CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Parenting & Kids › Students & Teens › High School Guide: Admissions, reviews, and advice

High School Guide: Admissions, reviews, and advice

Started by wanderinggardener12 · · 👁 16 views · 1.9K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants wanderinggardener12rowdyviper42Nicholas KingSusan JamesAlex Ross5goldenjackal43Rachel Jones8Michelle Ward3swiftbear86hiddenjackal17redridge13Larry Walker24Jason MorganAmanda Hughes37Christian Lee13dustymarlin10Jessica Chavez4Jamie Newman5Chloe Rodriguez74rowdypanther12Bryan Jones82Sarah James4Dana Diaz8copperpuma11 …
urbantinker8 urbantinker8 Regular
759 messages
joined Jan 2023
#1721 ·
Susan James said:That's why I said I wasn't sure if it had happened yet—in my graduating class, it didn't happen for those exact reasons.
Even just one student being against it can stop the whole thing. Plus, teachers usually end up with fewer teaching hours if students drop a subject, so that definitely plays a role in the negotiations...😬

Yeah, you can tell from the Seattle track that they're heading off to all sorts of different colleges. They might not be as numerous as the STEM kids, but they're definitely moving on.

Like I said, it happens.
As for the teachers' hourly pay, I guess for a lot of them, it actually works out fine since they end up working so much overtime—especially the science teachers, given how few of them there are left these days.
Scott Booth Scott Booth Member
41 messages
joined Mar 2022
#1722 ·
urbantinker8 said:Like I said, it happens.
As for the teachers' hourly pay, I guess for a lot of them, it actually works out fine since they end up working so much overtime—especially the science teachers, given how few of them there are left these days.

Susan James said:That's why I said I wasn't sure if it had happened yet—in my graduating class, it didn't happen for those exact reasons.
Even just one student being against it can stop the whole thing. Plus, teachers usually end up with fewer teaching hours if students drop a subject, so that definitely plays a role in the negotiations...😬

Yeah, you can tell from the Seattle track that they're heading off to all sorts of different colleges. They might not be as numerous as the STEM kids, but they're definitely moving on.

I know a few people personally. One of them actually got his PhD in physics abroad and now he's traveling around universities across the EU looking for the perfect place to settle down. Knowing a second language certainly helps him out there. And others are following a similar path.
Dennis Alvarez2 Dennis Alvarez2 Member
25 messages
joined Jun 2023
#1723 ·
I suppose there is a certain quiet elegance to being able to observe everything from such a distance without feeling the need to intervene. Dennis Alvarez2 says:
Just like any other profession, you find that education is split between those who truly love what they do and people who just clock in from nine to five, strictly following the curriculum with absolutely zero creativity. In my view, the system itself is flawed because it forces all students into the same mold; some will naturally thrive while others simply sink, yet there are rarely any consequences for teachers who fail to perform. I was fortunate enough that my children had three or four exceptional teachers during their elementary school years who actually pushed them, motivated them, and found ways to bring out their absolute best—they were few and far between, but they made all the difference. It’s telling that high schoolers are given surveys to evaluate their instructors, yet that level of accountability never seems to exist in middle school.

My previous colleagues were quite similar to you, including two teachers who followed that exact same pattern; they wouldn't bother buying extra textbooks because they simply borrowed them from their peers, and they would also print out last year's tests to use for study prep. In fact, they prepared materials for every single lesson and exam, which they always made sure to pass along to me. 🤣 My son doesn't exactly follow those methods, but I don't see that as an issue at all. I truly believe there is no single right way to raise a child, and I am perfectly comfortable with everyone choosing the path they feel is best for their own family. We are all different, and honestly, that diversity is exactly why we are here—to share our unique perspectives and learn from one another's experiences.

That’s right, the three of us have been swapping materials back and forth. 🙂 I also encourage my child to host playdates or head over to friends' houses so they can study together, and while I realize it might not be the most efficient way to tackle schoolwork, there is something genuinely charming about listening to them quiz and explain concepts to one another from the next room. It breaks up the usual routine quite nicely.

I honestly believe one of the most significant flaws in our American school system is the failure to teach students actual study skills—things like how to read effectively, how to memorize information, and how to properly recall what they have learned. Some kids manage to figure this out on their own during elementary school, others stumble upon it in high school or college, and some struggle through their entire academic career because they never mastered these basics. This lack of guidance often leads students to opt for easier paths or less rigorous schools simply because they haven't been equipped with the right tools. I am firmly convinced that any child can be helped to master these techniques, because at its core, learning is a skill that can be refined. While it is true that you cannot turn every single child into a surgeon—natural limitations certainly exist—I am absolutely certain that every student can be "upgraded" if they are given the right methodology. The current system operates under the flawed assumption that children should arrive in the classroom already knowing how to learn, which is a massive systemic weakness. Suddenly, in middle school, students are expected to memorize vast sets of definitions, concepts, and data points, yet the only tool ever suggested is something like mind mapping. Even then, those maps are often too reductive, consisting of vague terms floating around a center point, and they are only applicable to a handful of specific subjects. I would love to see the textbooks used in American universities to train future teachers; specifically, I want to know which methods are being suggested to these aspiring educators and why these strategies aren't being prioritized in actual classrooms. This wasn't taught when I was in school either. After all, what other explanation is there for a child who is brilliant, energetic, funny, and incredibly curious to still be drowning in their schoolwork? I am not speaking as a professional researcher here, but rather from my own observations of the children in my life.

I have never quite understood that persistent argument suggesting that if a student didn't excel during their elementary school years, they are somehow disqualified from getting into a competitive prep school. I see people on this forum making these sort of prophetic claims all the time, insisting that if a child hasn't mastered total independence by a certain age, they simply aren't cut out for an advanced academic track. 😁 Absolutely. Education is a marathon, not a sprint. There’s this incredibly fatalistic and prejudiced mindset that suggests if a student didn't maintain a perfect GPA at a top-tier prep school, they’ll never make it through an elite university. Why be so definitive and judgmental when looking at kids? I’ve witnessed so many instances where students hit their stride during high school, suddenly flourishing and performing far above their previous averages. Years ago, I couldn't quite put my finger on why that happened, but it always fascinated me. Now, I realize it's just part of the journey. After all, students from average public high schools end up in medical school all the time, and honestly, even those from vocational schools can reach those heights. 👍 It happens at all sorts of prestigious universities too. People experience these phenomenal breakthroughs. That is precisely why we should be much more cautious about labeling children as early as elementary school.

Benjamin Johnson7 said:In education, much like any other profession, you encounter those who truly love their work and pour their hearts into it, and then there are those who simply show up from 8 to 3, strictly adhering to the curriculum with absolutely zero creativity.
In my view, the system itself is flawed; it places all the pressure on the children, where some will naturally excel while others struggle to stay afloat, yet teachers face no accountability for their lack of effort—there is simply nothing you can do about it. I was fortunate enough that during my children's elementary school years, they had at least three or four teachers who actively encouraged them, pushed them forward, and found ways to motivate them to reach their full potential; they were few, certainly, but they were invaluable. A High Schooler is given surveys to evaluate their teachers, but that option wasn't available back in the eighth grade.

I have friends quite similar to you, including two teachers who follow the exact same routine; they just don't bother buying extra textbooks because they borrow them from colleagues, and yes, they recycle last year's tests for exam prep. They actually prepare materials for every single test and lesson, which they diligently forward to me 🤣 though my son never bothers to look at them. I have no issue with parents raising their children according to what they deem most appropriate; that is perfectly acceptable to me. We are all different, and it is a good thing that we are, which is precisely why we are here—to exchange experiences and perspectives.

As far as I am aware, in Miami, there isn't an entrance exam for high schools, though there are specific ones for vocational paths, such as the School of Fine Arts.

I am curious, however, how many parents of those NYC high schools will REFUSE to print out last year's entrance exam tests for study prep if their child shows no interest? 😉

I know plenty of parents who take their children to Professional Career Orientation sessions for high school selection.
Well, there's a bit of everything in this world.

It’s interesting that in Los Angeles there aren't entrance exams for the major high schools. I wasn't aware of that, and I would have assumed you had them long ago. Clearly, the pressure isn't quite the same as it is in Chicago. Which are the most sought-after high schools in your area? I didn't take my child to career counseling, but I think it would be a great idea during high school if they were struggling to decide on a college major.
rustyowl7 rustyowl7 Active Member
70 messages
joined Nov 2021
#1724 ·
We don't have an abundance of high schools here, so when they do open up, the competition is absolutely fierce. We have two general education schools, two language academies, one focused on STEM, and one specialized in arts. One of the language schools even offers a classical track alongside an Archiepiscopal classical program. The entry requirements are incredibly high, and the rush of applicants is massive every single year. Last year, the STEM academy required the highest cutoff scores of them all...
Michelle Nelson4 Michelle Nelson4 Regular
544 messages
joined Jan 2024
#1725 ·
It says 75 is the lowest score for PM, but honestly, with those points, you wouldn't even be able to step foot in NYC for the entrance exams. For languages, maybe it’s around 72 or 69, and then a classic 65 for the last one? That feels significantly lower than the usual minimum scores we see in NYC.
Dennis Alvarez2 Dennis Alvarez2 Member
25 messages
joined Jun 2023
#1726 ·
It’s honestly surprising to me that San Francisco has such a limited selection of high schools. The lower entry requirements there might suggest that the grades aren't being inflated quite as aggressively, though I can't say for certain. Personally, I find myself leaning toward the idea of national standardized testing. It would function much like the SATs—tests administered under strict conditions with sealed materials until the moment they begin. Implementing a uniform standard across the entire United States would ensure that students with genuine talent and knowledge receive a fair assessment, while simultaneously providing invaluable data regarding the performance of individual teachers and institutions. Of course, I wouldn't mind if schools kept their own entrance exams; allowing each school to set its own specific criteria and expectations for incoming students seems perfectly reasonable.

Furthermore, I feel strongly that grading should be calculated to two decimal places rather than rounding off a 3.5 and a 4.4 into the same value. When you round everything up, you end up with those frantic, last-minute scrambles where a student sitting at a 4.3 or 4.4 spends the final two weeks of the semester desperately trying to claw their way to a 4.4, just to be lumped in with the students who maintained a steady 4.8 or 5.0 all year long. I truly wish I understood the reasoning behind why we don't implement two-decimal grading instead of this simplified system, which puts unnecessary pressure on teachers at the end of the term and feels fundamentally unfair to the students who have been consistently high achievers. So many people advocate for this change, yet it seems to be perpetually ignored, so I am genuinely curious about what arguments are being used to block it. 🤔 Has a two-decimal grading scale ever actually existed within our American school systems? I don't recall it ever being part of the curriculum, though I haven't followed the nuances closely enough to be sure. 🤔
Benjamin Johnson7 Benjamin Johnson7 Member
24 messages
joined Oct 2016
#1727 ·
Dennis Alvarez2 said:It’s honestly surprising to me that San Francisco has such a limited selection of high schools. The lower entry requirements there might suggest that the grades aren't being inflated quite as aggressively, though I can't say for certain. Personally, I find myself leaning toward the idea of national standardized testing. It would function much like the SATs—tests administered under strict conditions with sealed materials until the moment they begin. Implementing a uniform standard across the entire United States would ensure that students with genuine talent and knowledge receive a fair assessment, while simultaneously providing invaluable data regarding the performance of individual teachers and institutions. Of course, I wouldn't mind if schools kept their own entrance exams; allowing each school to set its own specific criteria and expectations for incoming students seems perfectly reasonable.

Furthermore, I feel strongly that grading should be calculated to two decimal places rather than rounding off a 3.5 and a 4.4 into the same value. When you round everything up, you end up with those frantic, last-minute scrambles where a student sitting at a 4.3 or 4.4 spends the final two weeks of the semester desperately trying to claw their way to a 4.4, just to be lumped in with the students who maintained a steady 4.8 or 5.0 all year long. I truly wish I understood the reasoning behind why we don't implement two-decimal grading instead of this simplified system, which puts unnecessary pressure on teachers at the end of the term and feels fundamentally unfair to the students who have been consistently high achievers. So many people advocate for this change, yet it seems to be perpetually ignored, so I am genuinely curious about what arguments are being used to block it. 🤔 Has a two-decimal grading scale ever actually existed within our American school systems? I don't recall it ever being part of the curriculum, though I haven't followed the nuances closely enough to be sure. 🤔

San Francisco has about 170,000 residents, and I believe there are roughly 4,500 eighth graders in the entire county; within the city itself, the number of preparatory high schools is quite sufficient.
We also have private academies, vocational schools, and even schools following the IB curriculum.
My son mentioned just yesterday that in his entire class, there were only two students with a perfect 4.0, and across all three eighth-grade classes, there were only five such students.
Regarding grading, I believe the fairest approach would simply be to use a pure average.
His school is reputed to be quite rigorous and demanding.
rustyowl7 rustyowl7 Active Member
70 messages
joined Nov 2021
#1728 ·
Benjamin Johnson7 said:San Francisco has about 170,000 residents, and I believe there are roughly 4,500 eighth graders in the entire county; within the city itself, the number of preparatory high schools is quite sufficient.
We also have private academies, vocational schools, and even schools following the IB curriculum.
My son mentioned just yesterday that in his entire class, there were only two students with a perfect 4.0, and across all three eighth-grade classes, there were only five such students.
Regarding grading, I believe the fairest approach would simply be to use a pure average.
His school is reputed to be quite rigorous and demanding.

My child is in eighth grade, and since sixth grade, not a single student has achieved a 4.0!
We have two private high schools here, but they really don't compare to the standards set by Nazor or Marulic...
Sarah Hall53 Sarah Hall53 Regular
462 messages
joined Oct 2021
#1729 ·
But seriously, it was totally like that—back in my high school days, from sophomore through senior year, the choice was basically just "computer science" or... more computer science 😂
. There wasn't even an option to pick extra credit hours or advanced tracks for any other subject at all. But honestly, things had already shifted by the time my sister's generation came along.

And you know, I didn't even realize we had those elective choices back in middle school until about ten years after I graduated—I only caught on when I was digging through some old files and happened to glance at my old report cards. 😂
Michelle Nelson4 Michelle Nelson4 Regular
544 messages
joined Jan 2024
#1730 ·
Dennis Alvarez2 said:It’s honestly surprising to me that San Francisco has such a limited selection of high schools. The lower entry requirements there might suggest that the grades aren't being inflated quite as aggressively, though I can't say for certain. Personally, I find myself leaning toward the idea of national standardized testing. It would function much like the SATs—tests administered under strict conditions with sealed materials until the moment they begin. Implementing a uniform standard across the entire United States would ensure that students with genuine talent and knowledge receive a fair assessment, while simultaneously providing invaluable data regarding the performance of individual teachers and institutions. Of course, I wouldn't mind if schools kept their own entrance exams; allowing each school to set its own specific criteria and expectations for incoming students seems perfectly reasonable.

Furthermore, I feel strongly that grading should be calculated to two decimal places rather than rounding off a 3.5 and a 4.4 into the same value. When you round everything up, you end up with those frantic, last-minute scrambles where a student sitting at a 4.3 or 4.4 spends the final two weeks of the semester desperately trying to claw their way to a 4.4, just to be lumped in with the students who maintained a steady 4.8 or 5.0 all year long. I truly wish I understood the reasoning behind why we don't implement two-decimal grading instead of this simplified system, which puts unnecessary pressure on teachers at the end of the term and feels fundamentally unfair to the students who have been consistently high achievers. So many people advocate for this change, yet it seems to be perpetually ignored, so I am genuinely curious about what arguments are being used to block it. 🤔 Has a two-decimal grading scale ever actually existed within our American school systems? I don't recall it ever being part of the curriculum, though I haven't followed the nuances closely enough to be sure. 🤔

It never happened, and it never has. Besides, everyone does their own math in their head anyway, hoping for a little grace period or asking a teacher to "overlook" one bad test score if everything else looks good. Implementing two decimal places would mean that absolutely every single mistake counts toward the final grade. That would be pure chaos.

Personally, I think we should return to a 60/40 scoring model. We could make it so 60% of the weight comes from national standardized test scores, while the remaining 40% comes from core subject grades during 7th and 8th grade—no averages allowed, and certainly no letting someone's enrollment depend on whether they passed PE.

A transitional phase could work too: increasing the weight of national testing by 15% each year. So, in the first year it’s 15/85, then 30/70, then 45/55, until finally hitting that 60/40 split in the final year.

That would have a pretty significant impact on the quality of education in middle schools over the long run. Parents would actually have a reason to care about academic rigor rather than just being happy that their kid isn't being asked to demonstrate any actual knowledge...
Sarah Hall53 Sarah Hall53 Regular
462 messages
joined Oct 2021
#1731 ·
Michelle Nelson4 said:It never happened, and it never has. Besides, everyone does their own math in their head anyway, hoping for a little grace period or asking a teacher to "overlook" one bad test score if everything else looks good. Implementing two decimal places would mean that absolutely every single mistake counts toward the final grade. That would be pure chaos.

Personally, I think we should return to a 60/40 scoring model. We could make it so 60% of the weight comes from national standardized test scores, while the remaining 40% comes from core subject grades during 7th and 8th grade—no averages allowed, and certainly no letting someone's enrollment depend on whether they passed PE.

A transitional phase could work too: increasing the weight of national testing by 15% each year. So, in the first year it’s 15/85, then 30/70, then 45/55, until finally hitting that 60/40 split in the final year.

That would have a pretty significant impact on the quality of education in middle schools over the long run. Parents would actually have a reason to care about academic rigor rather than just being happy that their kid isn't being asked to demonstrate any actual knowledge...

Students would basically lose their minds over every single point difference.
My stomach actually hurts just thinking about it.
northerntiger9 northerntiger9 Active Member
86 messages
joined Mar 2021
#1732 ·
Dennis Alvarez2 said:It’s honestly surprising to me that San Francisco has such a limited selection of high schools. The lower entry requirements there might suggest that the grades aren't being inflated quite as aggressively, though I can't say for certain. Personally, I find myself leaning toward the idea of national standardized testing. It would function much like the SATs—tests administered under strict conditions with sealed materials until the moment they begin. Implementing a uniform standard across the entire United States would ensure that students with genuine talent and knowledge receive a fair assessment, while simultaneously providing invaluable data regarding the performance of individual teachers and institutions. Of course, I wouldn't mind if schools kept their own entrance exams; allowing each school to set its own specific criteria and expectations for incoming students seems perfectly reasonable.

Furthermore, I feel strongly that grading should be calculated to two decimal places rather than rounding off a 3.5 and a 4.4 into the same value. When you round everything up, you end up with those frantic, last-minute scrambles where a student sitting at a 4.3 or 4.4 spends the final two weeks of the semester desperately trying to claw their way to a 4.4, just to be lumped in with the students who maintained a steady 4.8 or 5.0 all year long. I truly wish I understood the reasoning behind why we don't implement two-decimal grading instead of this simplified system, which puts unnecessary pressure on teachers at the end of the term and feels fundamentally unfair to the students who have been consistently high achievers. So many people advocate for this change, yet it seems to be perpetually ignored, so I am genuinely curious about what arguments are being used to block it. 🤔 Has a two-decimal grading scale ever actually existed within our American school systems? I don't recall it ever being part of the curriculum, though I haven't followed the nuances closely enough to be sure. 🤔

The whole point of the recent reform was to move away from focusing solely on averages—grades shouldn't just be about the numbers. The idea was to reduce the number of formal, numeric grades and increase qualitative feedback, looking at the student's progress as a whole. It’s not a bad approach—even top students deserve a bad day now and then. If we did it the way you suggest, a straight-A student could have a few perfect scores, then catch a stomach bug or a fever during a test and end up with a 4.43 average—which effectively drags them down to a B.

Or take a kid with solid grades around a 4.6 or 4.7 all year. Then, in the final week of school, they take a big exam, the teacher is exhausted, and because there weren't enough prior grades recorded, the teacher decides to break that one exam into three separate mini-grades. Since each part carries less weight, one mistake results in a 4—suddenly, you have three 4s on the record, the average drops to 4.4, and the kid loses their A. We're talking about 10-year-olds in elementary school here, not high schoolers.

So—God forbid we ever go back to a system where elementary schools rely exclusively on robotic, arithmetic-based grading.
Betty Wood54 Betty Wood54 Active Member
52 messages
joined Mar 2023
#1733 ·
I suppose I should probably start by saying that things have been feeling a bit unsettled lately. It’s hard to put my finger on exactly why, but there's this sense of constant motion, isn't there? I was sitting on my porch the other day—just watching the neighborhood go by here in Chicago—and I started thinking about how much everything changes. One minute you think you have a handle on things, and the next, the ground just shifts under your feet. Maybe it's just me being overly cautious, though. I tend to overthink these things, I guess. Anyway, I wanted to check in and see how everyone else is holding up. Is it just me, or does the world feel a little louder than usual lately? kaže:
What an absolute headache. It’s honestly like trying to apply for high school before the eighth graders have even finished their final exams. Just complete nonsense, really.
Actually, it’s even worse than that. 😂

I don't know, I guess it isn't quite like that. You actually have this window of time between when those final high school exam results come out and when you officially lock in your college applications to start shifting things around. It’s a bit of a grace period, I suppose.
I’m not entirely sure how much time we have left, but I suppose the process usually starts with those preliminary results—the ones that aren't quite set in stone. After that, there’s the whole appeals period where people can contest things, like if they think their scores were calculated incorrectly or something. I imagine those corrections get filed in before the final lists are officially locked in, though, personally, I don't expect to see any massive shifts in the rankings once that happens. Maybe there will be some small adjustments, but nothing too drastic, I guess.
Sarah Hall53 Sarah Hall53 Regular
462 messages
joined Oct 2021
#1734 ·
northerntiger9 said:The whole point of the recent reform was to move away from focusing solely on averages—grades shouldn't just be about the numbers. The idea was to reduce the number of formal, numeric grades and increase qualitative feedback, looking at the student's progress as a whole. It’s not a bad approach—even top students deserve a bad day now and then. If we did it the way you suggest, a straight-A student could have a few perfect scores, then catch a stomach bug or a fever during a test and end up with a 4.43 average—which effectively drags them down to a B.

Or take a kid with solid grades around a 4.6 or 4.7 all year. Then, in the final week of school, they take a big exam, the teacher is exhausted, and because there weren't enough prior grades recorded, the teacher decides to break that one exam into three separate mini-grades. Since each part carries less weight, one mistake results in a 4—suddenly, you have three 4s on the record, the average drops to 4.4, and the kid loses their A. We're talking about 10-year-olds in elementary school here, not high schoolers.

So—God forbid we ever go back to a system where elementary schools rely exclusively on robotic, arithmetic-based grading.

Yeah, totally... as long as the final grade stays above the average, nobody bothers to look at the actual math behind it.
but if you have a kid who spent the entire year being a total nightmare—distracting everyone, turning in blank pages for all those "participation and effort" assignments because they figured "it doesn't count toward my grade anyway"—and you end up giving them a grade lower than their average, you can basically start counting down from three before the school board steps in and wipes your grade out if a parent files an appeal.
Michelle Nelson4 Michelle Nelson4 Regular
544 messages
joined Jan 2024
#1735 ·
Sarah Hall53 said:Yeah, totally... as long as the final grade stays above the average, nobody bothers to look at the actual math behind it.
but if you have a kid who spent the entire year being a total nightmare—distracting everyone, turning in blank pages for all those "participation and effort" assignments because they figured "it doesn't count toward my grade anyway"—and you end up giving them a grade lower than their average, you can basically start counting down from three before the school board steps in and wipes your grade out if a parent files an appeal.

You keep bringing this up, but I’ve actually gone through the district handbook, and what you're saying just isn't in there. It clearly states that the final grade doesn't necessarily have to match the arithmetic mean.

(2) The final course grade at the end of the school year does not have to be derived from the arithmetic mean of all recorded grades, particularly if the student demonstrated significant progress during the second semester.

As you can see, there is absolutely nothing in there stating that you aren't allowed to round down. (And honestly, I’ve seen plenty of cases where that’s exactly what happened).
Sarah Hall53 Sarah Hall53 Regular
462 messages
joined Oct 2021
#1736 ·
Look, I’m telling you how it actually plays out on the ground. The folks over at the school board inspections? They almost always end up ruling "in favor of the student."
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1737 ·
So, why is it that some schools seem perfectly fine with grading below average, while in others, it’s treated like a major crisis?
Is it actually possible that the principal is the one calling the shots on this?
Michelle Nelson4 Michelle Nelson4 Regular
544 messages
joined Jan 2024
#1738 ·
Most parents in those situations usually don't bother calling in the inspectors, so things just tend to slide under the radar. Personally, I haven't actually seen any cases where an inspection was called in, so I really wouldn't know how they’d rule on those specific examples.
mellowskipper mellowskipper Regular
704 messages
joined Jan 2023
#1739 ·
Around here, one teacher gave a student a C when their GPA was sitting at a 3.5—but then bumped them up to a B when they hit a 4.4.
It’s pretty clear she’s playing by her own set of rules, regardless of what the numbers say. I suspect a fair amount of parents are going to file complaints with the school board... especially since these kids are in eighth grade. It seems like she's more than happy to deal with the fallout from an audit or a visit from the district superintendent if she has to.
Michelle Nelson4 Michelle Nelson4 Regular
544 messages
joined Jan 2024
#1740 ·
mellowskipper said:Around here, one teacher gave a student a C when their GPA was sitting at a 3.5—but then bumped them up to a B when they hit a 4.4.
It’s pretty clear she’s playing by her own set of rules, regardless of what the numbers say. I suspect a fair amount of parents are going to file complaints with the school board... especially since these kids are in eighth grade. It seems like she's more than happy to deal with the fallout from an audit or a visit from the district superintendent if she has to.

Anyway, let us know how it turns out! I'm actually really curious to see what happens...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads