Can someone explain this?

I’m looking for an explanation as to why my posts are being deleted from the MK discussion thread regarding the void..

Under what specific rule am I forbidden from exchanging a few posts with Jane Doe? 😕

Someone... anything... give me some kind of explanation 🤷

Apparently, someone was feeling particularly industrious this morning—decided to issue a partial ban on MK... I suppose 😕 they felt like doing it without any prior notice regarding who or why 🤷

🤣

I am requesting that Supermod—or whoever is actually monitoring this—take a look at my two posts over in the void. There was absolutely no insult involved, no mockery,
no trolling whatsoever, I didn't even use "ROFL,"
how can two completely ordinary posts (one of which Jane Doe even replied to) be grounds for a partial ban?

You have received a partial ban from MK.
In light of recent activity across our other subforums regarding the Wall, coupled with the private chat communications you have been conducting with the woman you mentioned—which I believe takes place over on Television—it is clear that such interaction was entirely unnecessary, especially since she has the option to receive direct messages.
We simply do not require a user of your temperament here on MK.

As far as I am concerned, this discussion is permanently concluded and should be locked immediately to prevent an influx of similar individuals. If you wish to file an appeal, please contact our admins, hollowtrucker77 or Tyndall. Thank you.

Aaron Harris2 said:You've received a partial ban on MK.
Given the recent activity on other subforums regarding the Wall, and considering your chat communication with the woman you mentioned—which happens on another subforum (if I'm not mistaken, Television)—plus the fact that she has a private messaging option, this specific interaction won't be necessary.
We don't need a user like that on MK.

As far as I'm concerned, this discussion is over for good, and we might as well lock it before an influx of similar types arrives. For appeals, contact admins hollowtrucker77 or Tyndall. Thanks.

Could you please explain the bolded part? What kind of "actions" are we talking about, and which PDF is involved? And what kind of user is Kimberly Garcia74? We're starting to split into "good" and "bad" users again, just like the old days. In this case, regarding your precious PDF 😕—is it just your fear of Kimberly Garcia74? Is she some kind of forum suicide bomber or something that scares you? You aren't letting her post on the forum (I don't believe it, I seriously don't believe it 😁), on your PDF, because she posts on TV and can address the woman there. 😕
So, I guess that makes Television garbage, or just a troll PDF, whatever. 🤷
It's funny how none of the admins seem to notice this, right? This little private drama and the gloating over everything involving the Wall. Which, by the way, doesn't exist—so why even bring up the Wall, man, if you weren't involved in all of it?

Recently, Lastan wrote to a moderator in the banned section saying, "you disgust me," and they lifted his ban. Now I'm telling you, Aaron Harris2, you disgust me. Maybe I'll survive. 🤷

p.s. Why is the thread still here if posts are being deleted?

You aren't really part of this story, so nobody owes you an explanation.
hollowtrucker77

Aaron Harris2 said:You’ve been handed a partial ban from MK.
Given the recent activity across other subforums regarding the Wall—combined with your chat interactions with the woman you mentioned over on another board (if I recall correctly, the Television section)—plus the fact that she has private messaging available, this little side-conversation you initiated wasn't necessary.
We don't need a user like you on MK.

As far as I'm concerned, this debate is dead and buried—we might as well lock the whole thing up before an influx of similar types arrives. For any appeals, contact the admin hollowtrucker77 or Tyndall. Thanks.

Every single person on this forum has access to PMs, yet people insist on running around different chat rooms instead. 🤣

I honestly fail to see how my meager five or six posts spread out over two years could possibly bother anyone on MK—though I certainly don't understand why you're so obsessively fixated on specific usernames. 🙂

And frankly, I have no idea what kind of "user" you think I am. 😕

Kimberly Garcia74, could you maybe walk me through the logic of why you decided to go chat with a friend right on MK?
I mean, you had it announced right there on the screen, complete with a 😁 smiley face
.
Was that supposed to be some kind of masterstroke, or what?

Look, hollowtrucker77, since you’re clearly monitoring my posts with such intense scrutiny, you should have noticed by now that I use emojis in almost everything I write—perhaps even too many. There are even posts where I just use a single emoji 😁 or some other little icon,

And this whole business about "announcing" that I’m going to post in a certain thread... honestly, I don't even know how to respond to that. What kind of sin or violation is that supposed to be? 😕

It isn't some sort of calculated trickery, either. I posted there because I wanted to; if I actually broke a rule, I'd love to know which one... I'll take responsibility if I did

Besides, why on earth would I feel the need to explain my reasons for participating in a discussion to you specifically? 😕 You were the one who told us—those of us on the Wall who haven't been permanently banned—that we are perfectly free to join any debate across the entire forum 🤷 so don't give me that nonsense

And how exactly am I supposed to look at it if I'm not being thorough?
🙂
I only asked because your sentence basically sounds like "I'm off to go cause trouble on MK," which, honestly, is probably exactly what you meant anyway.
If "getting involved in discussions" actually means just jumping from one thread to another like a maniac, then clearly someone here is missing the entire point of having a forum in the first place.

hollowtrucker77 said:And how exactly am I supposed to look at things—with more detail??
🙂
I asked because your little comment sounded a lot like "I'm just going to go mess around on MK," which—frankly—is exactly what I think you intended to imply.
If "getting involved in discussions" actually means "jumping from one thread to another," then clearly someone here completely misses the entire point of an online forum.

Where on earth am I jumping from thread to thread? 🤷

Look, you can read through all my posts if you want, but I still have to ask—am I really the only person who writes across multiple threads? What is the actual issue there?

P.S.
Just lift this partial ban already. If I ever actually deserve it, I promise I won't say a single word or file a complaint.🙂

Hey 🙂