#1 ·
slybison8 said:What are you even talking about? What kind of alternative are you implying?
Is the man a nuclear scientist or isn't he?
And did his brother immediately run to the Police and claim there was absolutely no way he killed him over a property dispute?
I suppose there is quite enough circumstantial evidence there to justify discussing it outside of some conspiracy theory.
As for the evidence—well, look, if we are dealing with an organized hit, the killers would be pretty amateurish if they left clues behind. From that, I guess we can only conclude for certain that the Russians weren't behind this murder—given what they left trailing behind after the liquidation of Alexander Litvinenko. 😁
Aside from the fact that you're trolling—which I assume is allowed given your role as a moderator—I don't see where I ever denied that the guy is a nuclear scientist. Nor do I see any reason why his brother should be removed from the list of suspects, something even the police haven't done just because he claims he didn't do it. 🙂 And calling it an "alternative" applies because the thread starter is pretentiously building these theories without a shred of proof and publicly accusing, well, we all know who, of these murders. It really doesn't take much to read the OP's posts; even a fool could figure out who he uniquely and exceptionally hates in this world and see who he's aiming at. So what now? Because there is no evidence, every single person on this forum can just babble nonsense and accuse whoever they feel like, and you'll just let it happen? If that's how it works, just say the word, and maybe I'll contribute my own thoughts to this alternative accusation-thread too. Perhaps if you read the last paragraph of this thread, you might actually understand which part of it I find problematic.