urbantinker8 said:I suppose kids might want to gamify their schoolwork, but they’re just children, after all, so I guess they tend to care more about the grade on the paper than actually absorbing the material.
though parents probably ought to be a bit more discerning about that approach.☕
thankfully, various educational seminars have been highlighting this specific issue where students struggle to truly grasp a second language even after five years of study, and I'm hopeful that some sort of standard will be implemented soon to address it.🎉
That approach would actually make sense if learning a second language provided extra credit for school admissions—something that gives those continuing their studies a real edge over everyone else. Forcing kids into advanced tracks feels wrong; I think the best move is what Michelle Nelson4 and Sarah Hall53 are suggesting: simply reducing the number of kids required to take a second language in elementary school.
I truly believe we should give kids a real reason to stick with a language. Maybe offer extra points for a certificate from a private language academy, or include it as an elective credit on their transcripts. Even having them take an entrance exam to earn bonus points for advanced placement would create a meaningful advantage over the crowd of students sitting right at that 78-80% grade threshold.
I remember an instance where the German teacher's schedule was the deciding factor. It just happened to coincide with a generation of students who didn't prioritize German. Or perhaps they just couldn't justify increasing the hours for the French or Spanish teachers, depending on how you look at it.
In any case, there was some specific logic used to fill those first 28 spots in the French class, leaving everyone else out. Learning a language from 4th through 8th grade was a tough spot because there weren't enough students who had stuck with it to sustain the higher levels, yet priority was given to those who hadn't studied it at all. To me, that doesn't make much sense when there were plenty of interested students (and by the way, this was a group where both languages only started being taught in 4th grade). It’s especially strange because in that German class, you had students who had been studying German since 4th grade starting all over again, alongside students who had been studying French—yet everyone was forced into German... it just feels unfair. As I mentioned, it likely came down to the German teacher's availability (or maybe they just didn't want to overload the French teacher; I don't want to sound like I'm taking sides here...).
We shouldn't forget that elective options are limited by what the school can actually provide. Those choices are shaped by the specific credentials and certifications held by the staff on their diplomas.🤷
I'm not saying whether that's good or bad; it's just the reality of the situation. I honestly don't know how it could work any other way, since schools can't fulfill every single wish, and it's probably better if kids choose schools based on the languages actually offered... even if it means a slightly longer commute.