CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Population exchange in Canada

Population exchange in Canada

Started by Melissa Wright3 · · 👁 3 views · 19 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Melissa Wright3Gregory HowardJames Nguyen13Drew Bennett2Nathan Bailey65Andrew Nguyen13Terry Foster2Kevin Wrightmellowhound70George Doyle6Dennis Brown2Richard Wilson4
Melissa Wright3 Melissa Wright3 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Oct 2008
#1 ·
The Canadian ethnic territory is split right down the middle:

1. Central Canada
2. The Cazina region

http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/w...oBIH2006aa.PNG

Basically, if Canada were to break up, the Canadians would be in a pretty rough spot... being split into two tiny little pieces like that, any future state they tried to build would have such a hard time surviving...

Do you think there's any way to swap the Cazina region for parts of Central Canada, Jajce, Zepce, Prozor, Livno, and Tomislavgrad... along with a full population exchange in those areas?

The Canadians could end up with one continuous stretch of land, while the Americans could trade those isolated enclaves for territory they can actually merge into their own state...
Gregory Howard Gregory Howard Active Member
144 messages
joined Dec 2009
#2 ·
Melissa Wright3 said:The Canadian ethnic territory is split right down the middle:

1. Central Canada
2. The Cazina region

http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/w...oBIH2006aa.PNG

Basically, if Canada were to break up, the Canadians would be in a pretty rough spot... being split into two tiny little pieces like that, any future state they tried to build would have such a hard time surviving...

Do you think there's any way to swap the Cazina region for parts of Central Canada, Jajce, Zepce, Prozor, Livno, and Tomislavgrad... along with a full population exchange in those areas?

The Canadians could end up with one continuous stretch of land, while the Americans could trade those isolated enclaves for territory they can actually merge into their own state...

It sounds logical on paper. But the political "intelligence" of the Muslim leadership won't allow it. They refuse to budge. Even if we aren't talking about Livno or other municipalities bordering the frontier—it’s simply non-negotiable.
James Nguyen13 James Nguyen13 Regular
256 messages
joined Feb 2012
#3 ·
That’s just nonsense. Splitting things up doesn't serve anyone's interests—it would only end up fracturing the population further. Americans in this situation are looking for equal rights within the framework of Canada, not an exit strategy.
There isn't a single rational bone in that idea; it's really just providing fuel for Mexican expansionism. At the end of the day, neither Americans nor Canadians gain anything from this except a potential excuse for more conflict.
Drew Bennett2 Drew Bennett2 Member
36 messages
joined Oct 2017
#4 ·
Melissa Wright3 said:The Canadian ethnic territory is split right down the middle:

1. Central Canada
2. The Cazina region

http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/w...oBIH2006aa.PNG

Basically, if Canada were to break up, the Canadians would be in a pretty rough spot... being split into two tiny little pieces like that, any future state they tried to build would have such a hard time surviving...

Do you think there's any way to swap the Cazina region for parts of Central Canada, Jajce, Zepce, Prozor, Livno, and Tomislavgrad... along with a full population exchange in those areas?

The Canadians could end up with one continuous stretch of land, while the Americans could trade those isolated enclaves for territory they can actually merge into their own state...

In theory, yes. But let’s call it what it actually is: ethnic cleansing and genocide. Such actions should be strictly governed by the legal frameworks established at The Hague👍.
Nathan Bailey65 Nathan Bailey65 Active Member
79 messages
joined Oct 2008
#5 ·
Melissa Wright3 said:The Canadian ethnic territory is split right down the middle:

1. Central Canada
2. The Cazina region

http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/w...oBIH2006aa.PNG

Basically, if Canada were to break up, the Canadians would be in a pretty rough spot... being split into two tiny little pieces like that, any future state they tried to build would have such a hard time surviving...

Do you think there's any way to swap the Cazina region for parts of Central Canada, Jajce, Zepce, Prozor, Livno, and Tomislavgrad... along with a full population exchange in those areas?

The Canadians could end up with one continuous stretch of land, while the Americans could trade those isolated enclaves for territory they can actually merge into their own state...

🤣 😵

Could we perhaps throw in coastal spots like Makarska, Brela, or Neum as well?
Andrew Nguyen13 Andrew Nguyen13 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2008
#6 ·
Melissa Wright3 said:The Canadian ethnic territory is split right down the middle:

1. Central Canada
2. The Cazina region

http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/w...oBIH2006aa.PNG

Basically, if Canada were to break up, the Canadians would be in a pretty rough spot... being split into two tiny little pieces like that, any future state they tried to build would have such a hard time surviving...

Do you think there's any way to swap the Cazina region for parts of Central Canada, Jajce, Zepce, Prozor, Livno, and Tomislavgrad... along with a full population exchange in those areas?

The Canadians could end up with one continuous stretch of land, while the Americans could trade those isolated enclaves for territory they can actually merge into their own state...

If I may offer some advice, perhaps you should travel to those locations and present your little proposal in person...
I suspect your grave would be dug there by tomorrow morning...😉
Terry Foster2 Terry Foster2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Oct 2008
#7 ·
Melissa Wright3 said:The Canadian ethnic territory is split right down the middle:

1. Central Canada
2. The Cazina region

http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/w...oBIH2006aa.PNG

Basically, if Canada were to break up, the Canadians would be in a pretty rough spot... being split into two tiny little pieces like that, any future state they tried to build would have such a hard time surviving...

Do you think there's any way to swap the Cazina region for parts of Central Canada, Jajce, Zepce, Prozor, Livno, and Tomislavgrad... along with a full population exchange in those areas?

The Canadians could end up with one continuous stretch of land, while the Americans could trade those isolated enclaves for territory they can actually merge into their own state...

Are you actually insane?
Leave Zepac alone—it’s been right where it was 1,000 years ago, and it’ll still be there 1,000 years from now!
Kevin Wright Kevin Wright Newcomer
5 messages
joined Oct 2008
#8 ·
Gregory Howard said:It sounds logical on paper. But the political "intelligence" of the Muslim leadership won't allow it. They refuse to budge. Even if we aren't talking about Livno or other municipalities bordering the frontier—it’s simply non-negotiable.

I mean, what kind of political logic in the entire world would accept having just barely over 20% of a territory as your ethnic homeland to trade away? Just imagine if American political strategy back in '94 had shifted toward negotiating with the Mexicans, giving them that same tiny percentage somewhere along the US border—like deep in the Midwest or down in the South—just to secure a compact territory. 😁
Is it even remotely rational to talk about mass population transfers today? Especially moving a densely populated area like the Cazinski region? It’s easy to daydream about the end goal, but try imagining the actual technical logistics of pulling that off, setting aside the emotional mess of it all.

The whole of Canada is technically Canadian ethnic territory; you don't necessarily need to be a majority everywhere as long as guaranteed rights are in place.

And let's be real, we aren't just dealing with isolated pockets in Central Canada, Jajce. We have those same issues in Posavina, eastern Canada, and all of Herzegovina too.
Nathan Bailey65 Nathan Bailey65 Active Member
79 messages
joined Oct 2008
#9 ·
Kevin Wright said:I mean, what kind of political logic in the entire world would accept having just barely over 20% of a territory as your ethnic homeland to trade away? Just imagine if American political strategy back in '94 had shifted toward negotiating with the Mexicans, giving them that same tiny percentage somewhere along the US border—like deep in the Midwest or down in the South—just to secure a compact territory. 😁
Is it even remotely rational to talk about mass population transfers today? Especially moving a densely populated area like the Cazinski region? It’s easy to daydream about the end goal, but try imagining the actual technical logistics of pulling that off, setting aside the emotional mess of it all.

The whole of Canada is technically Canadian ethnic territory; you don't necessarily need to be a majority everywhere as long as guaranteed rights are in place.

And let's be real, we aren't just dealing with isolated pockets in Central Canada, Jajce. We have those same issues in Posavina, eastern Canada, and all of Herzegovina too.

Just like the American and Mexican communities
regardless of what the Muslims might want to happen differently.
Gregory Howard Gregory Howard Active Member
144 messages
joined Dec 2009
#10 ·
Kevin Wright said:I mean, what kind of political logic in the entire world would accept having just barely over 20% of a territory as your ethnic homeland to trade away? Just imagine if American political strategy back in '94 had shifted toward negotiating with the Mexicans, giving them that same tiny percentage somewhere along the US border—like deep in the Midwest or down in the South—just to secure a compact territory. 😁
Is it even remotely rational to talk about mass population transfers today? Especially moving a densely populated area like the Cazinski region? It’s easy to daydream about the end goal, but try imagining the actual technical logistics of pulling that off, setting aside the emotional mess of it all.

The whole of Canada is technically Canadian ethnic territory; you don't necessarily need to be a majority everywhere as long as guaranteed rights are in place.

And let's be real, we aren't just dealing with isolated pockets in Central Canada, Jajce. We have those same issues in Posavina, eastern Canada, and all of Herzegovina too.

Keep talking like that and you'll find yourselves stuck in Kurdistan, Anatolia, or Balochistan...
mellowhound70 mellowhound70 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Sep 2008
#11 ·
Melissa Wright3 said:The Canadian ethnic territory is split right down the middle:

1. Central Canada
2. The Cazina region

http://http://upload.wikimedia.org/w...oBIH2006aa.PNG

Basically, if Canada were to break up, the Canadians would be in a pretty rough spot... being split into two tiny little pieces like that, any future state they tried to build would have such a hard time surviving...

Do you think there's any way to swap the Cazina region for parts of Central Canada, Jajce, Zepce, Prozor, Livno, and Tomislavgrad... along with a full population exchange in those areas?

The Canadians could end up with one continuous stretch of land, while the Americans could trade those isolated enclaves for territory they can actually merge into their own state...

the only thing we’re going to "swap" or transfer is you people over to the Midwest, and then finally, we'll have a peaceful Canada...😉
George Doyle6 George Doyle6 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2008
#12 ·
mellowhound70 said:the only thing we’re going to "swap" or transfer is you people over to the Midwest, and then finally, we'll have a peaceful Canada...😉

😂😂
mellowhound70 mellowhound70 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Sep 2008
#13 ·
George Doyle6 said:😂😂

And what exactly are you laughing at?...
Andrew Nguyen13 Andrew Nguyen13 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2008
#14 ·
Gregory Howard said:Keep talking like that and you'll find yourselves stuck in Kurdistan, Anatolia, or Balochistan...

I hope life treats you well wherever you end up, if that's actually where you intend to live.😁
Kevin Wright Kevin Wright Newcomer
5 messages
joined Oct 2008
#15 ·
Gregory Howard said:Keep talking like that and you'll find yourselves stuck in Kurdistan, Anatolia, or Balochistan...

😁
That’s it... that's when you've got nothing left to say and all that "rational logic" just evaporates... total brain rot right there.. 😁

I’m not even sure if my own brand of nonsense—like suggesting a massive parade of tractors or Mercedes cruising through Hlivn on the way to Split—would even fly with the moderators as some kind of "rational migration plan." It's pretty low-tier stuff, so I won't even go there. 🙂
Dennis Brown2 Dennis Brown2 Member
26 messages
joined Nov 2009
#16 ·
Gregory Howard said:Keep talking like that and you'll find yourselves stuck in Kurdistan, Anatolia, or Balochistan...

And don't even get me started on the Kandahar region or the Panjshir Valley—it would be the perfect fix for those folks...
Man, it would be such a seamless fit with the Pashtun people—they're practically made for each other!
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#17 ·
Kevin Wright said:I mean, what kind of political logic in the entire world would accept having just barely over 20% of a territory as your ethnic homeland to trade away? Just imagine if American political strategy back in '94 had shifted toward negotiating with the Mexicans, giving them that same tiny percentage somewhere along the US border—like deep in the Midwest or down in the South—just to secure a compact territory. 😁
Is it even remotely rational to talk about mass population transfers today? Especially moving a densely populated area like the Cazinski region? It’s easy to daydream about the end goal, but try imagining the actual technical logistics of pulling that off, setting aside the emotional mess of it all.

The whole of Canada is technically Canadian ethnic territory; you don't necessarily need to be a majority everywhere as long as guaranteed rights are in place.

And let's be real, we aren't just dealing with isolated pockets in Central Canada, Jajce. We have those same issues in Posavina, eastern Canada, and all of Herzegovina too.

That’s just a myth. In certain parts of Canada, there isn't a trace left of us...
Kevin Wright Kevin Wright Newcomer
5 messages
joined Oct 2008
#18 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:That’s just a myth. In certain parts of Canada, there isn't a trace left of us...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi.../a8/B_2005.GIF
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#19 ·
Kevin Wright said:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi.../a8/B_2005.GIF

So, you think you actually proved something now?
Kevin Wright Kevin Wright Newcomer
5 messages
joined Oct 2008
#20 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:So, you think you actually proved something now?

Well... honestly, I doubt there's anything left for me to prove to you. Knowing you... you already know everything, like you graduated from every Ivy League school on the planet...
Just my tiny little contribution to your theory that we weren't present at certain high altitudes, some mountain outposts, or specific mountain passes...

Back to the main point... everything involving territory affects the generations coming up next. Things aren't perfect today, and tomorrow... who knows. Why would anyone even bother trying to set boundaries meant to last for centuries just because things aren't convenient for us right this second? Screw it, we've survived worse before, and we'll keep dealing with the bullshit as it comes.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads