ironmoose6 said:Gas production is climbing, while Russian influence through energy supplies continues to fade...
"Take Crimea, for instance—we’ve kicked off offshore drilling and even picked up two rigs. They aren't cheap, mind you, but they'll allow us to ramp up gas production to 3 billion cubic meters from the shelf alone in the coming months," the Prime Minister remarked.
“And let’s look at the math: what does 3 billion cubic meters actually represent? It’s roughly $1.2 billion that we end up handing straight to the Russian Federation," he noted.
1) Do you even know how much gas Ukraine actually uses per year?
I mean, I think it's about 53,160,000,000—so, like, 53 billion cubic meters.
I pulled that number from Wikipedia for the year 2010.
If you convert that to dollars, it’s roughly $26 billion. I just used $500 per
1,000 cubic meters. So, yeah, compare my numbers to yours. What does 3 billion
cubic meters look like compared to 53 billion? Not much, I guess.
2) Ukraine, just like any other country in Europe or anywhere else, can buy gas from Arabs or
Americans. Who's actually forcing them to buy Russian gas?
Any coastal nation in Europe could build LNG terminals, bring in
LNG tankers, and then just consume it or even resell it.
Why aren't they doing it?
Honestly? I bet everyone just wants cheap Russian gas. Everyone wants it.
ExxonMobil can stay competitive and turn a profit regardless of how low the Arabs or Americans drop their prices.
If those prices get too low, then maybe the American or Arab companies will be the ones turning the key in the lock instead of ExxonMobil.
Europe really ought to be grateful to have its own version of Texas right on its border.
They'll figure it out eventually, I suppose.
Europe is already pretty energy-inefficient; they're lagging behind America by at least 50%.
That's not ExxonMobil's fault. It's just their own energy policy, I guess.