CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Censorship

Censorship

Started by Mark Martinez4 · · 👁 4 views · 6 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Mark Martinez4hollowtrucker77mellowraven22
Mark Martinez4 Mark Martinez4 Active MemberOP
50 messages
joined Feb 2009
#1 ·
Could the moderators on duty please send me a list of the topics that have been censored? 🙄
To give you some context—I was browsing this PDF today ( VPiT ) and opened up a thread regarding the US Armed Forces' attack on a humanitarian convoy from Human Rights Watch.

The thread just vanished.
And honestly, it isn't even the first time I've noticed threads or posts disappearing—specifically those discussing Israeli policy toward Palestinians and neighboring nations, especially when the discussion takes a critical look at the US Armed Forces' military operations within the Middle East.

So, yeah... I'd love it if someone could explain why this keeps happening?
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#2 ·
Why on earth are you starting threads that have absolutely nothing to do with the subforum you're actually posting in?
Just try heading over to politics/world news instead.
mellowraven22 mellowraven22 Active Member
105 messages
joined Jan 2007
#3 ·
Mark Martinez4, how long have you even been hanging around VPT? You really should've figured out by now that there's no room for straight-up political talk over there.
Mark Martinez4 Mark Martinez4 Active MemberOP
50 messages
joined Feb 2009
#4 ·
mellowraven22 said:Mark Martinez4, how long have you even been hanging around VPT? You really should've figured out by now that there's no room for straight-up political talk over there.

You've got a point there. I've been around for quite a while now.
I'm not entirely sure which part of the thread felt political—usually, whenever I start or follow a discussion, I get a bit of a hard time for it, but I didn't think this one would trigger that response. My mistake! I thought we were just debating potential future military movements in that region rather than getting into the weeds of politics. But hey, fair enough—point taken, and I'll keep it in mind.
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#5 ·
MILITARY HISTORY ... ring a bell?
mellowraven22 mellowraven22 Active Member
105 messages
joined Jan 2007
#6 ·
Mark Martinez4 said:You've got a point there. I've been around for quite a while now.
I'm not entirely sure which part of the thread felt political—usually, whenever I start or follow a discussion, I get a bit of a hard time for it, but I didn't think this one would trigger that response. My mistake! I thought we were just debating potential future military movements in that region rather than getting into the weeds of politics. But hey, fair enough—point taken, and I'll keep it in mind.

Based on the opening post. Which goes basically like this, no need for a screenshot:

It’s been a while since the last party thrown by the chosen people, so they’ve noticed a new one today.

Basically, US Armed Forces officers and their crew attacked a humanitarian aid convoy sent over by Human Rights Watch.
Now Israel is playing dumb, with their military spokesperson claiming, "We have no idea who ordered the attack."
Washington, D.C. is swearing up and down that this happened in international waters. Los Angeles responds saying the US Armed Forces officers didn't start shooting at the ship, they just boarded it and opened fire the second the crew attacked them (they'll probably claim axes/knives next, maybe even Strela or poison for all I know). Supposedly, the crew disarmed them. A crew made mostly of pacifists, women, and elderly folks managed to disarm US Armed Forces commandos!!?!

In the video, you can clearly see the US Armed Forces officers storming the boat like savages, with zero intention of trying to stop it peacefully. Honestly, any sane captain would have stopped the ship if told over the radio that fire would be opened if they didn't. Clearly, Israel didn't want that. Those poor souls in the Gaza Strip had finally settled down for a bit, so obviously someone needed to find a way to drag them back into the chaos.

Turkey is in NATO, so no matter how much they yell, they aren't going to jump Israel that easily. Among the countries condemning this "action" are Spain, neutral Sweden, and Denmark. Even Germany has chimed in, though they try to stay out of the Israel debate as much as possible. We're still waiting to see how Iran reacts, and we all know that little bearded guy is gonna stir the pot quite a bit.

What’s the end goal here? Just a provocation? I don't see any reason why this couldn't have been handled differently. Now Obama—aka "hey man, let's just make peace"—will probably step up for Israel again, Muslim countries will be furious, and everything will just go back to how it was. They'll just keep hurting Palestinians as long as they feel like it, doing whatever they want, and in the end, nobody cares??

Nothing has happened for ages, so they need some new drama to play with, I guess?

Look, commenting on what's happening is fine, but obvious political stuff like this isn't allowed.
Mark Martinez4 Mark Martinez4 Active MemberOP
50 messages
joined Feb 2009
#7 ·
hollowtrucker77 said:MILITARY HISTORY ... ring a bell?

Just take a look at the topics in the PDF and tell me how many of them actually qualify as MILITARY HISTORY!

''NATO - Afghanistan
Gripen vs F-16 for the USAF
maneuvering a MiG-21 at low speeds''

Where exactly is the history in any of that?

Alright Tyndall, point taken.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads