students and their twenty-two parents to all have to bend over backwards and adjust their entire lives around one or two people? We're talking about everyone having to coordinate afternoon trips to religious education classes twice a week, just because. Is it really reasonable to expect that many families to shift their schedules, or shouldn't those one or two people—and their parents—just stand their ground on their beliefs? Why can't they just let things be and not cause a whole scene while the kids are hanging out in the library during those classes? Seriously, which way is actually more practical or even remotely doable for everyone involved?
I mean, honestly, would the same people demanding all this from everyone else actually have the guts to say the exact same thing if the tables were turned tomorrow? Would they really stand by those same principles if they were the ones sitting in the hot seat instead of pointing fingers? It makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Look, I’m saying this with total sincerity here—and please, don't take this the wrong way because I'm really not trying to offend anyone—but I honestly get the feeling that if we just let kids be kids and actually let them make their own choices for once, this whole mess wouldn't even be an issue in the first place. Isn't it funny how we adults act like we're all about preaching tolerance from our high horses, while we're simultaneously the ones fueling all this intolerance and hatred? We're basically creating the very problems we claim to be fighting, aren't we?

So, is my kid actually going to go through with getting baptized, start talking about God, or whatever? Honestly, it’s not even on my radar, and it's definitely not something that's causing me any sleepless nights. I mean, let him do his thing, right? As long as he isn't out there hurting people or causing chaos, why should I care? It honestly cracks me up when people make such a massive production out of this stuff—like, why all the heavy drama and the intense scrutiny over something so personal?
It is honestly hilarious—like, laugh-out-loud ridiculous—that someone actually thinks they can strip away rights from an entire class of kids just because it doesn't suit their own kid or their personal agenda😉, right? I mean, where does this even end? Tomorrow, someone’s going to decide math is too difficult, so why not just scrap math altogether? Then it’ll be English lit next, and before you know it, we’re looking at the total abolition of the school system itself☕ because there will always be someone out there who’s unhappy with how things work.

My little one isn't going to participate in PE tomorrow because she’s got this cough and feels like she might be running a fever... so she’ll just be sitting on the sidelines watching everyone else play... and what am I supposed to do here, really? Should I go demand that the teacher or the school cancels PE for the whole damn class just so my child doesn't feel isolated or left out?

If you look at it through a certain lens, it’s the exact same headache we deal with regarding religious education, just applied to a different subject... and would it even be decent of me to make that demand? Even if, by some twisted logic, I technically have the right to ask for it?

Not cool, man. You’re quoting another one of my posts where I said I wouldn't send my kid to Islamic school just to end up living in a country that's already mostly Muslim...

I don't see how you can even call yourself a believer, let alone a parent, sending your kid to Sunday school...
Are you teaching a kid to completely lose their sense of self just because of where they happen to be living?
Doesn't matter if it's religion or whatever else.
Waving faith around isn't actual faith.
But faith isn't just "I'll teach them what everyone else learns."
And look, this is basically the whole problem with religious ed in public schools. You’d send your kid to a Catholic class just because everyone else is doing it. Someone else does the same with a different denomination just to fit in. I don't get how you guys don't see the issue here.

Lawrence Torres56 said:Thanks for sharing your thoughts!😉
So, what, I should just go ahead and become illiterate too? Is that the plan?🎉

Who on earth is bringing up politics and democracy here? Seriously... let’s just cut the crap and drop the insinuations and the political demagoguery, alright? Look, you don't have to agree with my take—that's your right—but why the hell the sudden accusations?😲😁
Look, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we aren't actually going to be a true secular nation until we finally draw a hard line between the state and the church. Honestly, as long as we keep talking about separation while simultaneously leaning on phrases like "God willing" or keeping religious education in our public schools, all this talk about being a secular country is nothing more than empty noise. It's just pure theater, you know? Can we really claim to be separate when our very language and school systems are still wrapped up in religious tradition? To me, it's all just talk until we actually walk the walk.😉 And honestly, I just don't see any point in us clinging to something that isn't even true, you know? Why would we bother pretending when the facts are staring us right in the face?

Honestly, I don't even have an issue with most people, whether they belong to the majority or the minority groups out there.
I’m honestly just asking from a purely human perspective here—is this actually okay? Like, does it make any sense for twenty-two students and their twenty-two parents to all have to bend over backwards and adjust their entire lives around one or two people? We're talking about everyone having to coordinate afternoon trips to religious education classes twice a week, just because. Is it really reasonable to expect that many families to shift their schedules, or shouldn't those one or two people—and their parents—just stand their ground on their beliefs? Why can't they just let things be and not cause a whole scene while the kids are hanging out in the library during those classes? Seriously, which way is actually more practical or even remotely doable for everyone involved?
I mean, honestly, would the same people demanding all this from everyone else actually have the guts to say the exact same thing if the tables were turned tomorrow? Would they really stand by those same principles if they were the ones sitting in the hot seat instead of pointing fingers? It makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Look, I’m saying this with total sincerity here—and please, don't take this the wrong way because I'm really not trying to offend anyone—but I honestly get the feeling that if we just let kids be kids and actually let them make their own choices for once, this whole mess wouldn't even be an issue in the first place. Isn't it funny how we adults act like we're all about preaching tolerance from our high horses, while we're simultaneously the ones fueling all this intolerance and hatred? We're basically creating the very problems we claim to be fighting, aren't we?

So, is my kid actually going to go through with getting baptized, start talking about God, or whatever? Honestly, it’s not even on my radar, and it's definitely not something that's causing me any sleepless nights. I mean, let him do his thing, right? As long as he isn't out there hurting people or causing chaos, why should I care? It honestly cracks me up when people make such a massive production out of this stuff—like, why all the heavy drama and the intense scrutiny over something so personal?
It is honestly hilarious—like, laugh-out-loud ridiculous—that someone actually thinks they can strip away rights from an entire class of kids just because it doesn't suit their own kid or their personal agenda😉, right? I mean, where does this even end? Tomorrow, someone’s going to decide math is too difficult, so why not just scrap math altogether? Then it’ll be English lit next, and before you know it, we’re looking at the total abolition of the school system itself☕ because there will always be someone out there who’s unhappy with how things work.

My little one isn't going to participate in PE tomorrow because she’s got this cough and feels like she might be running a fever... so she’ll just be sitting on the sidelines watching everyone else play... and what am I supposed to do here, really? Should I go demand that the teacher or the school cancels PE for the whole damn class just so my child doesn't feel isolated or left out?

If you look at it through a certain lens, it’s the exact same headache we deal with regarding religious education, just applied to a different subject... and would it even be decent of me to make that demand? Even if, by some twisted logic, I technically have the right to ask for it?

Look, YOU—and no other parent for that matter—aren't dragging 19 kids to school. You're only responsible for your own kid (or two, or three...). So technically, it's the exact same deal for you as it is for the parent whose kid isn't taking the class: coordinating an afternoon arrival for any elective. You aren't the majority since you don't have 10 kids in the class. Not all parents in a grade work at the same company, take the same bus, or even live in the same neighborhood. You're acting like an individual. It's pretty embarrassing to preach a faith that's supposed to promote equality, caring for neighbors, and loving your friends while holding these kinds of views.

Alexander Ortiz3 said:Often, religious education instructors teach across multiple schools to build up enough hours for a full schedule, and frequently, there is only one instructor per school. How is that single teacher supposed to teach every grade during the first or last period if there are more classes than available slots—not to mention if they're traveling between different schools? In many cases, scheduling religious studies for the first or last period is simply technically impossible.
The issue lies entirely with the Department of Education; they have essentially left students who don't participate in religious studies to fend for themselves. In high schools, this is resolved by offering Ethics and Religion as a subject.
Why this hasn't been organized similarly in elementary schools is anyone's guess. It's possible the government finds it too expensive to pay ethics teachers when dealing with very small groups of students. Regardless, those interested should put pressure on the Department of Education to ensure adequate supervision for all students not attending religious studies, no matter the cost. Why Ethics and Religion aren't offered in elementary schools remains the real question.

Are you some religious ed teacher terrified for your job because fewer kids are showing up, and the ones who do are only there because they have to be?
Asking because I don't see any other reason for this kind of talk.

Exactly, most religious ed teachers do cover several schools. Wouldn't it be easier to just bring the kids from the same district to a church and knock out a solid 6-7 hour block? No driving between schools, no sitting in traffic, no 19 miles idling in the car between campuses and home? I don't get it, common sense says that's the easier way.
Even if it wasn't at a church, even if it was at the school during an off-shift like every other elective, wouldn't that still be easier to organize?

Why even bring up Ethics?

Alexander Ortiz3 said:When I say 90%, I’m talking about the rough percentage of school-aged kids enrolled in religious education classes. It tends to be slightly higher during elementary school and dips a bit during high school, but there isn't really any massive deviation from that figure.
Now, how many of those students and their families actually practice their faith on a daily basis is an entirely different conversation. You see all sorts of examples—kids from non-religious households finding their way toward faith, and others moving in the opposite direction.
Personally, I am strongly against forcing anyone to attend religious classes; that would be terrible. At the same time, I don't believe anyone should be discouraged or blocked from attending if they want to.
Choosing to opt out of religious studies just to follow a fad is honestly ridiculous. I don't even know what to say about parents who just chase after fleeting trends... though I doubt there are many like that. Who would actually send their child to listen to something they consider "bad" just because it's trendy?
The only downside I see here is that the government hasn't organized ethics classes in elementary schools the way they have in high schools, which leads to these issues with unsupervised free periods.
Furthermore, I’ve never heard the vast majority of people who choose religious education calling for it to be made mandatory for everyone. On the flip side, you constantly hear complaints from the minority who don't want it, often leading to calls to ban religious education for everyone, including those who actually want it. As for those parents who care more about neighborhood gossip than their own child's well-being, it's probably best not to even engage with them.
Looking at parental guidance, many parents don't bother teaching their children how to read or do basic math, yet they still send them to school to learn those things.
The bottom line is this: religious education is strictly voluntary. There are no negative consequences for those who choose not to participate. Trying to get into the specific reasons why someone chooses one faith over another—or none at all—is a complicated rabbit hole.
The only real issue is the gap in the schedule during those free periods, and the responsibility lies solely with the state to organize something for them. No one else can step in to handle that, and it's certainly not up to the Church to manage public school schedules.

P.S. According to official data from the 2011 Census, over 90% of Americans identify with various religious denominations, while atheists and agnostics make up less than 10%. Various religious organizations can organize these classes in accordance with parental interests.

I have to admit, I didn't quite follow your point about the "excessive Mass." I assume you're referring to the Roman Catholic Church. The truth is, nobody can force you to send your child to any religious service. If you do choose to send them, then you have to accept the rules of the religious community you selected for your child. Otherwise, find another one. We live in a free country.
If a parent views a religious rite as senseless or unnecessary, I truly wonder why they would expose their own children to something they hold such a negative opinion about.

1. Yeah, true. I'm one of those people. No one in my house goes to church—honestly, I don't even think they know how to make the Sign of the Cross properly. I went to religious ed because I chose to. I did my First Communion and Confirmation because I wanted to. I stayed in the community by choice. I never told my friends they had to cross themselves before eating, and I never told anyone they were going to hell just because they didn't pray with me. I never spoke ill of anyone at home either.

2. It's not some trend. I don't think we're anywhere near that. There's nothing "trendy" about kids doing religious ed. They go because they just go. Because their friends go. Because the older folks went. They go so they aren't stuck in the hallway, or because their best friend is enrolled. It's easier to just drift with the current than fight it. And then you get the double lessons, the Masses where participation is forced, sacraments that the parents don't even understand...

3. Let me give you a different perspective. I worked on the 2010 Census. I wasn't just crunching numbers behind a desk; I was out door-to-door, actually talking to people. I talked to about 1,100 people. Want to know how people answer questions about religion?
"Write whatever you want." (And since I can't do that, I just write 'declined to state')
"Uh... just put Catholic."
"Just so they don't think we're [Group X]."
"Write whatever everyone else writes."
"Wait, what's the deal with the President?"
I'll be listing their kids (who aren't there) and asking if they want me to include them. Parents will say, "Put Catholic for him too, he doesn't care..." Then the kid pops up at the door (even though I hadn't written anything yet) and says, "Put agnostic."

Honestly, I'm embarrassed by those Catholics, by believers in general. It's embarrassing that they claim to belong to the same community I do.
And no, statistics like that aren't a real reflection of what's happening in the country.

4. As for the "extra Mass," that's for me. My main Mass is the youth Mass held in our parish in the evening. But I want to help these little kids see Mass the way I saw it—the reason why I decided to stay. (I don't have kids of my own). So I show up to the extra 9 AM Mass to project song lyrics on the wall, to help the teachers engage the kids, to help with the music and the new altar servers... You know why so many people show up to that specific Mass (besides the ones who attend for themselves)? Because parents just drop their kids off in the church parking lot and pick them up after.
My parents (people who don't even know how to cross themselves) were at almost every Sunday Mass with me. They didn't get why I cared, but they saw I was interested in something, and they backed me up. Just like they showed up to my soccer games even though they didn't know a single rule of the sport.

That bolded part right there? That’s the whole reason parents sign their kids up for religious ed in the first place. If a parent doesn't see the point of Mass, Sunday school, First Communion, or all those Holy Week services—what's the kid even supposed to get out of religious class? Or the stuff they do at school? Look, if they can't wrap their heads around the logic, fine, they don't have to "get" it... but if they see their kid finding meaning in it, why fight it? Just let them be.
If you're a religious education teacher, I'd love to see some actual stats or even just what parents really think about everything their kids are forced to go through before receiving their sacraments.
James Alvarez2 James Alvarez2 Active Member
96 messages
joined Mar 2015
#275 ·
Alexander Ortiz3 said:Regardless of all the noise being made about this, I’m just trying to point out the core issue here: kids who don't opt into religious studies end up with a free period on their schedule.
They also have one fewer subject to worry about—and honestly, it’s a pretty easy one to manage.
The most logical fix would be to introduce an ethics course for them, similar to how it's handled in American high schools. That way, everyone's schedule stays balanced, and instead of adding more stress, you're giving them a lighter subject that actually helps boost their GPA.
If implementing an ethics class in elementary schools proves too complicated, a second alternative would be to organize supervised library time for any student with a free period. They could use that hour to read, catch up on homework, or study for their next class under the guidance of a librarian. With a little bit of cooperation, this should be easily solvable at any school... especially since the government was just bragging about how every single school in the country now has a fully equipped library and computer labs, right?

It’s perfectly understandable that parents are worried about what their children are doing during those unsupervised hours, but the fact that most kids choose religious studies voluntarily—while a small minority also chooses it voluntarily—means that specific subject isn't the cause of this logistical mess.
The Department of Education really should have resolved this free period issue by now in a way that doesn't create extra hurdles for the majority of students attending religious classes.

And you're telling me the Church isn't to blame? Like they aren't just playing blind to the fact that there's one elective stuck right in the middle of the daily schedule?
How can the Church claim to promote values that would actually give ALL kids TWO HOURS back in their week, or let the kids who want religion class take it during a different shift?

Alexander Ortiz3 said:Reverse scheduling wouldn't work for those attending religion classes. Why would they want to make an extra trip from home to the school when the alternative is for the kids who *don't* attend religion class to spend their free hour inside the building?
So, it's a completely selfish opinion that only looks out for their own interests without caring if it makes life harder for everyone else.

Hold up, hold up. What about the other electives?
Is it fair to the kids taking Computer Science? Or English? Or extra Math?
Why wouldn't switching shifts work for the religion students?
I get home at 1 PM, grab a snack, knock out some homework, chill for a bit, and then at 4 or 5 PM I head to religion class. I'll go with my buddy from down the street who's in the same boat. We'll walk, hang out, talk about homework...
Where's the actual problem here?
Meanwhile, our friend who isn't in religion might be in Computer Science then. Or English. Or soccer. Or just hanging at the park.

Frank Hughes40 said:Honestly, I don't get why everyone is making such a massive deal over a single period.

If religion class is just another slot in the schedule, kids can always study something else—especially if they have a big test coming up in a different subject. It’s not like every single grade level has that class during first or last period anyway, right?

Moving it to the afternoon shift? That sounds completely nonsensical to me.

And let’s be real: most issues or incidents at school have absolutely nothing to do with religious studies; they're about student behavior. Period.
-The "troublemakers"- In my school, the truly problematic ones were actually the math teachers and those instructors who gave more than half the class a failing grade. Yet, nobody ever started a petition to get them fired, even though they were genuinely unhinged and constantly dodging their responsibilities.

Anyway, all this drama over religion class... meanwhile, I'm standing in the hallway trying to read, study, or finish homework that I won't even have to touch once I get home.

It's not one hour. It's two hours a week. Multiply that by the number of school weeks. If I'm not mistaken—that's 70 school hours.
Someone's kid could have spent those 70 hours sleeping, staring at a wall, knitting, or fixing bike chains with all the neighbors on the block. That's not my business and yours. You chose what you wanted your kid to do for those 70 hours. Why shouldn't another parent have the right to choose for their kid?

Henry Lopez10 said:You know what the most interesting thing is?
The kids themselves don't care one bit about having religious education classes at school. Not the ones attending them, and certainly not the ones whose parents opt them out. Not at all.

The only people who seem to have a problem with religious studies in schools are the parents of the children who don't attend these optional classes. They act like it's some massive tragedy or a deep trauma if their child spends an hour sitting in the library reading something or just hanging out on a computer.
Aargh, as if that will tragically derail their development in this world full of pink sunshine and rainbows.🙂
I haven’t heard any kid coming forward to loudly claim they are being discriminated against, bullied, or neglected just because they aren't going to religion class. It’s really just that it bothers their parents... the kids aren't whining about being forced into it.
It's the neoliberal parents who are whining.
As a "trauma," it’s apparently a disaster if a child gets to head home early (presumably because tennis practice isn't until 6 PM) or if they pick up a book.
Oh, and heaven forbid they socialize a little with classmates at school or chat outside during recess... yikes.
Horror!
Not a single child has claimed they would much rather spend those hours grinding through physics or extra math drills.
No, it's just the parents—specifically the parents whose kids don't go to religion class—who think it's a waste of time.😵
They want to decide for everyone, attempting to dictate where children should be enrolled based on the free will of other parents who choose to have their kids attend religious studies. Give me a break!
It's the absurdity of neoliberal bullsh— Pardon me. Trying to dictate someone else's free choice just because you personally don't like it.😁
You don't want your kid in religion class? Fine... then don't send them. It's not mandatory.
Foreign language requirements aren't mandatory either, yet nobody goes on a crusade about discriminating against kids who don't want to take them. Nobody asks via Contra or B.A.B.A. where the rest of the kids are being discriminated against while George is busy learning German. They don't worry if or how much their little Steffek is suffering because he isn't conjugating verbs, but is instead resting his brain from studying 90% useless information.
Fair enough?

Meanwhile, those same people who nitpick over religious education try to force their kids to spend that hour studying partisan history, queer culture, algorithms, or some endless list of activities they cram them into without even asking:"Would you really, truly want to play the cello or study Japanese on Tuesdays and Thursdays, or are you doing this just to please Mommy and Daddy? Honey, what would you actually do in your free time? Play outside, stay in with Barbies, play video games, or just bounce a tennis ball around?"
Ask your kids honestly. Tell them they can stay home if they don't want to go anymore and that there won't be any trouble. Show them some respect, be democratic, and then you'll see what the kids actually say. Cello, German lessons, or playing?
😉
Let's run a poll on how many kids are pushed into various extracurriculars just so parents can prove to themselves that their kids are super smart and they are super elite parents.
Let's run a poll on what those kids actually think about the parents forcing them into rigid schedules of tennis, cello, language lessons, swimming, ballet, karate, and so on.
Sound good?☕
Let the kids decide for themselves whether they’d rather play the cello or attend religion class. I mean, since we are *so* liberal and care *so* deeply about children's rights and our own kids.
See you tomorrow for coffee.


You want to hear something even funnier?
Kids—both the ones in class and the ones out of it—wouldn't give a damn if we called the subject Eating Ice Cream Until We Feel Sick or Playing Ball Until It Gets Dark, Even Though Half the Class Can't Even Spell the Letter R... which we don't teach because, well, obviously.
But parents? They’d probably have a massive problem with that.

rowdypanther12 said:Yeah, obviously.
And I guess you wouldn't mind one bit if kids had to listen to a sermon during their school plays 😁
Sure, sure 😁

Look, personally? I wouldn't care.
But I know my own faith inside and out, so nothing else feels like a threat to me.
Actually, my teacher taught me that we all pray to the same God, just in different ways. That other faiths are just more stuff to discover, not some threat you gotta wipe out.

(Sorry mods for the double post, couldn't fit it all in one)
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#276 ·
James Alvarez2 said:And you're telling me the Church isn't to blame? Like they aren't just playing blind to the fact that there's one elective stuck right in the middle of the daily schedule?
How can the Church claim to promote values that would actually give ALL kids TWO HOURS back in their week, or let the kids who want religion class take it during a different shift?

Hold up, hold up. What about the other electives?
Is it fair to the kids taking Computer Science? Or English? Or extra Math?
Why wouldn't switching shifts work for the religion students?
I get home at 1 PM, grab a snack, knock out some homework, chill for a bit, and then at 4 or 5 PM I head to religion class. I'll go with my buddy from down the street who's in the same boat. We'll walk, hang out, talk about homework...
Where's the actual problem here?
Meanwhile, our friend who isn't in religion might be in Computer Science then. Or English. Or soccer. Or just hanging at the park.

It's not one hour. It's two hours a week. Multiply that by the number of school weeks. If I'm not mistaken—that's 70 school hours.
Someone's kid could have spent those 70 hours sleeping, staring at a wall, knitting, or fixing bike chains with all the neighbors on the block. That's not my business and yours. You chose what you wanted your kid to do for those 70 hours. Why shouldn't another parent have the right to choose for their kid?

You want to hear something even funnier?
Kids—both the ones in class and the ones out of it—wouldn't give a damn if we called the subject Eating Ice Cream Until We Feel Sick or Playing Ball Until It Gets Dark, Even Though Half the Class Can't Even Spell the Letter R... which we don't teach because, well, obviously.
But parents? They’d probably have a massive problem with that.

Look, personally? I wouldn't care.
But I know my own faith inside and out, so nothing else feels like a threat to me.
Actually, my teacher taught me that we all pray to the same God, just in different ways. That other faiths are just more stuff to discover, not some threat you gotta wipe out.

(Sorry mods for the double post, couldn't fit it all in one)

You didn't even seem offended by those parents wanting to strip religious studies and blessings from public schools.😁
Nancy Kelly31 Nancy Kelly31 Member
36 messages
joined Oct 2015
#277 ·
silentraven6 said:Let’s look at it this way, then. How many teachers have actually brought an imam, a rabbi, or an Orthodox priest—literally anyone from a different faith tradition—into their classroom just to help students grasp the concept of ecumenism?

How on earth am I supposed to know the answer to that? 🤷 I suppose it depends entirely on how much access they have to an imam, a rabbi, or an Orthodox priest... where I live, there isn't a single one in sight... I honestly don't see how a teacher would even go about finding them...
In major cities, I imagine things work quite differently. I know a friend who teaches religion, and for the last six or seven years, she has organized visits for every single generation to that Orthodox church over in downtown Manhattan and to the local Jewish community center. I know this because I happened to be waiting for a friend near the plaza once and saw them there, which led to a lovely little chat about where they were headed... 😁
I also know that in the suburbs, some teachers head over to the local mosque simply because it's nearby, and since they teach Islamic studies in school, they find ways to exchange perspectives...
And then there is that one teacher from the South who writes all about his interfaith visits on his personal blog...
I even recall hearing about a group of kids from my parish traveling out toward the outskirts of the state, eventually visiting a Greek Catholic community tucked away in the Appalachians...

So, what kind of response is actually being sought here?... 🤷
James Alvarez2 James Alvarez2 Active Member
96 messages
joined Mar 2015
#278 ·
rowdypanther12 said:You didn't even seem offended by those parents wanting to strip religious studies and blessings from public schools.😁

It wasn't even aimed at you. I was just calling out those people who can't wrap their heads around why having religion class in the middle of the school day is such a mess. The topic was solid and the point hit right on what I was saying, so I had to chime in... 😁

And she said it right to your faces, too... honestly, I felt like I was getting called out personally just because I admitted I believe in God... 🤣
Not really looking to dive headfirst into this group... too much nonsense being posted here that I don't even get... 😁

Nancy Kelly31 said:How on earth am I supposed to know the answer to that? 🤷 I suppose it depends entirely on how much access they have to an imam, a rabbi, or an Orthodox priest... where I live, there isn't a single one in sight... I honestly don't see how a teacher would even go about finding them...
In major cities, I imagine things work quite differently. I know a friend who teaches religion, and for the last six or seven years, she has organized visits for every single generation to that Orthodox church over in downtown Manhattan and to the local Jewish community center. I know this because I happened to be waiting for a friend near the plaza once and saw them there, which led to a lovely little chat about where they were headed... 😁
I also know that in the suburbs, some teachers head over to the local mosque simply because it's nearby, and since they teach Islamic studies in school, they find ways to exchange perspectives...
And then there is that one teacher from the South who writes all about his interfaith visits on his personal blog...
I even recall hearing about a group of kids from my parish traveling out toward the outskirts of the state, eventually visiting a Greek Catholic community tucked away in the Appalachians...

So, what kind of response is actually being sought here?... 🤷


Just waiting on some smartass response like: "You can't tell me a Protestant, Jewish, or whatever other minister doesn't have a car and can't make it where they're called..." Or that our local pastor doesn't have a ride so he can't show up... ridiculous.
silentraven6 silentraven6 Regular
276 messages
joined Nov 2018
#279 ·
James Alvarez2 said:It wasn't even aimed at you. I was just calling out those people who can't wrap their heads around why having religion class in the middle of the school day is such a mess. The topic was solid and the point hit right on what I was saying, so I had to chime in... 😁

And she said it right to your faces, too... honestly, I felt like I was getting called out personally just because I admitted I believe in God... 🤣
Not really looking to dive headfirst into this group... too much nonsense being posted here that I don't even get... 😁

Just waiting on some smartass response like: "You can't tell me a Protestant, Jewish, or whatever other minister doesn't have a car and can't make it where they're called..." Or that our local pastor doesn't have a ride so he can't show up... ridiculous.


Thanks for being able to read between the lines.

And thanks for saving me from having to write out a whole manifesto here. You pretty much nailed everything I wanted to say, except for the fact that my practical faith took a massive hit one Sunday in Palm Beach, and again on that Sunday when the only priest I actually respected passed away.

It's my problem, yeah, I'll give you that. But honestly, none of this helps deal with the current state of things—where I feel this sense of shame seeing how people are allowed to disrespect the very best parts of my faith in such a low-down way.
Kevin Bennett2 Kevin Bennett2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2015
#280 ·
Alexander Ortiz3 said:Believers have every right to express their faith publicly, and the government is supposed to guarantee that right. Just read the Constitution.
Why is it suddenly "harder" for a kid to walk in the opposite direction than it is for someone else to just sit through a free period?
I’ll say it again: I recognize there are issues with how these free periods are handled, but I put the blame squarely on the Department of Education for failing to set clear regulations.

The issue here isn't about believers expressing their faith in public; it's about how one specific religion clearly holds an advantage over others, even if the Constitution says otherwise.

If you're going to cite the Constitution, then actually read it:

Article 41.
"All religious communities are equal before the law and separate from the state.
Religious communities are free, in accordance with the law, to publicly perform religious rites, establish schools, colleges, other institutions, social and charitable organizations, and manage them, while enjoying the protection and assistance of the state in their activities."

Schools are state institutions. If this article of the Constitution is interpreted correctly, then religious education in schools should at least be modified—so that teachers of other religions in America get an equal number of hours—or moved to churches entirely.

Has anyone even tried to check the constitutionality of bringing religious instruction into schools (and had the Supreme Court reject it)?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads