CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › Akasha

Akasha

Started by Andrew Parker86 · · 👁 6 views · 66 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Andrew Parker86Amanda Robinson3Asilverotter2Linda Walker37Amanda Doyle74casualmaker13dustyskipper3Mark RamirezJeffrey Wilson4Benjamin Taylor6Sophia Moore38Morgan Brown5Gregory JacksonDavid Ross3Justin Baker6Paul Anderson15Gregory Carter67David Vaughn75Matthew Castillo5Gerald Jackson48hollowpuma762Kevin Ruiz36urbanhawk28 …
Joseph Bailey41 Joseph Bailey41 Veteran
1K messages
joined Apr 2021
#61 ·
Lawrence White10 said:👍
I’d add this—engaging with anything you don't truly grasp is risky. And let's be honest, there isn't much we actually understand, since our comprehension is limited by the mind. But, if we were to move into the heart... 😉.....

Essentially, 🤦you're 🤦🤦surrendering yourselves to entities, who then pass you off to someone else—for heaven's sake, why on earth would you give YOURSELF to anyone other than YOURSELF?!? It’s terrifying, really. I actually stumbled upon this concept in that PDF about "illnesses from spiritual work," or whatever it was called.

Anyway, seriously, watch your words, and be careful about who you invite into your space... 🍿🙂

There isn't really a danger here, since these entities are mostly (if not entirely) products of our own individual or collective imagination. If you find yourself surrendering to some imaginary entity, you're essentially just giving yourself back to yourself. As long as you aren't reaching for those massive collective constructs—or at least keeping things on equal footing with them—you'll be just fine.
hollowpuma762 hollowpuma762 Active Member
190 messages
joined Feb 2015
#62 ·
Lawrence White10 said:👍
I’d add this—engaging with anything you don't truly grasp is risky. And let's be honest, there isn't much we actually understand, since our comprehension is limited by the mind. But, if we were to move into the heart... 😉.....

Essentially, 🤦you're 🤦🤦surrendering yourselves to entities, who then pass you off to someone else—for heaven's sake, why on earth would you give YOURSELF to anyone other than YOURSELF?!? It’s terrifying, really. I actually stumbled upon this concept in that PDF about "illnesses from spiritual work," or whatever it was called.

Anyway, seriously, watch your words, and be careful about who you invite into your space... 🍿🙂

You’re taking the wording way too literally.

Lawrence White10 said:👍
I’d add this—engaging with anything you don't truly grasp is risky. And let's be honest, there isn't much we actually understand, since our comprehension is limited by the mind. But, if we were to move into the heart... 😉.....

Essentially, 🤦you're 🤦🤦surrendering yourselves to entities, who then pass you off to someone else—for heaven's sake, why on earth would you give YOURSELF to anyone other than YOURSELF?!? It’s terrifying, really. I actually stumbled upon this concept in that PDF about "illnesses from spiritual work," or whatever it was called.

Anyway, seriously, watch your words, and be careful about who you invite into your space... 🍿🙂

I could invite people over until next Tuesday; at most, I might trigger a little psychosis.

Joseph Bailey41 said:There isn't really a danger here, since these entities are mostly (if not entirely) products of our own individual or collective imagination. If you find yourself surrendering to some imaginary entity, you're essentially just giving yourself back to yourself. As long as you aren't reaching for those massive collective constructs—or at least keeping things on equal footing with them—you'll be just fine.

Imagination is just folklore.
The principles and mechanics behind symbolism? Not so much.

Some people just love to fantasize and act like idiots when they don't have anything smarter to do.
Joseph Bailey41 Joseph Bailey41 Veteran
1K messages
joined Apr 2021
#63 ·
hollowpuma762 said:You’re taking the wording way too literally.

I could invite people over until next Tuesday; at most, I might trigger a little psychosis.

Imagination is just folklore.
The principles and mechanics behind symbolism? Not so much.

Some people just love to fantasize and act like idiots when they don't have anything smarter to do.

The thing is, you can't even begin to grasp those principles or mechanisms unless you actually understand the symbols involved. And honestly, anyone who tries to label everything as "psychosis" just because they're confused would probably end up experiencing it anyway. At the end of the day, it all boils down to a broader interpretation of psychology.
hollowpuma762 hollowpuma762 Active Member
190 messages
joined Feb 2015
#64 ·
Joseph Bailey41 said:The thing is, you can't even begin to grasp those principles or mechanisms unless you actually understand the symbols involved. And honestly, anyone who tries to label everything as "psychosis" just because they're confused would probably end up experiencing it anyway. At the end of the day, it all boils down to a broader interpretation of psychology.

They’re just waiting for anyone who trips up.

Joseph Bailey41 said:The thing is, you can't even begin to grasp those principles or mechanisms unless you actually understand the symbols involved. And honestly, anyone who tries to label everything as "psychosis" just because they're confused would probably end up experiencing it anyway. At the end of the day, it all boils down to a broader interpretation of psychology.

We're talking about *actually* serious psychotic breaks here.

Joseph Bailey41 said:The thing is, you can't even begin to grasp those principles or mechanisms unless you actually understand the symbols involved. And honestly, anyone who tries to label everything as "psychosis" just because they're confused would probably end up experiencing it anyway. At the end of the day, it all boils down to a broader interpretation of psychology.

Which basically falls under philosophy.

That shallow pop-psychology garbage and the superstitious nonsense coming out of Hollywood—targeted at either the fragile types with zero imagination or the wild ones with absolutely no impulse control—that doesn't count. It's just a filter to weed them out.
Lawrence White10 Lawrence White10 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Sep 2018
#65 ·
Joseph Bailey41 said:There isn't really a danger here, since these entities are mostly (if not entirely) products of our own individual or collective imagination. If you find yourself surrendering to some imaginary entity, you're essentially just giving yourself back to yourself. As long as you aren't reaching for those massive collective constructs—or at least keeping things on equal footing with them—you'll be just fine.

That "mostly..." qualifier isn't a closed case—it’s a maybe/maybe not situation. It’s all just "who knows," really. Just as other dimensions, planets, galaxies, or aliens are possible, so too are entities, ghosts, orbs, and clusters of unresolved energy...

As for surrendering to a distorted "entity"—I agree that it's just surrendering to oneself, given that you're the one who conjured it in the first place.

hollowpuma762 said:You’re taking the wording way too literally.

I could invite people over until next Tuesday; at most, I might trigger a little psychosis.

Imagination is just folklore.
The principles and mechanics behind symbolism? Not so much.

Some people just love to fantasize and act like idiots when they don't have anything smarter to do.

Well, being literal is practical. Sometimes I prefer being literal.

hollowpuma762 said:You’re taking the wording way too literally.

I could invite people over until next Tuesday; at most, I might trigger a little psychosis.

Imagination is just folklore.
The principles and mechanics behind symbolism? Not so much.

Some people just love to fantasize and act like idiots when they don't have anything smarter to do.

Exactly. 😁
Paul Rogers94 Paul Rogers94 Active Member
235 messages
joined Apr 2022
#66 ·
Akasha: The most Mysterious of The Five Elements | Sadhgur

"I’m actually glad you’re confused. It’s better to be lost than to jump to stupid conclusions."

"If you're constipated, it just means there's still something left inside you."

Sadhguru

🙂
hollowpuma762 hollowpuma762 Active Member
190 messages
joined Feb 2015
#67 ·
Lawrence White10 said:That "mostly..." qualifier isn't a closed case—it’s a maybe/maybe not situation. It’s all just "who knows," really. Just as other dimensions, planets, galaxies, or aliens are possible, so too are entities, ghosts, orbs, and clusters of unresolved energy...

As for surrendering to a distorted "entity"—I agree that it's just surrendering to oneself, given that you're the one who conjured it in the first place.

Well, being literal is practical. Sometimes I prefer being literal.

Exactly. 😁

Sure, if you're talking about things that are dead simple—stuff anyone could spot or grasp in five seconds flat.
Like, I don't know, lugging a stack of bricks and five bags of Quikrete around.

But when you try to apply that logic to "spiritual" stuff? It’s shallow. It's totally inadequate. It's just a massive failure of oversimplification that leaves people wandering around lost in illusions and total nonsense.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register