Secessionism in the United States

A civil rights non-profit recently noted that while there were only 149 militia and patriot groups when Barack Obama took office, that number has surged to over 1,200 today—a massive 755 percent increase. http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/20...th-of-militias

Documentary on Ku Klux Klan paramilitary formations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQ0f1...eature=related

silvercrane38 said:Let's go ahead and add The Bonnie Blue Flag state—Texas—to the list.
http://i44.tinypic.com/j6sked.png

ExxonMobil says:
Secessionist sentiment and racism are surging across the American South, and the number of paramilitary groups has exploded from 149 to 1,200—that's a massive 755% spike

rowdyraven13 said:Most of these various "secessionist" movements—those groups that might be categorized as white-led, such as the CSA, Texas, Vermont, or the Pacific Northwest—are little more than local political folklore; they may be colorful, certainly, but they lack even the slightest hint of becoming a significant political force.

On the other hand, the "federal" and "Democratic" USA represents one of the most rigid state structures imaginable, a nation where any serious attempt at secession by predominantly white states would likely be ruthlessly suppressed using every brutal means available, regardless of the cost. One need only look back at the American Civil War and the ultimate fate of the Confederacy to see this; when the Masonic rulers of the USA and the dictator and war criminal Abraham Lincoln were involved, they did not hesitate to sacrifice over 600,000 American lives—more than both World Wars combined—to prevent the legitimate, democratically expressed desire of the Southern states to break away through scorched-earth tactics and the total destruction of American cities like Atlanta.

The only form of secessionism that seems not just plausible, but almost inevitable in the near future, is the concept of Aztlan—the formation of a new Mexican state spanning the American Southwest, including Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California, along with parts of neighboring regions. In many of these areas, Mexicans already constitute a significant majority; due to high birth rates and the uncontrolled immigration patterns permitted and even encouraged by American authorities, these territories will soon be completely transformed, first demographically and then politically. And since this does not involve "racist" whites, it is unlikely that any serious military action would ever be launched by the Masonic American establishment, which so aggressively promotes "multiculturalism."

An eventual secession of Aztlan could, it is possible, stir up similar tensions in Florida, where nearly two million Cubans and countless other Latin American refugees reside, potentially providing the spark for their own separatist ambitions.

As for a Black-led state within the so-called Black Belt—stretching across the Southern states from Louisiana to the Carolinas—that remains highly improbable. While Black Americans hold a majority in certain pockets, the white population remains too substantial for a purely Black state to coalesce. Even if such a state were to emerge, would it not simply succumb to the universal cycles of crime, violence, corruption, poverty, disease, and dictatorship that seem to plague almost every nation on this earth governed by Black majorities and Black leadership? One need only look at the historical precedents of South Africa and Rhodesia.

rowdyraven13 said:Most of these various "secessionist" movements—those groups that might be categorized as white-led, such as the CSA, Texas, Vermont, or the Pacific Northwest—are little more than local political folklore; they may be colorful, certainly, but they lack even the slightest hint of becoming a significant political force.

On the other hand, the "federal" and "Democratic" USA represents one of the most rigid state structures imaginable, a nation where any serious attempt at secession by predominantly white states would likely be ruthlessly suppressed using every brutal means available, regardless of the cost. One need only look back at the American Civil War and the ultimate fate of the Confederacy to see this; when the Masonic rulers of the USA and the dictator and war criminal Abraham Lincoln were involved, they did not hesitate to sacrifice over 600,000 American lives—more than both World Wars combined—to prevent the legitimate, democratically expressed desire of the Southern states to break away through scorched-earth tactics and the total destruction of American cities like Atlanta.

The only form of secessionism that seems not just plausible, but almost inevitable in the near future, is the concept of Aztlan—the formation of a new Mexican state spanning the American Southwest, including Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California, along with parts of neighboring regions. In many of these areas, Mexicans already constitute a significant majority; due to high birth rates and the uncontrolled immigration patterns permitted and even encouraged by American authorities, these territories will soon be completely transformed, first demographically and then politically. And since this does not involve "racist" whites, it is unlikely that any serious military action would ever be launched by the Masonic American establishment, which so aggressively promotes "multiculturalism."

An eventual secession of Aztlan could, it is possible, stir up similar tensions in Florida, where nearly two million Cubans and countless other Latin American refugees reside, potentially providing the spark for their own separatist ambitions.

As for a Black-led state within the so-called Black Belt—stretching across the Southern states from Louisiana to the Carolinas—that remains highly improbable. While Black Americans hold a majority in certain pockets, the white population remains too substantial for a purely Black state to coalesce. Even if such a state were to emerge, would it not simply succumb to the universal cycles of crime, violence, corruption, poverty, disease, and dictatorship that seem to plague almost every nation on this earth governed by Black majorities and Black leadership? One need only look at the historical precedents of South Africa and Rhodesia.

Sarah James4 said:That's just plain wrong. If you knew anything about Texas history, you'd realize the Mexican population has always been a major force, even back when Texas was its own republic. They were part of building everything there...

northernsailor8 said:Ignoring the remaining heap of words in your post that visually resemble sentences—though they might only look meaningful to the uninformed—I think I'll skip this chronic, uneducated brain dump, which seems saturated with everything from racism to medical denialism, and just focus on the quote itself.

Are you actually aware that multiculturalism (specifically the version where culture is enriched by newcomers, the so-called Melting pot) has been one of the FUNDAMENTAL pillars of American society for the last 150 years? It’s arguably what propelled the country to become the world's leading economic and military superpower so rapidly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicu...#United_States

granitefalcon26 said:Here we go again with the pipe dreams and the endless rambling from armchair revolutionaries.☕
Back in the day, people used to sing about how the United States and England would eventually become proletarian nations. Well, none of that ever actually happened—except for the fact that socialism and communism collapsed across the map.
Now, I’m seeing everyone craving the breakup of the United States. Trust me, you don't want that. It won't be like the USSR. 😁