CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Republican Party - General Discussion

Republican Party - General Discussion

Started by Michael Jackson10 · · 👁 20 views · 491 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Michael Jackson10Nicholas KingAdam Collins4electricnomad8Christian Torres3Chloe Martinez7hollowmason64Charles Fox10northernhawk33Emily Smith6brightheron64Robin Jones2hollowcanyon15gentlecrane8Tyler Vaughn7Kenneth Perez15Aaron Walker8Mark Hughes36Steven Lee15Charles Brown9Zachary Carter2Anthony Rodriguez8Ronald Chavez2Charles Carter4 …
Michael Jackson10 Michael Jackson10 Active MemberOP
140 messages
joined Feb 2023
#461 ·
Robin Jones2 said:I am not an educator...

I threw in a dollar just to make it visually obvious that it is impossible for them to have honestly spent $33 on toner over an 18-month period.

The police and the Department of Justice should be the ones determining what actually happened here. For theft exceeding $667, prosecution is mandatory.

At least $33 has been stolen here.

And that is just on toner alone.

Perhaps they were printing campaign materials for the Republican Party?

So, I was feeling pretty useless today, so I figured: why not? Let's put everything down on paper—stuff I haven't even actually done yet—just to see how all the pieces fit together. Any sense in that?
When I’m picking out gear for work, I always look at the cost of supplies first. Then it's all about how tough the machine actually is. There's an old rule of thumb when it comes to HP: if you're buying for a business, don't even touch a laser printer unless it has a built-in fan and weighs a massive amount. That's what real hardware looks like. Everything else? Those are just glorified toasters for your house. I already know that my toner from... $73 You could easily knock out two boxes of Navigator—that's like 5,000 sheets right there. I’m definitely grabbing the premium stuff on purpose, though. Why bother with cheap paper when you can avoid all those annoying jams? You'll also need enough toner to cover 5,000 sheets of standard office prints, maybe even more if you're feeling ambitious. Ready to get to work?

So, I was chatting with a buddy of mine who runs an IT services firm, and he gave me the inside scoop on how these government and public sector contracts actually work. It’s wild. They aren't even looking at performance, really. It all comes down to aesthetics—the color of the gear, having fancy little touchscreens, and making sure the printer duty cycles look good on paper. Oh, and they always need enough ink to print that official seal a few times a year. It’s basically a massive setup to push high-end hardware that uses the priciest consumables possible. If you can lock them into proprietary supplies instead of cheap third-party alternatives, you're golden. You get a customer for life who ends up paying ten times the initial equipment cost just through toner and ink. TCO versus ICO? It’s a total racket.

So, I was just thinking about how realistic that estimate actually is regarding this whole scam. He caught on to the equipment trick, right? But honestly, if you switch over to generic supplies, the savings could easily be double what he’s guessing. Sure, you lose the warranty if you go that route—but hey, just keep one original cartridge tucked away for service calls... I mean, who really cares?
Either you're just blowing through public funds like it's nothing—everything looks legit on paper, clean receipts and all—but does anyone actually look at how much is being wasted? I mean, seriously, what kind of operation needs to print 360 color pages every single day? Or even worse, if they start swapping in those cheap third-party toners, we're looking at 1,360 pages daily. Who actually needs that much?

Of course they’re printing promo stuff, party flyers, graduation projects, and theses. I mean, who actually keeps a printer like that sitting at home? They aren't exactly clueless. When you have access to everyone else's gear, computers, and basically all the time in the world at the office... not to mention just asking a buddy to handle it for you? It's a no-brainer.

wanderingbison9 said:@Michael Jackson10: My Brother laser printer is constantly jamming on me; it keeps pulling two sheets at once and then the second one just gets stuck. Does anyone know who I should contact about this? I'm being completely serious.

Sorry if this is off-topic. Or maybe it isn't...

Sent from my Mi 9T using Tapatalk

I’m old school through and through. I stick with HP and Epson, and lately, I’ve been trying out a Xerox—though honestly, it hasn't been much of a hit. I’ve never touched a Brother in my life. Because of that, I'm kind of in the dark about who actually handles repairs around here. Isn't it better to just find a reliable local repair shop? If you're even willing to deal with all that hassle, that is. $0.33 Nobody sane wants to deal with repairs anymore... right?

I ran had the exact same issue with my printer (it started by pulling from two trays at once, then just kept slipping). Turns out it was the pickup roller. It sits right above the paper tray, basically "grabbing" the sheets to pull them in. The rubber needs this specific, slightly textured pattern to grip properly, but over time, that texture just wears smooth. When I was desperate, I actually took it off, gave it a deep clean, and roughed it up a bit with some sandpaper just to get by. It works for a while, but eventually, you're stuck. Repair shops hate selling these parts, and finding them elsewhere is a nightmare. You end up hunting on eBay, where the prices swing wildly from basically nothing to absolutely insane.

Basically, here’s the drill: pull out the tray, pop the toner out, and open up all the covers. If you can, blow out the whole printer—it gets packed with all this fine paper dust. Then, grab a damp cloth with some dish soap and wipe down every single transport roller you can find. You should also look up how to take off the pickup roller online; give it a deep clean. If it feels too smooth where it grabs the paper, you can lightly roughen it up with some sandpaper, though honestly, just grabbing a replacement is probably smarter. Next, hunt down the separation pad—they come in different styles, but it's usually some little plate part of the tray mechanism—and clean that too. Don't forget to wipe the dust off the tray itself and check if the mechanism is working right (especially if there are springs involved). Finally, try a different type of paper—maybe something smoother, thicker, or just higher quality.
There's plenty on YouTube if you're feeling brave enough to DIY this...
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active Member
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#462 ·
Man, thank God they didn't decide to go and dump all that chemical crap on us too.
I mean, obviously—it’s not like anyone’s actually going to be held accountable for this mess anyway.
wanderingbison9 wanderingbison9 Active Member
159 messages
joined Jan 2018
#463 ·
Michael Jackson10 said:So, I was feeling pretty useless today, so I figured: why not? Let's put everything down on paper—stuff I haven't even actually done yet—just to see how all the pieces fit together. Any sense in that?
When I’m picking out gear for work, I always look at the cost of supplies first. Then it's all about how tough the machine actually is. There's an old rule of thumb when it comes to HP: if you're buying for a business, don't even touch a laser printer unless it has a built-in fan and weighs a massive amount. That's what real hardware looks like. Everything else? Those are just glorified toasters for your house. I already know that my toner from... $73 You could easily knock out two boxes of Navigator—that's like 5,000 sheets right there. I’m definitely grabbing the premium stuff on purpose, though. Why bother with cheap paper when you can avoid all those annoying jams? You'll also need enough toner to cover 5,000 sheets of standard office prints, maybe even more if you're feeling ambitious. Ready to get to work?

So, I was chatting with a buddy of mine who runs an IT services firm, and he gave me the inside scoop on how these government and public sector contracts actually work. It’s wild. They aren't even looking at performance, really. It all comes down to aesthetics—the color of the gear, having fancy little touchscreens, and making sure the printer duty cycles look good on paper. Oh, and they always need enough ink to print that official seal a few times a year. It’s basically a massive setup to push high-end hardware that uses the priciest consumables possible. If you can lock them into proprietary supplies instead of cheap third-party alternatives, you're golden. You get a customer for life who ends up paying ten times the initial equipment cost just through toner and ink. TCO versus ICO? It’s a total racket.

So, I was just thinking about how realistic that estimate actually is regarding this whole scam. He caught on to the equipment trick, right? But honestly, if you switch over to generic supplies, the savings could easily be double what he’s guessing. Sure, you lose the warranty if you go that route—but hey, just keep one original cartridge tucked away for service calls... I mean, who really cares?
Either you're just blowing through public funds like it's nothing—everything looks legit on paper, clean receipts and all—but does anyone actually look at how much is being wasted? I mean, seriously, what kind of operation needs to print 360 color pages every single day? Or even worse, if they start swapping in those cheap third-party toners, we're looking at 1,360 pages daily. Who actually needs that much?

Of course they’re printing promo stuff, party flyers, graduation projects, and theses. I mean, who actually keeps a printer like that sitting at home? They aren't exactly clueless. When you have access to everyone else's gear, computers, and basically all the time in the world at the office... not to mention just asking a buddy to handle it for you? It's a no-brainer.

I’m old school through and through. I stick with HP and Epson, and lately, I’ve been trying out a Xerox—though honestly, it hasn't been much of a hit. I’ve never touched a Brother in my life. Because of that, I'm kind of in the dark about who actually handles repairs around here. Isn't it better to just find a reliable local repair shop? If you're even willing to deal with all that hassle, that is. $0.33 Nobody sane wants to deal with repairs anymore... right?

I ran had the exact same issue with my printer (it started by pulling from two trays at once, then just kept slipping). Turns out it was the pickup roller. It sits right above the paper tray, basically "grabbing" the sheets to pull them in. The rubber needs this specific, slightly textured pattern to grip properly, but over time, that texture just wears smooth. When I was desperate, I actually took it off, gave it a deep clean, and roughed it up a bit with some sandpaper just to get by. It works for a while, but eventually, you're stuck. Repair shops hate selling these parts, and finding them elsewhere is a nightmare. You end up hunting on eBay, where the prices swing wildly from basically nothing to absolutely insane.

Basically, here’s the drill: pull out the tray, pop the toner out, and open up all the covers. If you can, blow out the whole printer—it gets packed with all this fine paper dust. Then, grab a damp cloth with some dish soap and wipe down every single transport roller you can find. You should also look up how to take off the pickup roller online; give it a deep clean. If it feels too smooth where it grabs the paper, you can lightly roughen it up with some sandpaper, though honestly, just grabbing a replacement is probably smarter. Next, hunt down the separation pad—they come in different styles, but it's usually some little plate part of the tray mechanism—and clean that too. Don't forget to wipe the dust off the tray itself and check if the mechanism is working right (especially if there are springs involved). Finally, try a different type of paper—maybe something smoother, thicker, or just higher quality.
There's plenty on YouTube if you're feeling brave enough to DIY this...

Thanks for the advice. I think I’ll need to set aside some dedicated time to really get under the hood and understand all the "internal organs" of this thing before I call in a pro, especially since it wasn't exactly cheap. Everything ran smoothly for ten years without a single hiccup, and then suddenly—bam, it just gave out. My apologies again for getting a bit off-topic earlier.

Sent from my Mi 9T using Tapatalk
Michael Jackson10 Michael Jackson10 Active MemberOP
140 messages
joined Feb 2023
#464 ·
wanderingbison9 said:Thanks for the advice. I think I’ll need to set aside some dedicated time to really get under the hood and understand all the "internal organs" of this thing before I call in a pro, especially since it wasn't exactly cheap. Everything ran smoothly for ten years without a single hiccup, and then suddenly—bam, it just gave out. My apologies again for getting a bit off-topic earlier.

Sent from my Mi 9T using Tapatalk

Honestly, it’s usually not a huge deal. If you’re the type who likes tinkering with gear, you can probably swap those consumables out yourself (as long as you grab some aftermarket parts). Just a heads-up though: after all these years, the plastic gets pretty brittle, so those little clips might snap on you. Most of those replaceable parts come in different colors too, and they're designed to pop out without any tools. You can always find manuals online with pictures showing you exactly how it's done.
Start by giving it a good cleaning and check out those rollers...
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#465 ·
"I’m ashamed of how little I have": Potraga takes a look back at a case that seems immoral and suspicious to everyone except the actual authorities

Of course you all remember that classic statement from the former Associated Press director, Krešimir Žunić. He managed to secure an apartment for his son at a sweetheart deal, then went ahead and sold it for a profit. And the FBI? As far as they're concerned, there isn't a shred of corruption in this whole absurd saga. In the end, it looks like Žunić was perfectly competent after all, so the Prime Minister doesn't need to lose any sleep over it.
Robin Jones2 Robin Jones2 Active Member
199 messages
joined Nov 2012
#466 ·
The man needs to be reinstated to his leadership role.

They sold off the condo, and now he’s back to feeling the sting of having nothing to show for it.

It is simply unacceptable for a member of a criminal organization to stand there alongside other thieves.
Charles Carter4 Charles Carter4 Active Member
152 messages
joined Mar 2023
#467 ·
The Ministry is refusing to disclose how much they spent flying those young Republican staffers out to see the Golden Gate Bridge

I mean, if you're a hardworking employee going on a well-deserved trip—which might just turn into an extended weekend, let's be honest—you shouldn't have to sit there and justify your travel expenses to some random official 🤔. It’s just common sense, really
.
Kenneth Perez15 Kenneth Perez15 Active Member
58 messages
joined Sep 2015
#468 ·
Emily Smith6 said:"I’m ashamed of how little I have": Potraga takes a look back at a case that seems immoral and suspicious to everyone except the actual authorities

Of course you all remember that classic statement from the former Associated Press director, Krešimir Žunić. He managed to secure an apartment for his son at a sweetheart deal, then went ahead and sold it for a profit. And the FBI? As far as they're concerned, there isn't a shred of corruption in this whole absurd saga. In the end, it looks like Žunić was perfectly competent after all, so the Prime Minister doesn't need to lose any sleep over it.

"It's an unusual statement, I must admit, and the whole situation feels strange," said Prime Minister Andrej Plenković.

The best part about this whole mess is that Plenka can actually get away with making such idiotic comments. Unlike the alleged legal violations by zlatiti Đurđević—which he actually called a violation of the law—this nonsense is merely "unusual" to him.

That’s just how it usually goes—instead of punishing government arrogance, voters end up rewarding it by cementing people into their positions, much like what happened back in 2007 with Sanders.
Charles Carter4 Charles Carter4 Active Member
152 messages
joined Mar 2023
#469 ·
It’s just kind of strange to me—mostly because it actually made it into the news cycle and now people are actually starting to look into it properly.
Terry Hernandez10 Terry Hernandez10 Active Member
58 messages
joined Jul 2023
#470 ·
We’re releasing the recordings, transcripts, and messages that expose exactly how Republican and Democratic cronies were lining their pockets within the state-owned enterprise.

We’ve got footage of the blatant favoritism happening in Columbus—someone actually says, "Just let him clear the paperwork, damn it!"
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#471 ·
Telegram reports: A high-ranking Republican official was allegedly drawing a massive salary for fake services, while the IRS let the investigation expire


I wonder if he’ll actually have the decency to pay it all back himself.
Robin Jones2 Robin Jones2 Active Member
199 messages
joined Nov 2012
#472 ·
Emily Smith6 said:Telegram reports: A high-ranking Republican official was allegedly drawing a massive salary for fake services, while the IRS let the investigation expire


I wonder if he’ll actually have the decency to pay it all back himself.

That is precisely why Zdravko Marić placed the tax-focused FBI under his thumb—to ensure there is no interference from the thieves within the Republican Party.
Chloe Martinez7 Chloe Martinez7 Active Member
144 messages
joined Jul 2017
#473 ·
Emily Smith6 said:Telegram reports: A high-ranking Republican official was allegedly drawing a massive salary for fake services, while the IRS let the investigation expire


I wonder if he’ll actually have the decency to pay it all back himself.

Is there any accountability for the IRS here?
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#474 ·
Chloe Martinez7 said:Is there any accountability for the IRS here?

Yeah, they'll reward you upfront for doing such a "great" job.
Charles Carter4 Charles Carter4 Active Member
152 messages
joined Mar 2023
#475 ·
Man, you guys are just so incredibly bitter. If you actually bothered to visit a small town out in the Midwest, you’d find plenty of locals who would have nothing but glowing praise for their mayor. You'd hear all sorts of excuses along the lines of, "Well, he took a little extra, but he earned it," or some other nonsense like that.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#476 ·
A bribed councilman’s confession: "They can't prove anything against me; everything was just a verbal agreement..."

Quincy:
The director of the Sierra Club, Elizabeth Warren, testified about how her party leader Harvey Pitt (Liberal Party) and Mayor John McCain (Republican Party) were ordering both the bribery of council members and the hiring of political cronies within the company.

View on facebook
View on facebook
So this is the "change" promised by the Republican-Liberal Coalition, I suppose.
ruggeddrifter85 ruggeddrifter85 Member
26 messages
joined Mar 2023
#477 ·
Emily Smith6 said:A bribed councilman’s confession: "They can't prove anything against me; everything was just a verbal agreement..."

Quincy:
The director of the Sierra Club, Elizabeth Warren, testified about how her party leader Harvey Pitt (Liberal Party) and Mayor John McCain (Republican Party) were ordering both the bribery of council members and the hiring of political cronies within the company.

View on facebook
View on facebook
So this is the "change" promised by the Republican-Liberal Coalition, I suppose.

Crystal ☕clear
hollowmason64 hollowmason64 Regular
411 messages
joined Jan 2016
#478 ·
Of course, their big-shot boss has suddenly vanished from the public eye 😁
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#479 ·
Buying out council members for small parties is an "excess." For the massive Republican Party, it’s just become the standard rule.

Quincy:
Joe Manchin accused the Republican Party of "political hiring." Newt Gingrich shot back, suggesting the Democratic Party would do the exact same thing if they weren't such a "minor party," which is why it's considered "excessive" when they do it. Apparently, for the Republican Party, it’s just an old rule.

Newt Gingrich, in his attempt at being witty, basically suggested the Democratic Party would pull the same stunts if they had the chance—but the Republican Party does it simply because they can.

He essentially confirmed what everyone already suspected: that the Republican Party views buying off council members and handing out cushy jobs to cronies as perfectly normal, routine behavior. They just happen to lead the pack because they're the biggest player. It's not an "excess" for them; it's just business. And since the Democratic Party isn't a major power anymore, their actions are labeled as extreme.

So, in the case of the Democratic Party, it's an "excess."
In the case of the Republican Party, it's just the rule of the road.
Harold Davis6 Harold Davis6 Active Member
56 messages
joined Mar 2023
#480 ·
Gingrich just sticks to his usual line: why are you sucking up to them? Because he can. 🤦

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads