#1 ·
Can Višnjić sue Rubićka for sexual assault? If they both claim he was intoxicated, then we're clearly looking at a situation where consent wasn't mutual... 🤣 🤣 🤣
Started by electricsailor13 · · 👁 4 views · 14 replies
goldenpuma84 said:Nah, we're talking about self-inflicted recklessness here—basically, he got himself hammered and used that state to justify getting intimate. Honestly, if he doesn't focus on starting a family with his wife soon, that marriage isn't going to last much longer...
It would be best if he had a child with his wife as soon as possible; otherwise, that marriage isn't going to last.
goldenpuma84 said:Nah, we're talking about self-inflicted recklessness here—basically, he got himself hammered and used that state to justify getting intimate. Honestly, if he doesn't focus on starting a family with his wife soon, that marriage isn't going to last much longer...
Angela Bailey30 said:Yeah, sure. Why don't he just start paying child support for two right now... obviously.
Angela Bailey30 said:It’s quite fascinating, really, how women are NEVER at fault or held accountable, no matter the circumstances...
goldenpuma84 said:If a young woman takes advantage of an opportunity involving high-quality genetic material—especially from a successful, wealthy, and famous actor—you can't really deny she played her cards right. But let’s be real: first, he got himself wasted. Second, everyone needs to know their own limits when it comes to drinking. And third, you have to be able to predict how you'll act in those situations. She didn't force him into anything; he was just in that headspace where his inhibitions are gone and his ego is running wild... basically showing who he actually is. It’s like when someone causes a car wreck while drunk; by that logic, they could claim they aren't responsible because they were intoxicated. Sure, they were, but they chose to drink and they chose to get behind the wheel knowing the risks. Being drunk isn't an excuse for the fallout...
electricsailor13 said:Being drunk doesn't necessarily mean he wanted sex—he might have just wanted to debate the current state of the American theater scene or something else entirely. It just means he lacked the capacity to say no.😬
goldenpuma84 said:I don't get why you're comparing this to a mistress instead of his wife. Look at it from her perspective: she's shared a bed with him for years, and then he goes and has a kid with someone else. On top of that, now he's footing the bill for support and calling to check in on the little guy. Most women would struggle to deal with that... Honestly, the best way to fix things is trying to rebuild that bond through the child. But that's got nothing to do with the law...
Chris Peterson53 said:😁 Now, *that* would actually be proof—he’s just missing the witnesses to back it up!
Olivia Turner49 said:Look, I’m definitely not a lawyer or anything, but I remember hearing this one crazy story once.
The tennis player Boris Becker was sleeping with some girl, but he was being careful and using protection.
Well, turns out she played him, and now she's pregnant.
Once the kid was born, she sued him for paternity and went after him for child support. He tried to fight it, arguing he did everything possible to ensure he wouldn't become a father, but the court didn't care. In the end, they ruled against him—he's the father, period, and now he’s stuck footing the bill for child support.