James Allen2 said:What is truly more spiritual or more humane: abandoning everything to elevate your mind toward some transcendental peak, or staying grounded among the friends, parents, and children who actually populate your life? What about the people who rely on your presence, your affection, and your loyalty? Could you honestly claim to possess any real wisdom if you lived your entire life without ever having known the warmth of being loved or raised by others?
Unfortunately, we are surrounded by so many megalomaniacs preaching spirituality, completely oblivious to the fact that since they were born into this modern era of digital noise and relentless materialism, their supposed "earthly enlightenment" likely hasn't even begun to approach the level they imagine it has.
I’m not looking to attack anyone here—I don't know you all—I am simply stating my perspective and wondering where you stand on it.
To me, this sounds a bit like an attack (or just a general judgment) against philosophers who are just spinning empty wheels and spiritualists who are selling smoke. Since many of us have dealt with that kind of attitude before—often much harsher—it shouldn't be a surprise when people respond with a little sarcasm or cynicism right out of the gate.
It also feels a bit like a "I'll ask, but I already know the answer" situation. I think a lot of people deceive themselves that way—hoping that if they just push hard enough for a long enough time, they can achieve something "their way" (which, let's face it, might be impossible) instead of actually trying to shift their perspective.
On the bright side, you kept the conversation going normally, which is already a huge plus (honestly, lately there's been a surge of clones just wasting everyone's time), so maybe we'll actually reach some kind of conclusion.
I find the posts from Maleficent, nimblemaker3, and bluemason3 to be very substantial, both theoretically and in terms of practical application.
The question of transcendence isn't about megalomania or a lack of humanity; it really is one of the most vital questions in spirituality.
~ "Seek first the kingdom of heaven, and all these things will be added to you" and
~ "The kingdom of heaven is within you"
While many interpret that as a total rejection of the material world, the spiritual path I follow (tantric) doesn't ignore any aspect of human existence.
Desires aren't suppressed, crushed, or cast aside. They just get the place they deserve in a person's life. Nothing more, nothing less. And that goes for physical and mental needs too. But even then, the idea remains to "seek the kingdom of heaven first"—that need to distinguish the essential from the trivial, the permanent from the fleeting... as the Indians would say.
And without getting attached to them (vairagya).
Being centered in oneself and knowing who you are isn't a matter of ideology, philosophy, religion, or psychology—it's a matter of direct experience (though all those things can certainly help). And that requires grueling, daily work and introspection. There are no shortcuts, no magic wands, and no easy fixes.
Now, certain seeds have existed for thousands of years, but you could always say—for whatever reason—that you don't like those solutions.
Then it's on you to come up with a better one.
So,
what would the ideal answer to your question look like to you? Based on what theory or practice?
And why haven't you been able to achieve what you want so far? Where do you think it's stalling?
PS
"Lord, grant me the patience to endure
what I cannot change,
give me the strength to change
what I can change,
and
the wisdom to tell the difference."