Alternative History: The USA as a Socialist State in 2011

Richard Wilson4 said:Just like always, none of these American types have the guts to actually tackle the topic or bring anything to the table besides that tired old "everyone had a job back then, so things were better" line.

But look, we have to give credit where it's due—back in the America days, Italian fishermen wouldn't have dreamed of fishing in our waters; it wasn't even on their radar.🤣

Not having a war would be better, which I suppose is the default assumption. I mean, you don't have the destruction, the injuries, the deaths, or people being forced from their homes; instead, infrastructure actually grows rather than being leveled... that’s probably better, right?

William Wright7 said:The economy would’ve been way stronger. We’d be part of the European Union and NATO by now, too... wouldn't have to deal with all this constant humiliation. And we wouldn't be facing The Hague.

Basically, that's the gist of it.

What economy are we even talking about? Europe—which has had fifty years to get its act together—can barely compete with China as it is. Now you want to bring in one more country from the old America region with such a massive surplus of workers? Things might have been different then—maybe the West couldn't just open factories wherever they felt like it back in the day—but honestly, maybe keeping those local industries alive would have been better, rather than ending up with everything being "Made in China" for Mercedes.

It probably would’ve just limped along, kind of like how Canada is scraping by these days. Communism would have eventually folded just like it did everywhere else, leading to a multi-party system, and the whole country would've likely turned into some sort of decentralized confederation—honestly, that might have been the only way anything could have actually survived.

Richard Wilson4 said:Ever since this whole mess kicked off about three years ago, people have been preaching this myth like it’s some kind of religion—this idea that the USA was this righteous socialist utopia while America was just some unfair capitalist wasteland.

I’d love to hear them actually explain how any of that would work in the real world.

Look, there was no war, no nationalism, and we just stayed part of the USA exactly like we were back in the 80s, or hey, maybe Markov's plan actually worked out.

So, what does the USA look like in 2011?

What does a socialist oasis even look like nowadays, especially when every other country—Russia and China included—has already embraced capitalism and the free market?

If Ante Marković’s plan had actually succeeded, America today would probably just be a cheap imitation of China. You’d have the same corrupt communist bureaucrats running the show, while the average person grinds away for peanuts in factories owned by American corporations or other foreign giants. Honestly, it wouldn't be much different from the current situation; the only difference is you wouldn't have dozens of multi-party parasites constantly clawing at the levers of power, not because they care about the people, but because they're obsessed with the personal perks that come with holding office.

Richard Wilson4 said:Did you even read the headline?

It was a socialist country, man!

Who’s saying it would stay socialist? It would have reformed... we were basically twenty or thirty years ahead of every other socialist state back then, and now look at Poland—they're living the dream compared to us...

Let that be a lesson to everyone...

bluerider63 said:It probably would’ve just limped along, kind of like how Canada is scraping by these days. Communism would have eventually folded just like it did everywhere else, leading to a multi-party system, and the whole country would've likely turned into some sort of decentralized confederation—honestly, that might have been the only way anything could have actually survived.

Look at the mess we saw with the Canadian peace—or lack thereof. How exactly is a multi-ethnic state supposed to pull it off once democracy actually hits the scene?

And here you go, talking about moving toward capitalism now.

But then you’ve got all these Yugonostalgics still listing off perks from the old socialist days.

Pick a side already.

Ever since this whole mess kicked off about three years ago, people have been preaching this myth like it’s some kind of religion—this idea that the USA was this righteous socialist utopia while America was just some unfair capitalist wasteland.

I’d love to hear them actually explain how any of that would work in the real world.

Look, there was no war, no nationalism, and we just stayed part of the USA exactly like we were back in the 80s, or hey, maybe Markov's plan actually worked out.

So, what does the USA look like in 2011?

What does a socialist oasis even look like nowadays, especially when every other country—Russia and China included—has already embraced capitalism and the free market?

I mean, I guess those Yugo-nostalgics aren't actually missing the socialism itself, they're just mourning the old days...

William Wright7 said:Who’s saying it would stay socialist? It would have reformed... we were basically twenty or thirty years ahead of every other socialist state back then, and now look at Poland—they're living the dream compared to us...

Let that be a lesson to everyone...

US GDP
(PPP) 2010 estimate
Per capita $17,609[3]

Poland
GDP (PPP) 2009 estimate
Per capita $18,705[3]

They're slightly better off, but it's nothing special.

We're still ahead of most Eastern European countries. Sure, those places don't carry as much debt, but their infrastructure is total junk.

Richard Wilson4 said:US GDP
(PPP) 2010 estimate
Per capita $17,609[3]

Poland
GDP (PPP) 2009 estimate
Per capita $18,705[3]

They're slightly better off, but it's nothing special.

We're still ahead of most Eastern European countries. Sure, those places don't carry as much debt, but their infrastructure is total junk.

But what about things like average salaries versus cost of living? Or how people actually follow the law, corruption, crime and all that stuff...

Those numbers and stats are one thing, but actual real life is something else entirely...

It honestly hurts to think about the old days under the USA—if things hadn't gone down the way they did, the whole economy would have just crumbled. The entire industrial sector was built on massive employment numbers, combined with all that systemic corruption—you know, everything from the janitors up to the CEOs...

On the flip side, people who constantly trash talk the former era are being pretty disrespectful, too—they kind of deserve a reality check. When you actually look at the politics and the history, the best thing that ever happened to America was that period. If we hadn't been part of the USA, America would probably just be a tiny patch centered around a single city and its suburbs today.

As for the fact that the breakup was so violent? I guess that’s just how it goes—it's like a marriage. When a marriage falls apart, most couples don't just walk away peacefully. Since the people making up the country couldn't figure out how to split up without fighting, why should the state be any different? At the end of the day, nations are just reflections of the people who built them.

Richard Wilson4 said:Look at the mess we saw with the Canadian peace—or lack thereof. How exactly is a multi-ethnic state supposed to pull it off once democracy actually hits the scene?

And here you go, talking about moving toward capitalism now.

But then you’ve got all these Yugonostalgics still listing off perks from the old socialist days.

Pick a side already.

Look, it’s not like I have anything to negotiate with anyone; once communism collapsed in Europe, things in America would've shifted regardless. The global climate was such that any state would've been forced toward democracy by sheer necessity, though instead of guys like Milan Kučan, Slobodan Maddox, Franjo Harmon, or Alija Izetbegović, we probably would've seen some other politicians stepping up. The real headache is that the global power players actually wanted Maddox sitting in charge in Mexico—he was being bankrolled by the Soros Open Society Foundations through those Mexico City banks—which basically triggered that whole domino effect across the other republics. But hey, that sounds like a conspiracy theory to some people, so I'll leave it at that. 😁

Richard Wilson4 said:Ever since this whole mess kicked off about three years ago, people have been preaching this myth like it’s some kind of religion—this idea that the USA was this righteous socialist utopia while America was just some unfair capitalist wasteland.

I’d love to hear them actually explain how any of that would work in the real world.

Look, there was no war, no nationalism, and we just stayed part of the USA exactly like we were back in the 80s, or hey, maybe Markov's plan actually worked out.

So, what does the USA look like in 2011?

What does a socialist oasis even look like nowadays, especially when every other country—Russia and China included—has already embraced capitalism and the free market?

It's all just a frantic race now; certain groups are demanding their own republic, people are waiting six months for service on old '85 models, they're laying the foundation for a highway from Karlovac to Bosiljevo, military service has been cut down to 11 months, the 25th League of Communists of America congress is looming, and the Veterans organization is out protesting because AT&T is buying up USPS.

Just like always, none of these American types have the guts to actually tackle the topic or bring anything to the table besides that tired old "everyone had a job back then, so things were better" line.

The economy would’ve been way stronger. We’d be part of the European Union and NATO by now, too... wouldn't have to deal with all this constant humiliation. And we wouldn't be facing The Hague.

Basically, that's the gist of it.

bluerider63 said:It probably would’ve just limped along, kind of like how Canada is scraping by these days. Communism would have eventually folded just like it did everywhere else, leading to a multi-party system, and the whole country would've likely turned into some sort of decentralized confederation—honestly, that might have been the only way anything could have actually survived.

Look, bluerider63, you have to realize that America was already a decentralized state; those former republics actually held way more autonomy than any of the US states do today.

Every single republic operated with its own Government, its own police force, and they even had their own versions of the FBI running things locally. Each republic managed its own education system, its own media landscape, and so on. Every republic even maintained its own Federal Reserve and its own independent financial infrastructure (for instance, back in the Republic of Mexico, they utilized what was known as the Security agency) and all that stuff.

William Wright7 said:The economy would’ve been way stronger. We’d be part of the European Union and NATO by now, too... wouldn't have to deal with all this constant humiliation. And we wouldn't be facing The Hague.

Basically, that's the gist of it.

Did you even read the headline?

It was a socialist country, man!

🤣If America were still standing today, we’d likely boast at least one FIFA World Cup title and a handful of major trophies across Europe. Our basketball players would be struggling to stand upright under the sheer weight of all those championship medals and Olympic golds, and our water polo team wouldn't even be able to climb out of the pool because they'd be weighed down by their own hardware. We wouldn't even bother following the other sports; we’d just constantly nag everyone about how many medals and titles we had accumulated.
Thompson would be headlining shows at the Convention Center and making regular appearances on Fox News, while Ceca and Karleuša would be the faces of massive tourism campaigns for the 2011/2012 season in America. Slobodan Maddox would have been forced to distribute profits more equitably, whereas Boris Tadić and Ivo Josipović would probably be viewed with suspicion by other Presidents of the Republic—suspected of being far too cozy with one another and plotting some sort of joint conspiracy against the rest of the neighbors. The Canadians would continue to buy cheap produce from the rest of the federation, only to sell us premium Fruit company products alongside high-end refrigerators and stoves. At 7:30 PM, the entire country would be gathered around the TV watching "Housewife" commercials while catching the latest leaks coming out of WikiLeaks. The US Army would be selling its services in Iraq, and ExxonMobil would be pulling in cheap oil from the same regions. Following the era of "new primitivism," Canada would likely have birthed a new global music genre that the whole world would follow, and the "Surrealists" would be busy mocking both Silvio Berlusconi and Vladimir Putin. North Mexico wouldn't have any disputes over its name, and Albanians would live peacefully within just two states in the region. Everything would look picture-perfect, even if we were as deeply in debt as Greece.🤣
Of course, we would have flatly refused to let the European Union join our ranks. To the rest of the nations in Europe, America would have remained 🙂
.

If the USA still existed, I suppose none of what was mentioned earlier would even matter. It would likely end up just like Cuba. Nothing but misery and poverty.