#121 ·
Anthony Perez9 said:Friendship? Yeah, good luck with that. Most people are just looking for someone to use until they don't need them anymore. Anthony Perez9 says:
I’ve always leaned toward the idea that life’s initial blueprint already packed in all the potential it needed. To me, evolution isn't about carving out new hallways; it's just wandering through the ones that were already there.
That sounds a lot like creationism to me—maybe not exactly, but take it as a prompt for debate. Basically, "God created living things, then they just underwent micro-evolution." 👎
Maybe you've got a different definition of what the "seed of life" actually means, huh? Slow and relentless. Evolution is a fact, whether we like it or not.
There’s definitely still a lot to dig into here, but let’s not get too lost in the weeds and ignore reality. Sound good? lolThat’s just the physical side of things. Honestly, it feels way more plausible that consciousness was always there, rather than just popping out of nowhere.
Maybe it sounds that way, but all this mental gymnastics we're doing... Eternities and absolutes.Sooner or later, it’s gonna come back to haunt us. 🙂Why would that be any more logical? Not a chance. Once you realize there couldn't have been a beginning, eternity becomes the only thing that actually makes sense.When you think about eternity, the idea of consciousness just existing forever actually feels more plausible than the thought of it suddenly popping into existence out of nowhere.
That "conclusion" isn't worth emphasizing. We could just as easily argue that the idea of a beginning is just as impossible to wrap your head around as the notion of eternal consciousness. Space and time aren't meant to be figured out; they exist entirely outside the realm of logic.It’s the foundation of everything, really. Nothing just pops out of thin air—even if things looked super basic at the start, there had to be some kind of starting point to build what we're looking at today.
That’s just some heavy theological and cosmological mental gymnastics right there.Look, I'll just point this out: if it isn't knowledge, then it’s just an assumption. And can a person actually say something like, "I think/assume it went like this..." while simultaneously not believing it?Can we hold a mindset or an assumption without actually turning it into a belief?
We could, if we just ignore the whole "mental premise" thing—it’s too extra and honestly just feels gross. It pretends to mean something, but it doesn't actually say anything at all. 🙂The only way we avoid falling into blind faith is by avoiding assumptions altogether. Right now, we’re basically operating in a total vacuum of opinion. It lets us weigh different possibilities without getting hung up on personal bias. Basically: it could go one way... or it could just as easily go this way. Period.
?That’s a completely rational take. It’s probably the best way to move through this world if you're the type who prefers logic over everything else.
We started with logic, so let's stick to it. It’s better to just set the irrational stuff aside entirely rather than pretending we're being logical while actually spiraling. That's just a trap. 😉
Look, we know evolution works in terms of change, and we know natural selection pushes things in a certain direction. What we don't actually know is the starting point. When I talk about the "seed of life," I'm thinking that at some single point, there existed this perfect DNA that held all the potential—all the biological programming. Basically, it contained the initial information for every single (initial) life form. A species was just a specific set of pointers to the programs that particular species uses. What happens next? Well, those species are just left to evolve. For the sake of survival, a species only really uses a tiny fraction of its DNA. That specific part follows the rules of natural selection, which helps preserve the quality of the DNA, or maybe even selectively improve it. Meanwhile, the parts that aren't being used are subject to random mutations without any selective pressure, so the only real outcome there is degradation and the loss of that original info. Over time, that becomes what people call "junk DNA."
As for how that initial Earth-based DNA came to be... who knows? Maybe it was direct creation by God, or maybe it was planted by some advanced civilization out there?
I don't have any tools to prove this, obviously, but it seems like a valid possibility to me. Personally, it feels a bit more intuitive to think that consciousness stemmed from consciousness rather than just popping into existence spontaneously, so that's the version that feels a little more likely, I guess.
Anthony Perez9 said:Friendship? Yeah, good luck with that. Most people are just looking for someone to use until they don't need them anymore. Anthony Perez9 says:
I’ve always leaned toward the idea that life’s initial blueprint already packed in all the potential it needed. To me, evolution isn't about carving out new hallways; it's just wandering through the ones that were already there.
That sounds a lot like creationism to me—maybe not exactly, but take it as a prompt for debate. Basically, "God created living things, then they just underwent micro-evolution." 👎
Maybe you've got a different definition of what the "seed of life" actually means, huh? Slow and relentless. Evolution is a fact, whether we like it or not.
There’s definitely still a lot to dig into here, but let’s not get too lost in the weeds and ignore reality. Sound good? lolThat’s just the physical side of things. Honestly, it feels way more plausible that consciousness was always there, rather than just popping out of nowhere.
Maybe it sounds that way, but all this mental gymnastics we're doing... Eternities and absolutes.Sooner or later, it’s gonna come back to haunt us. 🙂Why would that be any more logical? Not a chance. Once you realize there couldn't have been a beginning, eternity becomes the only thing that actually makes sense.When you think about eternity, the idea of consciousness just existing forever actually feels more plausible than the thought of it suddenly popping into existence out of nowhere.
That "conclusion" isn't worth emphasizing. We could just as easily argue that the idea of a beginning is just as impossible to wrap your head around as the notion of eternal consciousness. Space and time aren't meant to be figured out; they exist entirely outside the realm of logic.It’s the foundation of everything, really. Nothing just pops out of thin air—even if things looked super basic at the start, there had to be some kind of starting point to build what we're looking at today.
That’s just some heavy theological and cosmological mental gymnastics right there.Look, I'll just point this out: if it isn't knowledge, then it’s just an assumption. And can a person actually say something like, "I think/assume it went like this..." while simultaneously not believing it?Can we hold a mindset or an assumption without actually turning it into a belief?
We could, if we just ignore the whole "mental premise" thing—it’s too extra and honestly just feels gross. It pretends to mean something, but it doesn't actually say anything at all. 🙂The only way we avoid falling into blind faith is by avoiding assumptions altogether. Right now, we’re basically operating in a total vacuum of opinion. It lets us weigh different possibilities without getting hung up on personal bias. Basically: it could go one way... or it could just as easily go this way. Period.
?That’s a completely rational take. It’s probably the best way to move through this world if you're the type who prefers logic over everything else.
We started with logic, so let's stick to it. It’s better to just set the irrational stuff aside entirely rather than pretending we're being logical while actually spiraling. That's just a trap. 😉
Let's try it this way: if we throw out the concept of time entirely, then a chain of cause and effect can't have a beginning. "Eternity" is really just a human concept we use to try and perceive a world where nothing ever truly started, but instead, something has simply always existed.
Anthony Perez9 said:Friendship? Yeah, good luck with that. Most people are just looking for someone to use until they don't need them anymore. Anthony Perez9 says:
I’ve always leaned toward the idea that life’s initial blueprint already packed in all the potential it needed. To me, evolution isn't about carving out new hallways; it's just wandering through the ones that were already there.
That sounds a lot like creationism to me—maybe not exactly, but take it as a prompt for debate. Basically, "God created living things, then they just underwent micro-evolution." 👎
Maybe you've got a different definition of what the "seed of life" actually means, huh? Slow and relentless. Evolution is a fact, whether we like it or not.
There’s definitely still a lot to dig into here, but let’s not get too lost in the weeds and ignore reality. Sound good? lolThat’s just the physical side of things. Honestly, it feels way more plausible that consciousness was always there, rather than just popping out of nowhere.
Maybe it sounds that way, but all this mental gymnastics we're doing... Eternities and absolutes.Sooner or later, it’s gonna come back to haunt us. 🙂Why would that be any more logical? Not a chance. Once you realize there couldn't have been a beginning, eternity becomes the only thing that actually makes sense.When you think about eternity, the idea of consciousness just existing forever actually feels more plausible than the thought of it suddenly popping into existence out of nowhere.
That "conclusion" isn't worth emphasizing. We could just as easily argue that the idea of a beginning is just as impossible to wrap your head around as the notion of eternal consciousness. Space and time aren't meant to be figured out; they exist entirely outside the realm of logic.It’s the foundation of everything, really. Nothing just pops out of thin air—even if things looked super basic at the start, there had to be some kind of starting point to build what we're looking at today.
That’s just some heavy theological and cosmological mental gymnastics right there.Look, I'll just point this out: if it isn't knowledge, then it’s just an assumption. And can a person actually say something like, "I think/assume it went like this..." while simultaneously not believing it?Can we hold a mindset or an assumption without actually turning it into a belief?
We could, if we just ignore the whole "mental premise" thing—it’s too extra and honestly just feels gross. It pretends to mean something, but it doesn't actually say anything at all. 🙂The only way we avoid falling into blind faith is by avoiding assumptions altogether. Right now, we’re basically operating in a total vacuum of opinion. It lets us weigh different possibilities without getting hung up on personal bias. Basically: it could go one way... or it could just as easily go this way. Period.
?That’s a completely rational take. It’s probably the best way to move through this world if you're the type who prefers logic over everything else.
We started with logic, so let's stick to it. It’s better to just set the irrational stuff aside entirely rather than pretending we're being logical while actually spiraling. That's just a trap. 😉
What's the question?
Anthony Perez9 said:Friendship? Yeah, good luck with that. Most people are just looking for someone to use until they don't need them anymore. Anthony Perez9 says:
I’ve always leaned toward the idea that life’s initial blueprint already packed in all the potential it needed. To me, evolution isn't about carving out new hallways; it's just wandering through the ones that were already there.
That sounds a lot like creationism to me—maybe not exactly, but take it as a prompt for debate. Basically, "God created living things, then they just underwent micro-evolution." 👎
Maybe you've got a different definition of what the "seed of life" actually means, huh? Slow and relentless. Evolution is a fact, whether we like it or not.
There’s definitely still a lot to dig into here, but let’s not get too lost in the weeds and ignore reality. Sound good? lolThat’s just the physical side of things. Honestly, it feels way more plausible that consciousness was always there, rather than just popping out of nowhere.
Maybe it sounds that way, but all this mental gymnastics we're doing... Eternities and absolutes.Sooner or later, it’s gonna come back to haunt us. 🙂Why would that be any more logical? Not a chance. Once you realize there couldn't have been a beginning, eternity becomes the only thing that actually makes sense.When you think about eternity, the idea of consciousness just existing forever actually feels more plausible than the thought of it suddenly popping into existence out of nowhere.
That "conclusion" isn't worth emphasizing. We could just as easily argue that the idea of a beginning is just as impossible to wrap your head around as the notion of eternal consciousness. Space and time aren't meant to be figured out; they exist entirely outside the realm of logic.It’s the foundation of everything, really. Nothing just pops out of thin air—even if things looked super basic at the start, there had to be some kind of starting point to build what we're looking at today.
That’s just some heavy theological and cosmological mental gymnastics right there.Look, I'll just point this out: if it isn't knowledge, then it’s just an assumption. And can a person actually say something like, "I think/assume it went like this..." while simultaneously not believing it?Can we hold a mindset or an assumption without actually turning it into a belief?
We could, if we just ignore the whole "mental premise" thing—it’s too extra and honestly just feels gross. It pretends to mean something, but it doesn't actually say anything at all. 🙂The only way we avoid falling into blind faith is by avoiding assumptions altogether. Right now, we’re basically operating in a total vacuum of opinion. It lets us weigh different possibilities without getting hung up on personal bias. Basically: it could go one way... or it could just as easily go this way. Period.
?That’s a completely rational take. It’s probably the best way to move through this world if you're the type who prefers logic over everything else.
We started with logic, so let's stick to it. It’s better to just set the irrational stuff aside entirely rather than pretending we're being logical while actually spiraling. That's just a trap. 😉
it's like that one guy once said—trying to rationalize something irrational is probably a bad move. Still, though... how are we even supposed to talk about the irrational stuff? It's not like we can just toss it out the window and act like it doesn't exist, right?