CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Dr. Michael Newton

Dr. Michael Newton

Started by Daniel Ortiz15 · · 👁 4 views · 7 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Daniel Ortiz15bluemason3Nancy Wilson2redharbor9mellowseal20
Daniel Ortiz15 Daniel Ortiz15 MemberOP
10 messages
joined Mar 2012
#1 ·
What’s everyone’s take on this "certified hypnotherapy expert"? He’s pretty well-known for his book "journey of souls," but depending on who you ask, he’s either just another big-time promoter for the "New Agency" or he’s a total realist. I'm curious to hear what you all think about him.
bluemason3 bluemason3 Veteran
1.1K messages
joined Jun 2016
#2 ·
Is this meant to be an alternative topic? 😬

Look, being a realist isn't necessarily a bad thing, though I suppose some might see it that way 😁
Nancy Wilson2 Nancy Wilson2 Active Member
73 messages
joined Sep 2011
#3 ·
His sessions are handled with a complete lack of professionalism—his case studies are no different. It’s all heavily driven by suggestion, which inevitably leads to his clients walking away with nothing but false memories and pure fabrications.
redharbor9 redharbor9 Regular
272 messages
joined Aug 2009
#4 ·
But look, the fact is it actually helps, which just brings up this massive question: what matters more... having a reliable memory or actually solving the problem?
Nancy Wilson2 Nancy Wilson2 Active Member
73 messages
joined Sep 2011
#5 ·
Yes, it provides some comfort—in the sense that it dulls the edge of fear and offers a bit of solace. However, my priority remains the truth. And the reality is that these recollections are fundamentally unreliable, given the facts I laid out above.

That said, it doesn't follow that the entire premise Michael Newton was attempting to prove is false.
redharbor9 redharbor9 Regular
272 messages
joined Aug 2009
#6 ·
It’s not just about calming nerves or offering some comfort; this stuff can actually wipe the problem out entirely...

As for the whole truth thing... that's on the individual to decide. When my clients ask me to dig up memories through hypnosis, I always lay it out for them: those "memories" might just be mental constructs that have zero connection to what actually happened. I let them choose—do they want to just fix the issue, or are we going down the rabbit hole of chasing "truth"?
bluemason3 bluemason3 Veteran
1.1K messages
joined Jun 2016
#7 ·
Therapy is fine, but things get messy when people present it as absolute fact or hard proof for anything. It’s especially problematic when there's too much orchestration involved—all those indirect suggestions nudging you toward a specific conclusion.

From a therapeutic standpoint, though, I think it gets more interesting when you look at direct regression to a cause. Even without any intention of exploring past lives, if someone experiences something that feels like a previous existence, my guess is the subconscious can just wrap its own narrative around any framework provided. It uses those details to work through issues. After all, we already use stories, metaphors, and various visualizations in sessions, so this could easily be perceived the same way.🤷
mellowseal20 mellowseal20 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2012
#8 ·
Honestly, this stuff was all laid out fifty years ago. Go ask your auntie at the local library if you don't believe me.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads