CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered đŸ”„ Popular 📡 RSS Members đŸ‘„ 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Economy › Is buying a primary residence actually a good investment?

Is buying a primary residence actually a good investment?

Started by Sophia White · · 👁 5 views · 26 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Sophia Whitemellowraven8Douglas Reed3Kimberly Nguyenbluewolf0Sam Ramos85Mark Nguyen6mistystag90Sandra Williams70Betty Perez81
Sophia White Sophia White MemberOP
18 messages
joined Oct 2003
#1 ·
Hey there, fellow business minds! 😁

So, I was digging through the Real Estate subforum earlier, and I noticed this debate popping up for the second time now—basically, can buying a home you actually intend to live in really be called an "investment"? On the surface, it feels like a no-brainer, right? But if we're being technical, an investment usually implies some kind of recurring cash flow—monthly, quarterly, whatever—that pays you back. If you’re living in it, you aren't seeing any profit; in fact, it’s just a constant drain on your wallet. In my book, a primary residence is a weird hybrid category. You have to weigh the expected value against all the costs, like mortgage interest (which is pretty much the norm these days) and general upkeep. Plus, most people don't sell their homes because they're trying to play the market like a Wall Street trader; they sell because life happens—they need cash, they need more space, or they're moving for work. They aren't timing the market to squeeze out every last cent.

To me, a house is more like a forced savings account—kind of like the "gold standard" for the average person. It's a tangible asset you hold onto to preserve value over the long haul, but it doesn't check the boxes of a true investment. Unless, of course, you're using the term loosely, like when someone says they're "investing" in a new 4K Sony TV for their living room.

One user over in that thread put it this way: "Of course a home is an investment, even if you live in it! Not everyone is lucky enough to land a massive four-bedroom house right off the bat. For those who start out in a tiny studio or a one-bedroom apartment and then have kids, that place is absolutely an investment because they'll eventually have to sell it to upgrade to something bigger." But honestly, wouldn't you call that more like strategic saving rather than a pure investment move?

What do you guys think about this? Is it an investment or just a fancy way to store wealth?
mellowraven8 mellowraven8 Active Member
51 messages
joined Feb 2013
#2 ·
I see three types of homebuyers:

a) flippers
b) buy-to-let investors looking for rental yield
c) people just trying to find a place to live

In my book, buying a home falls under "investment" regardless of which category you fit into
(whether it’s a good or bad move is irrelevant to this specific point, since market conditions dictate that; the bottom line is you're sinking a massive amount of cash into a property)

Categories A and B are pretty straightforward; they don't need much explaining.
The house is an asset—something meant to generate money.
How much it actually makes depends on the market, which right now means barely anything, if it isn't losing money outright.

Category C—that's where things get complicated.

If you're buying with cash:
- You've sunk your money into four walls, and your "return" is simply not having to pay rent to someone else.
It's similar to a buy-to-let setup, except the "profit" is mostly theoretical—you aren't putting extra cash in your pocket, but you aren't bleeding money to a landlord either.
Plus, you can always sell the place and move that capital elsewhere.

Your equity is locked up and there's no way around it, but at least you have some basic stability.

If you're buying with a mortgage:
- The money belongs to someone else, so your "gain" is avoiding rent while your cost is the interest paid to the bank.

Depending on the math, that interest could be less or more than what local market rent would cost. It's up to the individual to decide if it's worth it, though currently, monthly mortgage payments are often several times higher than equivalent rent.
Essentially, your payment minus interest is just a slow process of buying back your own home until you finally own it outright.

All three groups—A, B, and C—are at the mercy of market fluctuations and the gap between what you paid and what the place is actually worth now.
The "Category C plus mortgage" crowd is the most vulnerable; they risk losing both their home and their savings, though they can certainly come out ahead too, I suppose.

It all boils down to one thing: timing the market.
Douglas Reed3 Douglas Reed3 Member
23 messages
joined Nov 2012
#3 ·
It’s clearly an investment since you’re essentially paying yourself rent every single month.
Kimberly Nguyen Kimberly Nguyen Regular
543 messages
joined Jul 2009
#4 ·
I truly believe that an investment doesn't always have to show up on a bank statement... for me, I’m investing in the quality of life for myself and my family. Sure, I don't get a monthly dividend check from this particular "asset," but I get paid back every single day in the sheer enjoyment and peace of mind it provides... It’s an investment for my kids, too. One day, they’ll inherit this home, and by then, it will have fundamentally leveled up their standard of living.

Take my parents' house, for instance. Looking back at what they paid for it about twenty years ago—back when things were much more affordable—it’s worth a fortune today compared to that initial price tag. We aren't looking to sell it, obviously, but we recognize the equity we're sitting on. Based on how much property values have surged over the decades, it’s clearly going to keep climbing... and even if the market hits a plateau, the value is still lightyears beyond where it started two decades ago.
Sophia White Sophia White MemberOP
18 messages
joined Oct 2003
#5 ·
So, where does buying a house—basically just figuring out your living situation—actually fit into all this:

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/investment.asp

What is investment
Think of it as grabbing an asset or something specific with the goal of seeing it pay you back later or grow in value down the road. In an economic sense, an investment is basically buying stuff you don't use up right now, but instead use later to build up some serious wealth. When we're talking about things in the financial sense, an investment is a money-based asset you pick up because you expect it to either cough up some income later or jump up in price so you can flip it for a profit.

Investopedia explains investment...
Building out a massive manufacturing plant to churn out products, or even the money you sink into getting a degree at a place like Harvard or a state university, are both classic examples of investments in an economic sense.

In the financial sense, investments include things like picking up bonds, stocks, or Real Estate.

Just a heads-up though—don't go mixing up "making an investment" with just straight-up speculating. Investing usually involves the creation of wealth, whereas speculating is more of a zero-sum game where no new wealth actually gets made. Even if speculators think they've done their homework, most people wouldn't call what they're doing traditional investing.
bluewolf0 bluewolf0 Member
13 messages
joined Jul 2009
#6 ·
Do yourself a favor and pick up Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert Kiyosaki.
Within twenty pages, you'll realize that buying a house just to have a roof over your head isn't an investment—it's actually a liability.
Give it thirty pages and your whole perspective on money shifts. Finish the book, and you might actually start making money work for you instead of spending your life chasing it.

I'm currently offloading a condo I bought. 🙂
Assets! Assets! Assets! 👍
mellowraven8 mellowraven8 Active Member
51 messages
joined Feb 2013
#7 ·
Finished the book.

I’m sticking to my guns: buying an apartment is an investment. A capital one.

Whether it's a "good" or "bad" move is irrelevant to this point.

As a family man, my priority is simple—if I kick the bucket, I want to know my family isn't out on the street.

I’ve got a decent place, which means I’m not burning $2,500 a month on rent.
Since I'm not bleeding cash, my monthly cash flow stays healthy enough.

Selling isn't even on my radar.

I'm not interested in playing the speculator, wondering what kind of returns I might squeeze out of some random stock or fund if I liquidated everything.

If I were single and looking to gamble:

1) I’d have sold both properties I picked up back in 2008.
2) I’d put half into bonds and the other half into money market funds.
3) Once prices finally bottom out in a few years,
I’d buy a solid place to live and grab some land on the outskirts where the city is likely to expand.

Secure the roof over your head first; speculate later.
Sam Ramos85 Sam Ramos85 Active Member
55 messages
joined Oct 2012
#8 ·
Some people claim that buying a condo brings you peace of mind, but honestly, you have to break that down into two very different realities: there's the nightmare of taking out a mortgage with astronomical interest rates in this absolute mess of an economy, and then there's buying a place with cold, hard cash—which, let's face it, usually means you either inherited it or hit some lucky break.

Since my wife works in healthcare, I hear all kinds of heavy stuff constantly. For instance, she’s seeing more and more people coming in complaining about insomnia, crippling job anxiety, or the sheer terror of being laid off. People are watching their mortgage payments skyrocket while their wages stay flat, and they're staring down 30-year debt cycles. It's wild... there's a massive surge in people asking for antidepressants, and they're popping them like candy...

Peace of mind and investing? It’s all a bit moot if you didn't inherit your money...
Douglas Reed3 Douglas Reed3 Member
23 messages
joined Nov 2012
#9 ·
Sophia White said:So, where does buying a house—basically just figuring out your living situation—actually fit into all this:

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/investment.asp

What is investment
Think of it as grabbing an asset or something specific with the goal of seeing it pay you back later or grow in value down the road. In an economic sense, an investment is basically buying stuff you don't use up right now, but instead use later to build up some serious wealth. When we're talking about things in the financial sense, an investment is a money-based asset you pick up because you expect it to either cough up some income later or jump up in price so you can flip it for a profit.

Investopedia explains investment...
Building out a massive manufacturing plant to churn out products, or even the money you sink into getting a degree at a place like Harvard or a state university, are both classic examples of investments in an economic sense.

In the financial sense, investments include things like picking up bonds, stocks, or Real Estate.

Just a heads-up though—don't go mixing up "making an investment" with just straight-up speculating. Investing usually involves the creation of wealth, whereas speculating is more of a zero-sum game where no new wealth actually gets made. Even if speculators think they've done their homework, most people wouldn't call what they're doing traditional investing.

Right under that definition on Investopedia, you'll find

Investopedia explains Real Estate and you have Exploring Real Estate Investments

If you don't own your own apartment or house, you basically have two choices: live on the streets or pay, say, $667 a month for a rental. When you invest in buying your own place, you effectively generate an income of $667 per month that you pay to yourself... plus there is the long-term appreciation of the property. You might have bought it for $200 per square foot, and now it's worth $250.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#10 ·
Douglas Reed3 said:It’s clearly an investment since you’re essentially paying yourself rent every single month.

I suppose I wouldn't have phrased it quite that way myself—it just hasn't crossed my mind before.
But then again, looking at it now, he's right. It really is.
Sophia White Sophia White MemberOP
18 messages
joined Oct 2003
#11 ·
Come on now, you guys are just daydreaming. Let’s get real and look at a practical example—something we can actually wrap our heads around. Say you’re looking at a house priced at $120,000, just to keep the math simple. Now, let's say you take out a loan for a third of that value—so, $40,000—spread over a 15-year term. At a 7% interest rate, your monthly mortgage payment would sit right around $359. If you were renting a place like that, your rent would be roughly the same amount anyway. So, when you crunch the numbers, your actual profit is basically zero—especially since you have to account for that "rent" money you're essentially paying to yourself to cover the loan.

And don't even get me started on appreciation. Imagine you bought a place back in 2007 and you're trying to flip it in 2011, right when the market is cratering and everything is worth at least ten percent less than what you paid. In my book, you can't just bank on appreciation like it's guaranteed profit—not once you start factoring in things like depreciation and inflation.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#12 ·
Sophia White said:Come on now, you guys are just daydreaming. Let’s get real and look at a practical example—something we can actually wrap our heads around. Say you’re looking at a house priced at $120,000, just to keep the math simple. Now, let's say you take out a loan for a third of that value—so, $40,000—spread over a 15-year term. At a 7% interest rate, your monthly mortgage payment would sit right around $359. If you were renting a place like that, your rent would be roughly the same amount anyway. So, when you crunch the numbers, your actual profit is basically zero—especially since you have to account for that "rent" money you're essentially paying to yourself to cover the loan.

And don't even get me started on appreciation. Imagine you bought a place back in 2007 and you're trying to flip it in 2011, right when the market is cratering and everything is worth at least ten percent less than what you paid. In my book, you can't just bank on appreciation like it's guaranteed profit—not once you start factoring in things like depreciation and inflation.

True, but then again—what other option do you really have if you don't have a permanent place to live?
If you pay roughly the same amount in rent, the day you move out, all you're taking with you is your laundry. But here, when you eventually move, you're taking the equity of the home with you.

In the meantime, you've essentially invested in your own freedom—having your own style, not answering to a landlord, having some comfort, and so on. I assume we don't need to explain the fundamental difference between being a tenant and being an owner.
Sophia White Sophia White MemberOP
18 messages
joined Oct 2003
#13 ·
Honestly, if you’re buying a place just to finally have a roof over your head, the only way you’re actually seeing a profit is through pure speculation—and even then, it's a massive stretch. You'd have to hope the value sky-rockets way past what you paid, plus inflation, plus all those annoying upkeep costs like new cabinets or swapping out old bathroom fixtures. That kind of windfall isn't something people actually plan for when they're signing mortgage papers, anyway. So, calling it an "investment" feels like a bit of a reach to me. If I had to label it, I'd say it's more like a form of forced savings—you're basically tucking away the value of that home over time, and if things ever get hairy, you can eventually liquidate it for cash.
Sophia White Sophia White MemberOP
18 messages
joined Oct 2003
#14 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:True, but then again—what other option do you really have if you don't have a permanent place to live?
If you pay roughly the same amount in rent, the day you move out, all you're taking with you is your laundry. But here, when you eventually move, you're taking the equity of the home with you.

In the meantime, you've essentially invested in your own freedom—having your own style, not answering to a landlord, having some comfort, and so on. I assume we don't need to explain the fundamental difference between being a tenant and being an owner.

But honestly, that’s exactly the point! When we talk about what is investment in an economic sense, we're talking about something that builds actual value or—if you're feeling a bit more aggressive—something that generates income. Now, having a super comfy lifestyle doesn't generate income, just like having a steady paycheck doesn't automatically buy you freedom from a boss.

You've really gotta draw a line between the economic definition and the casual way people use the word "investment"—otherwise, you end up making weak excuses for buying a house. Look, I bought my condo because I wanted to "invest" in my own peace of mind and independence. But strictly speaking? My place isn't an investment. It’s tied up in a mortgage, I spent a ton of extra cash customizing the interior, and I’m not looking to flip it for a quick profit whenever the market spikes—I actually want to live there for the long haul. From a cold, hard investment standpoint, it’s a total flop—I’d probably be better off putting that money elsewhere. That said, if you look at it as a form of forced savings, I can pretty much count on getting back roughly what I put in, give or take whatever the current market vibes are.
mellowraven8 mellowraven8 Active Member
51 messages
joined Feb 2013
#15 ·
Sophia White said:So, where does buying a house—basically just figuring out your living situation—actually fit into all this:

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/investment.asp

What is investment
Think of it as grabbing an asset or something specific with the goal of seeing it pay you back later or grow in value down the road. In an economic sense, an investment is basically buying stuff you don't use up right now, but instead use later to build up some serious wealth. When we're talking about things in the financial sense, an investment is a money-based asset you pick up because you expect it to either cough up some income later or jump up in price so you can flip it for a profit.

Investopedia explains investment...
Building out a massive manufacturing plant to churn out products, or even the money you sink into getting a degree at a place like Harvard or a state university, are both classic examples of investments in an economic sense.

In the financial sense, investments include things like picking up bonds, stocks, or Real Estate.

Just a heads-up though—don't go mixing up "making an investment" with just straight-up speculating. Investing usually involves the creation of wealth, whereas speculating is more of a zero-sum game where no new wealth actually gets made. Even if speculators think they've done their homework, most people wouldn't call what they're doing traditional investing.

Example 1 (all numbers are accurate):

Contract signed in '02, purchase finalized in '04 (post-construction),
Price: $55,000 ($750/sq ft)

Current value (accounting for market fluctuations): $117,000 ($1,700/sq ft)

Profit calculation:

Current value - Original price + Saved rent
(what I would’ve spent renting someone else's place)

($117,000-$55,000)+($2,975 x 20 years)= $62,000 + $59,500 = $121,500

That’s a $121,500 gain over 20 years on a $55,000 investment.

Is this an investment or just an expense?

Don't factor in quality of life or comfort.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#16 ·
Sophia White said:But honestly, that’s exactly the point! When we talk about what is investment in an economic sense, we're talking about something that builds actual value or—if you're feeling a bit more aggressive—something that generates income. Now, having a super comfy lifestyle doesn't generate income, just like having a steady paycheck doesn't automatically buy you freedom from a boss.

You've really gotta draw a line between the economic definition and the casual way people use the word "investment"—otherwise, you end up making weak excuses for buying a house. Look, I bought my condo because I wanted to "invest" in my own peace of mind and independence. But strictly speaking? My place isn't an investment. It’s tied up in a mortgage, I spent a ton of extra cash customizing the interior, and I’m not looking to flip it for a quick profit whenever the market spikes—I actually want to live there for the long haul. From a cold, hard investment standpoint, it’s a total flop—I’d probably be better off putting that money elsewhere. That said, if you look at it as a form of forced savings, I can pretty much count on getting back roughly what I put in, give or take whatever the current market vibes are.

I suspect the root of this misunderstanding lies in how we define "income."

It seems like you view cash as the only possible metric for return. I haven't approached it quite that way—because, honestly, comfort carries its own kind of value, which, if I'm deciding whether to buy a condo, is certainly significant to me. There's also the security of knowing I won't be kicked out onto the street, among other things, but let's not get too sidetracked here.

So, everything that distinguishes owning versus renting represents a value to me that can, in theory, be measured in dollars and cents. And I am essentially capturing that value by purchasing the property.

In that light, I viewed it as an investment—looking at the total gain, rather than just the liquid cash.
mellowraven8 mellowraven8 Active Member
51 messages
joined Feb 2013
#17 ·
Example 2 (same scenario, but using a mortgage):

Apartment bought in late 2002, fully financed by a bank loan in early 2004 once construction finished.
Purchase price: $51,254 ($753/sq ft)

Loan details: $51,254.26 over 20 years, 5.9% interest, monthly payment of $364.25

Current market value (accounting for past fluctuations): $108,800 ($1,600/sq ft)

Total paid to the bank so far: $28,755
Lost rent (what I’d be paying if I were renting someone else's place): $27,650
Principal paid off to date: $10,805
Remaining principal: $40,449

The breakdown:

Current property value + lost rent = $136,450

Total bank payments + remaining principal = $69,204

Net profit (if I sold today and cleared the debt): $67,246,
and that's without putting any actual cash down upfront.

So, is this an investment or just a massive expense?
mistystag90 mistystag90 Member
10 messages
joined Mar 2010
#18 ·
mellowraven8

You haven't actually banked that $60,000 profit until you sell it for significantly more than your initial buy-in. Take me for example: back in 2007, I held shares that were trading at a massive premium compared to where they are now. But because I sat on them and didn't pull the trigger, I’m nowhere near the level of profit I thought I had back then.

In my opinion, until you cash out at that price point, you're just looking at an unrealized cost. Plus, once you do sell, you still have to deal with reality—you'll need to find somewhere else to live, whether that means buying a new place or renting. If we're talking about a rental property you don't personally occupy, then sure, that's a clear-cut investment.

If (or rather, when) capital gains taxes eventually get implemented, I think it would be a massive blunder to tax the potential gains on a primary residence—the home you actually live in—just because it sells for more than what you originally paid.
Sandra Williams70 Sandra Williams70 Member
45 messages
joined Jun 2010
#19 ·
A foolish question met by even stupider answers—though I suppose I have nothing better to do.
If someone buys a condo with the specific intent of turning a profit later, that is an investment. An investment carries the potential for both gain and loss. Otherwise, a property is just an expense—much like a car; an expense that may be necessary or entirely superfluous.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment
mellowraven8 said:Example 1 (all numbers are accurate):

Contract signed in '02, purchase finalized in '04 (post-construction),
Price: $55,000 ($750/sq ft)

Current value (accounting for market fluctuations): $117,000 ($1,700/sq ft)

Profit calculation:

Current value - Original price + Saved rent
(what I would’ve spent renting someone else's place)

($117,000-$55,000)+($2,975 x 20 years)= $62,000 + $59,500 = $121,500

That’s a $121,500 gain over 20 years on a $55,000 investment.

Is this an investment or just an expense?

Don't factor in quality of life or comfort.

That logic is akin to saying you went out to dinner, but since you ended up not eating for some reason, you never actually went.
What happens after the purchase is irrelevant—the original intent determines whether it is an expense or an investment.
Sophia White Sophia White MemberOP
18 messages
joined Oct 2003
#20 ·
Check out this data from back in July 2008: "Federal Reserve analysts found that real estate prices in the US shot up by 89.9 percent over the previous decade—with a massive 61.6 percent of that jump happening in just the last four years alone. Compare that to the stretch between 1997 and 2003, where things were way more chill, growing by only about 17.5 percent total."

So, yeah—anyone who pulled the trigger ten years ago is sitting pretty right now. But here’s the real question: are you actually expecting that kind of crazy appreciation over the next five or ten years? Like, does buying right now even qualify as an "investment" if you're looking for those kinds of returns?

And let’s be real for a second—even if someone made a killing selling a place they bought a decade ago, they can only actually pocket that cash if they decide to walk away from owning property altogether. Because if they want to stay in the game and buy another place, the price of that new home has likely climbed right along with their old one. It’s like a shell game where you move from one expensive house to another... so when you crunch the numbers, your actual profit ends up being basically zero.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads