CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Philosophical Question #6: How should we think?

Philosophical Question #6: How should we think?

Started by Benjamin Moore6 · · 👁 8 views · 60 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Benjamin Moore6placidnomad50Harold James9Dennis Rogers6Michelle Sanders72goldencobra5neonowl7coastalskipper92William Gonzalez3Edward Flores4mistyfox812Linda Taylor11steelridge58Olivia Evans8Morgan Hernandez5Timothy Kern11rustymaker5steeleagle2gentleseal3amberviperEmily Chavez31Kenneth Peterson5Brenda Cook4coastalorca11 …
Gregory Nelson Gregory Nelson Newcomer
9 messages
joined May 2008
#61 ·
mistyfox812 said:Whatever. You can't own metaphors, so there's no such thing as theft here. Besides, I'm not even "passing it off" as mine (honestly, you always try to spin this into me stealing or scamming or some other drama every single time). Look, I already made my stance clear on this: Everything I write on this board is totally unoriginal—nothing groundbreaking, nothing wild, just stuff that's been written somewhere else before.

In philosophy, originality doesn't mean squat—it's truth that matters. If something is true, then it's universal. It doesn't belong to me, or some random guy, or even Heidegger or Rockefeller.

And yet, if one wishes to articulate any semblance of truth with any degree of precision, one finds that exceptional originality becomes an absolute necessity.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads