CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Just feeling cynical...

Just feeling cynical...

Started by Jonathan Brown6 · · 👁 7 views · 52 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jonathan Brown6ARachel BishopHarold James9swiftcobra15ruggedfalcon30Jack Harris3Nathan Rodriguez97Jonathan Brooks8mistyscout2northerntrucker42Rebecca Garcia2copperotter16Kenneth Ward8Eric Wright2Peter Jackson4Thomas Lopez28
copperotter16 copperotter16 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2005
#41 ·
Spirituality is way more subtle than some math equation, proof, or theorem. If we humans could actually hit that perfect state of harmony—where we’d have total creative power (including making beings that can reach that level too) and know absolutely everything—then we’d basically be God. For now, we're just deluding ourselves into thinking this basic math and science we have can explain the whole world...
Rebecca Garcia2 Rebecca Garcia2 Member
19 messages
joined Apr 2005
#42 ·
Rebecca Garcia2, don't you think those critiques come off a bit condescending?
copperotter16 copperotter16 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2005
#43 ·
hotnix said:copperotter16, aren't those critiques a little condescending?

You think that's because I called math and the sciences "pathetic"?

Let me clarify: reaching a new realization, discovering or creating something fresh—it brings massive satisfaction. I’d even go as far as calling it a tiny glimpse of the divine. But thinking that what we've discovered proves there's no spiritual side to things is like a kid learning their multiplication tables and suddenly deciding they're a master mathematician...
Basically, new discoveries matter because they open the door to even more discovery. If new findings just filled up a closed loop until everything was "complete," it would be tragic—it would lead to nothingness, to death. Then there's the fact that some people *want* to close that loop and declare something to be the ultimate, final truth. Priests would say that person is just trying to play God, no matter how limited that little "god" actually is...
Rebecca Garcia2 Rebecca Garcia2 Member
19 messages
joined Apr 2005
#44 ·
You’re being pretty pessimistic here...

Science might be heading toward a dead end, but where exactly does ignorance lead?

It seems like staying comfortable matters more to you than finding the truth.

Real insight usually comes from the most uncomfortable places...
copperotter16 copperotter16 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2005
#45 ·
Rebecca Garcia2 said:You're being pretty pessimistic here...

If science leads to death , then where does ignorance lead?

It seems like staying comfortable matters more to you than finding the truth.

Real insight usually comes from the hardest places.

You didn't actually quote anyone, but I'm assuming this is directed at me since I wrote the last post...
Where did you get the idea that I think science leads to death? That’s not even close to what I meant! If you read a little closer, you'd see my point: "New discoveries are valuable specifically because they open the door to even more discovery." To me, that’s the whole heart of the Socratic idea that "I know that I know nothing." What actually leads to ruin is the belief that we already know everything. History shows us that dictatorships thrive on that exact mindset—they stay in power by cutting people off from information. It makes sense why those regimes tend to be atheistic; the leaders basically want to play God and act like there's no authority higher than them.
Rebecca Garcia2 Rebecca Garcia2 Member
19 messages
joined Apr 2005
#46 ·
If I’m following you correctly, you're saying science eventually leads to spiritual death because it has its limits. Once everything is understood, it's game over!

But honestly, nobody knows everything, and nobody ever will.
Rebecca Garcia2 Rebecca Garcia2 Member
19 messages
joined Apr 2005
#47 ·
.
copperotter16 copperotter16 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2005
#48 ·
Rebecca Garcia2 said:If I'm following you, you're saying science leads to spiritual death because it eventually hits a wall. Like, once everything is figured out, it's game over!

Honestly, nobody knows everything, and we never will.

I think you missed the point there...
Kenneth Ward8 Kenneth Ward8 Member
29 messages
joined Dec 2002
#49 ·
relativity suggests:
I used to find philosophy quite intriguing, until I realized the whole discipline is essentially nonsense. If you examine things from a molecular perspective, we are all fundamentally identical—whether it’s a rock, a flower, an animal, or a human being—not counting the specific composition. People drone on about the soul or the intellect, but frankly, it's all triviality.

In what way is a human being distinct from a river, for instance, when viewed at the molecular level? Every thought we possess, every movement we make, is merely a chemical reaction—an ORDINARY CHEMICAL REACTION. Therefore, it is impossible to argue for any higher values regarding our status as individuals.

It seems to me that you all engage in philosophizing simply to feed your "spirit," which is really just fulfilling a specific need (another chemical reaction). After all, every emotion we experience is a chemical reaction. Even every word I am typing right now is the product of chemical reactions driven by atomic collisions, or whatever lies beneath if we descend to a lower level of inquiry.

Ultimately, I have come to realize that all this philosophizing leads nowhere; it is merely another human habit.
👋

Perhaps my timing is a bit late, and I apologize for intruding upon such an advanced discussion... however, this post is compelling enough to warrant a brief addition.
There is actually a minor flaw in that logic. Even if philosophizing is nothing more than a habit or a series of mundane chemical reactions (which is a perfectly logical stance), the act of philosophizing does not lose its purpose. Even if only because it satisfies that very need. And we have needs that we both desire and must fulfill—starting with the need to eat and reproduce, and culminating in the need for intellectual stimulation... 🙂
Eric Wright2 Eric Wright2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2005
#50 ·
relativity said:I used to be super into philosophy, you know, until I totally realized it’s all just complete nonsense. Like, if you look at everything from a molecular level, we're all basically the same—whether it's a rock, a flower, an animal, or a person—if you aren't talking about composition. I kept seeing people talk about the soul or the mind or whatever, but honestly, it feels like total BS.

In what way is a human being any different from, say, the Mississippi River on a molecular level? (not counting what they're made of). Every single thought we have, every little move we make, is just a chemical reaction—like, a totally ORDINARY CHEMICAL REACTION. So, I guess we can't really talk about any higher values regarding us as individuals.

I feel like you guys are all philosophizing just to feed your "spirit" or some kind of need (which is just another chemical reaction, right?), because every emotion we feel is just chemistry playing out. And even every word I'm typing right now is just a product of those chemical reactions caused by atoms bumping into each other, or whatever happens when you go deep enough (who knows what's actually hiding at the bottom of it all?).

But I'm starting to see that all this pondering doesn't actually lead anywhere, it's just another human habit.
👋

A bit late to the party, but here's my little contribution to the chat!
Everything you do in life, if you ignore the basic stuff like eating, drinking, and keeping the species going... I guess you're doing it for one of two reasons:

1. either you're doing it for fun
2. or you're doing it to learn something.

I didn't come up with this myself, though; I just read it in a book by J.S. Bach (and no, it's not about that seagull J. Livingston).
Of course, sometimes you do things to have fun AND learn something at the exact same time.

I think that's why we're all hanging out on this forum. Some people are here for football, and some are here for philosophy. If philosophy isn't entertaining you and you aren't learning anything interesting from these posts, maybe just go watch some football instead! 😁 👋
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#51 ·
...maybe if you take a few soccer balls to the head, you'll finally be able to string together a decent sentence (though I guess the apples worked better)...
Peter Jackson4 Peter Jackson4 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jun 2005
#52 ·
relativity suggests:
I used to be interested in philosophy until I realized it’s mostly nonsense. If you look at things from a molecular perspective, everything is essentially the same—a rock, a flower, an animal, or a human being—regardless of composition. People talk about the soul or reason, but it’s all triviality.

What distinguishes a person from a river, for instance, on a molecular level? Every thought we have and every movement we make is just a chemical reaction—an ordinary chemical reaction. Therefore, there is no basis for claiming any higher value for us as individuals.

It seems to me that you all engage in philosophy merely to feed your "spirit," which is itself just a biological need—another chemical reaction. Every emotion we feel is a chemical process, and every word I am typing right now is simply the product of chemical reactions and atomic collisions. We don't even truly know what lies beneath that level.

Ultimately, I find that philosophizing leads nowhere; it is just another human habit.
👋

How can you deny the existence of the soul and reason? They are the very tools required to write this post.

Furthermore, even if our emotions are chemical reactions, does that diminish their worth? It is entirely a matter of perspective. One could argue that a winning Powerball ticket is just a scrap of paper, yet for the holder, it represents the solution to their existential struggles. Similarly, the fact that our thoughts and consciousness are brain processes does not strip them of their significance.
Thomas Lopez28 Thomas Lopez28 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jul 2005
#53 ·
relativnost said:I used to waste my time obsessing over philosophy until I finally realized the whole thing is absolute garbage. If you look at things from a molecular standpoint, we’re all essentially identical—whether it's a rock, a flower, an animal, or a human being (and I'm not even talking about composition here). People drone on about the "soul" or "reason" or whatever other nonsense. It's pure delusion.

In what possible way is a human being different from the Mississippi River at a molecular level? Not in composition, obviously. Every single thought we have, every twitch of a muscle, is just a chemical reaction. A plain, simple CHEMICAL REACTION. Therefore, there is zero basis for claiming any higher value for us as individuals.

The way I see it, you people engage in these philosophical debates just to feed your "spirit"—which is really just another one of your biological needs (yet another chemical reaction). Every emotion we feel is chemistry. Even every word I am typing right now is merely the product of chemical reactions triggered by atomic collisions, or whatever else is happening down at the subatomic level—honestly, who knows what's hiding at the very bottom of it all?

But I've come to realize that all this philosophizing leads absolutely nowhere. It's nothing more than just another human habit.
👋

Watch out: you smoke a cigarette near me, and I punch you (that's a physical reaction)!

Stop wasting your breath on this nonsense.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads