David Green11 said:It is true that genetics largely sets the stage by establishing our predispositions; however, the actual performance depends on whether we choose to nurture those traits or suppress them. To use an analogy, if someone carries a genetic predisposition for lung cancer but never touches a cigarette in their entire life, it is highly probable they will never face that illness. In that sense, free will remains very much in play.
The tricky thing is that we can't actually verify this, because you might be absolutely right—I could be operating under the mere illusion of free will whenever I face a crossroads; perhaps my "choice" was already hardwired from the start, making free will effectively non-existent.
But if that were the case, what would even be the point of existing?
But what does "better" even mean? What is considered a better path for you might be entirely different for me. It feels to me as though we have all arrived in this world to undergo specific experiences that we ourselves selected to encounter.
I agree that certain elements feel predetermined, though that is a topic ripe for further debate. While we may have chosen the specific experiences we wish to navigate in this lifetime, the manner in which we experience them is up to us. We have the capacity to learn through both smooth sailing and turbulent storms, and that choice rests solely with us.
Not on my watch! If we just settle for that, then what is the whole point of living? What is the purpose of everything we do??
You aren't entirely wrong. Consider a similar scenario: if there is a genetic predisposition toward colon cancer, logic suggests switching to a dietary pattern proven to be safer. Research indicates that a vegetarian diet offers better protection in that regard. However, the actual difference between a vegetarian diet and a "standard" American diet is captured in this scientific study:
“Out of 100 subjects who consumed meat at some stage of their lives, 33 developed some form of cancer, whereas among vegetarians, cancer was recorded in 29 out of 100 people.”So, observe how much influence free will actually exerts.
Then there is Aveline Kushi, a macrobiotics advocate, who ultimately passed away from cancer. Is that not a twist of fate?
If free will exists, why doesn't the majority of the population opt for a healthier lifestyle? Why doesn't everyone practice meditation (which modern science confirms has positive physiological effects), eat better, or lead lower-stress lives if it all boils down to free will? Any rational person should use their intelligent free will to choose health and optimal conditions for themselves, yet we see the exact opposite happening. Does a person choose war, illness, or misfortune through free will, or is it driven by ignorance—or perhaps a third factor? Does free will depend on knowledge? If it does, then the concept of "freedom" becomes murky, because the knowledge an individual possesses is dictated by many other external factors. It is a tangled web... an interaction of everything and anything.
David Green11 said:It is true that genetics largely sets the stage by establishing our predispositions; however, the actual performance depends on whether we choose to nurture those traits or suppress them. To use an analogy, if someone carries a genetic predisposition for lung cancer but never touches a cigarette in their entire life, it is highly probable they will never face that illness. In that sense, free will remains very much in play.
The tricky thing is that we can't actually verify this, because you might be absolutely right—I could be operating under the mere illusion of free will whenever I face a crossroads; perhaps my "choice" was already hardwired from the start, making free will effectively non-existent.
But if that were the case, what would even be the point of existing?
But what does "better" even mean? What is considered a better path for you might be entirely different for me. It feels to me as though we have all arrived in this world to undergo specific experiences that we ourselves selected to encounter.
I agree that certain elements feel predetermined, though that is a topic ripe for further debate. While we may have chosen the specific experiences we wish to navigate in this lifetime, the manner in which we experience them is up to us. We have the capacity to learn through both smooth sailing and turbulent storms, and that choice rests solely with us.
Not on my watch! If we just settle for that, then what is the whole point of living? What is the purpose of everything we do??
That is a vital question. However, I haven't found the answer. There are as many answers as there are people. Not one is verifiable or entirely satisfying. Consequently, I have made my peace with not knowing. I don't know who I am, where I am going, or what will become of me. I only know that I exist, here and now, and I attempt to be content with that.