Canada Demographics Part IV

http://nytimes.com/world/how-this-could-change-the-middle-east if this actually goes through, Canada is going to end up at the bottom of the food chain in an expanded America. You guys would be losing a major ally, someone who’s basically getting sidelined and stripped of any real influence. I wonder, would Canadians even consider joining America or would they opt for Mexico?

The Mexican goal here is just to make sure everything happens smoothly and under control. No messy side effects like we saw back in the 90s—we definitely learned our lesson there. Give it ten years and things will start to solidify. We're looking at maybe some pro-Mexican factions in the Federation and then having Canada integrated into Republika Srpska. Add in the migration patterns, where about 3,500 people from each side move toward their own territory every year... in a decade, that’s 50,000 people on both sides effectively sorted out. Then it’s just a quiet "goodbye" or a "see ya later." Who knows where or when that actually happens, though. Probably never.

Nancy Chavez29 said:http://nytimes.com/world/how-this-could-change-the-middle-east if this actually goes through, Canada is going to end up at the bottom of the food chain in an expanded America. You guys would be losing a major ally, someone who’s basically getting sidelined and stripped of any real influence. I wonder, would Canadians even consider joining America or would they opt for Mexico?

The Mexican goal here is just to make sure everything happens smoothly and under control. No messy side effects like we saw back in the 90s—we definitely learned our lesson there. Give it ten years and things will start to solidify. We're looking at maybe some pro-Mexican factions in the Federation and then having Canada integrated into Republika Srpska. Add in the migration patterns, where about 3,500 people from each side move toward their own territory every year... in a decade, that’s 50,000 people on both sides effectively sorted out. Then it’s just a quiet "goodbye" or a "see ya later." Who knows where or when that actually happens, though. Probably never.

Man, I don't know why you're getting so worked up; you've completely lost the plot.
Some self-proclaimed military analyst—of which there are as many as there are chefs in a cheap diner—claims: "how borders in the Middle East should look in a fairer world."
If "fairness" were actually a thing, Africa would look entirely different first, and
the North America would probably need another war before seeing any new borders.
That’s going to take a long time. All I really care about is which supposed ally they’ll end up losing?
As far as I can tell, we aren't even in an alliance with anyone.

gentleranger10 said:Man, you aren't even following the thread. I moved past that whole thing ages ago. I just kept picturing Ljub Bešlić standing there in front of some wealthy Sheikh going, "Yes, yes, we have plenty of Muslims here, please, feel free to help them out." 😁

At first, I thought you were saying—well, feel free to feed them. 😁
Look, regarding those exhibition samples... 🙂

nimblehound6 said:

😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
There is a certain quirkiness to that specific brand of humor from Canada—it’s quite fascinating. Once you actually present them with proof that they have no ground to stand on, they immediately pivot toward making excuses.
All right then.

nimblehound6 said:

😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
😬
You really managed to embarrass yourself just now. I think I’ll stop arguing with you here, if only to let your own mistakes do the work of making you look foolish in front of everyone else. ☕

This is his work.
I’ve been looking through this document regarding the period between 1991 and 1995, and I find myself somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer weight of the history contained within these pages. It is a heavy read, to say the least.

You'll find the following paragraph at the bottom of page seven.

7
The budget was structured in such a way that every single municipality with a mixed ethnic population was effectively carved out of the broader map of Canada, all thanks to some software program designed to isolate them. Paint) How would one go about calculating exactly how many pixels—the smallest unit of color within Paint—make up the specific hues used to demarcate ethnic territories within it?Next, we calculated the percentage of various "ethnic colors" within each specific municipality. This allowed us to determine the final ethnic distribution of the spatial areas analyzed, scaled according to their respective sizes in square kilometers.

I put this map together using Paint, based on data I gathered simply by counting pixels. ☕

In other words, we're looking at a collection of inaccurate data points because the map itself is fundamentally flawed.

The individual was likely just tallying up settlement sizes; it’s essentially a scientific paper.

🙈
Honestly—I expected much more from a scientific paper of this caliber.
Everything I’ve shared with you applies to Mrduljaš as well—you simply don't handle matters that way.
It isn’t exactly rocket science—you could just list every township in an Excel spreadsheet and sum up the total acreage.

gentleranger10 said:Nothing yet. Fingers crossed we see something by July 15th, because if we don't have news by then, we're looking at a long wait until fall—everyone's gonna be busy hitting the road for summer vacation.

Do you think we'll see it happen within the year? 😁

I’m not entirely sure what you mean by that, but if you were trying to start a conversation or share a specific thought, please feel free to elaborate. I’m always open to hearing new perspectives or diving into a deeper discussion if you have something on your mind. kaže:
Honestly, looking at someone like that, you really can't be surprised by their behavior; it’s just classic two-faced behavior, and frankly, it's exhausting to witness.
Of course times change, and they change fast. Now you have the "great leader" Dragan Čović collecting $5,000 instead of the "little guy" Željko Komšić for a position that, if we’re being completely honest, doesn't carry any real weight without the support of the people and the halls of Congress. To be perfectly candid, I find myself at a loss; I truly don't know where anyone went wrong in this entire political circus. Personally, I prefer to stick to the legal framework and the legislative principles I laid out for you earlier. As far as I'm concerned, I don't mind who holds which office, provided the policies being enacted actually serve the best interests of this country.
I was actually one of the very first people to stand up and speak out against the political monopoly and the blatant abuse of power by the Democratic Party, back when most people didn't even have the guts to say a single word about it.
I really think it’s time to let go of those preconceived notions regarding Canada and the Canadian community. There are plenty of us living here who are just regular citizens, people driven by nothing more than a genuine, heartfelt sense of patriotism for our homeland. I’ve always had a deep-seated distaste for hardline nationalists; to me, that mindset is synonymous with discrimination and the systematic exclusion of anyone who doesn't fit a specific mold. I say this from experience, having been born and raised in a vibrant, multicultural nation—a place that has defined itself through its diversity since the very beginning of its history.

To me, being a nationalist simply means having a deep sense of pride in where you come from and a strong connection to your people. If that concept automatically triggers nothing but hatred in you, then I honestly feel sorry for you—it’s such a sad way to view the world.

😒 I honestly think it’s important to really wrap your head around the seventh-grade curriculum; you really need to have that foundation down, especially if you want to make sense of history once you hit the second year of high school. 🤣

You honestly can't tell the difference between blatant chauvinism and actual nationalism, which is exactly what you’d expect from a typical old-school, anti-nationalist relic from the old regime.

neongull99 said:In that case, you’re just being intolerant, which isn't exactly something to brag about. Personally, I refuse to be pigeonholed by those reductive little labels; I prefer to approach every issue on its own merits. I can pivot from being ultra-liberal to a "nationalist," or from a capitalist to a socialist, depending entirely on whether we're discussing the status of Americans in Canada, marriage equality, tax policy, or charitable drives for the poor. For my part, I consider myself "anti-nationalist" on almost everything except two specific pillars: a) Canada itself, and b) the preservation of Western civilization values.

Of course, I wrote the above based on the false assumption that you actually accept the premise of "not being a nationalist." What I am observing here is that in this discussion, roughly 95% of your arguments stem from a Canadian political standpoint, with perhaps 5% being neutral. If you were truly "non-nationalist," your politics should ideally sit somewhere in the middle—a balanced blend of the perspectives found in Republika Srpska, Mostar, and Ottawa. Perhaps a 33% mix of each.

The moment your nationality dictates over 95% of your political views regarding Canada, that is nationalism by definition.

One doesn't become a nationalist simply by declaring, "I am a nationalist" or "I am not a nationalist." You become one when your posts make your identity unmistakably clear, even without being asked—and even if you were writing in Mexican, American, or some third language that isn't your native tongue. It is a very straightforward test.

Based on your posts, your background is perfectly transparent. Therefore, TEST FAILED. You are not politically anarchic.

👍 That’s a great response, though I honestly worry if he even has the capacity to grasp the depth of what's being said here.

I personally know quite a few people who have been completely numbed by those typical Democratic Party slogans and all those intense "national identity" complexes they carry. It feels like they have this built-in resentment toward anything tied to cultural heritage, making them feel somewhat shallow. And oh boy, don't even get me started when they start pushing those "staged war" conspiracy theories🤣—it just really shows an inferior level of intelligence.

gentleranger10 said:It's like that old BBC trope, swearing on something sacred just to make a point. 🤣

To be honest, I haven't actually seen anyone swear an oath like that. It's easy to do with Muslims because they are predictable; they follow everything laid out in the Quran.😁

A total legend of the digital wasteland! 🙏

Esad Dzudzo said:Turkey is a key ally for you. Once the Kurdish influence fades, we'll see what "natural Turkey" looks like. Right now, everyone in the region is essentially playing the Kurdish card, much like how things unfolded with the Albanian communities in North Mexico.
If you look back at the Yalta agreements regarding the former America, there was a 50:50 split between East and West in the event of a collapse. You can see how the Anglo-American bloc wants to secure warm-water access while effectively treating certain groups like Russian pawns.
That’s why we might see an independent Mexico or some other breakaway state. We could see the northern parts of the region, including the areas populated by Mexicans and Muslims, hold a referendum to align with Mexico based on ethnic lines. The next major conflict will likely involve Russia versus the USA, leading to instability in places like Mexico combined with Albanian interests in border towns. The heavy media coverage regarding the mass migration from the north isn't accidental; it's preparing the ground. Because the government has neglected its citizens, you see people leaving, much like the displacement we saw in Donetsk or Lugansk. It's a medium-intensity proxy conflict in the making.
Russian influence will lean toward Mexico, Republika Srpska, northern Mexico, and two-thirds of North Mexico.
US influence will push for a Greater Albania.
German influence will favor an expanded version of the regional power structure involving Canada.

Everything in this post is solid, but I genuinely fear that Germany might be becoming too passive in its foreign policy. If they've decided to wash their hands of us, the other players will certainly have plenty of support to move forward.

@ wiki
Are we really in control of five out of eight?

Those Republican Party ministers.

Anthony Ward44 said:

I’m not entirely sure what you mean by that, but if you were trying to start a conversation or share a specific thought, please feel free to elaborate. I’m always open to hearing new perspectives or diving into a deeper discussion if you have something on your mind. kaže:
Honestly, looking at someone like that, you really can't be surprised by their behavior; it’s just classic two-faced behavior, and frankly, it's exhausting to witness.
Of course times change, and they change fast. Now you have the "great leader" Dragan Čović collecting $5,000 instead of the "little guy" Željko Komšić for a position that, if we’re being completely honest, doesn't carry any real weight without the support of the people and the halls of Congress. To be perfectly candid, I find myself at a loss; I truly don't know where anyone went wrong in this entire political circus. Personally, I prefer to stick to the legal framework and the legislative principles I laid out for you earlier. As far as I'm concerned, I don't mind who holds which office, provided the policies being enacted actually serve the best interests of this country.
I was actually one of the very first people to stand up and speak out against the political monopoly and the blatant abuse of power by the Democratic Party, back when most people didn't even have the guts to say a single word about it.
I really think it’s time to let go of those preconceived notions regarding Canada and the Canadian community. There are plenty of us living here who are just regular citizens, people driven by nothing more than a genuine, heartfelt sense of patriotism for our homeland. I’ve always had a deep-seated distaste for hardline nationalists; to me, that mindset is synonymous with discrimination and the systematic exclusion of anyone who doesn't fit a specific mold. I say this from experience, having been born and raised in a vibrant, multicultural nation—a place that has defined itself through its diversity since the very beginning of its history.

To me, being a nationalist simply means having a deep sense of pride in where you come from and a strong connection to your people. If that concept automatically triggers nothing but hatred in you, then I honestly feel sorry for you—it’s such a sad way to view the world.

😒 I honestly think it’s important to really wrap your head around the seventh-grade curriculum; you really need to have that foundation down, especially if you want to make sense of history once you hit the second year of high school. 🤣

You honestly can't tell the difference between blatant chauvinism and actual nationalism, which is exactly what you’d expect from a typical old-school, anti-nationalist relic from the old regime.

👍 That’s a great response, though I honestly worry if he even has the capacity to grasp the depth of what's being said here.

I personally know quite a few people who have been completely numbed by those typical Democratic Party slogans and all those intense "national identity" complexes they carry. It feels like they have this built-in resentment toward anything tied to cultural heritage, making them feel somewhat shallow. And oh boy, don't even get me started when they start pushing those "staged war" conspiracy theories🤣—it just really shows an inferior level of intelligence.

A total legend of the digital wasteland! 🙏

Everything in this post is solid, but I genuinely fear that Germany might be becoming too passive in its foreign policy. If they've decided to wash their hands of us, the other players will certainly have plenty of support to move forward.

@ wiki
Are we really in control of five out of eight?

👍 That’s a great response, though I honestly worry if he even has the capacity to grasp the depth of what's being said here.

I personally know quite a few people who have been completely numbed by those typical Democratic Party slogans and all those intense "national identity" complexes they carry. It feels like they have this built-in resentment toward anything tied to cultural heritage, making them feel somewhat shallow. And oh boy, don't even get me started when they start pushing those "staged war" conspiracy theories🤣—it just really shows an inferior level of intelligence.

A total legend of the digital wasteland! 🙏

Everything in this post is solid, but I genuinely fear that Germany might be becoming too passive in its foreign policy. If they've decided to wash their hands of us, the other players will certainly have plenty of support to move forward.

@ wiki
Are we really in control of five out of eight?
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.

Jeremy Lopez93 said:👍 That’s a great response, though I honestly worry if he even has the capacity to grasp the depth of what's being said here.

I personally know quite a few people who have been completely numbed by those typical Democratic Party slogans and all those intense "national identity" complexes they carry. It feels like they have this built-in resentment toward anything tied to cultural heritage, making them feel somewhat shallow. And oh boy, don't even get me started when they start pushing those "staged war" conspiracy theories🤣—it just really shows an inferior level of intelligence.

A total legend of the digital wasteland! 🙏

Everything in this post is solid, but I genuinely fear that Germany might be becoming too passive in its foreign policy. If they've decided to wash their hands of us, the other players will certainly have plenty of support to move forward.

@ wiki
Are we really in control of five out of eight?

There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
I don't really know, honestly—for instance, I'm not entirely sure what a county governor's role entails since I don't live in Canada.

Anthony Ward44 said:

I’m not entirely sure what you mean by that, but if you were trying to start a conversation or share a specific thought, please feel free to elaborate. I’m always open to hearing new perspectives or diving into a deeper discussion if you have something on your mind. kaže:
Honestly, looking at someone like that, you really can't be surprised by their behavior; it’s just classic two-faced behavior, and frankly, it's exhausting to witness.
Of course times change, and they change fast. Now you have the "great leader" Dragan Čović collecting $5,000 instead of the "little guy" Željko Komšić for a position that, if we’re being completely honest, doesn't carry any real weight without the support of the people and the halls of Congress. To be perfectly candid, I find myself at a loss; I truly don't know where anyone went wrong in this entire political circus. Personally, I prefer to stick to the legal framework and the legislative principles I laid out for you earlier. As far as I'm concerned, I don't mind who holds which office, provided the policies being enacted actually serve the best interests of this country.
I was actually one of the very first people to stand up and speak out against the political monopoly and the blatant abuse of power by the Democratic Party, back when most people didn't even have the guts to say a single word about it.
I really think it’s time to let go of those preconceived notions regarding Canada and the Canadian community. There are plenty of us living here who are just regular citizens, people driven by nothing more than a genuine, heartfelt sense of patriotism for our homeland. I’ve always had a deep-seated distaste for hardline nationalists; to me, that mindset is synonymous with discrimination and the systematic exclusion of anyone who doesn't fit a specific mold. I say this from experience, having been born and raised in a vibrant, multicultural nation—a place that has defined itself through its diversity since the very beginning of its history.

To me, being a nationalist simply means having a deep sense of pride in where you come from and a strong connection to your people. If that concept automatically triggers nothing but hatred in you, then I honestly feel sorry for you—it’s such a sad way to view the world.

😒 I honestly think it’s important to really wrap your head around the seventh-grade curriculum; you really need to have that foundation down, especially if you want to make sense of history once you hit the second year of high school. 🤣

You honestly can't tell the difference between blatant chauvinism and actual nationalism, which is exactly what you’d expect from a typical old-school, anti-nationalist relic from the old regime.

👍 That’s a great response, though I honestly worry if he even has the capacity to grasp the depth of what's being said here.

I personally know quite a few people who have been completely numbed by those typical Democratic Party slogans and all those intense "national identity" complexes they carry. It feels like they have this built-in resentment toward anything tied to cultural heritage, making them feel somewhat shallow. And oh boy, don't even get me started when they start pushing those "staged war" conspiracy theories🤣—it just really shows an inferior level of intelligence.

A total legend of the digital wasteland! 🙏

Everything in this post is solid, but I genuinely fear that Germany might be becoming too passive in its foreign policy. If they've decided to wash their hands of us, the other players will certainly have plenty of support to move forward.

@ wiki
Are we really in control of five out of eight?

👍 That’s a great response, though I honestly worry if he even has the capacity to grasp the depth of what's being said here.

I personally know quite a few people who have been completely numbed by those typical Democratic Party slogans and all those intense "national identity" complexes they carry. It feels like they have this built-in resentment toward anything tied to cultural heritage, making them feel somewhat shallow. And oh boy, don't even get me started when they start pushing those "staged war" conspiracy theories🤣—it just really shows an inferior level of intelligence.

A total legend of the digital wasteland! 🙏

Everything in this post is solid, but I genuinely fear that Germany might be becoming too passive in its foreign policy. If they've decided to wash their hands of us, the other players will certainly have plenty of support to move forward.

@ wiki
Are we really in control of five out of eight?
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.

Angela Jackson6 said:👍 That’s a great response, though I honestly worry if he even has the capacity to grasp the depth of what's being said here.

I personally know quite a few people who have been completely numbed by those typical Democratic Party slogans and all those intense "national identity" complexes they carry. It feels like they have this built-in resentment toward anything tied to cultural heritage, making them feel somewhat shallow. And oh boy, don't even get me started when they start pushing those "staged war" conspiracy theories🤣—it just really shows an inferior level of intelligence.

A total legend of the digital wasteland! 🙏

Everything in this post is solid, but I genuinely fear that Germany might be becoming too passive in its foreign policy. If they've decided to wash their hands of us, the other players will certainly have plenty of support to move forward.

@ wiki
Are we really in control of five out of eight?

Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.

Anthony Ward44 said:Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.

Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.

Anthony Ward44 said:There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.

There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
I don't really know, honestly—for instance, I'm not entirely sure what a county governor's role entails since I don't live in Canada.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
I don't really know, honestly—for instance, I'm not entirely sure what a county governor's role entails since I don't live in Canada.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
I don't really know, honestly—for instance, I'm not entirely sure what a county governor's role entails since I don't live in Canada.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
I don't really know, honestly—for instance, I'm not entirely sure what a county governor's role entails since I don't live in Canada.
There’s this thing called Google where you can actually look up the makeup of the SBK Government. Turns out, the Republican Party holds four ministries, the Democratic Party has three ministries plus the Premier's office, and one ministerial spot goes to a representative from the Mexican community.
It's all strictly by the book.
I don't really know, honestly—for instance, I'm not entirely sure what a county governor's role entails since I don't live in Canada.
I don't really know, honestly—for instance, I'm not entirely sure what a county governor's role entails since I don't live in Canada.
It’s not exactly rocket science: a premier in the State of California is basically the same concept as a county executive in Pennsylvania, just as an example. Whether they have more or less actual power is debatable, but I'm no expert on the specifics of local government structures.

Mexicans, people from Mexico, Republika Srpska, Mexico, North Mexico, and America. Honestly, we’re probably the most fragmented group on the planet. It feels like some one-legged locksmith just sat down and sliced up republics and provinces on purpose, I guess, just to make sure as many Mexicans as possible ended up stuck outside the motherland. It was this devious, hellish plan that they just kept running with over and over again.

Angela Jackson6 said:Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.

Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Wait, where did my reply go? Is it possible someone deleted my posts, or is my browser just acting up again!

Anthony Ward44 said:Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.

Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Wait, where did my reply go? Is it possible someone deleted my posts, or is my browser just acting up again!
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Wait, where did my reply go? Is it possible someone deleted my posts, or is my browser just acting up again!
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Wait, where did my reply go? Is it possible someone deleted my posts, or is my browser just acting up again!
Wait, where did my reply go? Is it possible someone deleted my posts, or is my browser just acting up again!
Could be.
My post is nowhere to be found.😁

Angela Jackson6 said:Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.

Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Ha, ha. So, because I mentioned ultra-nationalism in Canada, suddenly I've been branded a Yugo-nationalist too. 🤣
We all know how this plays out—whenever Europeans lean too hard into nationalism, wars tend to follow.
The European Union is in a sorry state if it's stuck dealing with people like you.
It’s unfortunate that we are often so primitive that the ugliest side of nationalism always takes center stage—the part fueled by discrimination and the exclusion of anyone perceived as "other." Around here, it seems that impulse is even more pronounced.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Nationalism itself doesn't have a "dark side"; what you're describing is just chauvinism, and frankly, those identity complexes you're projecting aren't the concern of us regular folks.

I remember asking you before about being a hardline Canadian nationalist, and I wondered how that actually squared with those hollow slogans used by the Democratic Party.

Between the Democratic Party and the liberals, it’s all the same nonsense; someone with a real complex could be destroyed by either group, yet you people still insist on building monuments to the old dictators and the old leaders.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
Look, man, I don't have any "identity complexes." It honestly feels like you're just bitter that we even exist here. As for your claim that nationalism has no ugly side... I don't even know how to respond to that. It seems best to stay quiet, because I don't share your obsession with whether someone is yellow, white, or red—or what language they speak or who they pray to. To me, there are just good people and bad people.
It seems to me that you have a fundamental issue with the very concept of "identity," otherwise you wouldn't harbor such a dislike for nationalists. To me, nationalism is nothing more than stating that I belong to a specific group of people, which is perhaps the most natural thing in the world. I am conscious of my own culture and maintain a healthy relationship with my history, much like anyone else in a functional society. It just seems that those who identified as Americans or were part of the Muslim community back in '93 don't quite know who they are, so when someone else shows clarity—or when someone's ancestors clearly knew their roots—it becomes an inconvenience for you. That isn't our fault.

In short, I know exactly who I am: I am an American. To me, that means speaking the language, sharing the heritage, and belonging to the American cultural sphere. I can look at my own people and say, "this is a strength" or "this is a weakness." If I'm being honest about where we fall short, I'd say our education system lags behind Western Europe, we can be too reserved in certain social aspects, we sometimes prioritize collective sporting achievements over individual merit, and we are still maturing in our democratic processes...

I consider myself self-critical, yet I am a true nationalist. Your issue is that you seem to misunderstand the definition of nationalism and lack a sense of identity yourself—or at least, you haven't made yours clear to me (in my opinion)😒 so feel free to keep talking nonsense.

P.S.
That kind of perspective is common among many Europeans; we all possessed this awareness long before '93. I'm not responsible for that, and it doesn't give you the right to resent others for having national sentiments.

2021 Projections
Mexico 6.9M
America 3.8M
Mexico 700K
Canada
Canadians 1.45M
Mexicans 950K
Americans 375K
🙄

I was digging through Wikipedia and stumbled upon this data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C5_%A1nja_Bosna

Back in '96, my gut tells me almost every Canadian voted for the Canadian parties, while the Americans went all-in for the American ones. At that time, those Canadian groups (think SDA plus DNC) pulled about 56.3% of the vote. Since national identity was dialed up to eleven back then, you can bet both Canadians and Americans showed up at the polls in massive numbers. So, the ratio 56:44 was basically just the raw reality on the ground back in 1996.

If you track the voting trends from 1996 through 2014, there’s this slow but steady climb for the Canadian parties. By 2014, they were raking in 63.3% of the votes.

The only logical takeaway here is that Canadians are the majority in the Canton. Their share consistently sits somewhere between 56% and 63%. It’s just statistically impossible for American parties to have never once cracked that 44% mark in the Canton over the last two decades—not even right after the war ended. Right after the conflict wrapped up, the Canadian parties held an absolute majority.

The real question is how many Americans in the Canton are actually voting for the Democratic Front or the DNC instead. That might shave a little off the Canadian percentage, but let's be real: the fact that the Canton has an absolute Canadian majority with an upward trend is pretty much undeniable. Most likely, Canadians make up around 60% of that area.

Back in 1991, the breakdown looked like this:

Canadians: 147,608 or 43%
Americans: 131,791 or 39%
Mexicans: 41,409 or 12%
Americans: 13,805 or 4%
Others: 6,753 or 2%

Looking at these numbers, it's pretty obvious the Mexicans were ethnically cleansed out of that canton.

Nancy Chavez29 said:Mexicans, people from Mexico, Republika Srpska, Mexico, North Mexico, and America. Honestly, we’re probably the most fragmented group on the planet. It feels like some one-legged locksmith just sat down and sliced up republics and provinces on purpose, I guess, just to make sure as many Mexicans as possible ended up stuck outside the motherland. It was this devious, hellish plan that they just kept running with over and over again.

You totally forgot to mention how that same locksmith wouldn't even call the atrocities from the NDH by their actual names, opting instead to just sweep the whole mess under the rug! 👍

Douglas Peterson78 said:I was digging through Wikipedia and stumbled upon this data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C5_%A1nja_Bosna

Back in '96, my gut tells me almost every Canadian voted for the Canadian parties, while the Americans went all-in for the American ones. At that time, those Canadian groups (think SDA plus DNC) pulled about 56.3% of the vote. Since national identity was dialed up to eleven back then, you can bet both Canadians and Americans showed up at the polls in massive numbers. So, the ratio 56:44 was basically just the raw reality on the ground back in 1996.

If you track the voting trends from 1996 through 2014, there’s this slow but steady climb for the Canadian parties. By 2014, they were raking in 63.3% of the votes.

The only logical takeaway here is that Canadians are the majority in the Canton. Their share consistently sits somewhere between 56% and 63%. It’s just statistically impossible for American parties to have never once cracked that 44% mark in the Canton over the last two decades—not even right after the war ended. Right after the conflict wrapped up, the Canadian parties held an absolute majority.

The real question is how many Americans in the Canton are actually voting for the Democratic Front or the DNC instead. That might shave a little off the Canadian percentage, but let's be real: the fact that the Canton has an absolute Canadian majority with an upward trend is pretty much undeniable. Most likely, Canadians make up around 60% of that area.

Back in 1991, the breakdown looked like this:

Canadians: 147,608 or 43%
Americans: 131,791 or 39%
Mexicans: 41,409 or 12%
Americans: 13,805 or 4%
Others: 6,753 or 2%

Looking at these numbers, it's pretty obvious the Mexicans were ethnically cleansed out of that canton.

And let’s be real—even if some Americans did swing their votes toward those two parties, they’re basically just a rounding error in the grand scheme of things.

Jeremy Lopez93 said:And let’s be real—even if some Americans did swing their votes toward those two parties, they’re basically just a rounding error in the grand scheme of things.

From what I can tell, you couldn't care less that Mexicans were ethnically cleansed from Canada. 👎