CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online
log in · register
Home › Society › Law › Level 5 compensation according to the law...

Level 5 compensation according to the law...

Started by rustycanyon93 · · 👁 4 views · 8 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants rustycanyon93Michael BennettThomas Miller80
rustycanyon93 rustycanyon93 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined May 2007
#1 ·
I'm looking into reclaiming property seized during the old Communist era. I've heard people mention the European Court of Human Rights, but I have no idea how much weight that actually carries in this situation.
Also, does anyone know who handles the third level of appeals? I’ve combed through the entire law and it doesn't say a damn thing about it, and I need an answer yesterday.
Thanks in advance.
Michael Bennett Michael Bennett Newcomer
5 messages
joined May 2007
#2 ·
Not totally sure I’m following exactly what you guys are looking for here, but maybe this clears things up a bit:
- first, you get a decision from the local county property office
- if you want to appeal that - the Department of Justice handles it
- then, if you're still not happy with how it went down - you file a lawsuit with the Administrative Court
rustycanyon93 rustycanyon93 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined May 2007
#3 ·
[QUOTE=Michael Bennett;8562063]I'm not entirely sure I follow what you're looking for, but maybe this clears things up:
- the initial decision comes from the county property office
- if you appeal that decision, the Department of Justice handles it
- if you're still unhappy with that outcome, you file a lawsuit in Administrative Court[/QUOTE

I guess that answers it. So the Administrative Court is basically the third tier of the process? And honestly, that fifth stage thing... I have no idea why the professor even brought that up. It seems totally out of left field.
Also, does anyone know if this specific law has undergone any amendments? If you happen to know, could you give me the official US Code citation or something similar so I can dig through the records myself?
Thanks[/QUOTE]
Thomas Miller80 Thomas Miller80 Active Member
93 messages
joined Jun 2007
#4 ·
Michael Bennett hit the nail on the head—the 3rd one is the Administrative Court.

Is this maybe like some local court in Chicago?😬
rustycanyon93 rustycanyon93 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined May 2007
#5 ·
[QUOTE=Thomas Miller80;8569215]Michael Bennett covered it all. Third up is the Administrative Court.

Is this maybe PF Split?😬[/QUOTE

Yeah.👍
But I’m curious—where did this whole thing about the fifth level of appeal come from?[/QUOTE]
Michael Bennett Michael Bennett Newcomer
5 messages
joined May 2007
#6 ·
So, look—it’s not strictly about the compensation law itself, more like the whole big picture of how people can actually go after what they're owed. You gotta look at it from a much broader perspective, you know? 🙂
I'll try to be a bit more specific next time... honestly, it's just way faster for me to dig through the books and find the exact statute and page number.

Alright, here’s the deal: we’ve hit the third stage, which is the decision from the Administrative Court. Once that court drops its ruling, there isn't really a standard appeal left. Instead, you've got the option to file a petition with the Supreme Court (per article 62 of the Constitution of the United States)

Once you've gone through the Supreme Court of the United States, you've pretty much exhausted every legal avenue available. Only then can you actually start a case with the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg (under article 35 of the European Convention on Human Rights)

And boom, there we go... we've reached the fifth level 🙂 good luck with the rest of the deep dive!
Thomas Miller80 Thomas Miller80 Active Member
93 messages
joined Jun 2007
#7 ·
rustycanyon93;8570029 said:
Thomas Miller80 said:Michael Bennett hit the nail on the head—the 3rd one is the Administrative Court.

Is this maybe like some local court in Chicago?😬

He keeps asking about a third tier based on compensation laws—so I told him straight up, that doesn't exist.

Then he has the nerve to ask if I've ever actually read the law and demands I show him the exact statute where it *doesn't* say that!
So I showed him 😬

Honestly, there's nothing left to add to what Michael Bennett said.🙂
rustycanyon93 rustycanyon93 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined May 2007
#8 ·
Thomas Miller80;8574026 said:
rustycanyon93 said:me asking about the third tier under the compensation law—I told them that simply doesn't exist.

then they ask if I've ever actually seen this law and demand I show them the specific statute where it *doesn't* say that!
so I showed him 😬

there’s really nothing left for Michael Bennett to add to this.🙂

Thanks to both you and Michael. Since you two are clearly such experts, maybe you could help me out with these last two questions.🙂
First off, can an animal actually be a beneficiary of a trust? I'm leaning toward yes, but I'm not certain. And second, how on earth would one leave their entire estate to an animal?
That's it. I won't bother you guys anymore.😁
Thomas Miller80 Thomas Miller80 Active Member
93 messages
joined Jun 2007
#9 ·
It’s pretty obvious we’ve been spinning the same wheels on these exact questions for years now🙏 🙏

If I remember correctly—and my memory isn't *that* bad—the estate goes to an animal through a trust😉

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads