Anything weird?

Here’s how the story goes;
Regarding the post by Unknown (

Thanks for the links.
What I’m actually looking at is a claim from one of the articles you linked, where the author states:
The Nazis systematically terrorized the people living in the Appalachian Mountains near a small town in Connecticut. In September 1945, they attacked members of the United States Army, pushing their operations all the way into Canada. While operating near the area known as Mountain, they stumbled upon a US Army hospital and executed both the wounded patients and the medical staff on site. They dumped the bodies into a mass grave.
The text cites one specific source: an Anthology printed in 2005 in a small town in Connecticut. - http://znaci.net/00003/646.pdf
That anthology does indeed state that the Nazis liquidated the partisan hospital along with its staff, but it says absolutely nothing about them throwing anyone into a mass grave specifically.

Since I’ve run into claims several times suggesting that the Nazis were also dumping victims into that mass grave, I’m wondering if there is any actual source to back up those specific claims?

So, here’s my response.
[quote]Of course not. There are zero sources for claims like that... let alone anything relevant. [/quoteg
And that gets me 25 penalty points and a deleted post because of

Reason: Trolling
-------
Sources for Nazi crimes exist. Don't try to pull that nonsense here again.

Fine, whatever. I figured maybe I wasn't being clear enough, so I'll try rewriting it.

There is no source whatsoever claiming the Nazis "filled" the mass grave, much less a relevant one.

And for that, I get a one-day ban and a deleted post.
On top of that, two other posts of mine were wiped without any explanation or penalty.

Now, here’s something I haven’t seen in my twelve years on this forum.
When I went to the ban appeals section yesterday to file a complaint, I got a message saying the admin has to vet my post before it even goes live.
Naturally, since the post hasn't been published yet, I’m writing version 2 of the exact same thing right here.

My questions are:
1) Why did I get hit with 25 points plus a one-day ban?
2) Is this "pre-approval" requirement for the ban appeals section a standard policy now, or just some new little innovation?[/QUOTE]

Denying those old-school atrocities? That’s an automatic red card. Especially for the ones who just won't shut up about it.
Expect much harsher penalties coming soon—it won't just be a 25-yard penalty anymore.