Dennis Carter3 said:Sapphire Radeon R7 260x OC, 1GB GDDR5, DVI, DP, HDMI
Intel Box Processor Intel Pentium G3258
Asrock H81M-HDS - Intel Socket 1150 H81M-HDS
Patriot Sig. DDR3 1600Mhz, 4GB, HS
Fortron Hexa Plus 400W, 80+, active, 12 cm
Seagate ST1000DM003, 1TB, 7200 rpm, 64MB, SATA 6Gb/s, Seagate Barracuda
Zalman ZM-T1 Plus micro tower case
Total: Price:$1017 Diskont24
Personally, I’d go this route—the CPU handles overclocking quite well, and more importantly, it leaves the door wide open for a much more substantial upgrade path toward i5 or i7 processors later on. It also allows for pairing with a significantly beefier graphics card; compared to an i3 setup, which honestly feels like a bit of a dead end, this offers much better long-term value.
The G3258 is starting to fall behind—not because it lacks raw power, but because it’s just missing cores. Since the i3 offers four threads, it can still pass for a quad-core in games like Dragon Age: Inquisition, which...
I can't. Run it on two cores. More and more titles are being released that operate this way, so if you're putting together a budget gaming build, you're better off going with an i3 and just compromising on the non-OC 260x.
crimsonstag84 said:Looks like that processor is out of stock... which was my main target anyway.
Also, I don't think the 260X model is worth the extra $67 difference (since the R7 260 is $217). 😉
If you went with an Athlon, there'd be plenty of room for the 260X, regardless of anything else... $67 It's pricier than the non-X 260, but honestly, it's just noticeably better. There isn't really a smarter way to spend the money here.
If that Athlon isn't available, then we're looking at a whole different situation... 😬 In that case, the i3 is definitely the way to go.