Internet vs. Prayer: The spiritual value of WikiLeaks

The Internet is basically the ultimate achievement.

Everything you could ever want to know right at your fingertips... being able to chat or connect with someone halfway across the globe in real time... It’s wild!

But here's the catch—it's turning into a straight-up addiction.
Every coin has two sides, after all...

The issue isn't actually the Internet itself; it’s our own built-in inability to stop biting onto everything that catches our eye...
We're like those monkeys who find something inside a hollow tree trunk—once they shove their hand in, they can't pull it back out because they refuse to let go of whatever they're clutching.

If this obsession were purely about the pursuit of knowledge, we'd be fine.
Man, I'd give anything to have been able to surf the web as a kid whenever I got obsessed with astronomy, physics, chemistry, geology, aerospace, biology... you name it. Instead of wasting my life digging through dusty old library stacks.

Sadly, that hunger for truth (now that every scrap of info is just a tap away) hasn't won out.

Other appetites have sniffed out an opportunity and floated right to the surface.

The problem is clearly us.

Take WikiLeaks; you have to wonder how much of it is actual information and how much is just pure manipulation.
All the time, people trade a little credibility by leaking half-truths or highly selective facts—sacrificing a small win now to make a killing later—just so they can pivot and hit you with lies and insinuations exactly where they want.
Who knows what the endgame is, who the target is, or who's pulling the strings behind the curtain.
This whole story about some disgruntled clerk leaking thousands upon thousands of documents? It's as hollow as Tutankhamun's skull.
People are just easy prey, like cattle waiting to be led.
The whole thing reeks to me, just like the attacks on the World Trade Center.

When you crunch the numbers, the "victim" ends up walking away with a massive profit.

They get to control Iraqi oil, dominate the Middle East (and if they feel like it, take a swing at Iran), squeeze Russia (by planting issues in Poland), and slow down China and the European Union in their attempts to become economic superpowers—all while triggering economic crises or depressions by dumping massive amounts of cash from the American central reserves.

It's the exact same way certain tabloids used to run the show back in the day, under the thumb of guys like Ivić Pašalić, installing and toppling ministers or swaying decisions made by Franjo Harmon.
Operating from the shadows to a certain extent...
Everyone used to fear the Doctor (Her Flick).
Nowadays, anyone and everyone can be demonized or promoted overnight.
You can turn a saint into a degenerate or vice versa in a heartbeat.

The real question is simply: who is holding the reins and steering public opinion?

I get the feeling that, in that regard, the Internet is nothing but a digital El Dorado of endless possibilities.

😢

dustyskipper3 said:It’s interesting... I know larger groups have meditated for peace here in the States too. But I guess I’m not entirely sure if prayer—you know, addressing some transcendental being, sometimes even with a specific request in mind—can really be equated to meditation. Meditation doesn't involve any kind of address or asking for things; it's just this general longing for harmony and peace, I suppose. I just know the Roman Catholic Church isn't exactly fond of meditation or yoga; to them, those kinds of things are practically devilry. Yet, what they do themselves and who they choose to back is apparently perfectly fine in their eyes. There was even a claim that Vatican City once stated: "If Bill Clinton is a thief, then so is Pope Benedict XVI".😲😲😲

I'm also curious about the actual meaning behind the word "synarchy" used in this piece regarding Agartha.

Quote : When The Anarchy which exists in Our World is replaced by The Synarchy

Is what they are doing with WikiLeaks an introduction to anarchy, or is it leading toward synarchy, which some people interpret as a cryptocracy—you know, that rule by people operating from the shadows?

There is such a thing as Christian meditation, which is actually quite similar to Eastern practices; the goal is to achieve unity with God through a contemplative state rather than just asking for things...

Synergy implies the rule of the spiritually superior, the enlightened... I'm not sure if what's happening with WikiLeaks is intended to establish a caste of brahmins...

And I don't see Agartha as a physical location—that feels a bit too materialistic to me. It’s more of a symbol. René Guénon also rejected that materialist view, arguing instead that it represents a communion of spirit, the collective spiritual strength of certain people, rather than a specific geographic spot where they all live...

dustyskipper3 said:It’s interesting... I know larger groups have meditated for peace here in the States too. But I guess I’m not entirely sure if prayer—you know, addressing some transcendental being, sometimes even with a specific request in mind—can really be equated to meditation. Meditation doesn't involve any kind of address or asking for things; it's just this general longing for harmony and peace, I suppose. I just know the Roman Catholic Church isn't exactly fond of meditation or yoga; to them, those kinds of things are practically devilry. Yet, what they do themselves and who they choose to back is apparently perfectly fine in their eyes. There was even a claim that Vatican City once stated: "If Bill Clinton is a thief, then so is Pope Benedict XVI".😲😲😲

I'm also curious about the actual meaning behind the word "synarchy" used in this piece regarding Agartha.

Quote : When The Anarchy which exists in Our World is replaced by The Synarchy

Is what they are doing with WikiLeaks an introduction to anarchy, or is it leading toward synarchy, which some people interpret as a cryptocracy—you know, that rule by people operating from the shadows?

Watch out, that's exactly how Satan creeps in—just to cloud the transparency🙄
Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between the spirits of Darkness and everyone else.

dustyskipper3 said:It’s interesting... I know larger groups have meditated for peace here in the States too. But I guess I’m not entirely sure if prayer—you know, addressing some transcendental being, sometimes even with a specific request in mind—can really be equated to meditation. Meditation doesn't involve any kind of address or asking for things; it's just this general longing for harmony and peace, I suppose. I just know the Roman Catholic Church isn't exactly fond of meditation or yoga; to them, those kinds of things are practically devilry. Yet, what they do themselves and who they choose to back is apparently perfectly fine in their eyes. There was even a claim that Vatican City once stated: "If Bill Clinton is a thief, then so is Pope Benedict XVI".😲😲😲

I'm also curious about the actual meaning behind the word "synarchy" used in this piece regarding Agartha.

Quote : When The Anarchy which exists in Our World is replaced by The Synarchy

Is what they are doing with WikiLeaks an introduction to anarchy, or is it leading toward synarchy, which some people interpret as a cryptocracy—you know, that rule by people operating from the shadows?

They were practically looking to crucify them, and they even ended up on blacklists
but honestly, we've seen this play out before: even Jesus stood against authority, national borders, and rigid hierarchies🙄
Jesus died and rose again so that we could experience His Spirit within the virtual realm and through the Internet🙏

Jeremy Davis7 said:The Internet is basically the ultimate achievement.

Everything you could ever want to know right at your fingertips... being able to chat or connect with someone halfway across the globe in real time... It’s wild!

But here's the catch—it's turning into a straight-up addiction.
Every coin has two sides, after all...

The issue isn't actually the Internet itself; it’s our own built-in inability to stop biting onto everything that catches our eye...
We're like those monkeys who find something inside a hollow tree trunk—once they shove their hand in, they can't pull it back out because they refuse to let go of whatever they're clutching.

If this obsession were purely about the pursuit of knowledge, we'd be fine.
Man, I'd give anything to have been able to surf the web as a kid whenever I got obsessed with astronomy, physics, chemistry, geology, aerospace, biology... you name it. Instead of wasting my life digging through dusty old library stacks.

Sadly, that hunger for truth (now that every scrap of info is just a tap away) hasn't won out.

Other appetites have sniffed out an opportunity and floated right to the surface.

The problem is clearly us.

Take WikiLeaks; you have to wonder how much of it is actual information and how much is just pure manipulation.
All the time, people trade a little credibility by leaking half-truths or highly selective facts—sacrificing a small win now to make a killing later—just so they can pivot and hit you with lies and insinuations exactly where they want.
Who knows what the endgame is, who the target is, or who's pulling the strings behind the curtain.
This whole story about some disgruntled clerk leaking thousands upon thousands of documents? It's as hollow as Tutankhamun's skull.
People are just easy prey, like cattle waiting to be led.
The whole thing reeks to me, just like the attacks on the World Trade Center.

When you crunch the numbers, the "victim" ends up walking away with a massive profit.

They get to control Iraqi oil, dominate the Middle East (and if they feel like it, take a swing at Iran), squeeze Russia (by planting issues in Poland), and slow down China and the European Union in their attempts to become economic superpowers—all while triggering economic crises or depressions by dumping massive amounts of cash from the American central reserves.

It's the exact same way certain tabloids used to run the show back in the day, under the thumb of guys like Ivić Pašalić, installing and toppling ministers or swaying decisions made by Franjo Harmon.
Operating from the shadows to a certain extent...
Everyone used to fear the Doctor (Her Flick).
Nowadays, anyone and everyone can be demonized or promoted overnight.
You can turn a saint into a degenerate or vice versa in a heartbeat.

The real question is simply: who is holding the reins and steering public opinion?

I get the feeling that, in that regard, the Internet is nothing but a digital El Dorado of endless possibilities.

😢

A coin always has two sides... whether it's Satan or the spirit of God, transparency or manipulation—in the end, it’s up to us to use our free will following WikiLeaks to sort through the noise ourselves.

They'll probably ban me soon: that's three posts in a row, yikes!

On Agartha from the book King of the World by Ren Guenona:

Based on the testimony of all consenting traditions, it’s easy to conclude that there exists a single "Holy Land"—a spiritual center to which all other centers are subject. This "Holy Land" is also the "land of the saints," the "land of the blessed," the "land of the living," and the "land of immortality." All these terms are synonymous, and one should probably add the descriptor "pure land" that Plato uses specifically to describe the "abode of the blessed." Usually, this abode is located within the "invisible world," but if we actually want to grasp what this means, we shouldn't forget the "spiritual hierarchies" mentioned by all traditions, which essentially represent various initiatory stages.

Here is another excerpt from the book:

... We won't dwell further on the meaning of those two priesthoods here; we will simply include some words from Saint Paul: "Here (in the Levitical priesthood) mortals receive a tenth, but there, one receives it for him who is testified to live forever." That "living man" is Melchizedek; he is the Manu who remains "eternal" (le olam in Hebrew), meaning for the entire duration of his cycle (manvantara) or the world over which he specifically reigns. He is "without genealogy" because his origin is "non-human," as he is the prototype of man himself. He is indeed "akin to the Son of God" because, through the Law he brings, he serves as the expression and image of the divine Word for this world.

Honestly, you really ought to read the whole booklet. Presented in snippets like this, it's probably a bit confusing since he’s pulling from so many different traditions... Regardless, I find myself believing in the power of the "invisible"—in a divine order that possesses the capacity to overcome the forces of Darkness at any given moment. And I suspect even the "little guy" with his "small thoughts" can make an impact. Now, whether WikiLeaks is actually an extension of Melchizedek's reach... that's a question.

We'll just have to wait and see what's rolling in from over the horizon.
My old handle back in the day on this site was Dream, and I actually stumbled upon my own post in that one thread about enrollments—the one that's actually worth a read—and I couldn't help but laugh at myself. I was basically consuming nonsense back then, and looking back, my style was just so childish and full of that total life naivety we all go through.
A lot of futurists and cultural philosophers generally argue that any theoretical concept can be quite effectively used within the New World Order to strengthen things on both a personal and social level—mostly by distributing it evenly to every single individual, though, of course, they probably won't even realize it's happening.
WikiLeaks could very easily become a new kind of mainstream media quite soon: everyone is talking about us, so what, let the humans enjoy themselves with the info. It doesn't really do any harm, since the system is only getting stronger from a practical and socio-global standpoint.
Can anyone actually stop staring at their screens?! 😁
It might sound a bit horrible, but this could take on much more serious dimensions soon, especially since 2011 is predicted to be the birth year for the synergy between mobile communications and the computing world.
Whether there's an entire community of that specific kind of raw honesty hiding behind Julian Assange... well, only time will tell.
Will he end up being absorbed by the Borg, or will the promise of the next spring blossoms hold true? We'll just have to see...
It feels to me like we're entering an era of much more intense global shifts. Whether the appearance of a ghost in the machine means a happy, unhappy, or just a messy outcome—and how that outcome will impact our entire civilization—is a question that even Julian Assange doesn't seem to lose sleep over.
😉

Jeremy Brooks6;

I can’t shake the feeling that we’re sliding straight into a period of massive, global upheaval. It feels heavy. Like, how do you even read the signs anymore? If a ghost shows up in the window, does that mean things are finally looking up, going south, or just spiraling into some chaotic, nonsensical mess? And more importantly—if the outcome is a total wreck, what does that actually do to the foundation of our entire civilization? Everything feels like it's hanging by a thread. It’s the kind of question that even Julian Assange wouldn't bother wasting his breath on. Honestly, why would he?
😉

I don't know, man... I’ve got my doubts. Just looking at the absolute circus they've made out of him and how he's handling the whole mess, it just doesn't sit right with me.
The image they’re building? It’s being crafted with a steady, calculated hand.
Oh, please. He’s playing the noble "victim" card again. Like he’s this selfless martyr who only cares about the greater good, while—get this—he's always telling the "absolute truth." Give me a break. It's such a tired act.
People everywhere would probably drop their last dollar just to see him walk free—or they'd empty their bank accounts just to keep him on the job. Seriously, wow.
Honestly, does anyone actually *live* anymore? Most people are just going through the motions, drifting from one obligation to the next without ever really being present. It’s like we’re all just ghosts haunting our own lives. I see it all the time—people staring at their phones in coffee shops, physically there but mentally miles away, lost in some digital void. We’re surviving, sure, but truly living? That feels like a luxury most of us can't afford lately.
He’s constantly on the move, always drifting around like some kind of guerrilla fighter... for crying out loud.
Years spent living off the grid... years of playing this endless game of hide-and-seek with "the system." You know the one—that faceless, headless corporate monster that everyone pretends is real just to feel safe. It’s exhausting.
Wake up, world! Open your eyes!
That carries way deeper implications than people realize. It means there’s absolutely no way to vet his background or verify anything he says. He’s essentially a ghost—just this mysterious, shadowy figure that doesn't actually exist on any paper trail. You can't audit someone who isn't even there.
Top tier!
Any rookie cop worth his salt knows that’s the very first thing you check when you're trying to verify anything. It's basic training, really.

This whole circus regarding those assault allegations—which, let's be honest, are practically impossible to prove and don't actually pose any real threat to him—is just a cheap way to manufacture some "victim" persona. It’s a classic move. He gets all the media spotlight he could ever want, and more importantly, it gives him a built-in alibi. Once people actually try to unmask what he's really up to, he can just hide behind this fake victimhood and claim he's being persecuted. It's calculated.
Oh, here we go again... back at it with the baseless, low-blow attacks. Just like they were when I first started this whole thing. Seriously? Give me a break! *Sigh.*
And those two little graces coming after him? They showed up right on cue... like they were ordered to be there.

The end game here? It’s going to be WikiLeaks becoming a massive global brand. They'll turn into that one "reliable" source everyone points to—the go-to fallback for every major news outlet whenever they need some ammunition to take someone down.
Smear campaigns based on this kind of garbage have this terrifying ability to steer public opinion like nothing we've ever seen before. Most of it comes down to those clickbait trash sites—you know the ones. People just scroll through, skim a headline, spend maybe two or three minutes glancing at some nonsense, and suddenly they think they’re experts on how the world works. It's all surface-level junk, but it's enough to brainwash anyone who isn't paying attention.

I’ve got this nagging feeling that they're intentionally clearing the path to let Satan take over other major power centers around the globe. It feels like a setup.

I’m honestly starting to worry that Julian Assange is just some paid mouthpiece—a glorified distraction designed to keep us all from seeing what's actually happening right in front of our eyes.

Look, even if the info being leaked right now turns out to be 100% accurate, it doesn't change a damn thing. It’s just noise.

You have to look at this whole mess through a long-term lens. It’s all about the endgame. You really need to ask yourself who they’re actually going to come after in the end—and more importantly, who the person behind Julian Assange is actually trying to take down. If you look closely enough, the target is already starting to show.

To keep from looking like total suckers, we shouldn't fall for campaigns like "sacrifice a little today to earn a dollar tomorrow"—especially when it's clearly just someone else lining their pockets at our expense.
Remember the attacks on the World Trade Center? Just thinking about all the chaos and those endless controversies that followed... man, it’s still heavy.

Think about it. You spend two or three years carefully building this "unquestionable whistleblower" persona, stacking up credibility like you're playing a high-stakes game of Monopoly. Once that happens? You’ve basically unlocked a cheat code. You suddenly have this terrifying level of influence where you can drop whatever manufactured info you want, and people will swallow it whole without even blinking. It's scary how much power that kind of manufactured trust actually gives someone.

They'll be able to manipulate public opinion however they damn well please. It’s all just math to them at this point.

Just making excuses for all kinds of bullshit, wiping out anyone who stands in the way, and pushing through whatever agenda they feel like... it's the same old story.

The theater of illusions is nothing more than a dirty little pond, and let’s be real—only the toughest sharks are ever going to make it out alive.

Who’s actually calling the shots in this game, and who’s just a pawn? Honestly, we'll see. Time tells all.

I’d be careful about diving headfirst into this whole thing. Honestly? I wouldn't trust anything coming out of that kitchen until I saw some proof. Better to keep your guard up.
Right now, the intel is useful—it's enough to keep us hanging on.
The main thing is making sure they don't completely play us, you know? We can't let them get under our skin.
We’ve gotta watch out so that the "knight in shining armor" doesn't pull a fast one and reveal his true colors before we even realize what happened.



Just wait and see how this plays out!

🙂

Jeremy Davis7 said:Jeremy Brooks6;

I can’t shake the feeling that we’re sliding straight into a period of massive, global upheaval. It feels heavy. Like, how do you even read the signs anymore? If a ghost shows up in the window, does that mean things are finally looking up, going south, or just spiraling into some chaotic, nonsensical mess? And more importantly—if the outcome is a total wreck, what does that actually do to the foundation of our entire civilization? Everything feels like it's hanging by a thread. It’s the kind of question that even Julian Assange wouldn't bother wasting his breath on. Honestly, why would he?
😉

I don't know, man... I’ve got my doubts. Just looking at the absolute circus they've made out of him and how he's handling the whole mess, it just doesn't sit right with me.
The image they’re building? It’s being crafted with a steady, calculated hand.
Oh, please. He’s playing the noble "victim" card again. Like he’s this selfless martyr who only cares about the greater good, while—get this—he's always telling the "absolute truth." Give me a break. It's such a tired act.
People everywhere would probably drop their last dollar just to see him walk free—or they'd empty their bank accounts just to keep him on the job. Seriously, wow.
Honestly, does anyone actually *live* anymore? Most people are just going through the motions, drifting from one obligation to the next without ever really being present. It’s like we’re all just ghosts haunting our own lives. I see it all the time—people staring at their phones in coffee shops, physically there but mentally miles away, lost in some digital void. We’re surviving, sure, but truly living? That feels like a luxury most of us can't afford lately.
He’s constantly on the move, always drifting around like some kind of guerrilla fighter... for crying out loud.
Years spent living off the grid... years of playing this endless game of hide-and-seek with "the system." You know the one—that faceless, headless corporate monster that everyone pretends is real just to feel safe. It’s exhausting.
Wake up, world! Open your eyes!
That carries way deeper implications than people realize. It means there’s absolutely no way to vet his background or verify anything he says. He’s essentially a ghost—just this mysterious, shadowy figure that doesn't actually exist on any paper trail. You can't audit someone who isn't even there.
Top tier!
Any rookie cop worth his salt knows that’s the very first thing you check when you're trying to verify anything. It's basic training, really.

This whole circus regarding those assault allegations—which, let's be honest, are practically impossible to prove and don't actually pose any real threat to him—is just a cheap way to manufacture some "victim" persona. It’s a classic move. He gets all the media spotlight he could ever want, and more importantly, it gives him a built-in alibi. Once people actually try to unmask what he's really up to, he can just hide behind this fake victimhood and claim he's being persecuted. It's calculated.
Oh, here we go again... back at it with the baseless, low-blow attacks. Just like they were when I first started this whole thing. Seriously? Give me a break! *Sigh.*
And those two little graces coming after him? They showed up right on cue... like they were ordered to be there.

The end game here? It’s going to be WikiLeaks becoming a massive global brand. They'll turn into that one "reliable" source everyone points to—the go-to fallback for every major news outlet whenever they need some ammunition to take someone down.
Smear campaigns based on this kind of garbage have this terrifying ability to steer public opinion like nothing we've ever seen before. Most of it comes down to those clickbait trash sites—you know the ones. People just scroll through, skim a headline, spend maybe two or three minutes glancing at some nonsense, and suddenly they think they’re experts on how the world works. It's all surface-level junk, but it's enough to brainwash anyone who isn't paying attention.

I’ve got this nagging feeling that they're intentionally clearing the path to let Satan take over other major power centers around the globe. It feels like a setup.

I’m honestly starting to worry that Julian Assange is just some paid mouthpiece—a glorified distraction designed to keep us all from seeing what's actually happening right in front of our eyes.

Look, even if the info being leaked right now turns out to be 100% accurate, it doesn't change a damn thing. It’s just noise.

You have to look at this whole mess through a long-term lens. It’s all about the endgame. You really need to ask yourself who they’re actually going to come after in the end—and more importantly, who the person behind Julian Assange is actually trying to take down. If you look closely enough, the target is already starting to show.

To keep from looking like total suckers, we shouldn't fall for campaigns like "sacrifice a little today to earn a dollar tomorrow"—especially when it's clearly just someone else lining their pockets at our expense.
Remember the attacks on the World Trade Center? Just thinking about all the chaos and those endless controversies that followed... man, it’s still heavy.

Think about it. You spend two or three years carefully building this "unquestionable whistleblower" persona, stacking up credibility like you're playing a high-stakes game of Monopoly. Once that happens? You’ve basically unlocked a cheat code. You suddenly have this terrifying level of influence where you can drop whatever manufactured info you want, and people will swallow it whole without even blinking. It's scary how much power that kind of manufactured trust actually gives someone.

They'll be able to manipulate public opinion however they damn well please. It’s all just math to them at this point.

Just making excuses for all kinds of bullshit, wiping out anyone who stands in the way, and pushing through whatever agenda they feel like... it's the same old story.

The theater of illusions is nothing more than a dirty little pond, and let’s be real—only the toughest sharks are ever going to make it out alive.

Who’s actually calling the shots in this game, and who’s just a pawn? Honestly, we'll see. Time tells all.

I’d be careful about diving headfirst into this whole thing. Honestly? I wouldn't trust anything coming out of that kitchen until I saw some proof. Better to keep your guard up.
Right now, the intel is useful—it's enough to keep us hanging on.
The main thing is making sure they don't completely play us, you know? We can't let them get under our skin.
We’ve gotta watch out so that the "knight in shining armor" doesn't pull a fast one and reveal his true colors before we even realize what happened.



Just wait and see how this plays out!

🙂

Exactly. It’s all just such a minor thing, really. If he had actually stepped on the toes of the US government, he would have ended up like Saddam Hussein. I also highly doubt they can actually find Osama bin Laden in those hills; I suspect they just assume having him around is useful, you know, as someone they can constantly point to as a "dangerous enemy" whenever they want to justify doing whatever nonsense they want across the globe.

The end result will be WikiLeaks becoming a brand, or maybe this "reliable" source of information that every media outlet will use whenever they feel like taking a jab at someone.

I suppose I fear the ground is being carefully prepared for the satanization of other power centers around the world...

"Reliable," haha. I guess it doesn't matter if it's actually reliable, just that it becomes famous enough without being tied to any specific country or entity you could actually take to court. In other words, just like how "tax havens" used to exist—places where you could quietly wash dirty money like you're cleaning laundry—now we might see internet information havens. Places where you can set up a server and wage war against whoever you want, and nobody can sue you for libel or hold a major nation accountable... all while calling it "reliable."

I also worry that Julian Assange is just a paid mouthpiece, a sort of mask meant to pull the wool over all our eyes.

The information being released right now might be accurate, but I guess that doesn't necessarily mean anything.

Maybe the Americans produced him specifically so they could later "strike back" at China or Russia. Because, I think, it's quite significant: the US is losing the economic war to new power centers, and they're losing the information war too. The Russians seem much better at actual physical espionage—you know, the kind where you have to physically deal with someone or seduce them, like some version of Chapmanica (I mean, James Bond is purely a Western fantasy 😁)—while the Chinese are far superior at industrial and military spying; you spend billions on a patent only to realize Mao was right about something. So... the Americans are mostly just better at electronic and satellite surveillance, which costs a fortune and requires controlling space, but who knows how long that lasts. As for Julian Assange, I wonder if he can even work "for whoever pays more," because he'd probably be executed via summary judgment immediately. Honestly, if he ever released anything regarding Israel, it’s almost certain that would happen to him. But when he starts releasing things about Russia or China, he'll likely just "disappear," much like Osama bin Laden did.😲😍

The theater of illusion is basically just a shallow puddle where only the most capable fish manage to pull through.

I suppose we will just have to wait and see who actually turns out to be the shark in this game, and who is merely a minnow.

Well, I guess I have to agree with you there, even if it is mostly because you are probably just as paranoid as I am. But, if one looks at this logically, and considering the kind of world we actually live in... the simple fact that Julian Assange is still breathing suggests we might be right. I mean, forces like the USA go through immense trouble to take down entire heads of state, so it seems unlikely they would drag someone like him into court for "threatening national security" unless he was still somehow useful to them in the end.☕

dustyskipper3;

...the simple fact that Julian Assange is still breathing just proves we're right. Look, powers like the USA don't hesitate to take out entire heads of state, so you really think they wouldn't drag a guy like him through the courts for "threatening national security"? Not unless he's becomes useful to them at the very last second.☕

Here’s how the whole play works:

They find some fanatic with mental issues and indirectly indoctrinate them to sacrifice themselves for the "greater good."
The lunatic opens fire, the civilized world acts horrified, the authorities—whoever they actually are—issue an official condemnation... the killer gets tossed into a cage to rot, and that's that.

The wolf is full, and the sheep are still plenty.

If he doesn't get hit by a "bullet from nowhere" pretty soon, you should take everything coming out of that kitchen with a massive grain of salt...

I mean, what kind of single individual has the capacity to get their hands on thousands upon thousands of documents and just release them like that!?

Obviously only one... Julian Assange.

Who The fuck is Asange !?

Nobody knows !
Oh, wait (almost forgot)... do two Swedish women remember him!?

PS.
It's the exact same story where seven college buddies, acting on their own initiative and using their own cash, armed with nothing but pocket knives, bring down the WTC, the Pentagon, the White House, Congress, and the Bill of Rights—all at once.

The fallout from that little initiative (carried out by totally average nobodies from the same small town) is something the whole world is feeling today.
The economic crisis currently shaking the European Union to its core was triggered by that very act.
Two days after the attacks, Alan Greenspan flooded the market with "cheap money" by pumping in funds from the Federal Reserve...
Everything after that was just a downward spiral of cause and effect...

Sometimes the stupidity is so blinding that you can't see the forest for the trees...

The more mindless or trivial it is, the easier people swallow it...

When you actually stop to think about it, that's the most unsettling part of this whole circus...

😉

jademarlin26 said:That's nonsense, though you sound a bit like a religious fanatic. The internet is essentially a massive marketplace where supply meets demand—a hub for B2B and B2C transactions. As long as there is profit to be made, the internet isn't going anywhere. Besides, bad things happen regardless of what the calendar says.

Hahahahahahaha 🤣 'like a religious fanatic'? Like what? 🤣 What does that even have to do with anything?
I am simply relaying the information I've gathered... and not from some random internet thread, either.

'religious fanatic' hahahahahaha 🤣 😁
I apologize, but this is genuinely hilarious 🤣

Arthur White37 said:Hahahahahahaha 🤣 'like a religious fanatic'? Like what? 🤣 What does that even have to do with anything?
I am simply relaying the information I've gathered... and not from some random internet thread, either.

'religious fanatic' hahahahahaha 🤣 😁
I apologize, but this is genuinely hilarious 🤣

Exactly that...

Arthur White37 said:Hahahahahahaha 🤣 'like a religious fanatic'? Like what? 🤣 What does that even have to do with anything?
I am simply relaying the information I've gathered... and not from some random internet thread, either.

'religious fanatic' hahahahahaha 🤣 😁
I apologize, but this is genuinely hilarious 🤣

Jeremy Davis7 said:dustyskipper3;

...the simple fact that Julian Assange is still breathing just proves we're right. Look, powers like the USA don't hesitate to take out entire heads of state, so you really think they wouldn't drag a guy like him through the courts for "threatening national security"? Not unless he's becomes useful to them at the very last second.☕

Here’s how the whole play works:

They find some fanatic with mental issues and indirectly indoctrinate them to sacrifice themselves for the "greater good."
The lunatic opens fire, the civilized world acts horrified, the authorities—whoever they actually are—issue an official condemnation... the killer gets tossed into a cage to rot, and that's that.

The wolf is full, and the sheep are still plenty.

If he doesn't get hit by a "bullet from nowhere" pretty soon, you should take everything coming out of that kitchen with a massive grain of salt...

I mean, what kind of single individual has the capacity to get their hands on thousands upon thousands of documents and just release them like that!?

Obviously only one... Julian Assange.

Who The fuck is Asange !?

Nobody knows !
Oh, wait (almost forgot)... do two Swedish women remember him!?

PS.
It's the exact same story where seven college buddies, acting on their own initiative and using their own cash, armed with nothing but pocket knives, bring down the WTC, the Pentagon, the White House, Congress, and the Bill of Rights—all at once.

The fallout from that little initiative (carried out by totally average nobodies from the same small town) is something the whole world is feeling today.
The economic crisis currently shaking the European Union to its core was triggered by that very act.
Two days after the attacks, Alan Greenspan flooded the market with "cheap money" by pumping in funds from the Federal Reserve...
Everything after that was just a downward spiral of cause and effect...

Sometimes the stupidity is so blinding that you can't see the forest for the trees...

The more mindless or trivial it is, the easier people swallow it...

When you actually stop to think about it, that's the most unsettling part of this whole circus...

😉

It makes you wonder how much this actually benefits Obama. From what I can gather, he basically tripped himself up by trying to act principled during the elections. He claimed he’d end the Bush-era practice of immediately and illegally snatching up every single person globally who poses a threat to U.S. national security. So now, he’s stuck navigating these endless legal proceedings just to get to Julian Assange, because he feels he has to prove he protects American national security without violating sensitive human rights. It honestly smells to me like something cooked up by a faction within the U.S. intelligence agencies that is still clinging to the Bush legacy—not to mention that the elder Bush was once the head of the CIA 😉—so maybe it's just an internal American political power struggle that's spilling out onto the world stage. It reminds me somewhat of that situation involving Mark Rebić, where he was dropping "Allah Akbar" leaflets from a plane, thinking he could pin it on Muslims—specifically Canadians—but he was so ignorant he didn't even know how to correctly say Allah Akbar. 🤣

But I have a feeling Obama will be out of power pretty quickly once he finishes his "job" of printing dollars in a way that wouldn't sit well with any neoliberal conservative, and soon enough, we'll probably see another Bush come back to power, while the Arabs and North Korea get whatever they want. They used to call Bill Clinton "sex between the bushes," so I wonder what they'll call Obama? Maybe "safari in the brush"? (I admit, that sounded a bit racist 😳). The scary part about all of this is that it could easily escalate into a massive global conflict, so I suppose we might find ourselves needing divine intervention and prayer quite soon.😲