CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Economy › Business, Accounting & Taxes › Starting an LLC: Where to begin?

Starting an LLC: Where to begin?

Started by Anonymous · · 👁 23 views · 1.1K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants AGeorge Barrett34Jerry Moore2goldengull3Gary Watson4Jerry Wright6Robin Rodriguez5mistyjackal8Sarah Rodriguez8Ashley Rogers4Jamie Cooper34Emily Ortiz25silentpanther15steelstag4Sandra Williams70Hannah Davis18Chris Ruiz10restlesssurfer97Lisa Moore2darkbadger132shadowseal372Keith Taylor4James Green6Gary Cox72 …
Kyle Wilson7 Kyle Wilson7 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2007
#161 ·
I can't quite catch what you mean by "banderas"—not sure if you're talking about flags or something else entirely—but I'm all ears if you want to clear that up! kaže:
It doesn't even have to be subject to Sales Tax—honestly, there's zero difference from running a small sole proprietorship until you actually cross that revenue threshold. $28 Annual revenue—doesn't even have to include Sales Tax.

True, but with an LLC you don't have to pay those self-employment taxes on yourself—whereas with a sole proprietorship, you're stuck paying them no matter what, even if you've got another job elsewhere. Honestly, running a small business while being employed somewhere else just doesn't make much sense that way.

I honestly don't get why people act like owning a business is just some status symbol to brag about. I don't know what your experience with running a private company is—seriously—but how are you even supposed to hold down a regular job elsewhere while keeping a business afloat? Unless you're some local government official or working for a massive state agency, it feels shady. It’s like you only need that side hustle to pull off little scams—not to mention the actual criminal stuff, like taking bribes or funneling contracts away from your employer and straight into your own pocket.

Being in the Sales Tax system isn't always a bad thing—even if you aren't pulling in huge numbers yet. $28333 Honestly, even if I was terrible at math—which, let’s face it, I am—trying to survive on $85k a year sounds brutal. Even if you have zero overhead and a killer margin, once you take that $50k pre-tax profit and split it by twelve after the IRS takes their cut... man, you're left with peanuts. If you're running a serious operation, though, being able to write off Sales Tax on your purchases is a huge plus. Just doesn't really apply to people like dentists or GPs working under Medicare & Medicaid contracts, since they aren't part of the Sales Tax system.
I still don't get how you can score cheaper beer if you aren't in the sales tax system—like, even if the wholesale price hits you the same, you just lose out on the tax credit. If you're staying out of the system, the brewery or the shop is still gonna charge you sales tax, so you end up paying more for that brew instead... $2.75 With that 22% sales tax kicking in—adding $1.76 to bring it up to $9.76—you’re basically stuck... you won't even be able to flip it for a profit. $3.25 So if you sell something for $12, you're looking at a $2.24 profit—but once you factor in being in the Sales Tax system, you’ve got an $8 input and then $1.76 in Sales Tax. If you sell it again for $12, that's $2.16 in Sales Tax, but since you already paid the $1.76, you still owe the government another $0.40... so it looks like you made less, but hey—like my massage therapist always says—business requires overhead. I don't know any coffee shop owners who don't drive a car, but they'll happily hop on a scooter that costs maybe $26,000 just to save a buck—on a $26k purchase, that's $4,400 in Sales Tax alone. Ex $7.4 =$10853 What can you actually claim as a tax deduction—go ahead and split that up with the others. $0.13 What kind of sales tax do you gotta cough up first? $0.13 You gotta pay up once you sell 81,400 cans—so basically, you either drop your prices or end up ahead of where you’d be if you stayed off the grid... assuming you bought the exact same truck.
I honestly jumped into this whole business thing just to see if I could actually save more than I would working some corporate job—which, let's be real, is why pretty much everyone thinks about going solo in the first place. But man... just thinking about how many beers you'd have to move to pay off all the bar equipment, let alone trying to scrape together enough to actually buy the building itself? It's a lot.
So, my take—just keep up with the Sales Tax and get as much done as possible. Honestly? I wouldn't even mind paying more if it meant things actually worked. $333333 Sales Tax—just so I can actually make some decent money...
Kenneth Myers10 Kenneth Myers10 Member
33 messages
joined Jun 2006
#162 ·

Kyle Wilson7 said:Judging by your questions, you’re pretty green when it comes to the professional world—let alone actually running a business. I'll try to keep my answers short since these vague, broad questions would take forever to fully unpack—but if you have more, just try to be more specific next time.
1. What are the minimum monthly contributions for an LLC (if there even are any)?
-I think you're asking about overhead. If you haven't launched yet, you won't have any. Once you're up and running, though, costs depend entirely on what you're doing. Some basics include: payroll (which includes you if you're working for yourself—and if you don't have employees, then you aren't really "running a business," you're just freelancing...) wages, taxes, and various payroll withholdings, plus things like holiday bonuses or benefits if you have a team.
Then there's office space—rent or a mortgage—plus phone, internet, electricity, and other utilities (see how it varies? An office job barely uses power, but a manufacturing plant? That adds up fast).
Vehicle expenses too (if you need them for work)—depreciation, gas, maintenance.
-Accounting (seriously, don't cheap out here—a bad accountant will ruin your life).
-To keep it brief, there's more, but...

2. When an LLC is formed, how is the business activity determined, how many can be listed, what does it cost, and what's the process for adding more later?


-You register the activities you want to perform right when you file your formation papers, following the official list of industries provided by the state. You pay for each one, so think ahead about what you want to do now and what might make sense down the road. You could technically register to sell weapons or pharmaceuticals, but you'd need special permits for those.
-Updating your registration isn't free—honestly, it costs almost as much as the initial setup (minus the capital contribution, obviously). Even changing your business address isn't cheap; just the notary fee is around $1000.

3. How does setting up a second venture under an existing LLC work? For example, if an LLC already has a restaurant license and decides to open a cafe, are there any advantages over opening a "pure" cafe (like a sole proprietorship)?
-I'm not quite following "second ventures under an LLC"—if you have a restaurant license and open a cafe, you still have to get all the same permits, health inspections, and meet the same technical requirements as a sole proprietor (those are all extra costs too). The main difference is whether you operate as an LLC (subject to corporate income tax) or a sole proprietorship (subject to individual income tax). One big thing to remember: as a sole proprietor, you're personally liable with all your own assets, whereas with an LLC, you aren't. There are also differences in how you handle the IRS and some other small details.

It sounds like you’ve been running businesses for a long time—I can tell from your post—but maybe you haven't really sat down to check how things actually work these days. Things change so fast, you know? I remember back when I was first starting out, I thought I had everything figured out, only to realize the rules had shifted under my feet before I could even get settled. It's funny how that happens.

Kyle Wilson7 said:Judging by your questions, you’re pretty green when it comes to the professional world—let alone actually running a business. I'll try to keep my answers short since these vague, broad questions would take forever to fully unpack—but if you have more, just try to be more specific next time.
1. What are the minimum monthly contributions for an LLC (if there even are any)?
-I think you're asking about overhead. If you haven't launched yet, you won't have any. Once you're up and running, though, costs depend entirely on what you're doing. Some basics include: payroll (which includes you if you're working for yourself—and if you don't have employees, then you aren't really "running a business," you're just freelancing...) wages, taxes, and various payroll withholdings, plus things like holiday bonuses or benefits if you have a team.
Then there's office space—rent or a mortgage—plus phone, internet, electricity, and other utilities (see how it varies? An office job barely uses power, but a manufacturing plant? That adds up fast).
Vehicle expenses too (if you need them for work)—depreciation, gas, maintenance.
-Accounting (seriously, don't cheap out here—a bad accountant will ruin your life).
-To keep it brief, there's more, but...

2. When an LLC is formed, how is the business activity determined, how many can be listed, what does it cost, and what's the process for adding more later?


-You register the activities you want to perform right when you file your formation papers, following the official list of industries provided by the state. You pay for each one, so think ahead about what you want to do now and what might make sense down the road. You could technically register to sell weapons or pharmaceuticals, but you'd need special permits for those.
-Updating your registration isn't free—honestly, it costs almost as much as the initial setup (minus the capital contribution, obviously). Even changing your business address isn't cheap; just the notary fee is around $1000.

3. How does setting up a second venture under an existing LLC work? For example, if an LLC already has a restaurant license and decides to open a cafe, are there any advantages over opening a "pure" cafe (like a sole proprietorship)?
-I'm not quite following "second ventures under an LLC"—if you have a restaurant license and open a cafe, you still have to get all the same permits, health inspections, and meet the same technical requirements as a sole proprietor (those are all extra costs too). The main difference is whether you operate as an LLC (subject to corporate income tax) or a sole proprietorship (subject to individual income tax). One big thing to remember: as a sole proprietor, you're personally liable with all your own assets, whereas with an LLC, you aren't. There are also differences in how you handle the IRS and some other small details.

That’s just straight-up misinformation. The list of business activities isn't restricted to the NKD anymore—it's actually much more flexible now. Every single entry, unlike how things used to be, doesn't cost you a dime. You basically just have to define your primary activity so the Bureau of Labor Statistics can keep their numbers organized and accurate. That's really all there is to it.

Getting a notary service isn't exactly cheap—it'll definitely bite into your wallet if you aren't careful—so I always think it’s worth just giving them a quick ring beforehand to check the rates. It saves so much headache. Honestly, those offices right in the middle of downtown are usually outrageously expensive compared to the ones you'd find in a small town in the Midwest. I remember once driving way out of my way just to save a few bucks, and it was totally worth the extra gas.
Dennis Miller Dennis Miller Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2007
#163 ·
You’ll need $6667 seed capital or roughly $3333+$3333 in hard assets (computer, fax, phone, mobile... basically everything required for an office).
It's smarter to pay a notary maybe another 5-$2000 to handle all your paperwork, filings, and official seals. If you try to DIY it, you'll end up burning $3,500–$4,000 just on the runaround. You can perform any service you want, but you need the right primary business classifications. Register as many activities as possible right away; otherwise, they charge you extra later and it becomes a total headache.
An accountant will cost you 500-$333, depending on the workload.
Employees require minimum wage plus Social Security and payroll taxes.
Look, it isn't easy, but you have to go out on your own. Stop working for someone else.
I’m launching in three months once I finish setting up my office space.
Robin Rodriguez5 Robin Rodriguez5 Active Member
149 messages
joined Sep 2011
#164 ·
Kyle Wilson7 said:
I can't quite catch what you mean by "banderas"—not sure if you're talking about flags or something else entirely—but I'm all ears if you want to clear that up! kaže:
It doesn't even have to be subject to Sales Tax—honestly, there's zero difference from running a small sole proprietorship until you actually cross that revenue threshold. $28 Annual revenue—doesn't even have to include Sales Tax.

True, but with an LLC you don't have to pay those self-employment taxes on yourself—whereas with a sole proprietorship, you're stuck paying them no matter what, even if you've got another job elsewhere. Honestly, running a small business while being employed somewhere else just doesn't make much sense that way.

I honestly don't get why people act like owning a business is just some status symbol to brag about. I don't know what your experience with running a private company is—seriously—but how are you even supposed to hold down a regular job elsewhere while keeping a business afloat? Unless you're some local government official or working for a massive state agency, it feels shady. It’s like you only need that side hustle to pull off little scams—not to mention the actual criminal stuff, like taking bribes or funneling contracts away from your employer and straight into your own pocket.

Being in the Sales Tax system isn't always a bad thing—even if you aren't pulling in huge numbers yet. $28333 Honestly, even if I was terrible at math—which, let’s face it, I am—trying to survive on $85k a year sounds brutal. Even if you have zero overhead and a killer margin, once you take that $50k pre-tax profit and split it by twelve after the IRS takes their cut... man, you're left with peanuts. If you're running a serious operation, though, being able to write off Sales Tax on your purchases is a huge plus. Just doesn't really apply to people like dentists or GPs working under Medicare & Medicaid contracts, since they aren't part of the Sales Tax system.
I still don't get how you can score cheaper beer if you aren't in the sales tax system—like, even if the wholesale price hits you the same, you just lose out on the tax credit. If you're staying out of the system, the brewery or the shop is still gonna charge you sales tax, so you end up paying more for that brew instead... $2.75 With that 22% sales tax kicking in—adding $1.76 to bring it up to $9.76—you’re basically stuck... you won't even be able to flip it for a profit. $3.25 So if you sell something for $12, you're looking at a $2.24 profit—but once you factor in being in the Sales Tax system, you’ve got an $8 input and then $1.76 in Sales Tax. If you sell it again for $12, that's $2.16 in Sales Tax, but since you already paid the $1.76, you still owe the government another $0.40... so it looks like you made less, but hey—like my massage therapist always says—business requires overhead. I don't know any coffee shop owners who don't drive a car, but they'll happily hop on a scooter that costs maybe $26,000 just to save a buck—on a $26k purchase, that's $4,400 in Sales Tax alone. Ex $7.4 =$10853 What can you actually claim as a tax deduction—go ahead and split that up with the others. $0.13 What kind of sales tax do you gotta cough up first? $0.13 You gotta pay up once you sell 81,400 cans—so basically, you either drop your prices or end up ahead of where you’d be if you stayed off the grid... assuming you bought the exact same truck.
I honestly jumped into this whole business thing just to see if I could actually save more than I would working some corporate job—which, let's be real, is why pretty much everyone thinks about going solo in the first place. But man... just thinking about how many beers you'd have to move to pay off all the bar equipment, let alone trying to scrape together enough to actually buy the building itself? It's a lot.
So, my take—just keep up with the Sales Tax and get as much done as possible. Honestly? I wouldn't even mind paying more if it meant things actually worked. $333333 Sales Tax—just so I can actually make some decent money...

Look, you’re missing the point entirely. Once you hit that threshold, being part of the Sales Tax system isn't optional—it's mandatory. $28 But that doesn't kick in until January 1st. NEXT Look, here’s how it works. I could start a business right now, stay under the sales tax threshold, and still pull in a billion dollars in revenue this year. Legally speaking, I’d remain completely exempt from collecting sales tax until January 1st of next year. It’s a loophole that works just fine.
Just so you know, there are vastly more business owners out there who aren't actually on the payroll of their own companies than those who are. Following your logic, I guess people just wouldn't be allowed to own multiple businesses at all—because how could they possibly dedicate themselves to every single one if they weren't technically an employee in all of them?

If you can't grasp the concept of sales tax being applied only to the added value—using a simple example like a beer—then you clearly don't understand the absolute basics. You have to actually generate some kind of added value if you want to make a living as a bartender. Trying to claim sales tax as a pre-tax deduction within the final price is just fundamentally flawed. $1.00 It’s irrelevant what the sales tax will be on whatever you end up selling. $4.00Good grief. If you’re actually finding it more profitable to dodge input sales tax during procurement than to simply operate without sales tax while maintaining the same end prices, then you aren't running a business—you're hemorrhaging money. Period. Every single time you reject an input tax credit when selling to non-taxable entities, it only makes financial sense if your expenses are higher than your revenue. In other words, you're only "winning" if you're operating at a loss. All that nonsense about how being in the red is a strategic move because of heavy investments? That’s fairy tale stuff for children.

Why do you think the local concert hall stays outside the Sales Tax system? You think they just screwed up and realized it doesn't make financial sense? They’re probably running seminars about how much cheaper they could buy supplies if they actually joined the tax net 😁
It’s simple: 99% of their ticket buyers are just regular people. As an institution, they aren't required to register for Sales Tax regardless of their revenue. Of course they won't join—it would basically slash their bottom line by 18%.
Kyle Wilson7 Kyle Wilson7 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2007
#165 ·
So, by your logic, nobody can own more than one business—because how could they focus if they aren't working at all of them simultaneously?
I mean, how else would you be employed somewhere else--you know, besides being at your own companies--
?

What do you think is the reason the Lisinski Sales Tax System doesn't apply there?
It’s because of their contracts with the Social Security Administration or similar agencies—they just aren't part of the sales tax loop.
They get their funding straight from the federal budget, just like the Social Security Administration does, and their revenue is actually higher than $28333.
Read what I wrote first—if it doesn't make sense, just ask. If you think I'm wrong, give me a real argument, and I'll try not to run out of rebuttals like I did with Kenneth Myers10's post.
Kenneth Myers10:Based on your post, it looks like you started an LLC a long time ago and haven't checked how things work lately.
Well, the last time I actually started a company was nearly 20 years ago—since then, I've just bought two others—so I guess I should thank him for the "insight."
I used the brewery as an example because of your post, and if I recall correctly, this guy is thinking about opening a cafe anyway.
Also, it seems you missed one of the fundamental reasons for having Sales Tax in a real capitalist system beyond just uniform rates—it's about incentivizing investment. Basically, the government refunds the excess tax paid, making your investment cheaper. Plus, it encourages exports by using domestic raw materials. But hey, let's just flip everything upside down, right?
Robin Rodriguez5 Robin Rodriguez5 Active Member
149 messages
joined Sep 2011
#166 ·
Look, please stop bringing up the Social Security Administration; they have absolutely nothing to do with this. The reality is that cultural institutions get to decide whether they want to participate in the Sales Tax system or opt out, regardless of their annual revenue. Some choose to stay outside the system, while others stay in, based purely on what makes sense for their bottom line. Here are two clear-cut examples from the field:
The Lisinski Symphony Orchestra stays out of the Sales Tax system.
The Metropolitan Opera is part of the Sales Tax system.

For an organization like the Lisinski, staying out of the Sales Tax system is a massive win. For the Met, being in the system is actually beneficial. How? It’s simple: one is a major winner and the other is a massive loser. It shouldn't be hard to guess which is which—it's likely been that way since they were founded. This just proves my point: choosing to deal with Sales Tax only pays off if you're operating at a loss. The bigger your deficit, the more you benefit from being in the system, but let's be honest—running a business solely to lose money isn't exactly a winning strategy.
Kenneth Myers10 Kenneth Myers10 Member
33 messages
joined Jun 2006
#167 ·
Kyle Wilson7 said:So, by your logic, nobody can own more than one business—because how could they focus if they aren't working at all of them simultaneously?
I mean, how else would you be employed somewhere else--you know, besides being at your own companies--
?

What do you think is the reason the Lisinski Sales Tax System doesn't apply there?
It’s because of their contracts with the Social Security Administration or similar agencies—they just aren't part of the sales tax loop.
They get their funding straight from the federal budget, just like the Social Security Administration does, and their revenue is actually higher than $28333.
Read what I wrote first—if it doesn't make sense, just ask. If you think I'm wrong, give me a real argument, and I'll try not to run out of rebuttals like I did with Kenneth Myers10's post.
Kenneth Myers10:Based on your post, it looks like you started an LLC a long time ago and haven't checked how things work lately.
Well, the last time I actually started a company was nearly 20 years ago—since then, I've just bought two others—so I guess I should thank him for the "insight."
I used the brewery as an example because of your post, and if I recall correctly, this guy is thinking about opening a cafe anyway.
Also, it seems you missed one of the fundamental reasons for having Sales Tax in a real capitalist system beyond just uniform rates—it's about incentivizing investment. Basically, the government refunds the excess tax paid, making your investment cheaper. Plus, it encourages exports by using domestic raw materials. But hey, let's just flip everything upside down, right?

Well, look, I'm actually not an employee at any of the companies where I hold ownership stakes. 🙂 In fact, I have ownership in two different businesses, yet I spend my working hours over at a third one.
Kyle Wilson7 Kyle Wilson7 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2007
#168 ·
Kenneth Myers10 said:Well, look, I'm actually not an employee at any of the companies where I hold ownership stakes. 🙂 In fact, I have ownership in two different businesses, yet I spend my working hours over at a third one.

And the owner of that third one is... man, I highly doubt you're just working for some other "boss" at a tiny local shop.
The biggest reason I jumped into the private sector back when small businesses were first really taking off was freedom—you know, having zero bosses and being able to set my own hours (as long as the work actually gets done, obviously). The money comes after that. Because if I decide on a whim to head down to Florida for a beach trip, I can—though, I guess I'll have to figure out who's picking up the tab.
Kyle Wilson7 Kyle Wilson7 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2007
#169 ·
Robin Rodriguez5 said:Look, please stop bringing up the Social Security Administration; they have absolutely nothing to do with this. The reality is that cultural institutions get to decide whether they want to participate in the Sales Tax system or opt out, regardless of their annual revenue. Some choose to stay outside the system, while others stay in, based purely on what makes sense for their bottom line. Here are two clear-cut examples from the field:
The Lisinski Symphony Orchestra stays out of the Sales Tax system.
The Metropolitan Opera is part of the Sales Tax system.

For an organization like the Lisinski, staying out of the Sales Tax system is a massive win. For the Met, being in the system is actually beneficial. How? It’s simple: one is a major winner and the other is a massive loser. It shouldn't be hard to guess which is which—it's likely been that way since they were founded. This just proves my point: choosing to deal with Sales Tax only pays off if you're operating at a loss. The bigger your deficit, the more you benefit from being in the system, but let's be honest—running a business solely to lose money isn't exactly a winning strategy.

Honestly, neither Medicare nor the HNK or Carnegie Hall really matter here—none of these places are driven by profit, especially not the HNK, and both get their funding from the government budget anyway. It's not that the HNK is losing money because of VAT or because they don't know how to run a business (though there might be a grain of truth there)—it's that even your own company would be in the red if you had to run non-profit programs or stuff meant for the public good that doesn't make a dime. Plus, you've got all those actors, singers, dancers, musicians, and staff needed to keep a place like that running.
The bottom line is that these two houses aren't investing out of their own revenue. VAT is great if you're actually investing and growing—you know, if you're reinvesting most of what you make.
John Davis8 John Davis8 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jun 2007
#170 ·
Raymond Peterson81 said:I have a few questions regarding setting up an LLC here in the States

1. What are the minimum monthly contributions required for an LLC (if there are any at all)?

2. Once the LLC is established, how do you decide which business activities to list? Is there a limit on how many industries I can include, what does the filing cost, and what’s the process if I need to add more later?

3. How does it work if I want to add a second line of business under my existing LLC? For example, if I already have an LLC registered for hospitality services but decide to open a coffee shop—are there any specific advantages to doing that through the existing entity versus just starting a fresh small business from scratch?

That’s pretty much everything...


Try checking www.biz.com
Kenneth Myers10 Kenneth Myers10 Member
33 messages
joined Jun 2006
#171 ·
Let’s just say things are going pretty smoothly in my third venture. I’m essentially my own boss at this point.
I’ve stayed put here mostly out of a sense of loyalty—it feels a bit wrong to just walk away when I’ve been here so long—but the other two businesses are still in their early stages and haven't really hit those revenue milestones yet. It's a bit of a web, honestly; in one of them, the majority owner is actually the owner of this third firm, and in the other, my co-owner is a colleague from the third company.

It’s definitely a bit of a roundabout way to do business, I know. But that's just how things tend to evolve after you've spent five years working at the same firm... 🙂
Robin Rodriguez5 Robin Rodriguez5 Active Member
149 messages
joined Sep 2011
#172 ·
Kyle Wilson7 said:Honestly, neither Medicare nor the HNK or Carnegie Hall really matter here—none of these places are driven by profit, especially not the HNK, and both get their funding from the government budget anyway. It's not that the HNK is losing money because of VAT or because they don't know how to run a business (though there might be a grain of truth there)—it's that even your own company would be in the red if you had to run non-profit programs or stuff meant for the public good that doesn't make a dime. Plus, you've got all those actors, singers, dancers, musicians, and staff needed to keep a place like that running.
The bottom line is that these two houses aren't investing out of their own revenue. VAT is great if you're actually investing and growing—you know, if you're reinvesting most of what you make.

You’re completely missing the point here. It doesn't matter whether they get taxpayer money or not; I'm focusing strictly on whether they stay within the VAT system or opt out. Let's stick to VAT and ignore the subsidies for a moment. Both organizations deal directly with the public. Carnegie Hall operates in the black and stays outside the VAT system (if they were inside, their margins would be significantly thinner), while the HNK is operating at a loss and remains inside the VAT system (if they were outside, their losses would look even worse). Neither entity is private, but they still employ competent enough accountants not to screw up something as fundamental as VAT status. The math is simple: if your customer base consists of individuals, staying in the VAT system makes zero financial sense if you're running a profitable operation.
There are endless examples, but clearly, this isn't your area of expertise, so you're just diluting the discussion by dragging in Medicare, budget revenues, and reinvestment strategies. Almost no private concert agency operates within the VAT system—even without government subsidies—for the exact same reason: they deal with the general public. Look at last year's tickets for Pearl Jam; the price was over $100, and it clearly stated: VAT 0.00. We aren't talking about a state-run entity there; we're talking about a private firm run by industry veterans who knew exactly why opting out of VAT was the smarter move.
Too often, people trivialize this through sheer ignorance, pushing pamphlets that claim being in the VAT system makes everything cheaper.
Chris Ruiz10 Chris Ruiz10 Active Member
52 messages
joined Oct 2005
#173 ·
I’m with Banderas on this whole thread. Props to him. 👍

Regarding the investment side, being in the VAT system only makes sense if you're building a hotel, a factory, or some massive complex where you can write off millions in VAT. For a tiny startup just buying a laptop and some office furniture? It’s pointless. Especially if your customers are just regular people. If most of your clients are other businesses—excluding banks and insurance companies—then maybe it's worth it since VAT is neutral for them, and you get to offset the tax on your own bills for stuff like phone service and utilities.
Kyle Wilson7 Kyle Wilson7 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2007
#174 ·
Kenneth Myers10, hit me up when you're ready to scale—once your business actually takes off, there’s no way you’re working for some buddy if you can make more on your own. Honestly, looking at this whole mess, I don't see much of a future for a setup like that. You might end up being the one who comes out on top, but let's be real—it's not exactly a "real" business right now.
As for what I'd tell Banderas and Chris Ruiz10—look, Pearl Jam is just a sporadic gig. From what I hear about those concert promoters (and I'm not talking about Carnegie Hall or the HNK), they often end up owing money when shows get canceled, leaving everyone chasing ghosts because nobody can find the director or the money. Usually, when cafe owners invest, they go for a vehicle first, then the equipment. But hey, whatever—the guy asked for opinions, so I gave mine, and you gave yours, so he can decide for himself. I'm just looking at this from the perspective of a multi-million dollar operation with dozens of employees and constant reinvestment in production.
Robin Rodriguez5 Robin Rodriguez5 Active Member
149 messages
joined Sep 2011
#175 ·
Sure, agencies still owe money, which just proves you're right about needing to join the VAT system. 🙏 🙏 🙏
Honestly, you keep pivoting to every other topic just to avoid admitting you don't really grasp this specific issue. Yeah, playing Pearl Jam is just some sporadic, side gig kind of work. 🤣 The people doing those jobs were probably selling newspapers before that, and once that gig dries up, they'll be at a gas station cleaning windshields.

In your mind, any job that doesn't fit your philosophy is either tiny and inconsistent, government-subsidized, or some other category—but none of those "reasons" actually have anything to do with VAT. Use some logic here: if joining the VAT system was always the better move, why on earth would the option to opt out even exist? Do you honestly think people are such masochists that they’d choose an option that is objectively worse and less profitable? Or that some are such extreme masochists that they’d stubbornly cling to it?
It looks like you just don't know this area well, but you're having a hard time owning up to it. 🙂

And we could go on forever about the future and whether production is actually profitable. 😬
Kyle Wilson7 Kyle Wilson7 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2007
#176 ·
Look, being part of the VAT system isn't a win for everyone—I never said it was. I just gave an example of when it actually makes sense. Honestly, your own experience pretty much proves my point. I don't know what you think "manufacturing" actually means, though... so let me list some industries or companies that actually produce things—otherwise, you’ll probably just argue that organizing concerts is the only profitable future and everything else is doomed. So, here we go.
Oil (from crude extraction all the way down to derivatives like plastics), tobacco (growing and processing), automotive, aerospace, defense, and the food industry—everything from raw crops to Coca-Cola, burgers, or even your local deli sandwiches. When you eat, there's a massive industrial machine behind it—you really think it just appears? Then there's pharma (medicine, cosmetics, supplements), electronics (phones, TVs, etc.), IT (software and hardware), and an endless list of other manufacturing sectors. I won't bother listing specific companies in those fields just so you can tell me they're unprofitable and headed for disaster. The only ones that might rival them in profit are the big banks—and even then, those companies are their biggest clients.
And this isn't just some Western thing; look at our own giants like Pfizer, ExxonMobil, Tesla, Nestlé, Anheuser-Busch, Duke Energy, or Pacific Gas and Electric. Their non-manufacturing competitors might be JPMorgan Chase or maybe parts of Walmart's retail side—who decided manufacturing wasn't worth it and instead went out to buy Cargill and various others.
Manufacturing and creating value is basically a necessity for the survival of our species—because you're always going to need stuff from that list, usually more than you realize and often all at once.
P.S. Anyone staying in the VAT system is basically a masochist—just an unprofitable business with no future.
Betty Garcia3 Betty Garcia3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined May 2007
#177 ·
I’m looking into starting an Incorporated business, and I’ve heard a rumor that you can actually have the "company under formation" cover the initial setup costs—you know, things like the notary fees, court filings, and legal notices.

Could you guys share your experiences with this? Specifically, how do you handle the bookkeeping for those expenses so you can eventually reimburse yourself from the company's funds once everything is official?

Also, how does one go about claiming the sales tax credit on a notary's invoice?
John Davis8 John Davis8 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jun 2007
#178 ·
If your articles of incorporation specify that the corporation will reimburse the founder for the initial setup costs, you can draw those funds from the amount paid as $6667 initial capital...

LP
gentlehound15 gentlehound15 Newcomer
6 messages
joined May 2007
#179 ·
John Davis8 said:If your articles of incorporation specify that the corporation will reimburse the founder for the initial setup costs, you can draw those funds from the amount paid as $6667 initial capital...

LP

Actually, I don't think you can touch that initial $20,000; it’s gotta come from future earnings.

In my specific situation—while a notary was drafting our Articles of Incorporation of ABC LLC—one of the clauses was phrased like this: Members/founders of the corporation cannot demand that the corporation reimburse them for what they contributed as initial capital if doing so would result in a reduction of the corporation's base capital.

Then, in the very next section titled "incorporation costs," there's this line:
The corporation is required to reimburse founders for incorporation costs up to a maximum total of $3333, provided that these incorporation costs aren't paid out directly from the initial capital.

So, even though you might be able to spend that $6667 on whatever you need—office furniture, laptops, phone bills, all that good stuff—you can't just claim those setup costs against that specific pool of money.
Once the LLC starts bringing in its first $3,000-$$1333, then you can draw those incorporation costs back and record them under account 0100 (STARTUP EXPENSES) for example:
2444.80 incorporation costs - notary public
55.00 state registration fees
400.00 court filing fees
810.00 publication fees in local newspapers
Put those on the left (debit) side of your T-account, and under account 2134 (LIABILITIES TO OWNER) on the right side, using the same example:
2444.80
55.00
400.00
810.00

(The LLC is brand new, so I'm still picking this up from my accountant.)
The bottom line is that the notary really needs to anticipate this issue and bake it right into the Articles of Incorporation of ABC LLC.

Best,
Betty Garcia3 Betty Garcia3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined May 2007
#180 ·
Thanks so much for such a helpful and spot-on answer!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads