CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › The search for the perfect match

The search for the perfect match

Started by Justin Garcia7 · · 👁 5 views · 88 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Justin Garcia7Jacob Sanchez7Sandra Brooks85rustymaker5Frank Hughes2Laura Castillo4Emily Brooks63Sean Gray2Betty Peterson4Morgan Bishop4Michelle Robinson97Robert Diaz2Nancy Wilson2Tyler Cruz32Lawrence Torres56wanderingorca9Jeffrey Fisher5Mark Wilson5Angela Cox4Roger BennettElizabeth Castillo87wearyhawk83frozenmoose93Jeremy Scott …
Elizabeth Castillo87 Elizabeth Castillo87 Active Member
93 messages
joined Jun 2012
#61 ·
I honestly think we need to watch out so we don't get totally played by this endless chase for some impossible, cinematic ideal—you know, the kind that doesn't actually exist? If we aren't careful, we'll end up overlooking the person standing right in front of us who is actually perfect for us at this exact moment.
Look, I’m a believer in soulmates, really, I am. But maybe in this crazy world, those soulmate connections show up as best friends instead of romantic partners? Who's to say?
Robert Diaz2 Robert Diaz2 Member
31 messages
joined Aug 2012
#62 ·
Jacob Sanchez7 said:Of course, I’m interested in finding someone who feels whole as a partner, but I view that more as having a "soulmate connection" rather than just finding a specific type of person. It isn't even about some mystical merging of two beings. It’s more about true partnership—just sitting side by side on a roller coaster at Six Flags, soaking in the moment together.

How do you all see it? What are your thoughts?

I mean, that sounds totally fine to me. As long as it's the kind of relationship where everyone keeps their own independence and actually respects each other's space. You know, where there isn't any heavy codependency, jealousy, or being super possessive and all that stuff.
rustymaker5 rustymaker5 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2008
#63 ·
Jacob Sanchez7 said:Of course, I’m interested in finding someone who feels whole as a partner, but I view that more as having a "soulmate connection" rather than just finding a specific type of person. It isn't even about some mystical merging of two beings. It’s more about true partnership—just sitting side by side on a roller coaster at Six Flags, soaking in the moment together.

How do you all see it? What are your thoughts?

What do you even mean by a "soulmate" being someone who matches you on a soul level? I mean, honestly, a soul is a soul... they're all essentially the same kind of essence in everyone, if I can even put it that way without sounding like a complete idiot, and besides, a soul is supposed to be whole within every single person, so the whole idea of a soul being "half" of something just doesn't make any sense to me at all... 🤷

A partnership should be a true union, you know, where both people bring equal value to the table and there’s this unconditional, fundamental respect for who the other person actually is... it shouldn't be about one person trying to use the other to plug some gaping hole in their own soul, or worse, attempting to mold their partner into some idealized version that only exists in their own head, because when you start trying to reshape someone to fit your specific little expectations and whims, it always ends the exact same way—just a slow slide into total disappointment and resentment...
Accepting someone exactly for who they are, without that constant, nagging urge to reshape them or mold them into something that fits our own little lives better... even if that means one person wants to go full throttle on the roller coasters at Six Flags while the other is perfectly happy just sitting on a bench watching the chaos unfold... 😍
Jacob Sanchez7 Jacob Sanchez7 Active Member
79 messages
joined Jun 2012
#64 ·
rustymaker5 said:What do you even mean by a "soulmate" being someone who matches you on a soul level? I mean, honestly, a soul is a soul... they're all essentially the same kind of essence in everyone, if I can even put it that way without sounding like a complete idiot, and besides, a soul is supposed to be whole within every single person, so the whole idea of a soul being "half" of something just doesn't make any sense to me at all... 🤷

A partnership should be a true union, you know, where both people bring equal value to the table and there’s this unconditional, fundamental respect for who the other person actually is... it shouldn't be about one person trying to use the other to plug some gaping hole in their own soul, or worse, attempting to mold their partner into some idealized version that only exists in their own head, because when you start trying to reshape someone to fit your specific little expectations and whims, it always ends the exact same way—just a slow slide into total disappointment and resentment...
Accepting someone exactly for who they are, without that constant, nagging urge to reshape them or mold them into something that fits our own little lives better... even if that means one person wants to go full throttle on the roller coasters at Six Flags while the other is perfectly happy just sitting on a bench watching the chaos unfold... 😍

Look, when we use the term "better half" for a partner, I was referring specifically to that spiritual connection.

There was some old talk about souls being split in two, wandering somewhere else until they find their other side once we've grown up, but that's just something I read a long time ago. Maybe I totally misinterpreted the concept.

rustymaker5 said:What do you even mean by a "soulmate" being someone who matches you on a soul level? I mean, honestly, a soul is a soul... they're all essentially the same kind of essence in everyone, if I can even put it that way without sounding like a complete idiot, and besides, a soul is supposed to be whole within every single person, so the whole idea of a soul being "half" of something just doesn't make any sense to me at all... 🤷

A partnership should be a true union, you know, where both people bring equal value to the table and there’s this unconditional, fundamental respect for who the other person actually is... it shouldn't be about one person trying to use the other to plug some gaping hole in their own soul, or worse, attempting to mold their partner into some idealized version that only exists in their own head, because when you start trying to reshape someone to fit your specific little expectations and whims, it always ends the exact same way—just a slow slide into total disappointment and resentment...
Accepting someone exactly for who they are, without that constant, nagging urge to reshape them or mold them into something that fits our own little lives better... even if that means one person wants to go full throttle on the roller coasters at Six Flags while the other is perfectly happy just sitting on a bench watching the chaos unfold... 😍

True enough. I'd just extend that logic to every living thing.
wearyhawk83 wearyhawk83 Active Member
170 messages
joined Feb 2015
#65 ·
Robert Diaz2 said:Since pretty much every spiritual teaching out there hits on the same core idea—that getting too attached to people or things during our temporary time on this earth isn't exactly the move—I really hope you've done enough soul-searching and inner work to make sure you don't end up getting emotionally hooked on anyone.

Personally, I know I’d probably get attached, and honestly, that just leads to nothing but anxiety, stress, and heartache, so maybe it’s just better off being by myself. I actually think it's kind of cool how the English word "alone" can be read as "all one." 🙂


You’ve gotta know the difference between being "attached" to someone and actually being "connected" to them.
Being truly connected and knowing how to nurture that bond? Honestly, that's one of the best things you can ever experience in life.
The issue isn't about liking things or people; it's about whether you let those things define who you are.
Robert Diaz2 Robert Diaz2 Member
31 messages
joined Aug 2012
#66 ·
wearyhawk83 said:You’ve gotta know the difference between being "attached" to someone and actually being "connected" to them.
Being truly connected and knowing how to nurture that bond? Honestly, that's one of the best things you can ever experience in life.
The issue isn't about liking things or people; it's about whether you let those things define who you are.

So, basically, yeah. I guess we're just splitting hairs with semantics here. As long as you aren't dealing with emotional dependency, possessiveness, or that whole identity-merging thing you mentioned, then it sounds like a pretty stable and healthy relationship to me.
frozenmoose93 frozenmoose93 Member
10 messages
joined Oct 2013
#67 ·
I’m not settling for anything less than a perfect match. I can't stand lukewarm connections, whether we're talking friendship or romance. I’m strictly looking for people who actually click, even if it takes me my whole life to find them.🙂 Better off alone than stuck with someone who just doesn't fit.

Look, I get that 100% compatibility is a myth, but hitting 70-80%? That should be doable. Maybe most people think that’s unrealistic, but honestly, what's more unrealistic to me than seeing couples stay together for 10 years and then just suddenly call it quits?! Like, what were you even doing all that time?! Or how about people jumping straight from one relationship to another without even getting to know the next person first. So many people rush into these things based purely on physical attraction and sex, and once that spark dies down, the whole "relationship" just evaporates. 🙄

If everyone actually went after a high-quality partner, there wouldn't be nearly as many miserable people out there. Everyone talks about "tolerating" each other, but let's be real—that's usually just a fancy word for hypocrisy. If someone isn't right for you, why put up with it?! I have zero interest in wasting my time or my sanity on people I don't vibe with. Character compatibility is the only real foundation for a solid, long-term relationship, and eventually, the love follows. It’s that simple. Too bad so few people seem to get it...
Morgan Bishop4 Morgan Bishop4 Active Member
174 messages
joined Jul 2009
#68 ·
frozenmoose93 said:I’m not settling for anything less than a perfect match. I can't stand lukewarm connections, whether we're talking friendship or romance. I’m strictly looking for people who actually click, even if it takes me my whole life to find them.🙂 Better off alone than stuck with someone who just doesn't fit.

Look, I get that 100% compatibility is a myth, but hitting 70-80%? That should be doable. Maybe most people think that’s unrealistic, but honestly, what's more unrealistic to me than seeing couples stay together for 10 years and then just suddenly call it quits?! Like, what were you even doing all that time?! Or how about people jumping straight from one relationship to another without even getting to know the next person first. So many people rush into these things based purely on physical attraction and sex, and once that spark dies down, the whole "relationship" just evaporates. 🙄

If everyone actually went after a high-quality partner, there wouldn't be nearly as many miserable people out there. Everyone talks about "tolerating" each other, but let's be real—that's usually just a fancy word for hypocrisy. If someone isn't right for you, why put up with it?! I have zero interest in wasting my time or my sanity on people I don't vibe with. Character compatibility is the only real foundation for a solid, long-term relationship, and eventually, the love follows. It’s that simple. Too bad so few people seem to get it...

Well, obviously you should aim for compatibility, but that’s a far cry from demanding perfection. And besides, how are you even supposed to measure compatibility in percentages?! How do you calculate that someone is exactly 80 percent compatible with you...?? 😕
The truth is, a ton of relationships are built on looks, money, status, or just being able to tolerate someone else's nonsense... but I doubt those types of people will ever truly realize that their connections are hollow. They just fall into these patterns because maybe that's what they're looking for, and they don't know any better. If someone figures it out later in life, hey, better late than never... but you can't exactly convince a shallow person that they're shallow, because their entire worldview is too surface-level to even process it... anyway, I agree that you need to find someone you actually get along with; it's definitely better to be solo than to suffer through someone else's company just for the sake of it...
frozenmoose93 frozenmoose93 Member
10 messages
joined Oct 2013
#69 ·
Morgan Bishop4 said:Well, obviously you should aim for compatibility, but that’s a far cry from demanding perfection. And besides, how are you even supposed to measure compatibility in percentages?! How do you calculate that someone is exactly 80 percent compatible with you...?? 😕
The truth is, a ton of relationships are built on looks, money, status, or just being able to tolerate someone else's nonsense... but I doubt those types of people will ever truly realize that their connections are hollow. They just fall into these patterns because maybe that's what they're looking for, and they don't know any better. If someone figures it out later in life, hey, better late than never... but you can't exactly convince a shallow person that they're shallow, because their entire worldview is too surface-level to even process it... anyway, I agree that you need to find someone you actually get along with; it's definitely better to be solo than to suffer through someone else's company just for the sake of it...

No need to quote my ENTIRE post if you're just replying right underneath it. 😉
As for the answer—percentages are just a rough, subjective vibe. I mean, you probably get an idea of how much you click with someone based on shared interests, similar views, hobbies, whatever. It's just about how much your personalities align. Don't take it so literal! 😉 Obviously, there isn't some math formula to calculate if two people are a match. 😁
Morgan Bishop4 Morgan Bishop4 Active Member
174 messages
joined Jul 2009
#70 ·
frozenmoose93 said:No need to quote my ENTIRE post if you're just replying right underneath it. 😉
As for the answer—percentages are just a rough, subjective vibe. I mean, you probably get an idea of how much you click with someone based on shared interests, similar views, hobbies, whatever. It's just about how much your personalities align. Don't take it so literal! 😉 Obviously, there isn't some math formula to calculate if two people are a match. 😁

Personally, I couldn't really put a number on my own compatibility levels with anyone. I can usually tell if it's a hard "no," or if it's mostly "yes" or "no"... 🤷 though I'd say I'm pretty chill and tend to get along with a huge variety of people, even if they don't necessarily feel the same way about me 😁 but then you run into certain people who are such massive pains in the ass that even if they're technically compatible with someone, they'll find a million tiny little things to nitpick until they just write that person off entirely... :/ and honestly, I feel like certain opposites just balance each other out perfectly, like how a super laid-back person paired with someone who's got a bit of a temper works well. Two totally mellow people might just end up being boring and aimless together, while two high-strung or dominant types would probably just tear each other apart. So that whole idea that you need to be nearly identical to work doesn't really track for me. Same goes for dreamers needing someone to keep them grounded, and vice versa...
frozenmoose93 frozenmoose93 Member
10 messages
joined Oct 2013
#71 ·
Morgan Bishop4 said:Personally, I couldn't really put a number on my own compatibility levels with anyone. I can usually tell if it's a hard "no," or if it's mostly "yes" or "no"... 🤷 though I'd say I'm pretty chill and tend to get along with a huge variety of people, even if they don't necessarily feel the same way about me 😁 but then you run into certain people who are such massive pains in the ass that even if they're technically compatible with someone, they'll find a million tiny little things to nitpick until they just write that person off entirely... :/ and honestly, I feel like certain opposites just balance each other out perfectly, like how a super laid-back person paired with someone who's got a bit of a temper works well. Two totally mellow people might just end up being boring and aimless together, while two high-strung or dominant types would probably just tear each other apart. So that whole idea that you need to be nearly identical to work doesn't really track for me. Same goes for dreamers needing someone to keep them grounded, and vice versa...

I couldn't agree more with S. That’s exactly how most people see it, which is why you see those relationships imploding after just a couple of years. It might work for a little while, sure, but long-term? No way. Those kinds of setups are basically doomed from day one.

I'm a big believer in opposites attracting, but similarities? That’s where the real magic happens.

Phlegmatic types and high-strung types just don't mix. Their reactions to the exact same situation are worlds apart, and someone always ends up feeling insulted or slighted. That’s where the fighting starts—because the intense one expects support from their partner, while the chill one honestly couldn't care less. 😁
Two hotheads aren't gonna tear each other apart if they actually click. If they're both pissed off about the same thing, they can just agree on that and team up to take down whoever's bothering them.
Guys like Živac can actually read the room and predict what’s gonna bug their partner before it even happens, so they don't accidentally trip any wires. A total pushover just can't do that because they don't get how a high-strung person's brain works. It goes both ways, too.
Morgan Bishop4 Morgan Bishop4 Active Member
174 messages
joined Jul 2009
#72 ·
frozenmoose93 said:I couldn't agree more with S. That’s exactly how most people see it, which is why you see those relationships imploding after just a couple of years. It might work for a little while, sure, but long-term? No way. Those kinds of setups are basically doomed from day one.

I'm a big believer in opposites attracting, but similarities? That’s where the real magic happens.

Phlegmatic types and high-strung types just don't mix. Their reactions to the exact same situation are worlds apart, and someone always ends up feeling insulted or slighted. That’s where the fighting starts—because the intense one expects support from their partner, while the chill one honestly couldn't care less. 😁
Two hotheads aren't gonna tear each other apart if they actually click. If they're both pissed off about the same thing, they can just agree on that and team up to take down whoever's bothering them.
Guys like Živac can actually read the room and predict what’s gonna bug their partner before it even happens, so they don't accidentally trip any wires. A total pushover just can't do that because they don't get how a high-strung person's brain works. It goes both ways, too.

So, since you've seen plenty of these couples, you've basically decided they all fail?
I see it way differently... that example you gave feels more like those extreme cases where one person is a total zen master and the other is a ticking time bomb. Most people fall somewhere in the middle on that spectrum.
Besides, I haven't actually met two high-strung people who get worked up over the same things. Usually, when I see people like that, they're nitpicking each other over completely different little details and just constantly clashing.
And look, a chill person can still be annoyed by the same things as a high-strung person. Just because someone is easygoing doesn't mean they don't have strong opinions about certain things...
frozenmoose93 frozenmoose93 Member
10 messages
joined Oct 2013
#73 ·
Morgan Bishop4 said:So, since you've seen plenty of these couples, you've basically decided they all fail?
I see it way differently... that example you gave feels more like those extreme cases where one person is a total zen master and the other is a ticking time bomb. Most people fall somewhere in the middle on that spectrum.
Besides, I haven't actually met two high-strung people who get worked up over the same things. Usually, when I see people like that, they're nitpicking each other over completely different little details and just constantly clashing.
And look, a chill person can still be annoyed by the same things as a high-strung person. Just because someone is easygoing doesn't mean they don't have strong opinions about certain things...

I know. It’s just that they haven't ALL failed *yet*. 🤣 Some are hanging by a thread. To me, nothing is healthy if partners treat each other like garbage behind closed doors while acting like the perfect couple in public. 🙄 Usually, it's some toxic possessiveness keeping them locked together. It's basically people who are terrified of being alone. I've heard this from so many people. Like, when I ask, "Why stay with someone you can't even stand?" the response is always some idiotic, "Well, what am I supposed to do, be alone forever?!" OMFG!!! That's not how normal people think. Period.🙄

Morgan Bishop4 said:So, since you've seen plenty of these couples, you've basically decided they all fail?
I see it way differently... that example you gave feels more like those extreme cases where one person is a total zen master and the other is a ticking time bomb. Most people fall somewhere in the middle on that spectrum.
Besides, I haven't actually met two high-strung people who get worked up over the same things. Usually, when I see people like that, they're nitpicking each other over completely different little details and just constantly clashing.
And look, a chill person can still be annoyed by the same things as a high-strung person. Just because someone is easygoing doesn't mean they don't have strong opinions about certain things...

Every chill person I know has zero backbone. Total pushovers.
There's a difference between being naturally chill and just becoming numb to everything over time. I'm pretty laid back sometimes, but I still have my own opinions.
You started this talking about people with totally different personalities. That's why I'm saying chill types and high-strung types don't mix. Everything else is just nuance. We aren't all identical, obviously, but we tend to be pretty similar. That's where my 70-80% figure comes from.
Morgan Bishop4 Morgan Bishop4 Active Member
174 messages
joined Jul 2009
#74 ·
frozenmoose93 said:I know. It’s just that they haven't ALL failed *yet*. 🤣 Some are hanging by a thread. To me, nothing is healthy if partners treat each other like garbage behind closed doors while acting like the perfect couple in public. 🙄 Usually, it's some toxic possessiveness keeping them locked together. It's basically people who are terrified of being alone. I've heard this from so many people. Like, when I ask, "Why stay with someone you can't even stand?" the response is always some idiotic, "Well, what am I supposed to do, be alone forever?!" OMFG!!! That's not how normal people think. Period.🙄

Every chill person I know has zero backbone. Total pushovers.
There's a difference between being naturally chill and just becoming numb to everything over time. I'm pretty laid back sometimes, but I still have my own opinions.
You started this talking about people with totally different personalities. That's why I'm saying chill types and high-strung types don't mix. Everything else is just nuance. We aren't all identical, obviously, but we tend to be pretty similar. That's where my 70-80% figure comes from.

Okay, but hold up, those are two completely different things... why would a couple where one person is super chill and the other is constantly high-strung be fighting every single day? And what does that have to do with people being afraid of being alone?! You really can't just lump everything into one big bucket like that...
I don't know what kind of "chill" people you've run into, but that doesn't mean they're the same thing. Just because someone stays calm in situations where everyone else is losing their minds over nothing, doesn't mean they lack character, opinions, or a soul...
And honestly, if you stop stressing over every little thing as you get older, that doesn't make you "spineless," it just makes you a mature adult who isn't going to act like a hormonal teenager screaming and panicking over every minor inconvenience...

Also, just because I said chill personalities and high-strung ones often end up together, it doesn't mean they’re polar opposites in every single way. What does temperament have to do with their politics, or religion, or how they see society, or their actual goals, fears, tastes, or anything else that actually defines who they are?! A person isn't just "chill" or "high-strung" and nothing else... there's way more to it than that...
frozenmoose93 frozenmoose93 Member
10 messages
joined Oct 2013
#75 ·
Morgan Bishop4 said:Okay, but hold up, those are two completely different things... why would a couple where one person is super chill and the other is constantly high-strung be fighting every single day? And what does that have to do with people being afraid of being alone?! You really can't just lump everything into one big bucket like that...
I don't know what kind of "chill" people you've run into, but that doesn't mean they're the same thing. Just because someone stays calm in situations where everyone else is losing their minds over nothing, doesn't mean they lack character, opinions, or a soul...
And honestly, if you stop stressing over every little thing as you get older, that doesn't make you "spineless," it just makes you a mature adult who isn't going to act like a hormonal teenager screaming and panicking over every minor inconvenience...

Also, just because I said chill personalities and high-strung ones often end up together, it doesn't mean they’re polar opposites in every single way. What does temperament have to do with their politics, or religion, or how they see society, or their actual goals, fears, tastes, or anything else that actually defines who they are?! A person isn't just "chill" or "high-strung" and nothing else... there's way more to it than that...

I don't get what's confusing here. Some people just click and some don't. And yeah, there's a connection! People who are scared of being alone will settle for anyone, even someone they don't actually like, just because they lack the backbone to stand on their own. Those are just desperate, insecure people.

So, you’re still claiming that incompatible people can get along, love each other, and have a happy life?! Honestly, I think you're way off base.

I mean, I don't know what kind of "chill" people you've met, but that's not the point. Just because someone stays calm in most situations and doesn't freak out over every little thing that stresses others out doesn't mean they don't have a personality or opinions. Getting used to things over time doesn't make you "chill," it just makes you an adult who isn't going to act like a hormonal teenager screaming about every tiny drama.

I disagree. All the "chill" people I know are like that.☕ Maybe there are exceptions, but I haven't met them yet.
If someone has an opinion, they usually want to voice it. Chill people generally don't care enough to do that. They're just indifferent to everything. You can't even tell if they like something or hate it.

I'm chill about stuff I don't care about. Like, take politics, for example. I don't have any strong feelings about it, good or bad, because it's just not my thing. But I'm only like that with that one topic. I'm not a "chill person" overall, because I definitely have stances on most other things. 😬

And just because I said chill people and high-strung people go together, it doesn't mean they're opposites in every single way. What does that have to do with their views on politics, religion, society, or their personal desires and fears?! A person isn't just "chill" or "high-strung" and nothing else.

Obviously not. Some people are more chill, some are more high-strung, and some are neither. I was just responding to your theory about opposites attracting. That came from your post where YOU categorized people into chill, high-strung, and dreamers. 😉

Morgan Bishop4 said:Personally, I couldn't really put a number on my own compatibility levels with anyone. I can usually tell if it's a hard "no," or if it's mostly "yes" or "no"... 🤷 though I'd say I'm pretty chill and tend to get along with a huge variety of people, even if they don't necessarily feel the same way about me 😁 but then you run into certain people who are such massive pains in the ass that even if they're technically compatible with someone, they'll find a million tiny little things to nitpick until they just write that person off entirely... :/ and honestly, I feel like certain opposites just balance each other out perfectly, like how a super laid-back person paired with someone who's got a bit of a temper works well. Two totally mellow people might just end up being boring and aimless together, while two high-strung or dominant types would probably just tear each other apart. So that whole idea that you need to be nearly identical to work doesn't really track for me. Same goes for dreamers needing someone to keep them grounded, and vice versa...

You're kind of contradicting yourself here. 😕 First you're grouping everyone together, and now you're telling a totally different story. It doesn't quite add up. 🙂 😛
Jeremy Scott Jeremy Scott Active Member
70 messages
joined Feb 2015
#76 ·
It’s those misguided romantic movies. They’ve somehow managed to push this tired idea that out of seven billion people on this planet, there is only one single perfect soulmate waiting just for us.
Emily Brooks63 Emily Brooks63 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jan 2012
#77 ·
There’s no such thing as soulmates, honestly, I just can't wrap my head around that whole concept. Everyone is already a complete person on their own and totally capable of holding it down solo, but when you actually meet someone where everything just clicks and you start leveling each other up? That’s when it’s like, woooow 😁 And yeah, that definitely exists, but most of us are way too busy ignoring our own gut feelings to even realize when we've finally hit the jackpot.
rowdyharbor15 rowdyharbor15 Active Member
78 messages
joined Jan 2013
#78 ·
The perfect match for that enlightened consciousness of yours is probably just some heavy metal to blast in the car

Finding a decent girl is easy when you're sixteen. You aren't picky, and by default, there’s always someone hanging around. Sure, you still need a bit of luck, but at thirty-six? Not so much. Unless you haven't put any work into yourself and you're just looking for someone to take the edge off—which, honestly, is how I feel sometimes. I talk to plenty of women, but I always seem to attract the exact opposite of what actually works for me. Age gaps, lifestyle differences, all that stuff...

It’s the same story with everything else; I’ll have a great run with something, and then it just vanishes. Maybe if things had been more consistent, they wouldn't have disappeared, but there's no safety net. You just have to keep searching. And since I know that "searching" is really just a measure of how well you use your little tricks, I figure you can find plenty of women if you just lean into the social circles and systems available to you. But don't hold your breath for anything meaningful.
Morgan Bishop4 Morgan Bishop4 Active Member
174 messages
joined Jul 2009
#79 ·
I’ve always been the type to keep things pretty low-key, you know? Not really looking for all that flashy, high-octane nonsense that everyone else seems to be chasing these days... just trying to stay grounded and deal with reality as it comes, without all the extra noise... kaže:
What part of this isn't clicking for you? It’s pretty simple: some people just vibe together and others don't, and yeah, that actually matters... People who are absolutely terrified of being alone will cling to anyone and everyone just to feel something, even if they can't stand the person they're with, especially when there's a massive gap in maturity or character. Honestly, those types are just desperate and deeply insecure...

So, you’re seriously still out here peddling the idea that two people who are fundamentally incompatible can actually make it work, find common ground, and live some kind of blissful, happy life together?! Honestly, I’m sitting here thinking you might be more lost than you realize...

I mean, I’m right there with you on that, but if I’m reading you correctly, you’re basically saying that pairing up someone who’s totally laid back with a high-strung, jittery type is just a recipe for disaster from day one... a total mismatch that was never going to work out...
Look, I never actually said that incompatible people just magically click, but I’m also not out here claiming you need to be carbon copies of each other for some level of compatibility to exist... obviously if two personalities are complete polar opposites that just clash on every single level, it’s not going to work. But my point is that someone chill and laid-back paired with someone high-strung can actually balance each other out perfectly, yet you immediately jump to the conclusion that they're fundamentally incompatible. I’m definitely not saying every calm soul is a perfect match for every hothead out there, but if they actually manage to find common ground, I really think they could function quite well together...

I mean, honestly... I’ve always been more of a down-to-earth type of person, you know? Not really one for all that flashy, high-maintenance nonsense that seems to drive everyone else crazy these days... just prefer keeping things simple and real whenever possible... kaže:
I don't know, man... I just can't get on board with that. All I've ever seen are people who just don't give a damn about anything...☕ Maybe there are some out there that operate differently, but honestly, I haven't run into any yet...
People who actually have an opinion always feel this desperate, nagging need to go out and air it... but then you look at those total snowflakes and they just don't care about anything. They’re completely numb to the world around them. You can't even tell if they think something smells like roses or pure garbage because they're just too indifferent to bother deciding...

I haven’t actually run into anyone quite like the person you just described... maybe once if I really stretch it, but honestly, it feels like a total one-in-a-million scenario...

I guess you could say I’m pretty down-to-earth... if you consider someone who spends way too much time overthinking things while staring at a screen to be grounded, but yeah, that's basically the vibe... kaže:
Of course it isn't... I mean, some people just have a chill vibe, others are high-strung as hell, and then there's that whole other group that doesn't even fit into either category. I was really just poking fun at that theory you had about opposites attracting... specifically from that one post where YOU decided to categorize everyone into being laid-back, hot-headed, or total dreamers... 😉

Look, I’m not out here trying to put everyone into two or three little boxes... that's not really my thing. I was just throwing those out there as examples of certain personalities I've noticed popping up lately... or at least, they're the types I tend to run into in my own life and circle...
wearyhawk83 wearyhawk83 Active Member
170 messages
joined Feb 2015
#80 ·
frozenmoose93 said:I’m not settling for anything less than a perfect match. I can't stand lukewarm connections, whether we're talking friendship or romance. I’m strictly looking for people who actually click, even if it takes me my whole life to find them.🙂 Better off alone than stuck with someone who just doesn't fit.

Look, I get that 100% compatibility is a myth, but hitting 70-80%? That should be doable. Maybe most people think that’s unrealistic, but honestly, what's more unrealistic to me than seeing couples stay together for 10 years and then just suddenly call it quits?! Like, what were you even doing all that time?! Or how about people jumping straight from one relationship to another without even getting to know the next person first. So many people rush into these things based purely on physical attraction and sex, and once that spark dies down, the whole "relationship" just evaporates. 🙄

If everyone actually went after a high-quality partner, there wouldn't be nearly as many miserable people out there. Everyone talks about "tolerating" each other, but let's be real—that's usually just a fancy word for hypocrisy. If someone isn't right for you, why put up with it?! I have zero interest in wasting my time or my sanity on people I don't vibe with. Character compatibility is the only real foundation for a solid, long-term relationship, and eventually, the love follows. It’s that simple. Too bad so few people seem to get it...

Is it actually possible for two people to be compatible enough at the start, only to break up after ten years?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads