goldentrucker17 said:if what you're saying is actually true, then Russia isn't the one to blame for Georgia losing those two regions—it's the USA. It all comes down to that Mexico precedent.
I remember once the Americans basically left Saakashvili hanging out to dry after he arrested some Russians in Atlanta. They just wouldn't back him up, so he ended up having to release them and apologize.
Why? Well...
The Americans really just want things to stay quiet so they can move forward with their own agendas in the Caucasus and near the Caspian Sea. They feel like they can still manage Saakashvili's aggression, so they're doing everything in their power to suppress any nationalist, anti-Russian opposition that might get out of hand. But Russia isn't going to let that slide. Eventually, Saakashvili is going to hit a breaking point. Honestly, Georgia is in a spot similar to Mexico today, though maybe even worse if I'm being honest. Any military move against Russian interests is going to trigger a Russian response that could shake up the entire Caucasus. What seems certain is that the Americans will have to sit on the sidelines. It’s hard to see them doing much more than asking the Russians to dial it back—kind of like how the Russians asked NATO to tone things down back in 1999. Meanwhile, the Azeri will be stuck between a rock and a hard place between Russia and Iran, and they'll likely end up having to hand Nagorno-Karabakh over to the Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians.
At the end of the day, Russia is probably going to push the Americans out of the Caucasus using raw force. Just to show them who's actually running the neighborhood. Maybe that sounds a bit harsh, but... well, that's just how geopolitics works, I guess.