CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › Self-Actualization

Self-Actualization

Started by Justin Garcia7 · · 👁 5 views · 19 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Justin Garcia7nimbleranger5placidwolf27Rebecca Sanders37Elizabeth Castillo87Michael Gonzalez77Drew Flores3crimsonfox26Benjamin Taylor6Matthew Cruz44Joseph Bailey41Betty Patel172
Justin Garcia7 Justin Garcia7 MemberOP
36 messages
joined Jun 2013
#1 ·
Or perhaps we're talking about self-actualization according to Maslow.
Every one of us holds untapped potential, and we all have the free will to decide whether to tap into it or let it slide. Some people equate self-actualization with enlightenment or Nirvana—that state where every part of ourselves feels complete and the craving for external things simply vanishes. It’s about becoming the best version of ourselves. Listening to that inner voice and letting it guide us (some even call this Christ consciousness).
"Peak experiences" are what self-actualized individuals encounter; it's a state of pure euphoria. But honestly, only a tiny fraction of people actually reach that point. Procrastination, the fear of failing, breaking through anxiety barriers, and general insecurity are massive hurdles that very few people ever manage to clear on their way to fulfillment.
The path to self-actualization is an internal journey. It provides an inner sense of peace that no amount of external stimulation can ever replicate. Instead, we often chase various addictions just to try and squeeze out a drop of that same euphoria, which only ends up pulling us further away from our true selves.
Procrastination is easily one of the biggest culprits keeping us paralyzed on this journey.

What are your thoughts on this? 😁
nimbleranger5 nimbleranger5 Member
32 messages
joined Feb 2015
#2 ·
I think this hits the nail right on the head. Honestly, beautifully written! 👍
placidwolf27 placidwolf27 Active Member
170 messages
joined Mar 2012
#3 ·
Does all this euphoria actually carry any weight?
And does this whole idea of self-actualization even mean anything at all?...
Justin Garcia7 Justin Garcia7 MemberOP
36 messages
joined Jun 2013
#4 ·
'St.Ireneus : 'The pursuit of happiness''
placidwolf27 placidwolf27 Active Member
170 messages
joined Mar 2012
#5 ·
Great, and?

Do you actually have an idea of how one achieves this? A specific method, perhaps? A technique? For instance, how does a person fight against procrastination—or how did those "successful" types you mentioned manage it? Or better yet, did they even face such struggles in the first place?

From what I gather, Maslow was attempting to develop what he called "positive psychology"—an effort to distinguish his work from the rest of psychology and psychiatry. His angle was that instead of obsessing over people's problems and searching for ways to fix them—since those are pathologies, which are inherently "negative"—he looked at individuals who described themselves as "self-actualized." He essentially used their lives as a blueprint to conclude what a self-actualized person should look like... as if we're all meant to just copy them.

Naturally, as a humanist—and likely an individualist, given the trends of his generation—Maslow assumes that everyone is fundamentally capable of reaching this state.
In reality, the examples he used to build his hypothesis were simply people lucky enough to be born with certain predispositions, and then even luckier that their environment nurtured them into disciplined, capable adults—whether through intervention or despite it. It seems the only thing they failed to achieve was having a massive amount of offspring... so that there might be more of these "actualized" types out there.

Conditioning is a cage. No one achieves more than what is "written" for them; perhaps things can shift through heavy conditioning, or some sort of reconditioning...
If we were actually discussing how to deal with this conditioning—how to recondition oneself—then the conversation might actually hold water. As it stands, this is just another carrot dangled on a stick... just another way for your own mind to troll you.

Besides, doesn't everything constantly actualize itself? Is there ever truly an instance where something exists but remains "unactualized"?

Ultimately, the whole thing boils down to little more than saying, "this tree has grown to its maximum height."

So, yeah... lucky guy.
Rebecca Sanders37 Rebecca Sanders37 Member
32 messages
joined Jun 2015
#6 ·
Honestly, I feel like people put way too much emphasis on chasing instant gratification and cheap thrills. If you ask me, the real heavy hitters in any spiritual practice should be self-awareness, true independence, being fearless, and finding actual happiness.
I guess in this gross capitalist era we’re living in—where everyone is basically worshiping quick dopamine hits—spirituality has just morphed into another tool to hunt down meaningless little pleasures. It’s like someone offers you a delicious bar of Hershey's, but you get so distracted by the shiny wrapper that you just toss the chocolate in the trash...
Justin Garcia7 Justin Garcia7 MemberOP
36 messages
joined Jun 2013
#7 ·
Why not view it as a blessing? That rush of euphoria you feel from self-actualization—isn't that just what you receive from God for fulfilling your purpose? It’s a sentiment echoed throughout the Bible.
Self-actualization really needs to be viewed through the lens of holistic growth. For instance, someone might become a world-class musician and think they've fulfilled their "purpose." While one part of them is realized, other facets remain untouched. Until a person achieves total wholeness, there will always be a lingering sense of emptiness or a longing for something they can't quite name. Of course, the path to self-actualization isn't just about finding yourself through creativity or what you contribute to the world; it's also found in your daily routine and how you treat others. You have to embrace the idea that we are multidimensional beings with multiple goals.
Elizabeth Castillo87 Elizabeth Castillo87 Active Member
93 messages
joined Jun 2012
#8 ·
I’ve been spiraling down this rabbit hole lately, just wondering about the actual distinction between what people call self-actualization and what they label as enlightenment. You know, some authors out there—and honestly, even some of the folks hanging out in these threads—seem to lump them together like they’re two sides of the same coin. But I don't know... is it really? Am I crazy, or does it feel like we’re talking about two completely different beasts altogether?
Rebecca Sanders37 Rebecca Sanders37 Member
32 messages
joined Jun 2015
#9 ·
Elizabeth Castillo87 said:I’ve been spiraling down this rabbit hole lately, just wondering about the actual distinction between what people call self-actualization and what they label as enlightenment. You know, some authors out there—and honestly, even some of the folks hanging out in these threads—seem to lump them together like they’re two sides of the same coin. But I don't know... is it really? Am I crazy, or does it feel like we’re talking about two completely different beasts altogether?

it's basically the same thing! Personally, I usually just call it self-realization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-enquiry
Michael Gonzalez77 Michael Gonzalez77 Active Member
234 messages
joined Feb 2015
#10 ·
Rebecca Sanders37 said:it's basically the same thing! Personally, I usually just call it self-realization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-enquiry

If everyone is claiming they've reached it, then we aren't talking about enlightenment. True enlightenment—the kind that serves as a genuine turning point toward a much broader spiritual evolution—is incredibly rare compared to the massive number of people claiming to be 'awake.' Sure, the ancient Greeks might have equated self-knowledge with the soul's true awakening, but people often mistake their own spiritual perks for the real deal. Those experiences are valuable, but they aren't enlightenment or the massive potential that comes with it; they are simply steps on a more meaningful path. That path is long and gradual, and honestly, it’s pretty treacherous if you try to navigate it alone without a guide who has already walked that path and knows where the pitfalls are.

Enlightenment remains a rare phenomenon, both today and throughout history. For the average person, it feels almost impossible to achieve—kind of like how it's technically possible for every single person in America to become a billionaire, but given the systemic conditions and general lack of awareness, the odds are basically zero.

Being 'awake' sounds more like someone who has gained deep spiritual insight and is truly conscious of everything happening around them, applying that wisdom to their daily life. People say that person has stepped onto the path, which is actually quite rare itself. There are plenty of people hovering near the edge, but very few who undergo a total inward revolution of consciousness. Even so, there are far more of those than there are enlightened beings, which means they can still work to shift things in favor of collective growth by making wisdom and practical truths accessible to everyone.
Drew Flores3 Drew Flores3 Member
40 messages
joined Jan 2011
#11 ·
Maybe "self-actualization" is a better way to put it than "enlightenment." To me, enlightenment usually feels tied up in Eastern spirituality—which, let's be honest, always sounds a bit exotic or abstract to us here in the States. It’s attractive because it feels mysterious, but at its core, there's a massive cultural gap there, especially when you look at the difference between individualistic Western values versus more collective societies. Self-actualization, though? That hits closer to home. It’s about finding your own mission on this planet and actually living it out. It’s about discovering your own sense of purpose, even if that purpose seems totally random or bizarre to anyone else. I think the term also captures that genuine spiritual fulfillment you get just from being happy to be alive. It's about embracing the sheer beauty of life as it comes at you—including all those messy, less-than-perfect extremes. Those rough edges are really just signposts helping us find that middle ground, that balance we're all constantly chasing.
Rebecca Sanders37 Rebecca Sanders37 Member
32 messages
joined Jun 2015
#12 ·
Drew Flores3 said:Maybe "self-actualization" is a better way to put it than "enlightenment." To me, enlightenment usually feels tied up in Eastern spirituality—which, let's be honest, always sounds a bit exotic or abstract to us here in the States. It’s attractive because it feels mysterious, but at its core, there's a massive cultural gap there, especially when you look at the difference between individualistic Western values versus more collective societies. Self-actualization, though? That hits closer to home. It’s about finding your own mission on this planet and actually living it out. It’s about discovering your own sense of purpose, even if that purpose seems totally random or bizarre to anyone else. I think the term also captures that genuine spiritual fulfillment you get just from being happy to be alive. It's about embracing the sheer beauty of life as it comes at you—including all those messy, less-than-perfect extremes. Those rough edges are really just signposts helping us find that middle ground, that balance we're all constantly chasing.

I’ve gotta disagree there! Honestly, Eastern spirituality has its own unique set of ideas, teachings, and philosophies regarding transcendentalism and self-discovery, and once you truly wrap your head around them, you realize you've grasped the actual core of spirituality itself—so where it originally started doesn't even matter anymore! For me personally, Buddhism is by far the most appealing because of how incredibly well it rationalizes and analyzes the nature of consciousness and reality. It doesn't rely on some outside forces or deities from beyond this world; instead, it focuses exclusively on what we actually perceive right here in front of us.
Drew Flores3 Drew Flores3 Member
40 messages
joined Jan 2011
#13 ·
See, the fact that you immediately jumped to analysis and logic—those classic Western ways of processing things—just proves my point about how deep those roots go.
It’s not that I’m looking down on Eastern spirituality or anything... honestly. I was just talking about the practical side of things, like breathing exercises, diet, or specific meditation styles. If you don't really know what you're doing or if you follow bad advice, you can end up feeling totally different from what you actually intended. There are definitely people here who know way more than I do and could dive much deeper into that.
At the end of the day, you'll learn so much more by just sitting down and really listening to your elders—their actual life lessons—than you ever will from some self-proclaimed guru on TV.
crimsonfox26 crimsonfox26 Member
46 messages
joined Dec 2020
#14 ·
Elizabeth Castillo87 said:I’ve been spiraling down this rabbit hole lately, just wondering about the actual distinction between what people call self-actualization and what they label as enlightenment. You know, some authors out there—and honestly, even some of the folks hanging out in these threads—seem to lump them together like they’re two sides of the same coin. But I don't know... is it really? Am I crazy, or does it feel like we’re talking about two completely different beasts altogether?

👍

I'll put my signature on that. I was just voicing the exact same thought on a different thread a moment ago.
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 Regular
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#15 ·
I honestly don't know where to start with this one—it’s just one of those things that keeps me up at night, staring at the ceiling while wondering how we even got here. You look at the state of things today, and it feels like everyone is just sprinting toward a cliff, completely ignoring the "Caution" signs posted everywhere. It’s maddening, really. I was sitting in my kitchen this morning—just sipping some coffee, minding my own business—and I started thinking about how much noise there is lately. Just constant, unrelenting noise. It reminds me of that argument crimsonfox26 was having online the other day—you know the one—where they were trying to make sense of the chaos, but it felt like shouting into a void. There’s this fundamental disconnect happening in our society right now, a total breakdown in how we actually communicate with one another. We aren't even speaking the same language anymore, metaphorically speaking. We’ve traded nuance for soundbites and deep thought for instant gratification, and frankly, it’s exhausting. And don't even get me started on the institutional side of things. Everything feels so fragile. You see these massive corporations—think of something like ExxonMobil or even the big tech giants out in Silicon Valley—acting like they have all the answers, when in reality, they’re often just reacting to the latest trend or panic. It’s a house of cards, really. One little nudge and the whole structure starts to wobble. I remember back in college, studying these theories—Maslow's hierarchy and all that stuff—and it seemed so logical then. But applying those neat little models to the messy, unpredictable reality of modern American life? It’s like trying to map the ocean with a ruler. It just doesn't work. I’m not saying everything is hopeless—I’m not that much of a cynic—but we need to slow down. We need to stop reacting and start reflecting. If we keep living at this frantic, superficial pace, we’re going to lose the very things that make us a cohesive society. It's frustrating, it's overwhelming, and quite frankly, I'm tired of pretending it's normal. kaže:
It’s really just about self-actualization—you know, that whole concept from Maslow.
Every single one of us carries this untapped potential—it’s built right in there—and we all possess the free will to decide whether we actually do anything with it or just let it rot. It’s funny how people tend to conflate self-actualization with these lofty, almost unreachable concepts like enlightenment or Nirvana. Personally, I see it more simply: it’s that state where you’ve finally integrated every fragmented part of your psyche, where those restless, nagging cravings for "more" finally settle down because you've become whole. It’s about becoming the best version of yourself—not some idealized caricature, but the actual person you were meant to be. It comes down to listening to that inner compass and actually following it... though I know some folks prefer to call that the consciousness of Christ.
So, we’re talking about "peak experiences"—that absolute state of euphoria that supposedly only those who have reached self-actualization get to touch. It’s a beautiful concept, really. But let’s be honest for a second—very few people actually make it to that level of self-actualization. Most of us just spin our wheels. Between the endless cycle of procrastination, that paralyzing fear of failing, and the sheer anxiety of trying to break down those mental barriers we build around ourselves... it's a lot. There’s this deep-seated insecurity that acts like an anchor, and honestly, very few people ever manage to cut the rope and actually find their way toward true self-fulfillment. It’s much easier to stay stuck than to face the climb.
Self-actualization—it’s that long, winding road that actually fills you up from the inside out. It provides this deep, internal sense of fulfillment that no amount of external stimulation could ever hope to touch. Honestly, it's the only thing that truly sticks. But look at what we do instead. We chase every cheap thrill and fleeting addiction imaginable just to squeeze out one tiny drop of euphoria—trying to mimic that genuine high that comes from within. It’s a losing game. We end up chasing shadows, drifting further and further away from our actual selves in the process. It's exhausting, really.
Procrastination—honestly, it’s one of those massive, invisible walls that just keeps us stuck in place, spinning our wheels while life passes us by. It’s a total paralysis. I mean, you know that feeling? You sit down at your desk, maybe with a fresh cup of coffee from Starbucks, intending to finally tackle that big project or file those taxes, and suddenly you're three hours deep into a Wikipedia rabbit hole about the history of the interstate highway system. It happens to me more often than I care to admit—I'll be staring at a deadline like it's some looming storm cloud on the horizon, yet somehow, I'm still reorganizing my bookshelf instead of actually working. It's frustrating, really—this constant tug-of-war between what we need to do and what we actually end up doing—but if we don't find a way to break through that mental fog, we're basically just standing still while the rest of the world moves forward.

What are your thoughts on this? 😁

One of our guys put together this massive deep dive on the subject: I’ve been sitting here staring at this thread for a while, trying to make sense of the absolute chaos unfolding, and honestly? I’m just exhausted. It feels like we’re circling the same drain every single time this topic comes up—everyone shouting over each other without actually saying anything of substance. It reminds me of that one time back in Chicago when I was stuck in a three-hour gridlock because some local politician decided to close a major artery for "renovations" that never actually happened. Just pure, unadulterated inefficiency. That’s what this discussion feels like. We are idling in neutral while the world moves on. And then there’s Benjamin Taylor6, who seems to think that if we just follow one specific line of reasoning, everything will magically fix itself. Look, I appreciate the passion, I really do, but you’re missing the forest for the trees. You can’t apply that kind of rigid logic to a system that is fundamentally broken and unpredictable. It’s like trying to use a map of New York City to navigate the streets of Los Angeles—it might look similar on paper if you squint hard enough, but you’re going to end up hitting a curb eventually. crimsonfox26 keeps chiming in with these pointed observations that, while technically accurate, completely ignore the underlying tension that’s driving the whole mess. It’s easy to be right when you refuse to acknowledge the context. But being right isn't the same thing as being useful. We need to stop this cycle of reactionary outbursts. If we want actual progress, we have to move past the knee-jerk responses and start looking at the structural issues. Otherwise, we’re just wasting our breath—and my time.
It really comes down to how you perceive reality—or rather, how much of it you’re actually capable of seeing. I’ve been thinking about this quite a bit lately, especially regarding those people who seem to operate on a completely different frequency. There’s a certain level of self-actualization that changes everything. When you reach that stage, you start noticing things others miss—the subtle layers of insincerity, the performative nonsense, and that pervasive sense of inauthenticity that most people just breeze right past. It’s like everyone else is watching a filtered version of a movie, while you’re finally seeing the raw footage. It can be exhausting, honestly—I remember being in a boardroom meeting in Chicago last year where the tension was thick enough to cut with a knife because someone was clearly lying through their teeth, yet everyone else was just nodding along like nothing was wrong. It’s maddening. But there’s a benefit to this heightened perception. People who have done the internal work don't get tripped up by ambiguity. They don't feel that awkward, creeping discomfort when a situation becomes gray or double-sided—they just accept it for what it is. And more importantly? They aren't paralyzed by the unknown. While everyone else is clutching their pearls and panicking because they can't predict what happens next, the self-actualized individual just moves forward. There's no fear of the dark when you've already learned how to see in it.

Self-acceptance—this whole idea of embracing who you are, the people around you, and even just the natural world—is such a massive, overlooked pillar. It’s about looking at your own flaws, those jagged little edges and weaknesses we all carry, and realizing they aren't some moral failing; they are simply part of being human. There shouldn't be this constant, nagging sense of shame or guilt attached to them. I mean, honestly, why should there be? We're all a bit of a mess. When you look at people who have actually reached that level of self-actualization—you know, those folks who have really done the work—they tend to be incredibly open and sincere. They don't feel this desperate, exhausting need to put on an act or curate a perfect persona just to impress the neighbors or win over strangers. They aren't out there trying to pretend they're something they're not just to fit a certain mold. They just... are. And there's something quietly powerful about that kind of honesty.

Spontaneity, simplicity, and just being... well, natural. When you look at self-actualization through that lens, spontaneity isn't just about acting without thinking—it’s more about that raw, unadulterated curiosity you see in kids. You know, that sense of wonder where nothing is "boring" because everything is a discovery? It allows a person to develop this beautifully unconventional perspective on the world—one where they actually have the capacity to find genuine beauty in things most people would just walk right past without a second thought. It’s about seeing the extraordinary in the mundane.
I was sitting there thinking about the whole ITD situation—and by that, I mean that massive conglomerate over in Chicago—and honestly, it just gets me fired up. It’s one of those things where you look at the sheer scale of what they're doing and you can't help but feel a bit cynical about the way things are run. You know how it goes—big corporations, big egos, and a lot of red tape that seems designed specifically to slow down anyone actually trying to get work done. It reminds me of this time back in Seattle when I was working for a logistics firm; we had this one department head who acted like he was the king of the world, making decisions that made zero sense for the actual workflow, all while insisting everything was "perfectly optimized." It wasn't. It was a mess. And seeing that kind of structural dysfunction play out on such a huge level? It’s exhausting. There’s just this disconnect between the people at the top making these sweeping, grand proclamations and the reality of the day-to-day grind. It’s frustrating, really—it's that classic case of mismanagement masquerading as "visionary leadership."

But here’s where we hit the real wall—it’s all well and good to talk about this massive potential we have sitting right in front of us, but what does any of that actually mean if we can't figure out how to tap into it? It’s one thing to stare at a gold mine, but it’s an entirely different beast to actually pick up a shovel and start digging. We keep circling the same drain, talking in circles about what *could* be, without ever addressing the actual mechanics of how we turn that raw capability into something tangible. It's frustrating, honestly—like watching a championship-caliber team in Chicago sit on the bench during the fourth quarter because they can't get their playbook straight. We have the talent, we have the resources, but the execution? That's the missing link. How do we actually bridge that gap? So, I have this friend—let’s call him Dave—who has recently decided that he’s too good for anything that’s actually been through a stove. He’s gone full raw vegan. Not just "I like salads" raw, but the kind of hardcore, unhinged raw where if it’s even been near a microwave, he looks at you like you’ve just admitted to a felony. It’s honestly exhausting. We were out grabbing a bite the other day—well, I was grabbing a bite, he was mostly just staring intensely at a bowl of unseasoned kale and some sprouted seeds—and the whole thing just felt... off. It’s one of those things where you want to support your buddies, really, you do, but there comes a point where their lifestyle choices start feeling like a personal lecture to everyone else at the table. I remember back in college, I had a roommate who went through a similar phase with some weird holistic cleanse, and it was just as draining. You end up sitting there, mid-sentence, wondering if you can even mention how good that burger smells without triggering an impromptu seminar on digestive enzymes or whatever the latest trend is. It’s less about the food and more about the sheer, stubborn intensity of it all—that feeling that if you don't eat exactly like them, you're somehow fundamentally failing at being a healthy human being. Anyway, I digress. Just one of those things that makes you miss the days when lunch was just... lunch. He claims that we can only truly tap into our full potential by synchronizing ourselves with the natural world—as if we’re just some broken gears waiting to be realigned. His big solution? Apparently, the secret to greatness lies in eating nothing but raw food and strictly sticking to organic farming. It sounds simple enough on paper, I suppose, but it ignores the sheer complexity of how we actually live. He insists we have to completely overhaul our mindsets and toss out everything we’ve been taught... especially when it comes to nutrition. Honestly, it feels like one of those "all or nothing" arguments that ignores the reality of a busy life in a place like Chicago or New York, where you can't exactly spend every waking hour tending to an organic patch of dirt just to get your vitamins. We’ve been conditioned by generations of dietary science, and while he thinks that conditioning is "wrong," I think it's a bit much to suggest we just wipe the slate clean and go back to basics overnight.
I honestly don't see how his diet is actually driving any spiritual breakthroughs. It’s all an illusion—he’s only "successful" because he’s convinced himself that the food is the catalyst. It's pure placebo. If you genuinely believe that blowing smoke from a tiny little finger for an hour every single day is going to expand your consciousness, then sure, it'll happen—but only because you've successfully brainwashed yourself into thinking it will.
It’s funny how some people are absolutely convinced that staring directly into the sun is going to make them enlightened or somehow physically superior—as if gazing at a blinding light source is a shortcut to spiritual nirvana or peak health. But honestly? It doesn't actually change their biology. It only "works" because they *believe* it does! It’s pure, unadulterated placebo effect—that psychological loop where if you convince yourself you're absorbing cosmic energy, your brain just decides to roll with it. It's like those folks who swear by certain expensive wellness supplements that have zero scientific backing; they feel better simply because they've invested in the idea. It’s all in the head.
It turns out that the whole concept of spirituality is really just one giant, circular exercise in self-worship—a massive feedback loop where you're basically just placing an enormous amount of faith in your own existence. 😲 😁

I’ve been trying—quite unsuccessfully, I might add—to convince a buddy of mine that our early ancestors were actually vegetarians at first. Then you have those folks who swear we only made any real spiritual or physical leaps once we started eating meat and cooking our food.
http://www.nytimes.com/news/cooking-evolution-article-23718

The idea is that marriage has always been more about shared meals than just physical attraction, according to Richard Wrangham, an anthropologist over at Harvard. It’s that old-school cliché everyone knows: the wife stays home all day prepping dinner so it's ready when the husband walks through the door after work.

The whole ritual kicks off the moment he steps inside; everyone takes their spots around the dining table, the husband sits at the head, and dinner is served.

We ended up with this specific social structure because of our deep evolutionary roots.

"I truly believe the real turning point for humanity happened when we mastered fire and started eating cooked food, because it fundamentally alters our bodies, our brains, how we manage our time, and our entire social fabric," Wrangham argues in his book, “Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human.”

When you look at the cultural, historical, and culinary evidence, Wrangham's theory carries some serious weight.

There isn't a single society on this planet that doesn't cook—honestly, if we were still relying solely on raw food, we probably wouldn't have made it this far. Not to mention how much harder it is to digest stuff that hasn't been broken down by heat.


P.S.

For some reason, reading this makes me think of Maslow and his take on Transcendental Meditation:

People jump into Transcendental Meditation for all sorts of reasons:

1. Cutting down on stress and finding some actual balance in life.

2. Boosting overall health and tackling issues triggered by stress.

3. Personal performance: mental clarity, sparking creativity, and being more productive.

4. Improving how you get along with other people.

5. Self-awareness: essentially fulfilling those core human needs.
Matthew Cruz44 Matthew Cruz44 Active Member
80 messages
joined Aug 2018
#16 ·
I honestly think this is such a fantastic topic to dive into.

When you're looking to truly find yourself and reach that level of self-actualization, the real work lies in actually listening to your own inner voice, but most people tend to procrastinate on that because, let's be honest, facing your own truth isn't exactly a walk in the park—it can be pretty uncomfortable. Instead of doing that heavy lifting, they often try to chase external milestones and trophies, thinking those things will somehow fill the void, which is a bit like trying to quench your thirst by staring at a picture of a glass of water.

It’s funny, though, because I’ve had plenty of people project their own selfishness onto me just because I make an effort to focus on my own growth and mental clarity, whereas they aren't quite willing to take that same path...
Matthew Cruz44 Matthew Cruz44 Active Member
80 messages
joined Aug 2018
#17 ·
Self-actualization pops up all the time in the world of art—think of those profound stories where someone meets their end with total, crystalline self-awareness.

It really doesn't matter whether you’re looking at this as a slow climb over several decades or a singular, lightning-bolt moment of clarity.

I don't see it as being synonymous with enlightenment either; in fact, I think it's something even more expansive. You could have someone who has reached a state of enlightenment but lacks true self-actualization, and honestly, that person often ends up struggling quite a bit.

The real goal here is to focus on the whole human being—to weave together every single thread of one's personal history and soul into a complete, unified tapestry.
Matthew Cruz44 Matthew Cruz44 Active Member
80 messages
joined Aug 2018
#18 ·
So, the whole idea is to catch oneself within a web, to weave oneself into a larger network.

That’s why social media serves as such a perfect symbol for this noble pursuit within its original concept.
Joseph Bailey41 Joseph Bailey41 Veteran
1K messages
joined Apr 2021
#19 ·
Matthew Cruz44 said:So, the whole idea is to catch oneself within a web, to weave oneself into a larger network.

That’s why social media serves as such a perfect symbol for this noble pursuit within its original concept.

I don't know if I agree. Those kinds of networks already exist all throughout nature; even fungi create these massive, interconnected webs. 😁
Betty Patel172 Betty Patel172 Member
35 messages
joined Mar 2009
#20 ·
If you happen to be lucky enough to retire with a decent nest egg, you could simply disappear into seclusion? 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads