CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Economy › Stocks › Con Edison

Con Edison

Started by Patrick King37 · · 👁 4 views · 6 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Patrick King37analogtiger24Sean Reed3jademason58
Patrick King37 Patrick King37 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Dec 2007
#1 ·
Let’s take a look at what’s happening outside our own backyard.😁
Like the title says, we're looking at an electric utility provider based in Moscow.
It's currently trading at $0.07, which is roughly 1.83 rubles. Looking at the fundamentals, the P/B is sitting at 2.55 and the P/E is 18.48.
I'll drop more details in a few posts.🙂
Market info: www.rts.ru
Company link: www.mgesk.ru
analogtiger24 analogtiger24 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Aug 2009
#2 ·
Are you some kind of regional manager for them or something, given how much you're out here promoting their brand? 🙄
Sean Reed3 Sean Reed3 Member
24 messages
joined Mar 2023
#3 ·
Hey, so this is actually 10X cheaper than what you'd pay at Target 😂
jademason58 jademason58 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Nov 2007
#4 ·
I’ve noticed this little psychological trick before—this whole "low price per share" bait used in various other countries.
I mean, who wouldn't jump at a stock if it was priced at, say, six cents? It feels like a steal!🙂
But that's only if you aren't paying attention to the fact that there are ten billion shares out there for a company worth maybe a hundred million dollars.
With math like that, a stock can really only move in massive jumps—we're talking minimum 10-20% swings.
Even a tiny one-cent fluctuation in my example would represent about a 17% swing.
It reminds me of that attempt they made with the Poughkeepsie stock, though I don't think many people actually fell for it!
Honestly, this whole "look how cheap the individual unit is" thing seems like something kids under five would fall for.
Eventually, even they learn that what actually matters is the total value of your holdings—or the total valuation of the corporation—not just the raw number of pieces you own.🤣
The seller or the market maker basically can't lose here; they win either way—they make money on high-volume quick flips, or they sit on what's left and watch it skyrocket. 🙏
analogtiger24 analogtiger24 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Aug 2009
#5 ·
jademason58 said:I’ve noticed this little psychological trick before—this whole "low price per share" bait used in various other countries.
I mean, who wouldn't jump at a stock if it was priced at, say, six cents? It feels like a steal!🙂
But that's only if you aren't paying attention to the fact that there are ten billion shares out there for a company worth maybe a hundred million dollars.
With math like that, a stock can really only move in massive jumps—we're talking minimum 10-20% swings.
Even a tiny one-cent fluctuation in my example would represent about a 17% swing.
It reminds me of that attempt they made with the Poughkeepsie stock, though I don't think many people actually fell for it!
Honestly, this whole "look how cheap the individual unit is" thing seems like something kids under five would fall for.
Eventually, even they learn that what actually matters is the total value of your holdings—or the total valuation of the corporation—not just the raw number of pieces you own.🤣
The seller or the market maker basically can't lose here; they win either way—they make money on high-volume quick flips, or they sit on what's left and watch it skyrocket. 🙏


Everything you mentioned is true.🙂

LESSON:
If you ever run a large LLC and decide to take it public as a corporation, issue as many shares as humanly possible.👍
Patrick King37 Patrick King37 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Dec 2007
#6 ·
jademason58 said:I’ve noticed this little psychological trick before—this whole "low price per share" bait used in various other countries.
I mean, who wouldn't jump at a stock if it was priced at, say, six cents? It feels like a steal!🙂
But that's only if you aren't paying attention to the fact that there are ten billion shares out there for a company worth maybe a hundred million dollars.
With math like that, a stock can really only move in massive jumps—we're talking minimum 10-20% swings.
Even a tiny one-cent fluctuation in my example would represent about a 17% swing.
It reminds me of that attempt they made with the Poughkeepsie stock, though I don't think many people actually fell for it!
Honestly, this whole "look how cheap the individual unit is" thing seems like something kids under five would fall for.
Eventually, even they learn that what actually matters is the total value of your holdings—or the total valuation of the corporation—not just the raw number of pieces you own.🤣
The seller or the market maker basically can't lose here; they win either way—they make money on high-volume quick flips, or they sit on what's left and watch it skyrocket. 🙏

How much cash are we talking?
Look, there are some baseline metrics here that matter. You're comparing the Moscow utility setup—basically like looking at Duke Energy—to the Democratic Party.
Cheers!🙄
analogtiger24 analogtiger24 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Aug 2009
#7 ·
Patrick King37 said:How much cash are we talking?
Look, there are some baseline metrics here that matter. You're comparing the Moscow utility setup—basically like looking at Duke Energy—to the Democratic Party.
Cheers!🙄


Of course PUNT-R-A is a ten times better stock😲

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register