Why is NBC 4 airing BBC?

Jack Cook7 said:Duh, obviously! That other thing only lasted about 90 years. Man, if we're talking a 900-year timeline... who even knows what would've happened? 😵

Right, because we still have buildings left over from that hypothetical 900-year stretch.

And from that 90-year period, we’re still dealing with landmines scattered all over the territory—that’s much better, isn't it?
...But hey, thanks a million. 😍

Sean Sanders81 said:Right, because we still have buildings left over from that hypothetical 900-year stretch.

And from that 90-year period, we’re still dealing with landmines scattered all over the territory—that’s much better, isn't it?
...But hey, thanks a million. 😍

I mean, give it like 900 years and those mines would probably just rot away into nothing anyway. 🤷

Jack Cook7 said:I mean, give it like 900 years and those mines would probably just rot away into nothing anyway. 🤷

Maybe those other ones from across the border have already rotted away too??
Better go check.😁

Zachary Young8 said:So, are we really just living under this massive shadow of German influence?

Like, what else would we be under the influence of—the Greeks, the Chinese, or should we all just sit around watching CNN?🙂 This whole thread is pretty mindless and honestly should just be shut down; I’d much rather spend my time hanging out with people who actually have something to say, because I usually see these discussions as a chance to pick up something new and grow a bit, so there's nothing wrong with not wanting to waste my breath on idiots.

And what’s wrong with the BBC?

And what exactly is wrong with NBC?

Zachary Young8 said:So, when can we expect to see Russia Today making its grand debut?

A NATO member watching Putin’s private propaganda? That's a bit much.

Kinda weird if you ask me, especially since we're basically in a Cold War with Russia right now and hitting them with all these sanctions.

Zachary Young8 said:And what exactly is wrong with NBC?

That's proof you haven't watched a single BBC program in your life.

Richard Wilson4 said:A NATO member watching Putin’s private propaganda? That's a bit much.

Kinda weird if you ask me, especially since we're basically in a Cold War with Russia right now and hitting them with all these sanctions.

Just because America is a NATO member doesn't mean anyone actually cares what we think (sadly). It’s honestly silly to lump America in with Germany or the USA and act like "we" are the ones driving the sanctions.

Besides, propaganda is coming at us from every direction anyway—so I don't see why there's an issue with listening to the Russian side too.

If they actually brought in an RT correspondent, things might feel a bit more lively and objective. But then again, is AJC really the gold standard for objectivity?

cosmicgardener92 said:Just because America is a NATO member doesn't mean anyone actually cares what we think (sadly). It’s honestly silly to lump America in with Germany or the USA and act like "we" are the ones driving the sanctions.

Besides, propaganda is coming at us from every direction anyway—so I don't see why there's an issue with listening to the Russian side too.

Imagine if they brought in North Korean influence and it actually ended up being our vibe 🙂

Zachary Young8 said:If they actually brought in an RT correspondent, things might feel a bit more lively and objective. But then again, is AJC really the gold standard for objectivity?

Talking about objectivity when you bring up Russia Today? Bitch, please.☕

And what, objectively speaking, is Fox News?