CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online
log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Appeal for PDF blocking issue

Appeal for PDF blocking issue

Started by Henry Kim3 · · 👁 5 views · 31 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Henry Kim3Sophia Thomas7Henry Hernandez7Joshua Jones13Harold Taylor6ironseal10dustyranger64rustydrifter10
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#1 ·
Since quite a bit of time has passed since my access to those specific restricted files was revoked,

I would like to ask the administrators if they could grant me access to at least one

of those two PDFs—or perhaps both, which would be even better—because I really need to read that section

and I honestly have no intention of getting into any more arguments with

anyone, nor will I do so; I plan on following the community guidelines

to the best of my ability. I am just saying

that I would appreciate being allowed access

to that part of the forum, even if it is just for a trial period,

and if I start acting up again, you can just block me once more...

Thanks...!
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#2 ·
It’s staying on the NYSE; there’s honestly just no logical reason to pull a partial liquidation now.
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#3 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:It’s staying on the NYSE; there’s honestly just no logical reason to pull a partial liquidation now.

And why is that?

Now you're treating me like I'm the absolute LAST PIECE OF TRASH

on this entire planet...!
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#4 ·
Henry Kim3 said:
And why is that?

Now you're treating me like I'm the absolute LAST PIECE OF TRASH

on this entire planet...!

There are actually a few reasons. Before the split even happened, you were asked several times to tone down your rhetoric, but you just wouldn't listen. Then, once the split went through, you ended up opening a clone account.

So, honestly, I don't see any point in removing the partition from the main forum.
Henry Hernandez7 Henry Hernandez7 Active Member
128 messages
joined Apr 2014
#5 ·
I’ve got no clue what Henry Kim3’s usual vibe is, though honestly, it doesn't really change my point.

If he was keeping things chill with the clone account and wasn't causing any drama, I don't see why they’d bother stripping his partial access.
The same goes if his communication style stayed consistent with his main handle—if there was no shift in behavior, then pulling those permissions seems pretty unnecessary.

That's all I've got.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#6 ·
Henry Hernandez7 said:I’ve got no clue what Henry Kim3’s usual vibe is, though honestly, it doesn't really change my point.

If he was keeping things chill with the clone account and wasn't causing any drama, I don't see why they’d bother stripping his partial access.
The same goes if his communication style stayed consistent with his main handle—if there was no shift in behavior, then pulling those permissions seems pretty unnecessary.

That's all I've got.

The site mods will have the final say on that.
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#7 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:There are actually a few reasons. Before the split even happened, you were asked several times to tone down your rhetoric, but you just wouldn't listen. Then, once the split went through, you ended up opening a clone account.

So, honestly, I don't see any point in removing the partition from the main forum.

Yeah, I am, obviously. I don't really have anything to hide.

I suppose I could have kept opening them constantly, but I didn't. The thing is, I’m mostly just curious to see what happens.

He says that treating someone like an idiot isn't exactly classy. I mean, if I had been the one actually building this thing, maybe things would be different, but still... it’s just not right.

Look, there are issues here, obviously. But what really gets me is how certain behaviors were basically encouraged—you know, that kind of blatant immorality where people would say things like, "Yeah, cheat on your husband, go for it," or "Is there anything more satisfying than deceiving him and then just crawling back into bed next to him before sleep?" It’s just... I guess it’s wild. Maybe it was just the era, but it's still problematic.

Look, I’m sorry, but I was just sharing my opinion, just like everyone else here was doing.

I honestly don't see why my position is being viewed as such an aggressive stance.

It’s just degraded. Honestly, I don't even know how some of that filth was allowed to be posted there.

If they actually allowed that... it's just appalling. And then, inevitably, they'll come after me next.

I haven't looked at that PDF in about a year now, and I suspect it might be...

That's more than enough, and I honestly think it would be perfectly reasonable if they just let me do it.

Accessing those PDFs... honestly, I don't see how that matters to me.

Nothing, I just want to have the whole thing.

It’s basically a forum for people to see things as they truly are, and to actually read what’s being said.

And since I have two failed ones within my own family...

Maybe I understand people a little better now.

I suppose you all might be able to help me out with this question... if you're up for it. So, yeah.

I’d like to ask everyone for a bit of tolerance and some basic respect toward this forum member.

I’m not looking to be degraded like I’m some kind of bottom-feeder. Like I said, if...

I suppose I’ll just end up causing trouble again, so you might as well ban me permanently. Though, if I'm being honest, maybe they deserve a second chance.

Everyone else, including myself, for that matter—because I’m certainly no better or worse than anyone else out there.

I suppose there are those certain forum members who seem to have access to everything, almost as if they’ve been granted some kind of special favor.

And even their restrictions have been lifted... That's why I'm saying, it's fair.

I am asking that I be granted access to that specific section, so that we might finally move forward.

Look, I don't think we should all be acting this way for no reason. It’s just not right.

And I...
Henry Hernandez7 Henry Hernandez7 Active Member
128 messages
joined Apr 2014
#8 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:The site mods will have the final say on that.

Anyone care to explain why I can't see anything either?😁
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#9 ·
The answer is still no. This thread has become incredibly unproductive, and since the center tag makes everything unreadable anyway, I don't see any point in continuing this conversation here.

Good luck dealing with those mods.
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#10 ·
Henry Hernandez7 said:I’ve got no clue what Henry Kim3’s usual vibe is, though honestly, it doesn't really change my point.

If he was keeping things chill with the clone account and wasn't causing any drama, I don't see why they’d bother stripping his partial access.
The same goes if his communication style stayed consistent with his main handle—if there was no shift in behavior, then pulling those permissions seems pretty unnecessary.

That's all I've got.

Look, my way of communicating is pretty straightforward: I have zero patience for people who back that kind of nonsense. You know the type—people who say stuff like, "Oh, it’s totally fine to reinterpret religious icons to fit a modern agenda," or "Yeah, everyone should just cheat on their spouse, why not?" That sort of thing is just wrong. Honestly, if anyone wants to take issue with me for saying that, they can go ahead and deal with the consequences.

Let’s be realistic here. I ended up getting those blocks from both the IRS and the FTC because...
I just couldn't stand the way certain users on these forums were being insulted.
Look, I’ll admit it—I probably went overboard two or three times. It’s just that our moderators here tend to overreact to absolutely everything.
I feel like my every word is being scrutinized under a microscope, and they're just letting it happen.
In my opinion, he’s just spitting venom. It really got under my skin back then. Now, I guess it doesn't bother me quite as much.
Honestly, I couldn't care less. People can talk all they want; it doesn't change anything for me.
They’re really just tarnishing their own reputation at this point.

Henry Hernandez7 said:I’ve got no clue what Henry Kim3’s usual vibe is, though honestly, it doesn't really change my point.

If he was keeping things chill with the clone account and wasn't causing any drama, I don't see why they’d bother stripping his partial access.
The same goes if his communication style stayed consistent with his main handle—if there was no shift in behavior, then pulling those permissions seems pretty unnecessary.

That's all I've got.

I had that clone account running for maybe two months or so. I probably dropped about 50 comments on it, but honestly, I was mostly just lurking and reading everything being said. I didn't really feel any particular urge to actually get involved in most of the discussions.
I guess I’m just not really in the mood for that right now. I mostly just want to read and observe.
I suppose I’ve been watching how people write, how they carry themselves, and how they react to things lately. It's all quite something.

Henry Hernandez7 said:I’ve got no clue what Henry Kim3’s usual vibe is, though honestly, it doesn't really change my point.

If he was keeping things chill with the clone account and wasn't causing any drama, I don't see why they’d bother stripping his partial access.
The same goes if his communication style stayed consistent with his main handle—if there was no shift in behavior, then pulling those permissions seems pretty unnecessary.

That's all I've got.

I haven't really been communicating in this particular manner throughout those fifty or so posts. Actually,
I haven't even bothered getting involved in any of those arguments or pointless flame wars.
I really don't have the energy for all this. I’d just state my piece and leave it at that.
Whatever. I guess it doesn't really matter. I'll probably just say it again anyway: everyone deserves a second chance, and honestly, everyone is...
I suppose we’d receive them, except for those who committed truly CARDINAL offenses.
Mistakes happen. But seriously, man, blocking me for good just because I...
Maybe he was just trying to stand his ground after the mods had already pretty much written him off.
Defending it? Honestly, that’s just a waste of time...

I’ll say it again: just give me one more shot. If I end up talking out of turn or being a nuisance, then fine.
Just leave me out of it. That's fine by me. At least then I'll know for sure that I don't deserve third place.
Maybe there's a chance... I guess. 😉
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#11 ·
Henry Hernandez7 said:Anyone care to explain why I can't see anything either?😁

Sure thing.

I’ve been thinking about this quite a bit lately, and honestly, I think we might be overcomplicating things. It feels like everyone is rushing to jump on the latest trend without actually stopping to see if it even works for them. I was talking to Henry Kim3 about this the other day, and he made a really solid point—we often get so caught up in the "newness" of a solution that we ignore the fact that our current setup isn't even broken. Why fix what isn't busted? It’s easy to get swept up in the hype, especially when people like Sophia Thomas7 start talking about how revolutionary a certain tool is. But at the end of the day, if it doesn't solve a practical problem in my daily routine, it’s just more noise. I know I’m probably being a bit cynical here, but I'd rather stick to what I know works than chase every shiny object that comes along. Does anyone else feel like they're constantly being sold a "better way" that ends up being more work?
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#12 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:The answer is still no. This thread has become incredibly unproductive, and since the center tag makes everything unreadable anyway, I don't see any point in continuing this conversation here.

Good luck dealing with those mods.

Look, you’re really out of line here. You are intentionally and consciously trying to degrade me.

What exactly is your motivation here? What's the reasoning behind this? I guess it's just because you don't like it.

I suppose, given my faith, it seems to me...

I guess you have some other thoughts on this.

So, the way I figured it out, things around here...

I guess that degradation is based solely on that one specific stance.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#13 ·
Henry Kim3 said:
Look, you’re really out of line here. You are intentionally and consciously trying to degrade me.

What exactly is your motivation here? What's the reasoning behind this? I guess it's just because you don't like it.

I suppose, given my faith, it seems to me...

I guess you have some other thoughts on this.

So, the way I figured it out, things around here...

I guess that degradation is based solely on that one specific stance.

It’s exactly this kind of logic that keeps my answer a firm "no." The partial election at the university stays put.

Anyway, cheers. 🙂
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#14 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:Sure thing.

I’ve been thinking about this quite a bit lately, and honestly, I think we might be overcomplicating things. It feels like everyone is rushing to jump on the latest trend without actually stopping to see if it even works for them. I was talking to Henry Kim3 about this the other day, and he made a really solid point—we often get so caught up in the "newness" of a solution that we ignore the fact that our current setup isn't even broken. Why fix what isn't busted? It’s easy to get swept up in the hype, especially when people like Sophia Thomas7 start talking about how revolutionary a certain tool is. But at the end of the day, if it doesn't solve a practical problem in my daily routine, it’s just more noise. I know I’m probably being a bit cynical here, but I'd rather stick to what I know works than chase every shiny object that comes along. Does anyone else feel like they're constantly being sold a "better way" that ends up being more work?

You honestly call this an explanation?

Think about how many people have done much worse things—insulting others, making threats,

and I really don't need to list them all—yet you still ended up banning those specific users,

so, what exactly makes me so special? Is it because of my faith?

Just tell me straight that you dislike me and find me obnoxious, and let's leave it at that...!
Joshua Jones13 Joshua Jones13 Active Member
69 messages
joined Jun 2006
#15 ·
Henry Kim3, first you go and open clones, and now you’re making posts like this just to prove you still don't get why those partial bans were handed out. Not to mention when you basically said you have zero intention of following the rules because they don't mean anything to you. I actually believe you, which is probably why I'm not voting to lift the partials either.
Henry Hernandez7 Henry Hernandez7 Active Member
128 messages
joined Apr 2014
#16 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:Sure thing.

I’ve been thinking about this quite a bit lately, and honestly, I think we might be overcomplicating things. It feels like everyone is rushing to jump on the latest trend without actually stopping to see if it even works for them. I was talking to Henry Kim3 about this the other day, and he made a really solid point—we often get so caught up in the "newness" of a solution that we ignore the fact that our current setup isn't even broken. Why fix what isn't busted? It’s easy to get swept up in the hype, especially when people like Sophia Thomas7 start talking about how revolutionary a certain tool is. But at the end of the day, if it doesn't solve a practical problem in my daily routine, it’s just more noise. I know I’m probably being a bit cynical here, but I'd rather stick to what I know works than chase every shiny object that comes along. Does anyone else feel like they're constantly being sold a "better way" that ends up being more work?

You're a moderator, true enough, but did I miss it? Nah, didn't happen.
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#17 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:It’s exactly this kind of logic that keeps my answer a firm "no." The partial election at the university stays put.

Anyway, cheers. 🙂

Well, I suppose that is the core issue here—you simply don't allow people who hold more influence than you do

to actually express themselves...

Good grief, if you won't let me return and you insist on maintaining this permanent partial election, then I guess

it's just because you don't trust me. There isn't some concrete reason, really; it's just that

you happen to dislike my stance on all the nonsense being discussed and written here, and that's that.

Honestly, I always had this hope that it might be

POSSIBLE to have a normal conversation with you moderators, but it turns out that is just impossible.

Whatever, take care...
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#18 ·
Joshua Jones13 said:Henry Kim3, first you go and open clones, and now you’re making posts like this just to prove you still don't get why those partial bans were handed out. Not to mention when you basically said you have zero intention of following the rules because they don't mean anything to you. I actually believe you, which is probably why I'm not voting to lift the partials either.

Well, after everything you people pulled on us regarding certain PDFs,

one might be tempted to say some pretty heated things, but I suppose I'll just move on.

And please, don't try to claim that I caused this or whatever,

just take a moment to reflect; you guys actually ADMITTED yourselves that in your little "moderator lounge"

you constantly insult the believers... For God's sake... And then, just because

I defended myself against YOU, who were CONSTANTLY attacking and degrading

and belittling me, I get banned without a second chance...

All I said was, give me a second chance, and if I fail to follow your rules,

then go ahead and issue a permanent partial ban. But what you're doing to me right now just

points to and confirms everything I've thought about you all up to this point,

because if someone came to me and politely asked for a break, saying they'd be careful, I would give them

a second chance. But I guess that's just because I'm a man of faith and I forgive,

and I also keep my word... Which means, if I said I WON'T

mess around on this forum, then I WON'T, and I promise that...!

So, do whatever you want.
Henry Kim3 Henry Kim3 MemberOP
30 messages
joined Sep 2012
#19 ·
Henry Hernandez7 said:You're a moderator, true enough, but did I miss it? Nah, didn't happen.

Well, you aren't going to look back.

I suppose I overreacted back when people started

attacking and belittling believers and all sorts of things here, but honestly, how could I not after everything these

moderators said and did... Anyone would lose their mind.

But, I guess, I am saying they have a chance to prove they are actually different

from how they acted back when that happened. But you see, they aren't giving themselves or

me a second chance.

Like I said, I'm not some kind of loser, and I don't want to get into a fight,

but man, I have too much education behind me to stoop to that level,

but when I see injustice, it just gets to me. It's unfortunate.

Anyway, whatever they decide, I sort of knew this was a futile attempt,

but well, hope dies last...!
Harold Taylor6 Harold Taylor6 Member
34 messages
joined Mar 2009
#20 ·
Don't you feel even a little bit embarrassed constantly playing the part of some pious, forgiving saint?
Suppose I’m not a believer at all—if I decided to give people a second chance, what would my justification be? Is it only believers who get to hand out second chances and offer forgiveness?
And what if I *am* a believer, but I choose not to grant that second chance? Does that just make me a "lesser" believer than you?

Honestly, your posts are about as effective as a cop trying to settle a dispute by hitting someone with a wet newspaper. From what I can see in just these few posts, you've basically boxed yourself into a corner.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads