CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Ready for The New York Times? The hypocrisy in the US is real.

Ready for The New York Times? The hypocrisy in the US is real.

Started by Charles Patel62 · · 👁 5 views · 29 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Charles Patel62Bradley Phillips35hollowwalker142Charles Jackson5Nathan Bailey65Olivia James9steelstag44Joseph Doyle16wiredwolf44Kyle Wilson9shadowtigerDennis Green62Gregory HowardRichard Wilson4
Kyle Wilson9 Kyle Wilson9 Member
46 messages
joined Sep 2009
#21 ·
Tell me, does that "For our nation, fight!" stuff actually bother you, or are you just conveniently ignoring it?

And when we're at the games, hearing "For the Homeland, ready" is practically polite compared to what you clearly prefer to hear:"You fucking faggot, go die, kill them all," and shit like that...
shadowtiger shadowtiger Member
34 messages
joined Dec 2009
#22 ·
It’s become this whole new trend—all those "Ready for Home" and "Let's go Nazis" slogans suddenly popping up at the stadium when they weren't even a thing four or five years ago. You really have to ask George W. Bush if he played a part in fueling this. Back when Ronald Reagan used to attend games, you didn't see any of this nonsense; but now that Joe Biden is showing up, we're constantly seeing this Nazi imagery. Perhaps it's just George W. Bush's way of trying to win back the crowd?
Dennis Green62 Dennis Green62 Member
23 messages
joined Dec 2009
#23 ·
It’s just the logical fallout from how they rehabilitated Nazi ideology during the Reagan era. And interestingly enough, you won't hear a peep about it on the major networks.
Gregory Howard Gregory Howard Active Member
144 messages
joined Dec 2009
#24 ·
Bradley Phillips35 said:"For glory and honor!" is basically our version of a warrior's battle cry...

The only way we'd ever find ourselves shouting "Death to fascism!" is if we were actually playing against Italy!!

😂
Dennis Green62 Dennis Green62 Member
23 messages
joined Dec 2009
#25 ·
They’d be screaming about the death of fascism if they hadn't been raised on politics that embraced it in the first place. 👍
Ali, none of that really matters—at some point, even people like this will end up right where Harmon's legacy left them: pushed aside as a genuine national disgrace. 😉
Olivia James9 Olivia James9 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Dec 2009
#26 ·
Dennis Green62 said:They’d be screaming about the death of fascism if they hadn't been raised on politics that embraced it in the first place. 👍
Ali, none of that really matters—at some point, even people like this will end up right where Harmon's legacy left them: pushed aside as a genuine national disgrace. 😉

🙏 👍
Charles Patel62 Charles Patel62 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Dec 2009
#27 ·
Master of Puppets said:I have to disagree here—this entire take feels pretty hollow. At least this time, the author isn't spinning wild fabrications. They aren't dragging up old ghosts or obsessing over Gojko Susak and his particular brand of right-wing politics. This is just noise for the sake of noise.

When are we going to realize that nobody outside our borders actually gives a damn about the chants, jokes, or slogans being yelled at a local football stadium in the States?

EDIT: The only people who care are the ones making a comfortable living off chasing "villains" and peddling cheap sensationalism.

Even Nicholas Wood wouldn't have a clue what was happening if he hadn't been prompted by certain agents in Washington, D.C.


If nobody cares, then why would a major publication even bother covering it in the first place?
Are you suggesting these local agents are powerful enough to pull the strings at The New York Times? That’s a massive stretch.
Charles Patel62 Charles Patel62 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Dec 2009
#28 ·
Master of Puppets said:Who exactly said they were being "kept in a sack"? I’m curious—what exactly are you implying there? 🙄 They just made a massive scene and reached out—it really was that simple. Honestly, The New York Times has this long-standing tradition of publishing nothing but anti-American hit pieces; they practically salivate at the chance to tear us down. It’s almost predictable at this point. In my view, The New York Times functions more like a lightweight bulletin for the Communist International than anything else.


I honestly think your post belongs in a satirical column over at Rolling Stone—the kind where they sketch out all the nonsense people are buzzing about these days. I’ll say it, even if this topic gets me banned from this forum for the next thirty years (though I’m sure the local right-wing crowd will be up in arms, crying about how they’re constantly being censored anyway). "Because The New York Times is just a budget newsletter for the Communist International." Honestly? You could mention the Jewish lobby in the same breath as calling The New York Times a mouthpiece for communists and nobody would blink an eye. It's completely unbelievable.
Charles Patel62 Charles Patel62 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Dec 2009
#29 ·
Master of Puppets said:If you actually understood the nuance here—which you clearly don't—you'd realize these two things are practically identical.

The opinion in Rolling Stone isn't particularly relevant. Well, I mean, it is—but only to those people currently circling the drain.

Have a pleasant night.

👋

Honestly, I think you’re just proving you’re the Gojko Susak of the century. Every single post you make confirms it.
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#30 ·
Bradley Phillips35 said:"For glory and honor!" is basically our version of a warrior's battle cry...

The only way we'd ever find ourselves shouting "Death to fascism!" is if we were actually playing against Italy!!

Don't be silly, only Americans and Germans were fascists... 😬

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads