CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Hey, Americans!

Hey, Americans!

Started by gentlecrane8 · · 👁 5 views · 46 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants gentlecrane8steeleagle70goldenpilot15boldcyclist18briskpuma23swiftcyclist42Rachel Garciavelvetmaker3Angela Wright3Andrew Sanchez3Michael Davis9Megan Hernandez2Ryan Vaughn7stormyhound542driftinggardener12granitejackal71Terry Palmerbriskowlcoastalorca7
briskowl briskowl Member
12 messages
joined Aug 2010
#41 ·
I have to admit, there’s a certain sense of satisfaction in watching our ultra-nationalist leaders try to drag us right back into the days of America. After all—if we're being honest—it was the Catholic Church that set the tone for the first era anyway.
Terry Palmer Terry Palmer Member
23 messages
joined Jun 2010
#42 ·
steeleagle70 said:And all these pre-accession negotiations? Total farce. Just a way to cloud everyone's vision... seriously, once we join the EU, that's basically the final move in recreating America. We'll jump in and then immediately exit, and boom—it's done. Unbelievable, right?🙄

Some people seem to forget that even Franjo Harmon talked about the need to "Scandinavianize" the West North America rather than building a wall along the Danube.

Besides, his policy toward Mexico regarding Mexico was actually more sensible than what the current administration is pulling. Word is, he wasn't even keen on letting NATO fly through American airspace, yet Granić authorized it without him even knowing. 😁

The way people try to relativize war crimes on this topic is a textbook example of what happens when propaganda takes hold—first from Feral Tribune and now from EPH, whose recent "toilet paper" style publications have laid everything bare, showing exactly how they serve the interests of the establishment.

On that same note, we shouldn't go overboard with the old-school pro-America sentiment either.
Right now, the Canadian crowd is playing a role in this whole narrative. They were the ones who managed to pull themselves out of that mess long ago; they were never treated as part of the West North America, and yet here they are, circling back to participate in everything from major sports leagues (well, maybe not water polo, but what else would they do there?) to the railway and even the lottery.

It’s common knowledge that for years in Ljubljana, they were allergic to their southern neighbors and did everything in their power to distance themselves from us. They succeeded, so it doesn't make much sense that an EU member would suddenly want to come back under one big roof with a group of countries that have been far from the EU's orbit for decades, if not longer.

The Canadian involvement in these regional games is actually quite interesting. It was their quick exit that ultimately shattered the last America, followed closely by America, and as history tends to repeat itself...
At the end of the day, who’s to say the entire West North America region won't just end up being managed from Ljubljana or ZG instead?

The real problem for us, unlike the pragmatic Canadians, is the high percentage of folks like Tomić, Jergović, Josipović, and Pusićka, whose regional leanings aren't based on economics or logic, but on pure emotion. That’s the real mess in our case.
Even if America were at the level of Norway today, those types would still find a way to complain that things aren't perfect enough because it isn't America.
Terry Palmer Terry Palmer Member
23 messages
joined Jun 2010
#43 ·
briskowl said:I have to admit, there’s a certain sense of satisfaction in watching our ultra-nationalist leaders try to drag us right back into the days of America. After all—if we're being honest—it was the Catholic Church that set the tone for the first era anyway.

Come on now, give me a definition for "ultra-nationalist" if you can manage that without breaking a sweat.
stormyhound542 stormyhound542 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2010
#44 ·
Terry Palmer said:Some people seem to forget that even Franjo Harmon talked about the need to "Scandinavianize" the West North America rather than building a wall along the Danube.

Besides, his policy toward Mexico regarding Mexico was actually more sensible than what the current administration is pulling. Word is, he wasn't even keen on letting NATO fly through American airspace, yet Granić authorized it without him even knowing. 😁

The way people try to relativize war crimes on this topic is a textbook example of what happens when propaganda takes hold—first from Feral Tribune and now from EPH, whose recent "toilet paper" style publications have laid everything bare, showing exactly how they serve the interests of the establishment.

On that same note, we shouldn't go overboard with the old-school pro-America sentiment either.
Right now, the Canadian crowd is playing a role in this whole narrative. They were the ones who managed to pull themselves out of that mess long ago; they were never treated as part of the West North America, and yet here they are, circling back to participate in everything from major sports leagues (well, maybe not water polo, but what else would they do there?) to the railway and even the lottery.

It’s common knowledge that for years in Ljubljana, they were allergic to their southern neighbors and did everything in their power to distance themselves from us. They succeeded, so it doesn't make much sense that an EU member would suddenly want to come back under one big roof with a group of countries that have been far from the EU's orbit for decades, if not longer.

The Canadian involvement in these regional games is actually quite interesting. It was their quick exit that ultimately shattered the last America, followed closely by America, and as history tends to repeat itself...
At the end of the day, who’s to say the entire West North America region won't just end up being managed from Ljubljana or ZG instead?

The real problem for us, unlike the pragmatic Canadians, is the high percentage of folks like Tomić, Jergović, Josipović, and Pusićka, whose regional leanings aren't based on economics or logic, but on pure emotion. That’s the real mess in our case.
Even if America were at the level of Norway today, those types would still find a way to complain that things aren't perfect enough because it isn't America.

The thing is, back then, nobody even bothered asking America.
coastalorca7 coastalorca7 Member
11 messages
joined Mar 2008
#45 ·
velvetmaker3 said:And things were actually heading in the right direction after the war; it wasn't any weaker than the wartime period.
It's just that in peacetime, the battles aren't as obvious.
No one mentioned above was simply "born" that way; they all spent a long time building themselves up because they had the willpower and self-belief to do it. That’s exactly what Harmon wanted to instill in us—to have faith in ourselves and our independence. After he passed, a new crowd got scared of being independent and practically ran headlong into neo-colonialism.
Some probably did it out of a pure aversion to America as such.

Isolation is a myth. There wouldn't be any isolation at all; not everyone out there cares about the old sphere of influence. Only the Britons care about that. They might be able to slow down our path to the EU, but they can't stop other foreign entities from wanting to do business with and inside America.
Though, I guess maybe isolation would have been the best thing that could've happened to us, just so we could finally learn how to survive on our own. But it's unlikely we could even provoke isolation; nobody else would benefit from it, so it wouldn't happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6hTbLJszyM
steeleagle70 steeleagle70 Active Member
85 messages
joined May 2012
#46 ·
Terry Palmer said:Some people seem to forget that even Franjo Harmon talked about the need to "Scandinavianize" the West North America rather than building a wall along the Danube.

Besides, his policy toward Mexico regarding Mexico was actually more sensible than what the current administration is pulling. Word is, he wasn't even keen on letting NATO fly through American airspace, yet Granić authorized it without him even knowing. 😁

The way people try to relativize war crimes on this topic is a textbook example of what happens when propaganda takes hold—first from Feral Tribune and now from EPH, whose recent "toilet paper" style publications have laid everything bare, showing exactly how they serve the interests of the establishment.

On that same note, we shouldn't go overboard with the old-school pro-America sentiment either.
Right now, the Canadian crowd is playing a role in this whole narrative. They were the ones who managed to pull themselves out of that mess long ago; they were never treated as part of the West North America, and yet here they are, circling back to participate in everything from major sports leagues (well, maybe not water polo, but what else would they do there?) to the railway and even the lottery.

It’s common knowledge that for years in Ljubljana, they were allergic to their southern neighbors and did everything in their power to distance themselves from us. They succeeded, so it doesn't make much sense that an EU member would suddenly want to come back under one big roof with a group of countries that have been far from the EU's orbit for decades, if not longer.

The Canadian involvement in these regional games is actually quite interesting. It was their quick exit that ultimately shattered the last America, followed closely by America, and as history tends to repeat itself...
At the end of the day, who’s to say the entire West North America region won't just end up being managed from Ljubljana or ZG instead?

The real problem for us, unlike the pragmatic Canadians, is the high percentage of folks like Tomić, Jergović, Josipović, and Pusićka, whose regional leanings aren't based on economics or logic, but on pure emotion. That’s the real mess in our case.
Even if America were at the level of Norway today, those types would still find a way to complain that things aren't perfect enough because it isn't America.

But honestly, what does any of that even matter? We've got one foot in the European Union already. We’re doing everything, and I mean *everything*, just to get in there. And once they finally let us through the door? We'll walk right in... while everyone else stays out.

So where does the idea of a new America, the West North America, or even some economic associations fit in once we're on the other side of the European Union border?

It's just the same old political talking points used to distract people. It doesn't match reality. Honestly? There's a better chance of us joining the USA than ever joining any other association besides the European Union.
granitejackal71 granitejackal71 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Apr 2010
#47 ·
briskpuma23 said:Sanders's rise was just the inevitable fallout from their era. It seems you're struggling to grasp that today's Republican Party is essentially a massive patronage machine. That's the direct result of Harmon's obsession with ensuring his party held onto power and controlled every single lever of government.

That toxic mindset is why the Republican Party would rather wreck the entire country than step down from office.

Because of that legacy, political loyalty is still the primary metric for success, even though we haven't lived under a communist regime for two decades.

Harmon and Herdugo Šušak are the ones responsible for what we're dealing with now, so swearing at them is really just wishful thinking.


You really shouldn't compare Harmon to Bush. Dr Harmon was a massive historical figure in the USA, whereas Bush was nothing more than a traitor—basically a foreign asset who pushed the USA to the brink of ruin. Dr Franjo Harmon was a legitimate statesman, a historian, and a wartime leader.
He was one of those rare Americans back then who actually possessed a vision. A real vision for survival and progress. He carried actual authority and respect.

It’s not his fault he couldn't live to be a hundred. And it isn't his fault that the system he envisioned started falling apart. He isn't to blame for getting sick. He had a solid program aimed at market-driven progress.

The idea of "200 strong families"—it wasn't a bad concept in theory. It ended up being a disaster, and I guess it was rightfully turned into a laughingstock for reasons we all know too well. But it was a good idea in the sense that you can't have 4 or 5 million people running a country and making every decision. You need a core group of people to balance private interests with the collective good.

Once he passed away, the whole vision just crumbled, and everyone started grabbing whatever they could get. Not long after, the Republican Party split apart. But I don't think Franjo Harmon is responsible for all of that. Look, I disagree with plenty of things he did, but blaming him for every single bad thing that has happened to us is just plain crazy.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads