Jose Ward4 said:@Angela Stewart6: "Yeah, I read somewhere that we tend to be pretty self-absorbed, but honestly, maybe that isn't such a bad thing. From an outsider's perspective, a person like that just has their own little world going on. Trying to force changes on them to make them more 'objective' feels risky. We might draw all the wrong conclusions because we're so tied to our own beliefs. Everyone lives in their own bubble; it’s just more pronounced in some people. Personally, I think instead of trying to break into someone else's bubble, you should just try to improve things within it if you can."
I mean, yeah, we are incredibly wrapped up in our own little bubbles, and let's be real—we can be pretty lazy too. I know I am, and I suspect most of us are. We just don't feel like grinding through pointless tasks. Thank God I have this remote gig; otherwise, I can't imagine dealing with the soul-crushing grind of a 9-to-5. But that internal world isn't inherently bad or malicious. It's usually well-intentioned. After all, there's a razor-thin line between being a genius and just being totally detached from reality, right? I don't think we've fallen into the latter category. As for me, I actually enjoy my solitude. Having someone in my life would be great, obviously, but I'm not going to overthink it. I remember once I was out on a date, and when we met up, she looked at me all puzzled and asked, "Did you seriously not notice I changed my hair near my temple?" I told her no, and she just sighed and said, "You're totally in your own world," much like my sister does to me. At the end of the day, everyone has their own universe, and we all just try to adapt to it as best we can.
I feel compelled to weigh in here. I'm not a professional, though I have family members who work in border patrol, but it is a complete falsehood to claim those people are lazy. I have witnessed incredible feats of adaptation from individuals who integrate themselves perfectly without ever asking for special treatment.
In my view, "neurotypical" people possess developed "filters" that allow them to breeze through daily hiccups. On the other hand, people dealing with some variation of psychosis are essentially overwhelmed by petabytes—I'm not sure how else to put it—of useless information. They have to sift through all that noise to figure out what actually matters and draw a conclusion in a fraction of a second.
Just one example (which isn't meant to be taken too seriously, but it hits at the core of the issue): Imagine an employer calls an employee over to fix a problem that isn't even part of their job description. The worker solves the issue mentally in an instant, but they just stand there with their mouth open because reality is finally setting in. Now, the employer wants the worker to either solve or ignore the problem, and they're watching from the sidelines along with a crowd of onlookers interested in the outcome. Ultimately, the worker isn't solving a simple task; they are navigating how the employer *wants* them to solve it. Now, that worker has spent their life essentially sabotaging their own cognitive processes (to put it bluntly, to achieve a sense of blessed silence), so even if their thoughts are clear, what they say or write might not always come across as eloquent.
It is quite difficult to write about something so abstract, especially when your interlocutor is a neurotypical person.
And one more thing: the idea of a person struggling with mental illness working in a group of five or more people is a fantasy. It’s not just because of the illness itself; it’s because everyone has their own little agendas, and people can act like piranhas when they smell blood in the water.