Mark Nguyen6 said:Oh, I don't think it works quite like that.
That is an extremely harsh form of relativism.
I didn't just invent the concept of duty any more than anyone else did (and certainly not me—though, I really shouldn't present myself as some hyper-super-mega-responsible figure... I've definitely cut corners before, believe me! 😁])—it doesn't just fall from the sky. It is learned, through upbringing, family examples, elementary school, and so on...
So, learning to live with the concept of duty isn't a category of absence that can be excused by saying "I see it this way or I see it that way." You wouldn't tell your stomach that you don't "see" the need to earn your bread (I'm oversimplifying here, but I think the point is clear).
The bottom line can't be a relative matter of "how everyone sees things." Duty is a very clear and visible concept (inspiration isn't part of it either, which is precisely the problem for those people, and the problem for those whose lives are built upon it).
And the actual bottom line is: people don't really have a problem with duty itself; they have a problem with the ego that refuses to accept that duty exists, rather than being the sole measure of what is meaningful.
And that leads to—megalomania.
PS.
We aren't in the military, but, if you find the willpower and write down every single action you take in one day (from the moment you wake up until you go to bed, including the tiniest details) and sort them into "inspiredly free" and "duties," you will be shocked by the results. And an unprepared person will be even more shocked when they realize that, somehow, the most meaningful actions are often the ones that have the least to do with being "inspiredly free." Truly free and meaningful moments are incredibly rare, even throughout human history. Most often, once you peel back the surface, you end up with this:
- What would you do if you could do whatever you wanted?
- I don't know, I'd travel the world and meet new people.
And honestly, I can't deal with that supposed "individuality" that half of humanity claims to have (everyone wants to do that). Not to mention that most people haven't even met their next-door neighbor. (Now, this is bordering on off-topic, though I don't really think it is)
It goes without saying (also), I am speaking about people older than, say, twenty-five.
Well, you clearly misread that.
I wanted to put the word "see" in quotes like this, but I couldn't be bothered because there were four of them and I figured you'd get what I meant.
Carol Thompson explained it for me, thanks Carol. 🙂
It's not about the bottom line being relative 😁, because the point isn't about perception; it's about something that develops inside a person that prevents them from acting.
And honestly, I think you're taking a really narrow view... since you're overemphasizing the whole idea of duty... but not everything we do is a "duty."
I'm thinking about important life activities and the freedom an individual should have to decide what matters in their own lives; not everything is external to us, like I said.
And that's exactly why, because of that, I made the connection to military discipline when discussing such an exaggerated sense of duty.
Quincy:
But the bottom line is this: people don't actually struggle with duty; they struggle with the ego that refuses to accept that duty exists independently of being the sole measure of meaning.
Which leads straight to megalomania. |
Actually, I've been reading your other posts in this thread, and it's pretty obvious you've had your own issues with "motivation" yourself (if I may say so).
So I don't get it—if you know what it means, why do you keep circling back to this same concept of duty?
I mean, it's fine to set boundaries at the start, like "normal functioning... means not... for example, depression."
But if you say that to someone who is hovering right on the edge of "normal," it sounds like you're just calling them irresponsible or saying it's all just ego.
Is duty the measure of meaning? Sure, it can be, but it doesn't apply to everything. And even for the things it does apply to, if something internal gets in the way (and no, it's not megalomania...), you simply won't be able to carry out that duty.
Quincy:
P.S. We aren't in the military, but try this: find the willpower to list every single thing you do in a day (from the moment you wake up until you go to bed, including the tiniest details) and categorize them into "inspired/free actions" and "duties." You will be shocked by the results. And if you aren't prepared for it, you'll be even more shocked when you realize that somehowThe most nonsensical ones are exactly those that have the least to do with being "inspiredly free." |
this isn't even up for debate,
I’m not saying every single move you make has to be "inspired," I'm just saying that when things aren't working, you need that spark—and that isn't just about checking off a sense of duty. It would be way easier if it were just about obligation, but honestly, I think in those moments, you have to look for meaning within yourself rather than searching for it externally.
Quincy:
truly rare are the moments of genuine freedom and purpose. even throughout human history. most of the time, once you peel back the surface, it ends up being just this:
- what would you do if you could do whatever you wanted? - I don't know, I'd travel the world and meet people.
and frankly, I couldn't care less about an "individuality" that half of humanity shares by default(everyone says the same thing). not to mention, they haven't even met their next-door neighbor. (I know I'm bordering on off-topic here, though I don't really think I am.) |
that's not really the point, at least in my opinion...
simplify it completely: you either do what you want or you do what you have to (duty).
the phase where you can't do either means you're stuck—you can't move forward to make a choice that is either your totally free will or your obligation.
I think you're only talking about the latter part. 🤷
Quincy:
| it goes without saying (also), and I'm talking about people older than xy years. |
I don't think age has anything to do with it; motivation—the internal kind (I won't say intrinsic on purpose, there's a reason but it doesn't matter right now...)—drops off even in mature, established personalities.
but you put this well:
Quincy:
>Mark Nguyen6 says: >> ... basically, I accept that there will be times when I can't find any meaning in anything, but I certainly won't presume to claim that meaning doesn't exist (not to sound megalomaniacal). over time, since life is plenty vivid and wonderful and never lacks imagination, a new area always emerges and meaning reveals itself to us in a new way. |
>
sure, there is meaning. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but I can't act until I "see" it, and facing that difficult period of discovery isn't easy—not everyone has the self-control (or whatever word you want to use) to just "wait" for life to reveal its meaning.