CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Kiro's "attack" again - 10 minutes with Kirin

Kiro's "attack" again - 10 minutes with Kirin

Started by rapidviper54 · · 👁 6 views · 38 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants rapidviper54Adam Collins4Patrick Scott5Arthur Martinez7Larry Turner3Henry Collins9granitemarlin77rapidranger79Keith Harris5hollowwalker142Sam Miller82Joshua Ortiz9Aaron Bailey15wanderingmaker8swiftotter13Jason Clark5Gregory Howardboldbison26Dennis Brown2Brandon Scott29
Sam Miller82 Sam Miller82 Member
26 messages
joined Jun 2007
#21 ·
The Democratic Party actually possesses a cohesive platform and principled leadership, whereas the Republican Party is essentially an empty shell. 🙂
What exactly has the Republican Party achieved during this four-year term, aside from a continuous cycle of scandals, criminal activity, and corruption?
At least the Democratic Party is transparent about its positions; conversely, the Republican Party is filled with individuals who lack any independent thought, simply deferring to the whims of their corrupt leader, George W. Bush...
In fact, upon further reflection, the only person within the Republican Party who dares to stand by his own convictions is Kirk 😂
Aaron Bailey15 Aaron Bailey15 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2007
#22 ·
Sam Miller82 said:The Democratic Party actually possesses a cohesive platform and principled leadership, whereas the Republican Party is essentially an empty shell. 🙂
What exactly has the Republican Party achieved during this four-year term, aside from a continuous cycle of scandals, criminal activity, and corruption?
At least the Democratic Party is transparent about its positions; conversely, the Republican Party is filled with individuals who lack any independent thought, simply deferring to the whims of their corrupt leader, George W. Bush...
In fact, upon further reflection, the only person within the Republican Party who dares to stand by his own convictions is Kirk 😂

Which specific people and programs are we talking about within the Democratic Party?
The Republican Party might look small compared to the Democratic Party when you only count scandals, crime, and corruption, but nobody ever writes about the mess the Democrats make.
And which "clearly stated positions" are you referring to?

Look, kid, you don't really have much to base your reasoning on; to someone like you, even Kiro would seem like a genius academic.
Sam Miller82 Sam Miller82 Member
26 messages
joined Jun 2007
#23 ·
The Republican Party is nothing more than a corrupt criminal syndicate that has gutted this country. Any attempt you make to defend them—likely fueled by your own vested interests—is both pathetic and transparent.
Furthermore, the Republican Party has held the reins of power in the States for nearly the last fifteen years, not the Democratic Party, so I believe you have your facts mixed up...
In those fifteen years, the Republican Party has achieved something few others could: they’ve managed to set the nation back by about fifty years. But for you Republicans, no matter what is said, it simply won't sink in. You refuse to acknowledge any valid argument, which makes this entire debate a waste of time.
I won't bother responding to insults; they say far more about the person hurling them than anyone else...
And one more thing: when you lack a real answer, you resort to counter-questions? Honestly, you Republicans are all just wonderful—a tight little sect of corrupt criminals. 😂
hollowwalker142 hollowwalker142 Active Member
100 messages
joined May 2009
#24 ·
Sam Miller82 said:The Republican Party is nothing more than a corrupt criminal syndicate that has gutted this country. Any attempt you make to defend them—likely fueled by your own vested interests—is both pathetic and transparent.
Furthermore, the Republican Party has held the reins of power in the States for nearly the last fifteen years, not the Democratic Party, so I believe you have your facts mixed up...
In those fifteen years, the Republican Party has achieved something few others could: they’ve managed to set the nation back by about fifty years. But for you Republicans, no matter what is said, it simply won't sink in. You refuse to acknowledge any valid argument, which makes this entire debate a waste of time.
I won't bother responding to insults; they say far more about the person hurling them than anyone else...
And one more thing: when you lack a real answer, you resort to counter-questions? Honestly, you Republicans are all just wonderful—a tight little sect of corrupt criminals. 😂

Look, I'm not defending the Republican Party, but as long as people like you are championing the Democratic Party, there's zero chance they ever actually take power.
Honestly, I can't tell if you're just a kid, if you've been in a coma for the last decade, or if you're simply clueless about how anything works.
If it wasn't a total fluke, the Democratic Party held power from 1999 to 2003—have you even looked at what they actually accomplished while they were in charge?
Sam Miller82 Sam Miller82 Member
26 messages
joined Jun 2007
#25 ·
Are you seriously equating four years of a six-party coalition government with fifteen years of uninterrupted rule by the Republican Party? 😂
hollowwalker142 hollowwalker142 Active Member
100 messages
joined May 2009
#26 ·
Sam Miller82 said:Are you seriously equating four years of a six-party coalition government with fifteen years of uninterrupted rule by the Republican Party? 😂

They aren't the same.
In an era where we weren't dealing with wartime chaos and everyone should have been able to focus entirely on fixing the economy, all they managed to do was this: keep the corruption going through privatization, absolutely gut the Democratic Party from the inside, funnel billions into private interests, hand over sensitive documents to international courts, sign away maritime territory, and a whole laundry list of other disasters.
One thing is certain: they’ve caused more damage in those four years than the Republican Party did in fifteen.
Sam Miller82 Sam Miller82 Member
26 messages
joined Jun 2007
#27 ·
I'm certain they managed to cause more chaos in four years than the Republican Party did over fifteen... quite a joke, really. 😂
Even if they had intended to match that level of dysfunction in just four years, they wouldn't have had the time. Beyond that, it's hard to imagine anyone ever surpassing the sheer stupidity and corruption seen under the Republican Party; when historians eventually analyze that era, it will undoubtedly be recorded as one of the darkest chapters in our nation's history. Unfortunately.
hollowwalker142 hollowwalker142 Active Member
100 messages
joined May 2009
#28 ·
Sam Miller82 said:I'm certain they managed to cause more chaos in four years than the Republican Party did over fifteen... quite a joke, really. 😂
Even if they had intended to match that level of dysfunction in just four years, they wouldn't have had the time. Beyond that, it's hard to imagine anyone ever surpassing the sheer stupidity and corruption seen under the Republican Party; when historians eventually analyze that era, it will undoubtedly be recorded as one of the darkest chapters in our nation's history. Unfortunately.

I think you better watch out for that golden silence.
wanderingmaker8 wanderingmaker8 Member
24 messages
joined Jul 2009
#29 ·
Arthur Martinez7 said:One could argue that political down payments already exist 🤣

06.34: "which is why the Democratic Party walked out of the soapbox... uh, the chamber"

😁 😁
swiftotter13 swiftotter13 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jul 2007
#30 ·
bijesprvi strikes again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp5bD...%3Dmain%5Fpage

This time, the target isn't just Kirin. By mocking the new Republican anthem, they're throwing shade at every single one of the Republican Party's past scandals. Sure, they didn't list every single transgression—if someone actually tried to recount every scandal and shady deal they've ever been involved in, a single song wouldn't come close to covering it. You'd probably need an entire opera to get through the whole list, let alone a song. 😁
Jason Clark5 Jason Clark5 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jul 2007
#31 ·
hollowwalker142 said:I think the Democratic Party needs to take a hard look at how much they can push this narrative before it backfires. It’s common sense: if you try to force too much through a system, eventually the whole thing just snaps and everything goes to hell.
What I'm getting at is that using advertising this way is going to trigger a massive backlash from a certain segment of the electorate. They aren't going to see it as clever; they're going to see it as mockery, and they'll vote against the Democratic Party specifically because of it.
We'll see who's left standing when the dust settles.
In my view, you don't win elections by playing the clown, and that applies to both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

Are you certain the Democrats are behind all of this?
hollowwalker142 hollowwalker142 Active Member
100 messages
joined May 2009
#32 ·
Jason Clark5 said:Are you certain the Democrats are behind all of this?

I'm not, but I'm guessing you have some secret intel that makes them look any less incompetent than the usual mess we see from the Democrats-Republicans.
rapidviper54 rapidviper54 Active MemberOP
64 messages
joined Jul 2010
#33 ·
hollowwalker142 said:I'm not, but I'm guessing you have some secret intel that makes them look any less incompetent than the usual mess we see from the Democrats-Republicans.

Is it really that hard for people in the Republican Party to grasp that there are actually dissatisfied citizens out there—people who know how to use a computer and own a $1.75 microphone to record a song?

Or is it always just the Democratic Party's fault...
hollowwalker142 hollowwalker142 Active Member
100 messages
joined May 2009
#34 ·
rapidviper54 said:Is it really that hard for people in the Republican Party to grasp that there are actually dissatisfied citizens out there—people who know how to use a computer and own a $1.75 microphone to record a song?

Or is it always just the Democratic Party's fault...

I wouldn't even bother replying to you if I thought the Republican Party and the Democratic Party were two sides of the same coin, but I specifically used plural pronouns because I was talking about more than just one household, so if you want to keep blindly believing in these "dissatisfied citizens," go ahead; that's your problem.😁
Gregory Howard Gregory Howard Active Member
144 messages
joined Dec 2009
#35 ·
It’s a trivial truth: even the worst version of the Republican Party beats the best version of the Democratic Party. The real issue is the lack of a viable third party capable of actually running things better than these two bottom-feeders.
boldbison26 boldbison26 Member
36 messages
joined Feb 2007
#36 ·
Sam Miller82 said:I cannot bring myself to agree with the idea that a pre-election campaign should consist solely of attacking other parties without offering any actual vision or concept.
The Republican Party has demonstrated its incompetence, corruption, and poor leadership over these last four years, so the Democratic Party hardly needs to exert much effort to confirm those failings.
In Western nations, a single scandal of this magnitude would result in a prime minister resigning and immediate new elections; yet, the Republican Party has faced countless such issues over this term and nothing happens. To me, that reality says everything about the kind of country I happen to live in by chance.
But, as I mentioned before, this sickness known as the Republican Party will eventually pass.🙂

The Republicans are bad, but how good are the others?
The Democratic Party isn't even trying to show how great they are.
Dennis Brown2 Dennis Brown2 Member
26 messages
joined Nov 2009
#37 ·
Gregory Howard said:It’s a trivial truth: even the worst version of the Republican Party beats the best version of the Democratic Party. The real issue is the lack of a viable third party capable of actually running things better than these two bottom-feeders.


I honestly don't even know where to start with this. Even the Republican Party caught me off guard—they've pivoted toward this level of subservience that's frankly embarrassing, basically groveling to all sorts of self-important types over at the MZ.
They've become just as distasteful to me as their counterparts in the Democratic Party.
The real tragedy, though, is that everything else on the American political stage is just a pathetic joke. You have the Whig Party—though I'm still trying to figure out who they even represent anymore—and then the Libertarian Party, whose very reason for existing remains a mystery to me. Why haven't they just folded into the Democratic Party already?
And don't even get me started on the Constitution Party and that absolute character Djapica...
Honestly, God help us!
Gregory Howard Gregory Howard Active Member
144 messages
joined Dec 2009
#38 ·
Dennis Brown2 said:I honestly don't even know where to start with this. Even the Republican Party caught me off guard—they've pivoted toward this level of subservience that's frankly embarrassing, basically groveling to all sorts of self-important types over at the MZ.
They've become just as distasteful to me as their counterparts in the Democratic Party.
The real tragedy, though, is that everything else on the American political stage is just a pathetic joke. You have the Whig Party—though I'm still trying to figure out who they even represent anymore—and then the Libertarian Party, whose very reason for existing remains a mystery to me. Why haven't they just folded into the Democratic Party already?
And don't even get me started on the Constitution Party and that absolute character Djapica...
Honestly, God help us!

The Democrats are less nauseating once the initial shock wears off. They actually manage some wins that the Democratic Party would never touch. But the reputation for being spineless sycophants remains.

If they lose power, I don't think it will be because of the subservience—the Democratic Party and the Libertarian Party are even bigger suck-ups. It will be because of their arrogance, the corruption, and the general vibe of being entitled bullies.
Brandon Scott29 Brandon Scott29 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2012
#39 ·
rapidviper54 said:Is it really that hard for people in the Republican Party to grasp that there are actually dissatisfied citizens out there—people who know how to use a computer and own a $1.75 microphone to record a song?

Or is it always just the Democratic Party's fault...

And now, it turns out this entire outrage was orchestrated by a Democratic brain trust consisting of Krešimir macan, Zinka Bardić, and Marko Rakar.

Setting aside the sheer immorality of such tactics and the damage dealt to legitimate grassroots movements, the media's role—specifically CBS in this instance—demands a response and meaningful sanctions.

The agitators were given regular airtime on public television, thinly veiled as civic activism, when in reality, it was nothing more than partisan propaganda. This is a textbook case of corruption.

Consider what would happen if CBS aired reports regarding meat quality from some supposed "Consumer Reports" group, only for it to be revealed later that the whole thing was a marketing stunt for Tyson Foods. What kind of penalties would those involved face for such a deception?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads