Aryna - 100 point spam?

Since when did spam start worth 100 points?

Larry Walker24 said:Since when does spamming count for 100 points?

Well, I suppose it counts for 100 points once people start flooding the boards with total nonsense that has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion, doing it over and over again without any shame, and just ignoring every single warning, report, or strike they get... you know, acting like it's all just some big joke despite being told to stop? In those cases, it’s definitely worth 100 points. Honestly, if this behavior keeps up, it might even be worth more than that.

Chloe Campbell95 said:Ever since people started flooding the boards with total nonsense that has zero to do with the topic—doing it constantly despite a mountain of warnings and strikes... and still acting like they're too dumb to get it. Fine, if that's the case, take 100 points. Honestly, could be more if this keeps up.

Why are you lying? Where exactly did YOU warn me? You literally just stepped into the moderator role.

And for your information, this is only the second strike you've handed me, and both were for 100 points.

Since when does spam count for 100 points?! You think I just showed up yesterday? A strike doesn't last two months; my last one wasn't even for spam, so there's no accumulation happening here.

Go ahead and re-read those guidelines Nica gave you (shout out to Nica).

Oh, and by the way, there are other types of strikes besides the 100-point ones.


I'm asking Cuku to check if the post Chloe Campbell95 deleted actually warrants 100 points and a two-month strike.

Thanks in advance, Cuka

Larry Walker24 said:Why are you lying? Where exactly did YOU warn me? You only just stepped up as a moderator.

As far as I'm concerned, this is just the second strike you've handed out to me, and both were for 100 points.

Since when does spam count for 100 points anyway?! Do you honestly think I just showed up here yesterday?! A strike can't last two months because my previous one wasn't for spam, so there shouldn't be any accumulation going on here.

Go ahead and take another look at those guidelines that Nica sent over (shout out to Nica!).

Oh, and by the way, there are other types of strikes besides the 100-point ones.

I’d like to ask Cuku to check if the post that Chloe Campbell95 deleted actually warrants 100 points and a two-month suspension?!

Thanks in advance, Cuka.

Given that you "haven't just arrived yesterday," isn't it a bit strange that you aren't aware of why you're getting flagged, especially since you've had plenty of time to learn the ropes by now?

Looking at your history of strikes and the reasons behind them, it’s pretty obvious how often people have tried to point out which rules you're breaking—or in this case, which rules of the Politics sub-forum you're violating. You keep getting flagged for essentially the same things, and users in the Politics section frequently report you for flooding threads with irrelevant content or just straight-up copy-pasting stuff from news sites. Honestly, you should stop pretending you have no idea what's going on.

Chloe Campbell95 said:Since you haven't "just arrived yesterday," it’s pretty weird that you don't realize why you're getting flagged. You really should have figured that out by now.

Looking at your warnings and the reasons behind them, it's obvious how much you've ignored the rules here on the Politics board. You keep getting flagged for basically the same stuff over and over. Users on the Politics sub are constantly reporting you for flooding threads with irrelevant nonsense or just straight-up copy-pasting junk from news sites. Stop acting like you have no clue what's going on.

So, you didn't actually give a warning, you just swung blindly—100 points, whatever, who cares.

And then you expect me, a total snitch, not to react. 🤦

I report posts on the Politics board too, but nothing ever happens. If you care that much, why even volunteer to moderate such a high-traffic section anyway?

You could have just played it cool—like, "Hey Larry Walker24, this is a warning, I'm watching more closely, so watch your step or you'll get the boot next time." I wouldn't have argued a single word; honestly, I would've just sent you a hug and a thank you. Could we have done it that way? Sure. But hey, who cares, 100 points to you.

That's not how this works.

The bottom line is:
1. You didn't warn me (I don't care if other mods did; my issue is with YOU, not them).
2. The post can't be worth 100 points because spam is only worth 10.
3. A two-month ban doesn't make sense since this isn't an accumulation from your previous post.

Just waiting on the final verdict from Cuka (who I trust 1000%).

Manchild, honestly, you’ve racked up so many different kinds of penalties—everything from basic warnings to full bans and partial restrictions—all for basically doing the exact same thing over and over, that I truly don't get how you have the nerve to sit here asking for a warning first. When you've hit something like 2,000 (!!!!) individual warnings, there really isn't any point in trying to explain things to you anymore. If you still haven't grasped what’s against the rules on this forum, maybe it’s time to consider finding a different corner of the internet to hang out in. You can't expect the "slap on the wrist" warnings or the light penalties meant for newcomers and those who just make an honest mistake to apply to you. You aren't getting a pass out of the goodness of our hearts, and frankly, it feels like you might even have a bit of Stockholm Syndrome going on at this point, though even that's starting to wear thin. Just give it some thought.

I'm locking this thread. Cuka can jump back in if they feel it's absolutely necessary.